Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Hum Vaccin ; 7(2): 258-64, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21307655

RESUMEN

An investigational combined Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and Neisseria meningitidis serogroups C and Y tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (HibMenCY-TT) has been developed to protect infants from invasive disease caused by Hib and these meningococcal serogroups without adding injections to the immunization schedule. Incorporation of this novel vaccine into the US vaccination schedule will require demonstration of a lack of immunologic interference with other routine pediatric vaccines. This study assessed the immune response to 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) and combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus vaccine (DTaP-HepB-IPV) when separately co-administered with HibMenCY-TT as compared to a US-licensed H. influenzae type b tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (Hib-TT) at 2, 4, 6 (N=606) and 12-15 months of age (N=366). HibMenCY-TT was non-inferior to Hib-TT in terms of antibody responses to all Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes contained in PCV7 and the diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and poliovirus antigens contained in DTaP-HepB-IPV one month after the third vaccine dose, and the anti-tetanus geometric mean antibody concentration (GMC) was significantly higher in the HibMenCY-TT group than in the Hib-TT group. In an exploratory analysis, no significant differences in the proportion of subjects with anti-pneumococcal antibody concentrations ≥0.2 µg/ml or anti-pneumococcal GMC were seen between the two groups after the fourth vaccine dose. A schedule of HibMenCY-TT given concomitantly with PCV7 and DTaP-HepB-IPV would be expected to protect infants against all of the targeted diseases.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Haemophilus/inmunología , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b/inmunología , Vacunas Meningococicas/inmunología , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo C/inmunología , Toxoide Tetánico/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/inmunología , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/inmunología , Vacuna Neumocócica Conjugada Heptavalente , Humanos , Lactante , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina/inmunología , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/inmunología , Método Simple Ciego , Toxoide Tetánico/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Combinadas/inmunología , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 27(7): 658-60, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18536623

RESUMEN

The immunogenicity and safety of hepatitis A vaccine and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, administered separately or concomitantly in children 15 months of age, were evaluated. After completed vaccinations, antihepatitis A and antipneumococcal geometric mean concentrations were similar across groups. Both vaccines were well-tolerated when given concomitantly during the second year of life.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/inmunología , Vacunas Meningococicas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Meningococicas/inmunología , Vacunas Neumococicas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Anticuerpos de Hepatitis A/sangre , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/administración & dosificación , Vacuna Neumocócica Conjugada Heptavalente , Humanos , Lactante , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación
4.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 27(4): 287-91, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18316993

RESUMEN

Previous hepatitis A recommendations for the United States targeted vaccination of at-risk individuals and children living in states and communities with consistently elevated rates of hepatitis A. Recommendations now call for routine hepatitis A vaccination of all children in the United States beginning at age 1 year (12-23 months). Currently, vaccination coverage rates for hepatitis A remain below rates of other routine childhood vaccines. Achieving a national immunization rate greater than 90% for the recommended 2 doses of hepatitis A vaccine would lessen disease impact throughout society. Routine childhood immunization against hepatitis A can be a highly effective strategy to reduce infection in children and community transmission of the virus, and the elimination of indigenous transmission of hepatitis A is an attainable goal.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/inmunología , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Hepatitis A/prevención & control , Preescolar , Política de Salud , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Incidencia , Lactante , Vacunación Masiva , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Vaccine ; 35(50): 6941-6948, 2017 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29089191

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Using text messaging for vaccine safety monitoring, particularly for non-medically attended events, would be valuable for pandemic influenza and emergency vaccination program preparedness. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of text messaging to evaluate fever and wheezing post-influenza vaccination in a prospective, observational, multi-site pediatric study. METHODS: Children aged 2-11 years old, with an emphasis on children with asthma, were recruited during the 2014-2015 influenza season from three community-based clinics in New York City, and during the 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 seasons from a private practice in Fall River, Massachusetts. Parents of enrolled children receiving quadrivalent live attenuated (LAIV4) or inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) replied to text messages assessing respiratory symptoms (day 3 and 7, then weekly through day 42), and temperature on the night of vaccination and the next seven nights (day 0-7). Missing data were collected via diary (day 0-7 only) and phone. Phone confirmation was obtained for both presence and absence of respiratory symptoms. Reporting rates, fever (T≥100.4 °F) frequency, proportion of wheezing and/or chest tightness reports captured via text message versus all sources (text, phone, diary, electronic health record) and parental satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: Across both seasons, 266 children were analyzed; 49.2% with asthma. Parental text message response rates were high (>70%) across sites. Overall, fever frequency was low (day 0-2: 4.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-7.4%]; d3-7: 6.7% [95% CI 4.1-10.8%]). A third (39.2%) of parents reported a respiratory problem in their child, primarily cough. Most (88.2%) of the 52 wheezing and/or chest tightness reports were by text message. Most (88.1%) participants preferred text messaging over paper reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Text messaging can provide information about pediatric post-vaccination fever and wheezing and was viewed positively by parents. It could be a helpful tool for rapid vaccine safety monitoring during a pandemic or other emergency vaccination program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02295007.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Fiebre/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Ruidos Respiratorios , Envío de Mensajes de Texto/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Fiebre/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos
6.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 25(7): 615-22, 2006 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16804432

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This clinical trial was conducted to demonstrate that each of 3 consistency lots of a combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine (MMRV) would be well tolerated, induce clinically acceptable and similar immune responses to each antigen and induce immune responses similar to measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) administered concomitantly with varicella vaccine (V). An additional objective was to evaluate the persistence of antibodies 1 year postvaccination. METHODS: Study participants 12 to 23 months of age received a single injection of either one of 3 consistency lots of MMRV or MMR + V administered at separate injection sites. RESULTS: A total of 3,928 healthy children were enrolled at study sites in the United States and Canada. Immune responses to measles, mumps, rubella and varicella in children immunized with each of 3 lots of MMRV were similar and the combined response to all 3 lots was comparable to that of the control group. The 1-year antibody persistence rates for measles, mumps, rubella and varicella viruses were each greater than 95% and comparable among the recipients of the 3 consistency lots of MMRV and the control group. All vaccines were generally well tolerated during the 42 days after vaccination and the overall incidence of adverse experiences was comparable between recipients of MMRV and MMR + V. Rates of fever (temperature >or=38.9 degrees C oral equivalent or tactile) were greater in recipients of MMRV than in recipients of MMR + V (39.1% versus 33.1%, P = 0.001). Fevers were transient and there was no difference in the incidence of febrile seizures. CONCLUSIONS: MMRV was generally well tolerated and had comparable immunogenicity and overall safety profiles to MMR + V administered concomitantly. Long-term persistence of antibodies after receipt of MMRV is expected based on similar antibody titers against all 4 antigens 1 year postvaccination compared with recipients of MMR and V.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Vacunas Combinadas/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/biosíntesis , Varicela/inmunología , Varicela/prevención & control , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Varicela/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Sarampión/inmunología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/normas , Paperas/inmunología , Paperas/prevención & control , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/inmunología , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Vacunas Combinadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Combinadas/normas
7.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 23(11): 1015-22, 2004 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15545856

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Seven valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) was licensed and introduced in 2000 for universal administration of children younger than 2 years of age and for selective immunization of children 2-5 years of age. SPECIFIC AIMS: To identify changes in colonization and antimicrobial susceptibility among Streptococcus pneumoniae organisms after introduction of PCV7. METHODS: Infants and children ages 2-24 months were enrolled in surveillance study of nasopharyngeal carriage of S. pneumoniae. Nasopharyngeal cultures for S. pneumoniae were performed at all well child visits and illness visits of children with acute otitis media. S. pneumoniae organisms were serotyped, and antimicrobial susceptibilities to penicillin, amoxicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and azithromycin were performed. RESULTS: During the 3-year period (October 2000 through September 2003), nasopharyngeal colonization with vaccine serotypes declined from 22% to 2%, and nonvaccine serotypes increased from 7% to 16%. Rates of antibiotic resistance of S. pneumoniae isolates to penicillin, amoxicillin, azithromycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were 29.3, 2.2, 26.5 and 28.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PCV7 immunization produces a marked decline in vaccine serotypes carried in the nasopharynx of young children, with a coincident rise in the prevalence of nonvaccine serotypes. Important shifts in antimicrobial susceptibility have not been observed to date.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Nasofaringe/microbiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Boston , Portador Sano , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Vacuna Neumocócica Conjugada Heptavalente , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones Neumocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Población Urbana , Vacunación/métodos
8.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 63(1): 1-13, 2002 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11879923

RESUMEN

Acute rhinosinusitis represents a condition for which educational efforts could help minimize the inappropriate use of antibiotics, particularly for children. The majority of acute rhinosinusitis cases are of viral etiology and thus, are self limiting. Although bacterial infection complicates a small number of cases, the lack of accessibility to the sinus, the limitations of diagnostic modalities and the lack of specificity among signs and symptoms often make it difficult to determine when bacterial infection occurs. Furthermore, antimicrobial resistance among the pathogens that frequently cause bacterial infection complicates the election of empiric therapy. The Sinus and Allergy Health Partnership recently developed and published antimicrobial guidelines to provide practitioners in the US with recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. The purpose of this paper is to review the rationale behind the development of these guidelines and how they apply to the management of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in children.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Niño , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Senos Paranasales/anatomía & histología , Senos Paranasales/fisiopatología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Rinitis/diagnóstico , Rinitis/microbiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sinusitis/diagnóstico , Sinusitis/microbiología
9.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 41(6): 373-90, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12166789

RESUMEN

The objective of this paper is to provide consensus recommendations for the management of acute otitis media (AOM) that pediatricians can incorporate into their daily practices. These recommendations were developed during a roundtable meeting that convened clinicians versed in the management of AOM. This meeting was sponsored by an educational grant from SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals. In addition, clinical studies on AOM identified via MEDLINE search were considered in the development of these recommendations. The Drug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Therapeutic Working Group guidelines for the management of AOM are reviewed in detail. All of the articles identified from the data sources were evaluated and all information deemed relevant was included in this review. AOM is one of the most common infectious diseases affecting infants and children and one of the leading causes of office visits and antibiotic prescriptions for this population. The incidence of AOM has increased during the past 25 years, probably the result of an increased utilization of day care facilities in the United States. The predominant pathogens in AOM include S. pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. The high prevalence of drug-resistant S. pneumoniae and beta-lactamase-producing organisms presents a clinical challenge for practitioners in the selection of empiric antimicrobial therapy. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles should be considered in addition to minimum inhibitory concentrations in selecting antibiotics for AOM. Amoxicillin at conventional or high doses (80-90 mg/kg/day) remains an appropriate choice for first-line therapy for AOM. For patients in whom amoxicillin is unsuccessful, second-line therapy should have demonstrated activity against penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae as well as beta-lactamase-producing pathogens. Appropriate options for second-line therapy include high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate (90 mg/kg/day based on the amoxicillin component) and ceftriaxone. Cefuroxime has been suggested as a second-line agent in the past, but recent surveillance data suggest it may no longer be active against penicillin-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae. Tympanocentesis is useful for identifying the causative pathogen, and it may be beneficial for patients who have failed multiple courses of antibiotics. The pneumococcal conjugate vaccine recently was approved for use in children and should be administered to all children less than 2 years old and those at risk for recurrent AOM (e.g., day care attendance, siblings with a history of recurrent AOM). Consensus recommendations are provided for the management of AOM, with a focus on antimicrobial therapy. The current challenges in the management of AOM include the need for an increased understanding of epidemiology, increasing resistance among common middle ear pathogens, use of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles in designing treatment strategies, and understanding the potential impact of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Directrices para la Planificación en Salud , Otitis Media/diagnóstico , Otitis Media/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Preescolar , Terapia Combinada , Consenso , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ventilación del Oído Medio/métodos , Otitis Media/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 33(5): 504-10, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24670957

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The direct impact of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) on colonization with unique PCV13 serotypes and the uptake of vaccine necessary to create indirect protection in nonimmunized children were assessed. METHODS: Carriage surveillance among children <60 months began in July 2010 at a pediatric practice in Boston, MA. Children had nasopharyngeal cultures and parents completed questionnaires detailing demographics and health status. Concurrently, we monitored uptake of PCV13 in children in the community. Children were classified as "presumed immune" or "presumed nonimmune" based on age and PCV13 immunizations received. We assessed trends using adjusted prevalence rates calculated within rolling, 25-week, consecutive intervals. RESULTS: Between July 2010 and June 2012, 1050 S. pneumoniae isolates were recovered from 1042 children. Eighty-nine isolates (8.5%) were 1 of 6 unique PCV13 serotypes. The expected fall/winter peak in PCV13 carriage was observed in nonimmune children, but was blunted in immune children. There was a 74% reduction in PCV13 colonization in immune compared with nonimmune children. We document a 50% or more decline in the PCV13 carriage in nonimmune children, at the time when the approximately 75% or more of the community children had received PCV13 and were considered immune. During the study, the difference in PCV13 serotype colonization prevalence in nonimmune and immune children disappeared. No evidence of replacement has been observed to date. CONCLUSIONS: The direct impact of PCV13 on colonization was demonstrated. Evidence of indirect protection in unimmunized (nonimmune) children was observed as vaccine uptake reached 75% in the target community.


Asunto(s)
Portador Sano/epidemiología , Portador Sano/microbiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Streptococcus pneumoniae/clasificación , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Portador Sano/prevención & control , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Nasofaringe/microbiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Serotipificación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 32(2): 163-8, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23334340

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Monovalent 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccines were licensed and administered in the United States during the H1N1 influenza pandemic between 2009 and 2013. METHODS: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System received reports of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) after H1N1 vaccination. Selected reports were referred to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment network for additional review. We assessed causality using modified World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: There were 3,928 reports of AEFI in children younger than age 18 years after 2009 H1N1 vaccination received by January 31, 2010. Of these, 214 (5.4%) were classified as serious nonfatal and 109 were referred to Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment for further evaluation. Ninety-nine (91%) had sufficient initial information to begin investigation and are described here. The mean age was 8 years (range, 6 months-17 years) and 38% were female. Median number of days between vaccination and symptom onset was 2 (range, -11 days to +41 days). Receipt of inactivated, live attenuated, or unknown type of 2009 H1N1 vaccines was reported by 68, 26 and 5 cases, respectively. Serious AEFI were categorized as neurologic events in 47 cases, as hypersensitivity in 15 cases and as respiratory events in 10 cases. At the time of evaluation, recovery was described as complete (61), partial (16), no improvement (1), or unknown (21). Causality assessment yielded the following likelihood of association with 2009 H1N1 vaccination: 8 definitely; 8 probably; 21 possibly; 43 unlikely; 17 unrelated; and 2 unclassifiable. CONCLUSIONS: Most AEFI in children evaluated were not causally related to vaccine and resolved without sequelae. Detailed clinical assessment of individual serious AEFI can provide reassurance of vaccine safety.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Niño , Preescolar , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Vacunación Masiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 31(2): 145-9, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22051860

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) causes otitis media, sinusitis, and likely lower respiratory tract infections in children. Colonization, strain diversity, transmission, and antimicrobial susceptibility have implications for both children and their caregivers. METHODS: For 13 months, we conducted a cross-sectional study of NTHi colonization. Upper respiratory tract cultures were performed in 273 infants and children 2 to 26 months of age and their primary caregivers. NTHi isolates were characterized by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and antibiotic resistance was examined. RESULTS: Of the 273 infants, 44 (16.1%) were colonized with NTHi. Prevalence of NTHi varied from 14% in infants less than 6 months of age to 32% in infants between 19 and 26 months of age (P = 0.003). NTHi-colonized infants were more likely to attend day care (30% vs. 12%), have a recent respiratory infection (68% vs. 38%), have recently taken an antibiotic (27% vs. 9%), and have a primary caregiver who reported asthma (11% vs. 1%), compared with other infants (P < 0.01). In the 44 infants colonized with NTHi, we identified 33 different MLSTs. Of the 44 infant-primary caregiver dyads, 9 (20.5%) were colonized with NTHi, and 7 of these 9 shared identical NTHi strains. We also found beta-lactamase-negative NTHi with minimum inhibitory concentrations >2 µg/mL for amoxicillin and beta-lactamase-positive NTHi with minimum inhibitory concentrations >2 µg/mL for amoxicillin clavulanate. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial diversity by MLST analysis among NTHi isolates from this community. Infant-primary caregiver dyads usually carried the same strain of NTHi, suggesting that infant-primary caregiver transmission is occurring.


Asunto(s)
Portador Sano/epidemiología , Variación Genética , Infecciones por Haemophilus/epidemiología , Haemophilus influenzae/clasificación , Haemophilus influenzae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Cuidadores , Portador Sano/microbiología , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Infecciones por Haemophilus/microbiología , Haemophilus influenzae/genética , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Epidemiología Molecular , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Prevalencia , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología
13.
Vaccine ; 31(1): 271-7, 2012 Dec 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22835735

RESUMEN

In immunization safety research, individuals are considered at risk for the development of certain adverse events following immunization (AEFI) within a specific period of time referred to as the risk interval. These intervals should ideally be determined based on biologic plausibility considering features of the AEFI, presumed or known pathologic mechanism, and the vaccine. Misspecification of the length and timing of these intervals may result in introducing bias in epidemiologic and clinical studies of immunization safety. To date, little work has been done to formally assess and determine biologically plausible and evidence-based risk intervals in immunization safety research. In this report, we present a systematic process to define biologically plausible and evidence-based risk interval estimates for two specific AEFIs, febrile seizures and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. In addition, we review methodologic issues related to the determination of risk intervals for consideration in future studies of immunization safety.


Asunto(s)
Inmunización/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacunas/efectos adversos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Vaccine ; 30(50): 7253-9, 2012 Nov 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23063829

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) reported to the national Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) represent true causally related events, as well as events that are temporally, but not necessarily causally related to vaccine. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if the causal relationships between the vaccine and the AEFI reported to VAERS could be assessed through expert review. DESIGN: A stratified random sample of 100 VAERS reports received in 2004 contained 13 fatal cases, 19 cases with non-fatal disabilities, 39 other serious non-fatal cases and 29 non-serious cases. Experts knowledgeable about vaccines and clinical outcomes, reviewed each VAERS report and available medical records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Modified World Health Organization criteria were used to classify the causal relationship between vaccines and AEFI as definite, probable, possible, unlikely or unrelated. Five independent reviewers evaluated each report. If they did not reach a majority agreement on causality after initial review, the report was discussed on a telephone conference to achieve agreement. RESULTS: 108 AEFIs were identified in the selected 100 VAERS reports. After initial review majority agreement was achieved for 83% of the AEFI and 17% required further discussion. In the end, only 3 (3%) of the AEFI were classified as definitely causally related to vaccine received. Of the remaining AEFI 22 (20%) were classified as probably and 22 (20%) were classified as possibly related to vaccine received; a majority (53%) were classified as either unlikely or unrelated to a vaccine received. CONCLUSIONS: Using VAERS reports and additional documentation, causality could be assessed by expert review in the majority of VAERS reports. Assessment of VAERS reports identified that causality was thought to be probable or definite in less than one quarter of reports, and these were dominated by local reactions, allergic reactions, or symptoms known to be associated with the vaccine administered.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Vacunas/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causalidad , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
16.
Pediatrics ; 127(6): e1375-85, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21624883

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Meningococcal disease incidence is highest in children younger than 2 years of age, yet there is no US-licensed vaccine for this age group. A phase III study evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of an investigational Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)-Neisseria meningitidis serogroups C and Y-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (HibMenCY). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 4180 infants were randomly assigned to receive the HibMenCY at the ages of 2, 4, 6, and 12 to 15 months or the licensed Hib tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (ActHIB) at 2, 4, and 6 months and Hib conjugated to N meningitidis outer membrane protein (PedvaxHIB) at 12 to 15 months. Routinely scheduled vaccines were coadministered. Serum bactericidal activity using human complement and anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate antibodies were assessed in 991 subjects. Local and systemic adverse reactions were recorded for 4 days after each dose. RESULTS: The percentage of HibMenCY recipients with serum bactericidal assay using human complement titers of 1:8 or higher after dose 3 was 98.8% for N meningitidis serogroup C (MenC) and 95.8% for N meningitidis serogroup Y (MenY). After dose 4, the percentages were 98.5% and 98.8%, respectively. The percentage of HibMenCY recipients with postdose 3 anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate antibody levels of ≥ 1.0 µg/mL was noninferior to that of control (96.3% vs 91.2%). After dose 4, MenC and MenY serum bactericidal assay using human complement antibody titers increased 12-fold over pre-dose 4 levels. Incidence of pain, redness, and swelling at the HibMenCY injection sites tended to be lower than with Hib type b after the first 3 doses and after the fourth dose. Rates of systemic symptoms were similar across groups. CONCLUSIONS: The HibMenCY was immunogenic against MenC and MenY and induced anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate antibody levels noninferior to those of licensed Hib conjugate vaccine. The safety profile of the HibMenCY was clinically acceptable and comparable to Hib conjugate vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Proteínas de la Membrana Bacteriana Externa/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Neisseria meningitidis/inmunología , Orthomyxoviridae/inmunología , Polisacáridos Bacterianos/administración & dosificación , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Gripe Humana/virología , Masculino , Infecciones Meningocócicas/inmunología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunas Conjugadas
17.
Vaccine ; 29(40): 6920-7, 2011 Sep 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21801776

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2004 the Clinical Consult Case Review (CCCR) working group was formed within the CDC-funded Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Network to review individual cases of adverse events following immunizations (AEFI). METHODS: Cases were referred by practitioners, health departments, or CDC employees. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) searches and literature reviews for similar cases were performed prior to review. After CCCR discussion, AEFI were assessed for a causal relationship with vaccination and recommendations regarding future immunizations were relayed back to the referring physicians. In 2010, surveys were sent to referring physicians to determine the utility and effectiveness of the CCCR service. RESULTS: CISA investigators reviewed 76 cases during 68 conference calls between April 2004 and December 2009. Almost half of the cases (35/76) were neurological in nature. Similar AEFI for the specific vaccines received were discovered for 63 cases through VAERS searches and for 38 cases through PubMed searches. Causality assessment using the modified WHO criteria resulted in classifying 3 cases as definitely related to vaccine administration, 12 as probably related, 16 as possibly related, 18 as unlikely related, 10 as unrelated, and 17 had insufficient information to assign causality. The physician satisfaction survey was returned by 30 (57.7%) of those surveyed and a majority of respondents (93.3%) felt that the CCCR service was useful. CONCLUSIONS: The CCCR provides advice about AEFI to practitioners, assigns potential causality, and contributes to an improved understanding of adverse health events following immunizations.


Asunto(s)
Inmunización/efectos adversos , Vacunas/efectos adversos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Humanos , Derivación y Consulta
18.
Vaccine ; 29(46): 8302-8, 2011 Oct 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21893148

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adverse events occurring after vaccination are routinely reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). We studied serious adverse events (SAEs) of a neurologic nature reported after receipt of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine during the 2009-2010 influenza season. Investigators in the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network sought to characterize these SAEs and to assess their possible causal relationship to vaccination. METHODS: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) physicians reviewed all SAE reports (as defined by the Code of Federal Regulations, 21CFR§314.80) after receipt of H1N1 vaccine reported to VAERS between October 1, 2009 and March 31, 2010. Non-fatal SAE reports with neurologic presentation were referred to CISA investigators, who requested and reviewed additional medical records and clinical information as available. CISA investigators assessed the causal relationship between vaccination and the event using modified WHO criteria as defined. RESULTS: 212 VAERS reports of non-fatal serious neurological events were referred for CISA review. Case reports were equally distributed by gender (50.9% female) with an age range of 6 months to 83 years (median 38 years). The most frequent diagnoses reviewed were: Guillain-Barré Syndrome (37.3%), seizures (10.8%), cranial neuropathy (5.7%), and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (3.8%). Causality assessment resulted in classification of 72 events as "possibly" related (33%), 108 as "unlikely" related (51%), and 20 as "unrelated" (9%) to H1N1 vaccination; none were classified as "probable" or "definite" and 12 were unclassifiable (6%). CONCLUSION: The absence of a specific test to indicate whether a vaccine component contributes to the pathogenesis of an event occurring within a biologically plausible time period makes assessing causality difficult. The development of standardized protocols for providers to use in evaluation of adverse events following immunization, and rapid identification and follow-up of VAERS reports could improve causality assessment.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedades de los Nervios Craneales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de los Nervios Craneales/epidemiología , Encefalomielitis Aguda Diseminada/inducido químicamente , Encefalomielitis Aguda Diseminada/epidemiología , Femenino , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/inducido químicamente , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA