Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 118
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Epidemiol ; 190(9): 1721-1723, 2021 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33831147

RESUMEN

Using a bibliometric approach, Nobles et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(9):1710-1720) conducted a study to explore dimensions of participation at the annual meetings of the Society for Epidemiologic Research (SER). Their findings suggested differences in representation by gender and affiliation in key presentation formats, which raises concerns about possible equity issues within the organization. In this commentary, I discuss the context, limitations, and strengths of the study, as well as reflections on interpretation and implications of the findings. Suggested next steps include: continuing the conversation; evaluating SER processes and making needed adjustments with equity in mind; and conducting ongoing surveillance and further research. Nobles et al. have provided a baseline for monitoring trends, as well as a starting point for future research efforts that should aim to refine methodologic aspects of the current study to obtain a more complete range of information. Although firm conclusions about possible determinants cannot be made at this time, the work of Nobles et al. can be expected to raise awareness of equity issues among SER members and the broader epidemiology community.


Asunto(s)
Bibliometría , Sociedades Médicas , Comunicación , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Humanos
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 223(2): 177-188, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32142826

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To provide updated and more detailed pooled intrauterine device expulsion rates and expulsion risk estimates among women with postpartum intrauterine device placement by timing of insertion, delivery type, and intrauterine device type to inform current intrauterine device insertion practices in the United States. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all studies, of any study design, that examined postpartum placement of Copper T380A (copper) or levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine devices that reported counts of expulsion. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: We evaluated intrauterine device expulsion among women receiving postpartum intrauterine devices in the "immediate" (within 10 minutes), "early inpatient" (>10 minutes to <72 hours), "early outpatient" (72 hours to <4 weeks), and interval (≥4 weeks) time periods after delivery. We assessed study quality using the US Preventive Services Task Force evidence grading system. We calculated pooled absolute rates of partial and complete intrauterine device expulsion separately and estimated adjusted relative risks by the timing of postpartum placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type using log-binomial multivariable regression. RESULTS: We identified 48 level I to II-3 studies of poor to good quality that reported a total of 7661 intrauterine device placements. Complete intrauterine device expulsion rates varied by timing of placement as follows: 10.2% (range, 0.0-26.7) for immediate; 13.2% (3.5-46.7) for early inpatient; 0% for early outpatient; and 1.8% (0.0-4.8) for interval placements. Complete intrauterine device expulsion rates also varied by delivery type: 14.8% (range, 4.8-43.1) for vaginal and 3.8% (0.0-21.1) for cesarean deliveries. Among immediate postpartum vaginal placements, the expulsion rate for levonorgetrel intrauterine devices was 27.4% (range, 18.8-45.2) and 12.4% (4.8-43.1) for copper intrauterine devices. Compared with interval placement, immediate and early postpartum placements (inpatient and outpatient combined) were associated with greater risk of complete expulsion (adjusted risk ratio, 8.33; 95% confidence interval, 4.32-16.08, and adjusted risk ratio, 5.27; 95% confidence interval, 2.56-10.85, respectively). Among immediate postpartum placements, risk of expulsion was greater for placement after vaginal compared with cesarean deliveries (adjusted risk ratio, 4.57; 95% confidence interval, 3.49-5.99). Among immediate placements at the time of vaginal delivery, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices were associated with a greater risk of expulsion compared with copper intrauterine devices (adjusted risk ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.65). CONCLUSION: Although intrauterine device expulsion rates vary by timing of placement, type, and mode of delivery, intrauterine device insertion can take place at any time. Understanding the risk of intrauterine device expulsion at each time period will enable women to make an informed choice about when to initiate use of an intrauterine device in the postpartum period based on their own goals and preferences.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Expulsión de Dispositivo Intrauterino , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
3.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 800, 2019 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31409314

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption is associated with increased risk of breast cancer; however, its association with subsequent risk of breast cancer death is unclear. METHODS: We followed 4523 women with complete information on relevant risk factors for mortality; these women were 35 to 64 years of age when diagnosed with incident invasive breast cancer between 1994 and 1998. During follow up (median, 8.6 years), 1055 women died; 824 died from breast cancer. The information on alcohol consumption before diagnosis was collected shortly after breast cancer diagnosis (average: 5.1 months) during an in-person interview which used a structured questionnaire. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer-specific mortality, mortality due to causes other than breast cancer, and all-cause mortality associated with alcohol consumption from age 15 years until breast cancer diagnosis and during recent periods of time prior to breast cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Average weekly alcohol consumption from age 15 years until breast cancer diagnosis was inversely associated with breast cancer-specific mortality (Ptrend = 0.01). Compared to non-drinkers, women in the highest average weekly alcohol consumption category (≥7 drinks/week) had 25% lower risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.56-1.00). Breast cancer mortality risk was also reduced among women in the highest average weekly alcohol consumption category in two recent time periods (5-year period ending 2-years prior to breast cancer diagnosis, HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57-0.95; 2-year period immediately prior to breast cancer diagnosis: HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.56-0.95). Furthermore, analyses of average weekly alcohol consumption by beverage type from age 15 years until breast cancer diagnosis suggested that wine consumption was inversely associated with breast cancer-specific mortality risk (wine Ptrend = 0.06, beer Ptrend = 0.24, liquor Ptrend = 0.74). No association with any of these alcohol consumption variables was observed for mortality risk due to causes other than breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found no evidence that alcohol consumption before breast cancer diagnosis increases subsequent risk of death from breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Población Negra , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Población Blanca , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Vigilancia de la Población , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
4.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 221(1): 43.e1-43.e11, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30885772

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contraception use among postpartum women is important to prevent unintended pregnancies and optimize birth spacing. Long-acting reversible contraception, including intrauterine devices and implants, is highly effective, yet compared to less effective methods utilization rates are low. OBJECTIVES: We sought to estimate prevalence of long-acting reversible contraception use among postpartum women and examine factors associated with long-acting reversible contraception use among those using any reversible contraception. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 2012-2015 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a population-based survey among women with recent live births. We included data from 37 sites that achieved the minimum overall response rate threshold for data release. We estimated the prevalence of long-acting reversible contraception use in our sample (n = 143,335). We examined maternal factors associated with long-acting reversible contraception use among women using reversible contraception (n = 97,013) using multivariable logistic regression (long-acting reversible contraception vs other type of reversible contraception) and multinomial regression (long-acting reversible contraception vs other hormonal contraception and long-acting reversible contraception vs other nonhormonal contraception). RESULTS: The prevalence of long-acting reversible contraception use overall was 15.3%. Among postpartum women using reversible contraception, 22.5% reported long-acting reversible contraception use, which varied by site, ranging from 11.2% in New Jersey to 37.6% in Alaska. Factors associated with postpartum long-acting reversible contraception use vs use of another reversible contraceptive method included age ≤24 years (adjusted odds ratio = 1.43; 95% confidence interval = 1.33-1.54) and ≥35 years (adjusted odds ratio = 0.87; 95% confidence interval = 0.80-0.96) vs 25-34 years; public insurance (adjusted odds ratio = 1.15; 95% confidence interval = 1.08-1.24) and no insurance (adjusted odds ratio = 0.73; 95% confidence interval = 0.55-0.96) vs private insurance at delivery; having a recent unintended pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio = 1.44; 95% confidence interval = 1.34-1.54) or being unsure about the recent pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio = 1.29; 95% confidence interval = 1.18-1.40) vs recent pregnancy intended; having ≥1 previous live birth (adjusted odds ratio = 1.40; 95% confidence interval = 1.31-1.48); and having a postpartum check-up after recent live birth (adjusted odds ratio = 2.70; 95% confidence interval = 2.35-3.11). Hispanic and non-Hispanic black postpartum women had a higher rate of long-acting reversible contraception use (26.6% and 23.4%, respectively) compared to non-Hispanic white women (21.5%), and there was significant race/ethnicity interaction with educational level. CONCLUSION: Nearly 1 in 6 (15.3%) postpartum women with a recent live birth and nearly 1 in 4 (22.5%) postpartum women using reversible contraception reported long-acting reversible contraception use. Our analysis suggests that factors such as age, race/ethnicity, education, insurance, parity, intendedness of recent pregnancy, and postpartum visit attendance may be associated with postpartum long-acting reversible contraception use. Ensuring all postpartum women have access to the full range of contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible contraception, is important to prevent unintended pregnancy and optimize birth spacing. Contraceptive access may be improved by public health efforts and programs that address barriers in the postpartum period, including increasing awareness of the availability, effectiveness, and safety of long-acting reversible contraception (and other methods), as well as providing full reimbursement for contraceptive services and removal of administrative and logistical barriers.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticoncepción Reversible de Larga Duración/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Posparto , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/administración & dosificación , Implantes de Medicamentos/uso terapéutico , Escolaridad , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Embarazo no Planeado , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
5.
Breast Cancer Res ; 20(1): 5, 2018 01 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29357906

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although it has been well-documented that obesity is associated with decreased risk of premenopausal breast cancer and increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, it is unclear whether these associations differ among breast cancer subtypes defined by the tumor protein expression status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). METHODS: We evaluated the associations of body mass index (BMI) at age 18 years and recent BMI in relation to risk of breast cancer overall and ER/PR/HER2-defined subtypes, in 6320 women (3934 case-patient participants, 2386 control participants) aged 35-64 years, who participated in one of three population-based case-control studies. We estimated multivariable-adjusted odd ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using polychotomous unconditional logistic regression methods for case-control comparisons in premenopausal women and postmenopausal women. RESULTS: BMI at age 18 years was inversely associated with risk of breast cancer, particularly among premenopausal women (≥ 25 vs. < 20 kg/m2, OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.53-0.96; per 5 kg/m2 increase, OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.73-0.95). This inverse association did not differ across ER/PR/HER2-defined subtypes or by race (white women, African-American women). Recent BMI was not associated with risk of premenopausal breast cancer after adjustment for BMI at age 18 years; nevertheless, the analysis for the joint effects of BMI at age 18 years and recent BMI showed that premenopausal women in the highest categories of the two BMI measures (≥ 25 kg/m2 at age 18 years and ≥ 30 kg/m2 for recent BMI) had 46% lower risk of breast cancer than premenopausal women in the lowest categories of the two BMI measures (< 20 kg/m2 at age 18 years and < 25 kg/m2 for recent BMI; OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.38-0.78). Neither measure of BMI was statistically significantly associated with risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that high BMI near the end of adolescence decreases risk of all ER/PR/HER2-defined subtypes of premenopausal breast cancer and also suggest that this benefit could be maximized among premenopausal women who consistently have high BMI during their premenopausal years.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Obesidad/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/genética , Obesidad/patología , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Receptores de Estrógenos/genética , Receptores de Progesterona/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
6.
Breast Cancer Res ; 19(1): 6, 2017 01 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28086982

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early age at menarche, nulliparity, late age at first completed pregnancy, and never having breastfed, are established breast cancer risk factors. However, among breast cancer subtypes, it remains unclear whether all of these are risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: We evaluated the associations of these reproductive factors with TNBC, in 2658 patients with breast cancer (including 554 with TNBC) and 2448 controls aged 20-64 years, who participated in one of the three population-based case-control studies: the Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study, the Women's Breast Carcinoma in situ Study, or the Women's Learning the Influence of Family and Environment Study. We used multivariable polychotomous unconditional logistic regression methods to conduct case-control comparisons among breast cancer subtypes defined by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 expression status. RESULTS: TNBC risk decreased with increasing duration of breastfeeding (P trend = 0.006), but age at menarche, age at first completed pregnancy, and nulliparity were not associated with risk of TNBC. Parous women who breastfed for at least one year had a 31% lower risk of TNBC than parous women who had never breastfed (odds ratio, OR = 0.69; 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.50-0.96). The association between breastfeeding and risk of TNBC was modified by age and race. Parous African-American women aged 20-44 years who breastfed for 6 months or longer had an 82% lower risk of TNBC than their counterparts who had never breastfed (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.07-0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that breastfeeding decreases the risk of TNBC, especially for younger African-American women.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/etiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Vigilancia de la Población , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de Estrógenos , Receptores de Progesterona , Historia Reproductiva , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Adulto Joven
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 216(5): 489.e1-489.e7, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28034652

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Migraine with aura and combined hormonal contraceptives are independently associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. However, little is known about whether there are any joint effects of migraine and hormonal contraceptives on risk of stroke. OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the incidence of stroke in women of reproductive age and examine the association among combined hormonal contraceptive use, migraine type (with or without aura), and ischemic stroke. STUDY DESIGN: This study used a nationwide health care claims database and employed a nested case-control study design. Females ages 15-49 years with first-ever stroke during 2006 through 2012 were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification inpatient services diagnosis codes. Four controls were matched to each case based on age. Migraine headache with and without aura was identified using inpatient or outpatient diagnosis codes. Current combined hormonal contraceptive use was identified using the National Drug Code from the pharmacy database. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of ischemic stroke by migraine type and combined hormonal contraceptive use. RESULTS: From 2006 through 2012, there were 25,887 ischemic strokes among females ages 15-49 years, for a cumulative incidence of 11 strokes/100,000 females. Compared to those with neither migraine nor combined hormonal contraceptive use, the odds ratio of ischemic stroke was highest among those with migraine with aura using combined hormonal contraceptives (odds ratio, 6.1; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-12.1); odds ratios were also elevated for migraine with aura without combined hormonal contraceptive use (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-3.7), migraine without aura and combined hormonal contraceptive use (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.9), and migraine without aura without combined hormonal contraceptive use (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-2.7). CONCLUSION: The joint effect of combined hormonal contraceptives and migraine with aura was associated with a 6-fold increased risk of ischemic stroke compared with neither risk factor. Use of combined hormonal contraceptives did not substantially further increase risk of ischemic stroke among women with migraine without aura. Determining migraine type is critical in assessing safety of combined hormonal contraceptives among women with migraine.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/efectos adversos , Migraña con Aura/epidemiología , Migraña sin Aura/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
8.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 214(6): 712.e1-8, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26694134

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about unintended pregnancy risk and current contraceptive use among women ≥45 years old in the United States. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of women ages 45-50 years old at risk for unintended pregnancy and their current contraceptive use, and to compare these findings to those of women in younger age groups. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 2006, 2008, and 2010 Massachusetts Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, the only state in the United States to collect contraceptive data routinely from women >44 years old. Women 18-50 years old (n = 4930) were considered to be at risk for unintended pregnancy unless they reported current pregnancy, hysterectomy, not being sexually active in the past year, having a same-sex partner, or wanting to become pregnant. Among women who were considered to be at risk (n = 3605), we estimated the prevalence of current contraceptive use by age group. Among women who were considered to be at risk and who were 45-50 years old (n = 940), we examined characteristics that were associated with current method use. Analyses were conducted on weighted data using SAS-callable SUDAAN (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC). RESULTS: Among women who were 45-50 years old, 77.6% were at risk for unintended pregnancy, which was similar to other age groups. As age increased, hormonal contraceptive use (shots, pills, patch, or ring) decreased, and permanent contraception (tubal ligation or vasectomy) increased as did non-use of contraception. Of women who were 45-50 years old and at risk for unintended pregnancy, 66.9% reported using some contraceptive method; permanent contraception was the leading method reported by 44.0% and contraceptive non-use was reported by 16.8%. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of women who were 45-50 years old were considered to be at risk for unintended pregnancy. Permanent contraception was most commonly used by women in this age group. Compared with other age groups, more women who were 45-50 years old were not using any contraception. Population-based surveillance efforts are needed to follow trends among this age group and better meet their family planning needs. Although expanding surveillance systems to include women through 50 years old requires additional resources, fertility trends that show increasingly delayed childbearing, uncertain end of fecundity, and potential adverse consequences of unplanned pregnancy in older age may justify these expenditures.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Anticonceptiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo no Planeado , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Riesgo , Abstinencia Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Esterilización Tubaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Vasectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
9.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 212(3): 324.e1-8, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25305406

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize age-group specific patterns in the stability of contraceptive use and to evaluate whether factors that are associated with nonuse and sporadic use, compared with stable use, differ by age among women who are at risk for unintended pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth to characterize the prevalence of stable and sporadic contraceptive use and nonuse by age over a 1-year period. We used polytomous logistic regression models to assess the odds of contraceptive nonuse and sporadic use vs stable use. Age-stratified models were used to show age-group differences in associated characteristics. RESULTS: Over a 1-year period, stable contraceptive use decreased across age groups from 80% for teens 15-19 years old to 74% for women 20-24 years old, and 70-71% for women 25-34 and 35-44 years old. Contraceptive nonuse increased across age groups from 5% for teens 15-19 years old to 9-20% for older women. By contrast, sporadic use was least common for women 35-44 years old (10% compared with 16-17% for younger women). Among teens 15-19 years old, a history of method discontinuation because of dissatisfaction was associated with nonuse. Among older women, intentions to have children in the future and reported difficulty achieving pregnancy were associated with nonuse and sporadic use. CONCLUSION: Because the stability of contraceptive use and associated factors differ by age, providers may need to consider these differences when talking to women about contraception. To address nonuse, helping teens identify a method that they are comfortable using may be especially important; for older women, discussing the potential for continuing fertility may be more important. To address sporadic use, discussing the benefits of user-independent methods may be helpful, with a particular emphasis on long-acting reversible contraceptives for younger women and teens who are less likely to have completed their desired childbearing and who have tended to rely on methods that are more difficult to use consistently.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Anticonceptiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticoncepción/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Modelos Logísticos , Embarazo , Embarazo no Planeado , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
10.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 212(2): 171.e1-8, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25093946

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine the associations between prenatal and postpartum contraceptive counseling and postpartum contraceptive use. STUDY DESIGN: The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2004-2008 data were analyzed from Missouri, New York state, and New York City (n = 9536). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the associations between prenatal and postpartum contraceptive counseling and postpartum contraceptive use, defined as any method and more effective methods (sterilization, intrauterine device, or hormonal methods). RESULTS: The majority of women received prenatal (78%) and postpartum (86%) contraceptive counseling; 72% received both. Compared with those who received no counseling, those counseled during 1 time period (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-2.67) and both time periods (AOR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.87-2.89) had significantly increased odds of postpartum use of a more effective contraceptive method (32% vs 49% and 56%, respectively; P for trend < .0001). Results for counseling during both time periods differed by type of health insurance before pregnancy, with greater odds of postpartum use of a more effective method observed for women with no insurance (AOR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.18-5.66) and Medicaid insurance (AOR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.98-7.06) than for those with private insurance (AOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.44-2.43) before pregnancy. Findings were similar for postpartum use of any contraceptive method, except that no differences by insurance status were detected. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of postpartum contraceptive use, including the use of more effective methods, was highest when contraceptive counseling was provided during both prenatal and postpartum time periods. Women with Medicaid or no health insurance before pregnancy benefited the most.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Anticonceptiva , Anticoncepción/estadística & datos numéricos , Consejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Posnatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anticoncepción/métodos , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/uso terapéutico , Dispositivos Anticonceptivos Femeninos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticonceptivos Orales/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Multivariante , Atención Posnatal/métodos , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Esterilización Reproductiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
11.
Breast Cancer Res ; 15(5): R90, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24070170

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The association of breast cancer patients' mortality with estrogen receptor (ER) status (ER + versus ER-) has been well studied. However, little attention has been paid to the relationship between the quantitative measures of ER expression and mortality. METHODS: We evaluated the association between semi-quantitative, immunohistochemical staining of ER in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas and breast cancer-specific mortality risk in an observational cohort of invasive breast cancer in 681 white women and 523 black women ages 35-64 years at first diagnosis of invasive breast cancer, who were followed for a median of 10 years. The quantitative measures of ER examined here included the percentage of tumor cell nuclei positively stained for ER, ER Histo (H)-score, and a score based on an adaptation of an equation presented by Cuzick and colleagues, which combines weighted values of ER H-score, percentage of tumor cell nuclei positively stained for the progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) results. This is referred to as the ER/PR/HER2 score. RESULTS: After controlling for age at diagnosis, race, study site, tumor stage, and histologic grade in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, both percentage of tumor cell nuclei positively stained for ER (Ptrend = 0.0003) and the ER H-score (Ptrend = 0.0004) were inversely associated with breast cancer-specific mortality risk. The ER/PR/HER2 score was positively associated with breast cancer-specific mortality risk in women with ER + tumor (Ptrend = 0.001). Analyses by race revealed that ER positivity was associated with reduced risk of breast cancer-specific mortality in white women and black women. The two quantitative measures for ER alone provided additional discrimination in breast cancer-specific mortality risk only among white women with ER + tumors (both Ptrend ≤ 0.01) while the ER/PR/HER2 score provided additional discrimination for both white women (Ptrend = 0.01) and black women (Ptrend = 0.03) with ER + tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support quantitative immunohistochemical measures of ER, especially the ER/PR/HER2 score, as a more precise predictor for breast cancer-specific mortality risk than a simple determination of ER positivity.


Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Población Blanca , Adulto , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Núcleo Celular/genética , Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de Estrógenos/genética , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo
12.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 225, 2013 May 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23642215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Black women are more likely than white women to have an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that is associated with higher mortality and this may contribute to the observed black-white difference in mortality. However, few studies have investigated the black-white disparity in mortality risk stratified by breast cancer subtype, defined by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. Furthermore, it is not known whether additional consideration of p53 protein status influences black-white differences in mortality risk observed when considering subtypes defined by ER, PR and HER2 status. METHODS: Four biomarkers were assessed by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded breast tumor tissue from 1,204 (523 black, 681 white) women with invasive breast cancer, aged 35-64 years at diagnosis, who accrued a median of 10 years' follow-up. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit to assess subtype-specific black-white differences in mortality risk. RESULTS: No black-white differences in mortality risk were observed for women with triple negative (ER-negative [ER-], PR-, and HER2-) subtype. However, older (50-64 years) black women had greater overall mortality risk than older white women if they had been diagnosed with luminal A (ER-positive [ER+] or PR+ plus HER2-) breast cancer (all-cause hazard ratio, HR, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.18 to 2.99; breast cancer-specific HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.83 to 2.74). This black-white difference among older women was further confined to those with luminal A/p53- tumors (all-cause HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.79; breast cancer-specific HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.93 to 3.86). Tests for homogeneity of race-specific HRs comparing luminal A to triple negative subtype and luminal A/p53- to luminal A/p53+ subtype did not achieve statistical significance, although statistical power was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the subtype-specific black-white difference in mortality risk occurs mainly among older women diagnosed with luminal A/p53- breast cancer, which is most likely treatable. These results further suggest that factors other than subtype may be relatively more important in explaining the increased mortality risk seen in older black women.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/metabolismo , Estados Unidos
13.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 134(2): 801-9, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22648732

RESUMEN

African American (AA) women have a higher mortality from breast cancer (BC) compared to European American (EA) women. This may be due to the higher proportion of AA women with tumors that are diagnosed at more advanced stages and are characterized as being estrogen receptor negative (ER-)/progesterone receptor negative (PR-). Our study sought to determine whether self-reported race and percent African ancestry were associated with BC tumor characteristics. In a multi-center, population-based case-control study of BC, we determined percent African ancestry using ancestry informative markers (AIM) among women self-reporting race as AA or Black. BC tumor characteristics were associated with self-reported race (including a 30 % reduction in ER+/PR+ tumors [95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-0.9] and a 1.5-fold increased risk of high grade [95 % CI: 1.2-1.9] for AA women compared to EA women). AIMs among AA women were not associated with BC tumor characteristics (AA women with ≥95 % versus <80 % African ancestry, odds ratio [OR] = 1.0 for ER+/PR+ [95 % CI: 0.6-1.8] and OR = 0.9 for high-grade tumors [95 % CI: 0.6-1.4]). Similar findings were observed for BC stage. While BC subtypes were associated with self-reported race, BC subtypes were not associated with percent African ancestry. These study results suggest that subtle differences in percent African ancestry are less important than the overall presence of African ancestry in relation to BC tumor characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Población Blanca , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Factores de Riesgo , Autoinforme
14.
Cancer Causes Control ; 23(5): 671-81, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22418777

RESUMEN

Racial differences in breast cancer risk, including the risks of hormone receptor subtypes of breast cancer, have been previously reported. We evaluated whether variation in genes related to estrogen metabolism (COMT, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, CYP17A1, CYP19A1, ESR1, GSTM1, GSTP1, GSTT1, HSD17B1, SULT1A1, and UGT1A1) contributes to breast cancer risk and/or racial differences in risk within the CARE study, a multi-centered, population-based case-control study of breast cancer. Genetic variation was assessed as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), haplotypes, and SNP-hormone therapy (HT) interactions within a subset of 1,644 cases and 1,451 controls, including 949 Black women (493 cases and 456 controls), sampled from the CARE study population. No appreciable associations with breast cancer risk were detected for single SNPs or haplotypes in women overall. We detected SNP-HT interactions in women overall within CYP1B1 (rs1800440; p (het) = 0.003) and within CYP17A1 (rs743572; p (het) = 0.009) in which never users of HT were at a decreased risk of breast cancer, while ever users were at a non-significant increased risk. When investigated among racial groups, we detected evidence of an SNP-HT interaction with CYP1B1 in White women (p value = 0.02) and with CYP17A1 in Black women (p value = 0.04). This analysis suggests that HT use may modify the effect of variation in estrogen-related genes on breast cancer risk, which may affect Black and White women to a different extent.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Estrógenos/genética , Estrógenos/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Población Negra , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Interacción Gen-Ambiente , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Variación Genética , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Factores de Riesgo , Población Blanca
15.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 206(2): 127.e1-7, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21963310

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate US rates of postpartum intrauterine device (IUD) insertion and postpartum tubal sterilization. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the 2001-2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to identify delivery hospitalizations with IUD insertion or tubal sterilization procedure codes. RESULTS: Estimated rates of postpartum IUD insertion and postpartum tubal sterilization were 0.27 and 770.67 per 10,000 deliveries, respectively. Although the rate of IUD insertion was similar across age groups, the rate of tubal sterilization increased with age. Nonetheless, 15% of tubal sterilizations occurred among women who were ≤ 24 years old. IUD insertion was more likely among women who delivered at teaching hospitals (odds ratio, 3.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-6.37); tubal sterilization was more likely among women without private insurance (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.97-2.11). CONCLUSION: Among US postpartum women, IUD insertion occurs considerably less frequently than tubal sterilization, even among younger women for whom poststerilization regret is a concern.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos Intrauterinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Posparto , Esterilización Tubaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
16.
Am J Epidemiol ; 174(11 Suppl): S80-8, 2011 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22135396

RESUMEN

In this article, the authors focus on epidemic-assistance investigations that dealt with maternal and child health problems, including unintended and adolescent pregnancy and family planning; international reproductive health surveys among refugees; pregnancy outcomes, including abortion, maternal mortality, infant mortality, and birth defects; leukemia; and Reye syndrome. During 1946-2005, a total of 1,969 investigations had sufficient data to classify them as possibly related to maternal and child health and were characterized by distinctive periods. Those related to family planning, pregnancy intention, and reproductive health among refugees began in the early 1970s and continued through 2005. Abortion-related investigations occurred during 1971-1982. Investigations of non-abortion-related maternal morbidity and mortality began in 1979 and included 2 international epidemic-assistance investigations. Investigations of clusters of disease among infants began in the 1960s, with a special focus on Reye syndrome during 1964-1984. Investigations of childhood cancer and birth defects began in the late 1950s. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has used the epidemic-assistance investigations mechanism to respond to a wide range of health concerns of women and children. The investigations of abortion-related health problems might have had the best-documented impact on public policy and public health.


Asunto(s)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./historia , Protección a la Infancia/historia , Epidemiología/historia , Mortalidad Materna/historia , Salud Reproductiva/historia , Aborto Inducido , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Lactante , Mortalidad Infantil/historia , Embarazo , Embarazo en Adolescencia , Salud Pública , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
Am J Epidemiol ; 173(1): 38-47, 2011 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21109566

RESUMEN

Removal or impairment of ovaries before menopause may affect a woman's breast cancer risk by altering her cumulative exposure to ovarian hormones. The Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study, a population-based, multicenter case-control study of incident invasive breast cancer, recruited women aged 35-64 years (4,490 cases and 4,611 controls) who provided data on ovariectomy, hysterectomy, and tubal sterilization during in-person interviews. Controls were frequency-matched to cases by age, race, and study site. Unconditional logistic regression analysis was used. Women who had not undergone premenopausal reproductive surgery were the referent group. Bilateral ovariectomy was associated with reduced breast cancer risk overall (odds ratio (OR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50, 0.69) and among women <45 years of age (ORs ranged from 0.31 to 0.52), but not among those who were older at surgery. It was also associated with a reduced risk for estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive tumors (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.75) but not receptor-negative tumors. Hysterectomy with ovarian conservation (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.72, 0.96) and hysterectomy with partial ovary removal (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.91) were also associated with lower risk. No association with breast cancer risk was observed with tubal sterilization only or partial ovariectomy without hysterectomy. Reproductive organ surgeries may alter ovarian hormone levels, thereby affecting breast cancer risk.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Anticoncepción/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Ovariectomía/efectos adversos , Historia Reproductiva , Esterilización Tubaria/efectos adversos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Anticoncepción/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ovariectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Esterilización Tubaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
Rev Endocr Metab Disord ; 12(2): 119-25, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21541854

RESUMEN

Unintended pregnancy remains a considerable problem in the United States, with health risks for both mother and infant. These risks may be increased among women with medical conditions, for whom pregnancy can lead to severe adverse outcomes. Highly effective and safe contraceptive methods are available to prevent unintended pregnancy. However, women with medical conditions and their providers also may be concerned about potential risks associated with contraceptive method use. Evidence-based guidance documents can be helpful tools for clinicians to efficiently use evidence and put risks into perspective. The US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010, provides evidence-based recommendations for the safety of contraceptive use among women with medical conditions and other characteristics. While some contraceptive methods pose risks for some women, these must be considered in context and weighed against such considerations as the absolute risk of adverse events and the risks associated with pregnancy. Most women, even women with medical conditions, can safely use highly effective methods of contraception and promoting their use will further efforts to reduce unintended pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Anticoncepción/efectos adversos , Anticoncepción/métodos , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/efectos adversos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
19.
J Urban Health ; 88(4): 779-92, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21779933

RESUMEN

Although street youth are at increased risk of lifetime pregnancy involvement (LPI), or ever becoming or getting someone pregnant, no reports to date describe the epidemiology of LPI among systematically sampled street youth from multiple cities outside of North America. The purpose of our assessment was to describe the prevalence of and risk factors associated with LPI among street youth from three Ukrainian cities. We used modified time-location sampling to conduct a cross-sectional assessment in Odesa, Kyiv, and Donetsk that included citywide mapping of 91 public venue locations frequented by street youth, random selection of 74 sites, and interviewing all eligible and consenting street youth aged 15-24 years found at sampled sites (n = 929). Characteristics of youth and prevalence of LPI overall and by demographic, social, sexual, and substance use risk factors, were estimated separately for males and females. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were calculated with multivariable logistic regression and effect modification by gender was examined. Most (96.6%) eligible youth consented to participate. LPI was reported for 41.7% of females (93/223) and 23.5% of males (166/706). For females, LPI was significantly elevated and highest (>70%) among those initiating sexual activity at ≤12 years and for those reporting lifetime anal sex and exchanging sex for goods. For males, LPI was significantly elevated and highest (>40%) among those who reported lifetime anal sex and history of a sexually transmitted infection. Overall, risk factors associated with LPI were similar for females and males. Among the total sample (females and males combined), significant independent risk factors with AORs ≥2.5 included female gender, being aged 20-24 years, having five to six total adverse childhood experiences, initiating sex at age ≤12 or 13-14 years, lifetime anal sex, most recent sex act unprotected, and lifetime exchange of sex for goods. Among street youth with LPI (n = 259), the most recent LPI event was reported to be unintended by 63.3% and to have ended in abortion by 43.2%. In conclusion, our assessment documented high rates of LPI among Ukrainian street youth who, given the potential for negative outcomes and the challenges of raising a child on the streets, are in need of community-based pregnancy prevention programs and services. Promising preventive strategies are discussed, which are likely applicable to other urban populations of street-based youth as well.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Embarazo no Planeado , Medición de Riesgo , Asunción de Riesgos , Sexualidad/psicología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Niño , Femenino , Geografía , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Embarazo , Características de la Residencia , Factores de Riesgo , Sexualidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Ucrania , Adulto Joven
20.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 202(6): 541.e1-6, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20132921

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine trends in hospitalizations for gynecologic disorders in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Data on hospitalizations from 1998-2005 among women 15-54 years old were from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a nationally representative survey of inpatient hospitalizations. Hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of a gynecologic disorder were used to estimate rates per 10,000 women. RESULTS: Gynecologic disorders accounted for 7% and 14% of all hospitalizations among women 15-44 and 45-54 years old, respectively. The most common diagnoses were uterine leiomyomas (rate = 27.5), menstrual disorders (rate = 12.3), endometriosis (rate = 9.5), genital prolapse (rate = 7.0), benign ovarian cysts (rate = 6.5), and pelvic inflammatory disease (rate = 6.1). The hospitalization rate for menstrual disorders increased from 9.8 in 1998 to 13.3 in 2005 (P trend < .001). In contrast, rates declined for pelvic inflammatory disease, genital prolapse, benign ovarian cysts, and endometriosis (P trend < .05) and were unchanged for uterine leiomyoma. CONCLUSION: Gynecologic disorders are an important contributor to inpatient hospitalization among women in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/terapia , Hospitalización/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA