Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Epidemiol ; 192(8): 1326-1334, 2023 08 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37249253

RESUMEN

Knowledge on the association between offspring birth weight and long-term risk of maternal cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality is often based on firstborn infants without consideration of women's consecutive births. We studied long-term CVD mortality according to offspring birth weight patterns among women with spontaneous and iatrogenic term deliveries in Norway (1967-2020). We constructed birth weight quartiles (Qs) by combining standardized birth weight with gestational age in quartiles (Q1, Q2/Q3, and Q4) for the women's first 2 births. Mortality was estimated using Cox regression and expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Changes in offspring birth weight quartiles were associated with long-term maternal CVD mortality. Compared with women who had 2 term infants in Q2/Q3, women with a first offspring in Q2/Q3 and a second in Q1 had higher mortality risk (HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.50), while risk was lower if the second offspring was in Q4 (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.91). The risk increase associated with having a first infant in Q1 was eliminated if the second offspring was in Q4 (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.75, 1.31). These patterns were similar for women with iatrogenic and spontaneous deliveries. Inclusion of information from subsequent births revealed heterogeneity in maternal CVD mortality which was not captured when using only information based on the first offspring.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Embarazo , Lactante , Humanos , Femenino , Peso al Nacer , Estudios de Cohortes , Nacimiento a Término , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/epidemiología
2.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 37(1): 19-27, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36173007

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Women with one lifetime singleton pregnancy have increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality compared with women who continue reproduction particularly if the pregnancy had complications. Women with twins have higher risk of pregnancy complications, but CVD mortality risk in women with twin pregnancies has not been fully described. OBJECTIVES: We estimated risk of long-term CVD mortality in women with naturally conceived twins compared to women with singleton pregnancies, accounting for lifetime number of pregnancies and pregnancy complications. METHODS: Using linked data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, we identified 974,892 women with first pregnancy registered between 1967 and 2013, followed to 2020. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for maternal CVD mortality were estimated by Cox regression for various reproductive history (exposure categories): (1) Only one twin pregnancy, (2) Only one singleton pregnancy, (3) Only two singleton pregnancies, (4) A first twin pregnancy and continued reproduction, (5) A first singleton pregnancy and twins in later reproduction and (6) Three singleton pregnancies (the referent group). Exposure categories were also stratified by pregnancy complications (pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery or perinatal loss). RESULTS: Women with one lifetime pregnancy, twin or singleton, had increased risk of CVD mortality (adjusted hazard [HR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21, 2.43 and aHR 1.92, 95% CI 1.78, 2.07, respectively), compared with the referent of three singleton pregnancies. The hazard ratios for CVD mortality among women with one lifetime pregnancy with any complication were 2.36 (95% CI 1.49, 3.71) and 3.56 (95% CI 3.12, 4.06) for twins and singletons, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Women with only one pregnancy, twin or singleton, had increased long-term CVD mortality, however highest in women with singletons. In addition, twin mothers who continued reproduction had similar CVD mortality compared to women with three singleton pregnancies.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Preeclampsia , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo Gemelar , Historia Reproductiva , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Resultado del Embarazo
3.
BMC Med ; 20(1): 186, 2022 05 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35614509

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is limited knowledge regarding the process of deprescribing psychotropic drugs to people with dementia (PwD) conducted by general practitioners (GP). We investigated the impact of a multicomponent intervention, emphasizing medication reviews, on psychotropic drugs and behavioral and psychological symptoms (BPSD) in home-dwelling PwD and quantified change in patient-GP communication evaluated by their informal caregivers. METHODS: LIVE@Home.Path is a stepped-wedge closed-cohort cluster randomized controlled trial for people with mild to moderate dementia aged ≥65 and their informal caregivers (dyads) in Norway. Complementary to health care as usual (control condition), municipal coordinators implemented the multicomponent LIVE intervention: Learning, Innovation, Volunteer support, and Empowerment (including medication review by the PwD's regular GPs). Block-randomization was used to allocate dyads in three groups receiving the intervention sequentially in periods of 6 months duration. Prepandemic data from the first period is reported, resulting in a 1:2 intervention-to-control ratio. Primary outcome was change in psychotropic drug use. Secondary outcomes were changes in BPSD by Neuropsychiatric Inventory and Cornell Scale of Depression in Dementia and patient-GP communication by an adaption of the Clinical Global Impression of Change. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-eight dyads were screened, 280 included, and 237 participated at 6 months (intervention group n=67; control condition n=170). At baseline, 63% used psychotropic medication regularly: antidementia drugs (47%), antidepressants (13%), hypnotics/sedatives (13%), antipsychotics (5%), and anxiolytics (2%). At 6 months, medication reviews were more frequently conducted in the intervention group compared to control (66% vs 42%, P=0.001). We found no differences regarding a change in drug use and BPSD. Patient-GP communication enhanced in the intervention group (mean score 0.95 [standard deviation 1.68] vs 0.41 [1.34], P=0.022). In the intervention group, control group, and overall sample, the informal caregivers of those who had their medications reviewed reported improved patient-GP communication compared to those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Change in psychotropic drug use and BPSD did not differ, even though patient-GP communication improved with medication reviews. Restricted psychotropic drug use among PwD likely reflects more judicious prescribing practices in recent years. Nevertheless, medication reviews could be cultivated to optimize pharmacologic treatment for this complex population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT04043364 ; registered 15/03/2019.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Médicos Generales , Cuidadores , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/tratamiento farmacológico , Demencia/epidemiología , Humanos , Revisión de Medicamentos , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico
4.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 1306, 2022 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36324159

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between clinical, demographic, and organizational factors and formal (health professionals) and informal (relatives) resource utilization in nursing home patients with and without dementia. METHODS: Baseline data from the multicomponent cluster randomized control COSMOS trial including 33 Norwegian nursing homes and 723 residents with and without dementia. Nursing home staff (n = 117) participated as proxy raters to approximate formal and informal resource use in daily care. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the Resource Utilization in Dementia - Formal Care scale to assess formal and informal care time in hours/month regarding basic activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADL, and supervision. Secondary outcomes were hours/week spent on formal and informal leisure activities. Behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) were assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version, physical function by the Physical Self-Maintenance Scale, and psychotropic drug use by the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. Organizational factors were ward size and staff ratio. RESULTS: Generalized linear mixed-effect models and two-part modelling revealed an association between increased formal care time and poorer physical function, higher agitation and psychotropic drug use and lower cognitive function (all p < .05). Enhanced formal leisure time was related to better ADL function (p < .05) and smaller wards (p < .05). The family related leisure time was associated with agitation, decline in ADL function, smaller wards, and better staffing ratio (all p < .05). Married patients received more informal direct care (p < .05) and leisure time (p < .05) compared to unmarried/widowed. CONCLUSION: For nursing home staff, higher agitation and psychotropic drug use, and lower cognitive function, is associated with more direct care time, whereas leisure time activities are less prioritized in people with lower physical function. Informal caregivers' engagement is encouraged by smaller nursing homes and better staff ratio. Therefore, we recommend stakeholders and healthcare professionals to consider these clinical and organizational factors to optimize treatment and leisure time activities in nursing home patients with various needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ; NCT02238652.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Demencia , Humanos , Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Cuidadores/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Demencia/psicología , Casas de Salud , Psicotrópicos
5.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 29(3): 304-315, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32753339

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of medication reviews using collegial mentoring and systematic clinical evaluation on psychotropic prescriptions, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), and activities of daily living (ADL). DESIGN: Four-month multicenter, multicomponent, cluster-randomized, single-blinded controlled trial. SETTING: Thirty-three Norwegian nursing homes including 67 nursing home wards (clusters). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 723 enrolled patients, of which 428 participated in the study; 217 were randomized to the intervention and 211 to care as usual (control). INTERVENTION: The COSMOS intervention consisted of Communication, Systematic pain management, Medication reviews, Organization of activities, and Safety. During medication review, the nursing home physician evaluated treatment with colleagues systematically using the results from validated clinical assessments. MEASUREMENTS: Mean changes from baseline to month 4 in the number of prescribed psychotropic drugs (antipsychotics, anxiolytics, hypnotics or sedatives, antidepressants, and antidementia drugs); Neuropsychiatric Inventory Nursing Home Version (NPI-NH) and Cornell Scale of Depression in Dementia (CSDD); Lawton and Brody's Physical Self Maintenance Scale (PSMS). RESULTS: Compared to control, the mean change in prescribed psychotropic drugs was reduced both in total and regular number, while mean changes in NPI-NH and CSDD scores did not differ between the groups. Mean change in PSMS showed improvement in the intervention group, and deterioration in the control group. CONCLUSION: Medication reviews using collegial mentoring and systematic clinical evaluation led to safe deprescribing, as the reductions in psychotropic drug use did not negatively affect BPSD, while ADL improved.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Demencia/tratamiento farmacológico , Demencia/psicología , Deprescripciones , Casas de Salud , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comunicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Conciliación de Medicamentos , Noruega , Manejo del Dolor/psicología , Seguridad del Paciente
6.
Scand J Public Health ; 49(8): 891-898, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33938301

RESUMEN

AIMS: Caesarean section (CS) is a medical intervention performed in Norway when a surgical delivery is considered more beneficial than a vaginal. Because deliveries with higher risk are centralized to larger hospitals, use of CS varies considerably between hospitals. We describe how the use of CS varies geographically by municipality. Since indications for CS should have little variation across the relatively homogenous population of Norway, we expect fair use of CS to be evenly distributed across the municipalities. METHODS: Data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway were used in our analyses (810,914 total deliveries, 133,746 CSs, 440 municipalities). We propose a spatial correlation model that takes the location into account to describe the variation in use of CS across the municipalities. The R packages R-INLA and TMB are used to estimate the yearly municipal CS rate and the spatial correlation between the municipalities. We also apply stratified models for different categories of delivering women (Robson groups). Estimated rates are displayed in maps and model parameters are shown in tables. RESULTS: The CS rate varies substantially between the different municipalities. As expected, there was strong correlation between neighbouring municipalities. Similar results were found for different Robson groups. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial difference in CS use across municipalities in Norway is not likely to be due to specific medical reasons, but rather to hospitals' different policies towards the use of CS. The policy to be either more or less restrictive to CS was not specific to any category of deliveries.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Hospitales , Femenino , Humanos , Noruega , Embarazo
7.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 21(1): 264, 2021 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34525979

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a knowledge gap regarding factors that may influence the access to different devices for home-dwelling people with dementia (PwD). The aim of this study was to identify different assistive technology and telecare (ATT) devices installed in the home and key factors associated with access to such technology. METHODS: The baseline data came from the LIVE@Home.Path trial, a 24-month multi-component intervention including PwDs and their informal caregivers (dyads) and were collected through semi-quantitative questionnaires in three Norwegian municipalities between May and November of 2019. Regression models were applied to detect demographic and clinical factors associated with access to ATT. RESULTS: Of 438 screened dyads, 276 were included at baseline. The mean ages of the PwDs and caregivers were 82 ± 7.0 and 66 ± 12 years, respectively, and 62.8% of the PwD were female and 73.5% had access to any type of ATT. The majority had traditional equipment such as stove guards (43.3%) and social alarms (39.5%) or everyday technology, e.g. calendar support and door locks (45.3%). Multivariate regression analyses revealed that access to a social alarm was more often available for females than males, at increased age, and when the PwD lived alone, while tracking devices (14.9%) were more often accessible at lower age. Everyday technology was more often available for females, at increased age of the PwD and the caregiver, higher comorbidity, and poor IADL (instrumental activities of daily living) function. For PwDs with severe dementia, access to ATT was significantly associated with poor IADL function, having their children as the main caregiver (61.3%), and having caregivers who contributed 81-100% to their care (49.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Home-dwelling PwDs mainly had access to traditional and obligated devices, followed by everyday technology. There is unmet potential for communication, tracking, and sensing technology, especially for devices not offered by the municipalities. Gender, ages of the PwD and caregiver, cohabitation status, and physical function were the main associated factors for access to ATT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04043364.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Dispositivos de Autoayuda , Telemedicina , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidadores , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
8.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 69: 104417, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36423459

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a major cause of death, but how cancer influences mortality risk in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: Determine all-cause mortality and mortality following a cancer diagnosis among MS patients compared with matched population controls. METHODS: Norwegian MS patients born 1930 - 1979 (n= 6950) followed-up 1953 - 2016, were matched with 37 922 controls. We compared incident cancer diagnosis from the Cancer Registry of Norway, date of death from the Cause of Death Registry, education from the National Education Database, by multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for all-cause mortality among MS patients was 4.97 (4.64 - 5.33), and 2.61 (2.29 - 2.98) for mortality following a cancer diagnosis. Mortality in MS was highest following urinary- (2.53: 1.55 - 4.14), colorectal- (2.14: 1.47 - 3.11), hematological- (1.76: 1.08 - 2.88), ovarian - 2.30 (1.73-3.06) and breast cancer diagnosis (2.61: 1.85 - 3.68), compared to controls. High education was inversely associated with mortality among MS patients. CONCLUSIONS: All-cause mortality was five- fold and mortality following a cancer diagnosis was two- fold increased among MS patients. Mortality following specific cancers raises the possibility of diagnostic neglect.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios de Cohortes , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros
9.
BMJ Open ; 12(1): e050628, 2022 01 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35074810

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 restrictions on behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (PAN.DEM) nested within the halted parent trial (LIVE@Home.Path). SETTING: Households in Norway immediate before and 6-9 weeks into the COVID-19 restrictions. PARTICIPANTS: 104 dyads (persons with mild to moderate dementia aged ≥65 and their informal carers) completed both prepandemic and pandemic assessments, among 237 in the parent trial. Mini-Mental Status Examination score 15-26 or Functional Assessment Staging score 3-7 covered dementia severity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-12) total (range 0-144), psychosis (range 0-24), hyperactive behaviour (range 0-60) and mood subsyndrome (range 0-48) scores; Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) total score (range 0-38). RESULTS: We found an overall increase in BPSD by NPI-12 total score comparing prepandemic to pandemic levels (median 16 IQR (4.5-29) to 20 (7-32.5), p=0.03) over a mean of 86 days (SD 19). NPI-12 total score worsened in 57 (55%) of people with dementia and was associated with postponed or averted contacts with healthcare professionals (logistic regression, OR 3.96, 95% CI 1.05 to 14.95). Psychosis subsyndrome levels increased (0 (0-3) to 0.5 (0-6), p=0.01) in 37 (36%) persons; this worsening was associated with partial insight (9.57, 1.14 to 80.71) and reduced informal carer contact (4.45, 1.01 to 19.71). Moreover, depressive symptoms increased as assessed by CSDD total score (5 (3-9) to 7 (4-12), p=0.01) and worsened for 56 (54%), which was inversely associated with psychotropic drugs on-demand (0.16, 0.03 to 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: BPSD worsened during the first months of the COVID-19 restrictions, most pronounced for psychosis and depression. These BPSD exacerbations have implications for pandemic policies, emphasising that restrictions must balance COVID-19 morbidity and mortality against dementia deterioration. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04043364; Results.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Demencia , Cuidadores , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
10.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 22(8): 1692-1698, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34087225

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In nursing homes (NHs), 30% to 60% of patients experience daily pain and >80% have dementia. This can lead to neuropsychiatric symptoms, including psychosis symptoms such as delusion. We investigated if there was a relationship between pain and psychosis symptoms over time. We also aimed to investigate the effect of a multicomponent intervention (COSMOS) on pain, psychosis symptoms, and analgesic prescription. DESIGN: COSMOS is a cluster-randomized, single blinded, controlled trial. Each NH unit was defined as a cluster and randomized to either the COSMOS intervention or care as usual. The COSMOS intervention is a multicomponent intervention, consisting of staff training in communication, pain treatment, medication review, organization of activities, and safety. The intervention lasted for 4 months with a follow-up at month 9. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-seven units from 33 Norwegian NHs in 8 municipalities. The study included 723 patients aged ≥65 years, residing at the NH ≥2 weeks before inclusion. Patients with a life expectancy <6 months were excluded. MEASURES: Pain was measured using the Mobilization-Observation-Behavior-Intensity-Dementia Pain Scale. Psychosis symptoms were measured using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-NH version. Measurements were performed at baseline, and months 4 and 9. RESULTS: Multilevel Mixed-Effect statistical analysis found that psychosis symptoms as a group (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, P = .009), and delusion (OR 2.12, P = .007) were associated with pain over time. No significant intervention effect on psychosis symptoms was observed. Compared with the control group, people with dementia in the intervention group experienced less musculoskeletal pain (ß: -0.47, P = .047). Analgesic prescription was not affected by the intervention. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Pain is associated with psychosis symptoms, and pain assessment should be done when making treatment decisions on psychosis symptoms in NH patients. The COSMOS intervention improved musculoskeletal pain in people with dementia, but not psychosis symptoms, and there is need for further studies on treatment of psychosis symptoms in NH patients.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Casas de Salud , Dolor , Calidad de Vida
11.
Trials ; 21(1): 510, 2020 Jun 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32517727

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The global health challenge of dementia is exceptional in size, cost and impact. It is the only top ten cause of death that cannot be prevented, cured or substantially slowed, leaving disease management, caregiver support and service innovation as the main targets for reduction of disease burden. Institutionalization of persons with dementia is common in western countries, despite patients preferring to live longer at home, supported by caregivers. Such complex health challenges warrant multicomponent interventions thoroughly implemented in daily clinical practice. This article describes the rationale, development, feasibility testing and implementation process of the LIVE@Home.Path trial. METHODS: The LIVE@Home.Path trial is a 2-year, multicenter, mixed-method, stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial, aiming to include 315 dyads of home-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers, recruited from 3 municipalities in Norway. The stepped-wedge randomization implies that all dyads receive the intervention, but the timing is determined by randomization. The control group constitutes the dyads waiting for the intervention. The multicomponent intervention was developed in collaboration with user-representatives, researchers and stakeholders to meet the requirements from the national Dementia Plan 2020. During the 6-month intervention period, the participants will be allocated to a municipal coordinator, the core feature of the intervention, responsible for regular contact with the dyads to facilitate L: Learning, I: Innovation, V: Volunteering and E: Empowerment (LIVE). The primary outcome is resource utilization. This is measured by the Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) instrument and the Relative Stress Scale (RSS), reflecting that resource utilization is more than the actual time required for caring but also how burdensome the task is experienced by the caregiver. DISCUSSION: We expect the implementation of LIVE to lead to a pathway for dementia treatment and care which is cost-effective, compared to treatment as usual, and will support high-quality independent living, at home. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04043364. Registered on 15 March 2019.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Costo de Enfermedad , Vías Clínicas , Demencia/psicología , Demencia/terapia , Actividades Cotidianas , Adaptación Psicológica , Anciano , Cuidadores/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Demencia/economía , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Humanos , Institucionalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Noruega , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA