Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Invest Surg ; 19(5): 291-7, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16966207

RESUMEN

Following laparotomy, almost 95% of patients develop adhesions. To prevent adhesion formation, peritoneal lavage has been investigated and many different lavage solutions have been proposed. In this study, different peritoneal lavage solutions were evaluated, testing their ability to prevent adhesion formation. Three consecutive steps were followed: (1) The lethal dose of Eschericia coli injected in the rat peritoneal cavity was determined, (2) the morbidity and mortality rates of different solutions for peritoneal lavage (i.e., saline, twice-distilled water, antiseptics, and antibiotics solutions) was investigated, and (3) the capability of the different lavage solutions to prevent adhesion formation was tested. Two hundred and ninety-eight rats were employed in this study. After intraperitoneal injection of E. coli, infection (clinical signs and animal vitality), adhesion formation (explorative laparoscopy, peritoneumgraphy and Zühlke scale grading), and animal performance status were investigated. All differences were evaluated by chi-square and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. Saline solution showed a low morbidity rate with no deaths. Twice-distilled water was associated with 100% mortality rate, as opposed to 45-75% for antiseptics, and 0-3% mortality for antibiotics. Antibiotics determined higher adhesion formation by Zühlke score as compared to saline solution (p < .001), while no difference was observed between antiseptics and saline (p = NS). Peritoneal lavage with 37 degrees C saline solution was associated with low adhesion formation and high survival rate as compared to twice-distilled water and antiseptics. Antibiotics solutions had high survival rate and high adhesion formation. Twice-distilled water and antisepsis should be avoided when based on the data obtained in this work.


Asunto(s)
Lavado Peritoneal/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Adherencias Tisulares/prevención & control , Animales , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/complicaciones , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Peritonitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Peritonitis/mortalidad , Peritonitis/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patología , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Cloruro de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adherencias Tisulares/patología , Agua/administración & dosificación
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 13(10): 1338-43, 2006 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16952022

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the incidence of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in the internal mammary chain, calculated the lymphoscintigraphy and surgical detection rates, and evaluated the clinical effect on staging and the therapeutic approach in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: The study involved 741 women diagnosed with breast cancer eligible for the SLN technique. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed on the day before the operation by peritumoral injection of (99m)Tc-labeled nanocolloid. During the operation, a gamma probe was used to detect the SLN, which was then removed. RESULTS: A total of 719 SLNs were found in the axillary chain and 72 in the internal mammary chain. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy showed 107 hot spots in the internal mammary chain, but only 72 SLNs in 65 patients were identified by the gamma probe and then removed with no complications. Of these 65 patients, 10 had a positive internal mammary chain SLN on final pathologic examination, whereas 55 patients had >or=1 negative SLNs on final pathologic analysis. Thirty-five (53%) of 65 patients had also an axillary SLN, but only 5 patients (8%) had a positive SLN on pathologic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the SLNs in the internal mammary chain may provide more accurate staging in breast cancer patients. If an internal mammary sampling is not performed, patients may be understaged. This technique may allow better selection of those patients who will be submitted to adjuvant locoregional radiotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Metástasis Linfática , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cintigrafía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA