Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Radiol Case Rep ; 18(5): 1825-1829, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36923385

RESUMEN

Persistent Mullerian Duct Syndrome (PMDS) is a type of pseudohermaphroditism that occurs in males. It is an autosomal recessive type of familial disease that is commonly associated with a history of consanguinity. We have documented this case of a 22-year-old adult male who came with acute right iliac pain; after an ultrasound scan and hormone investigations, he was diagnosed with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).

2.
Saudi J Biol Sci ; 26(6): 1107-1111, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31516336

RESUMEN

The aims of the present work were to quantify radiation doses arises from patients' exposure in mammographic X-ray imaging procedures and to estimate the radiation induced cancer risk. Sixty patients were evaluated using a calibrated digital mammography unit at King Khaled Hospital and Prince Sultan Center, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia. The average patient age (years) was 44.4 ±â€¯10 (26-69). The average and range of exposure parameters were 29.1 ±â€¯1.9 (24.0-33.0) and 78.4 ±â€¯17.5 (28.0-173.0) for X-ray tube potential (kVp) and current multiplied by the exposure time (s) (mAs), respectively. The MGD (mGy) per single projection for craniocaudal (CC), Medio lateral oblique (MLO) and lateromedial (LM) was 1.02 ±â€¯0.2 (0.4-1.8), 1.1 ±â€¯0.3 (0.5-1.8), 1.1 ±â€¯0.3 (0.5-1.9) per procedure, in that order. The average cancer risk per projection is 177 per million procedures. The cancer risk is significant during multiple image acquisition. The study revealed that 80% of the procedures with normal findings. However, precise justification is required especially for young patients.

3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 165(1-4): 102-6, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25852182

RESUMEN

This study aimed to assess patient entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) during chest and abdominal X-ray procedures in screen film radiography (SFR) and computed radiography (CR) to establish dose reference levels. Patients' doses were measured in five hospitals for a total of 196 patients. ESAK was calculated from exposure parameters using DosCal software. The X-ray tube output (mGy mAs(-1)), accuracy of exposure factors, linearity and reproducibility were measured using an Unfors Xi dosimeter. The overall mean and range of ESAK during chest X-ray were 0.6 ± 0.3 (0.1-1.3) mGy, while for abdominal X-rays they were 4.0 ± 3.2 (1.3-9.2) mGy. Hospital with a CR system was found to use relatively higher doses. Dose values for abdominal X-ray procedures were comparable with previous studies. The dose for chest X-ray procedure was higher by a factor of 2-3 compared with the current international reference levels.


Asunto(s)
Radiografía Abdominal/normas , Radiografía Torácica/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Dosimetría por Película , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Control de Calidad , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Abdominal/métodos , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Radiometría , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Programas Informáticos , Sudán , Rayos X , Adulto Joven
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 165(1-4): 194-8, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25852181

RESUMEN

Computed tomography (CT) scanning is recognised as a high-radiation dose modality and estimated to be 17 % of the radiological procedure and responsible for 70 % of medical radiation exposure. Although diagnostic X rays provide great benefits, their use involves some risk for developing cancer. The objectives of this study are to estimate radiation doses during chest, abdomen and pelvis CT. A total of 51 patients were examined for the evaluation of metastasis of a diagnosed primary tumour during 4 months. A calibrated CT machine from Siemens 64 slice was used. The mean age was 48.0 ± 18.6 y. The mean patient weight was 73.8 ± 16.1 kg. The mean dose-length product was 1493.8 ± 392.1 mGy cm, Volume CT dose index (CTDI vol) was 22.94 ± 5.64 mGy and the mean effective dose was 22.4 ± 5.9 mSv per procedure. The radiation dose per procedure was higher as compared with previous studies. Therefore, the optimisation of patient's radiation doses is required in order to reduce the radiation risk.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Pelvis/diagnóstico por imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Abdominal/métodos , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Calibración , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Rayos X , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA