Dietary Iron, Anemia Markers, Cognition, and Quality of Life in Older Community-Dwelling Subjects at High Cardiovascular Risk.

Anemia causes hypo-oxygenation in the brain, which could lead to cognitive disorders. We examined dietary iron intake as well as anemia markers (i.e., hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume) and diabetes coexistence in relation to neuropsychological function and quality of life. In this study, 6117 community-dwelling adults aged 55-75 years (men) and 60-75 years (women) with overweight/obesity and metabolic syndrome were involved. We performed the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Trail Making Test parts A and B (TMT-A/B), Semantic Verbal Fluency of animals (VFT-a), Phonological Verbal Fluency of letter P (VFT-p), Digit Span Test (DST), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), and the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF36-HRQL test). Dietary iron intake did not influence neuropsychological function or quality of life. However, anemia and lower levels of anemia markers were associated with worse scores in all neurophysiological and SF36-HRQL tests overall, but were especially clear in the MMSE, TMT-B (cognitive flexibility), and the physical component of the SF36-HRQL test. The relationships between anemia and diminished performance in the TMT-A/B and VFT tasks were notably pronounced and statistically significant solely among participants with diabetes. In brief, anemia and reduced levels of anemia markers were linked to inferior cognitive function, worse scores in different domains of executive function, as well as a poorer physical, but not mental, component of quality of life. It was also suggested that the coexistence of diabetes in anemic patients may exacerbate this negative impact on cognition. Nevertheless, dietary iron intake showed no correlation with any of the outcomes. To make conclusive recommendations for clinical practice, our findings need to be thoroughly tested through methodologically rigorous studies that minimize the risk of reverse causality.

Plasma fatty acid binding protein 4 is associated with atherogenic dyslipidemia in diabetes.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of adipocyte fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) on the lipid profile in type 2 diabetic subjects. Plasma levels of FABP4 and adiponectin and an extensive lipid profile were analyzed in 169 type 2 diabetic subjects and 105 controls. Type 2 diabetic subjects were categorized according the presence of atherogenic dyslipidemia. Univariate statistical analyses, partial correlation tests, and binary logistic regression models were applied. In type 2 diabetic subjects, FABP4 was positively correlated with plasma triglycerides (P = 0.007), apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) (P = 0.009), and all the components of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, including VLDL triglycerides (P = 0.002), VLDL-cholesterol (P = 0.001), and VLDL apoB (P = 0.001). FABP4 was inversely correlated with apoA-I (P = 0.038), HDL-cholesterol (P = 0.002), and HDL apoA-I (P = 0.010) in type 2 diabetic subjects. These correlations are not significantly affected by age, gender, body mass index, adiponectin, insulin, or any pharmacological treatment. The associations are even stronger when the FABP4/adiponectin ratio is considered. None of these associations were observed in controls. High FABP4 and low adiponectin levels are independent predictors of atherogenic dyslipidemia. In conclusion, FABP4 plasma concentrations hold strong potential for development as a clinical biomarker for atherogenic dyslipidemia, independent of obesity and insulin resistance, in type 2 diabetic subjects.