Cultural and environmental aspects influence lateral preferences.

Transcultural approaches comparing the distribution of lateral preference between countries focused primarily on handedness. However, other laterality dimensions may also be susceptible to cultural variations. The present study compared lateral preference in five dimensions (hand, foot, trunk, hearing, and visual) of young adults from Brazil and Mozambique. Two hundred and two undergraduate students participated in the study, of which 101 were Brazilian (21.7 ± 1.66 years old) and 101 Mozambican (25.6 ± 6.2 years old). The participants' lateral preference direction and degree were assessed using the global lateral preference inventory. Most Brazilians were classified in the moderate preference category, while Mozambicans had a higher frequency of individuals with strong preferences. Hence, Mozambicans presented a higher lateralization degree for all dimensions. A subsequent analysis considering only preference direction (right, left or indifferent), and not degree, did not show the same outcomes, revealing similarities in preference distribution between the two groups. This finding highlights the necessity to incorporate preference degrees in future analysis to not overlook potential differences. We also conclude lateral preference investigations with transcultural approaches should analyse beyond handedness, as other dimensions can also be modulated by cultural characteristics.

A historical, systematic review of handedness origins.

Handedness ontogenesis is still under debate in science. This systematic review analyzed articles regarding the theories and basis of handedness formation, highlighting the historical knowledge path that this literature underwent. Cochrane Library, LILACS, Web of Sciences, Science Direct and PubMed databases were searched. This review included review studies with handedness as the main topic. Only papers written in English with analyses exclusively in neurotypical humans (any age range) were included. Different approaches (genetic, neural, social, and behavioural) were reviewed in light of growing evidence, summarizing the current state of the art. Genetic and environmental/social impacts are common points in most of the reviews, each given more or less importance, depending on the author and theory proposed. Multifactorial, developmental approaches to handedness formation seem to be the most up to date view of the phenomenon. Different control mechanisms between hemisphere and neural asymmetries are also contributing factors to handedness formation.

Beyond handedness: assessing younger adults and older people lateral preference in six laterality dimensions.

Lateral preference is influenced by many different factors. Although studies that assessed handedness contributed greatly to our understanding of the phenomenon, looking to other dimensions of motor laterality, such as lower limbs, trunk, visual and hearing preference, may be an interesting strategy to further advance in the field. Comparing different age groups with a complete inventory also contributes to understanding the ageing impact on these variables. Our aim, therefore, was to assess six motor laterality dimensions in younger adults and older people. Two hundred subjects participated in this study (102 adults, 30.6 ± 11.2 years old, and 98 elders, 70.4 ± 7.22 years old) and lateral preference was assessed by the Global Lateral Preference Inventory. We verified significant differences between groups in all dimensions, except the visual one, with proportionally stronger right preference in the older group. Compared to other dimensions, higher frequency of ambidexterity was observed in trunk, hearing and visual preference for both groups. These results might indicate that lateral preference is, indeed, multifactorial, being affected by ageing, task complexity and other possible related aspects.

The development of hand, foot, trunk, hearing, and visual lateral preference throughout the lifespan.

This research investigated the developmental process of five lateral preference dimensions (hand, foot, trunk, hearing, and visual preference). A total of 1236 volunteers participated in this study, divided into five age groups: 07-12 (n = 247); 13-17 (n = 234); 18-30 (n = 227); 31-60 (n = 225); and 61-90 years old (n = 303). Lateral preference was assessed via questionnaire with the Global Lateral Preference Inventory. By assessing the degree and direction of lateral preference in different ages, our results revealed a pattern of lateralization strengthening with aging in all the analyzed dimensions. We also verified significant correlation between hand preference and the other dimensions for all age groups, but correlation was stronger in the 7-12 group for all correlation pairs. Our results lead to the suggestion of an underlying general lateralization process in early ages (7-12 years old) followed by specific developmental trajectories of each preference dimension (13 years forward), likely startled by hemisphere and functional specialization related to innate developmental patterns of neural structures and social/environmental influences.

Control of interjoint coordination in the performance of manual circular movements can explain lateral specialization.

Between-arm performance asymmetry can be seen in different arm movements requiring specific interjoint coordination to generate the desired hand trajectory. In the current investigation, we assessed between-arm asymmetry of shoulder-elbow coordination and its stability in the performance of circular movements. Participants were 16 healthy right-handed university students. The task consisted of performing cyclic circular movements with either the dominant right arm or the nondominant left arm at movement frequencies ranging from 40% of maximum to maximum frequency in steps of 15%. Kinematic analysis of shoulder and elbow motions was performed through an optoelectronic system in the three-dimensional space. Results showed that as movement frequency increased circularity of left arm movements diminished, taking an elliptical shape, becoming significantly different from the right arm at higher movement frequencies. Shoulder-elbow coordination was found to be asymmetric between the two arms across movement frequencies, with lower shoulder-elbow angle coefficients and higher relative phase for the left compared to the right arm. Results also revealed greater variability of left arm movements in all variables assessed, an outcome observed from low to high movement frequencies. From these findings, we propose that specialization of the left cerebral hemisphere for motor control resides in its higher capacity to generate appropriate and stable interjoint coordination leading to the planned hand trajectory.

Motor learning and tDCS: A systematic review on the dependency of the stimulation effect on motor task characteristics or tDCS assembly specifications.

TDCS is one of the most commonly used methods among studies with transcranial electrical stimulation and motor skills learning. Differences between study results suggest that the effect of tDCS on motor learning is dependent on the motor task performed or on the tDCS assembly specification used in the learning process. This systematic review aimed to analyze the tDCS effect on motor learning and verify whether this effect is dependent on the task or tDCS assembly specifications. Searches were performed in PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and PsycINFO. Articles were included that analyzed the effect of tDCS on motor learning through pre-practice, post-practice, retention, and/or transfer tests (period ≥24 h). The tDCS was most frequently applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) or the cerebellar cortex (CC) and the majority of studies found significant stimulation effects. Studies that analyzed identical or similar motor tasks show divergent results for the tDCS effect, even when the assembly specifications are the same. The tDCS effect is not dependent on motor task characteristics or tDCS assembly specifications alone but is dependent on the interaction between these factors. This interaction occurs between uni and bimanual tasks with anodal uni and bihemispheric (bilateral) stimulations at M1 or with anodal unihemispheric stimulations (unilateral and centrally) at CC, and between tasks of greater or lesser difficulty with single or multiple tDCS sessions. Movement time seems to be more sensitive than errors to indicate the effects of tDCS on motor learning, and a sufficient amount of motor practice to reach the "learning plateau" also seems to determine the effect of tDCS on motor learning.

Use of accelerometry to investigate standing and dynamic body balance in people with cerebral palsy: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: People with cerebral palsy (CP) often have difficulties related to maintaining body balance in their daily living activities. Accelerometers are low-cost wearable devices with potential use to objectively assess balance. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the main characteristics and findings from protocols used in research aiming to investigate standing or dynamic body balance stability through trunk accelerometry in people with CP? METHOD: We searched in December 2021 seven databases, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Science Direct, Scopus, PEDro, and Lilacs, with descriptors related to cerebral palsy, accelerometer, and balance. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, with a total of 197 evaluated people with CP. These studies were classified as moderate or high methodological quality. We found convergence on the use of the sensor at the lumbar region (L3), with sampling frequency at 100 Hz. For balance assessment, 60 % of the reviewed studies used the 10-m walk test, while the other studies used different walking distances, or the quiet standing test. For data processing, the low-pass filter at 20 Hz has been used predominantly, and the most commonly used variable to evaluate balance stability has been root mean square of trunk acceleration. Children and adolescents with CP had higher acceleration values and greater gait complexity than typically developing children. Individuals with bilateral impairment had greater anteroposterior and mediolateral trunk accelerations than those with unilateral impairment. Trunk acceleration was shown to be sensitive to improvement in gait stability from interventions, and acceleration-based measures have been found to correlate with qualitative balance assessment tools. SIGNIFICANCE: Trunk accelerometry in quiet posture and dynamic tasks was shown to be a valid and sensitive measurement to evaluate balance stability in children and adolescents with CP. It is a small, light, low-cost and easy-to-handle tool that is effective for measuring body balance on different tasks in this population.

How Positional Constraints Affect Footedness in Football: A Notational Analysis of Five Leagues in Europe.

In elite-level soccer, the ability to take shots with both limbs from different positions in the pitch may be key to success. This research aimed to: 1) analyze footedness of elite-football players in European leagues during shooting by computing frequency of right- and left-foot use and accuracy; and 2) investigate whether an athlete's distance from the target (goal, penalty, and outside penalty area) and pitch zone (center, left, or right from the goal) can constrain foot selection during shooting. We analyzed 1826 games from the 2017/18 season, divided between: Spanish LaLiga (380 matches); Italian Serie A (380 matches); English Premier League (380 matches); German Bundesliga (306 matches); and French Ligue 1 (380 matches). Results revealed asymmetrical proportions of foot selection, favoring the preferred foot for right- and left-footed athletes. Frequency of preferred foot selection increased as a function of distance from the target (i.e., the farther the athlete, higher the percentage of preferred foot selection). Shots taken from the left side were more often performed with the right foot and vice-versa, for both left- and right-footed athletes. Interestingly, asymmetries were observed only in foot selection, but not in performance, as success rate did not vary between limbs in any position.

Are the Predictions of the Dynamic Dominance Model of Laterality Applicable to Children?

According to the dynamic dominance model, the left cerebral hemisphere is specialized for the control of intersegmental dynamics and the right hemisphere for impedance control. Our aim was to test predictions from the dynamic dominance model in children by comparing performance between the right (preferred) and left hands in aiming. Three groups were compared: 4-7, 8-11, and 18-38 years old. Results showed higher movement linearity in the performance with the right hand in all age groups (P < .01), while initial directional error and endpoint accuracy were equivalent between hands. These results provided partial support for the dynamic dominance model.

Are the predictions of the dynamic dominance model of laterality applicable to the lower limbs?

Investigation of manual actions has supported the proposition that the right and left cerebral hemispheres have complementary specializations relevant for movement control. To test the extent to which hemisphere specialization affect lower limb control, we compared performance between the legs in two motor tasks. A pedal aiming task was employed to test the notion of left hemisphere specialization for dynamic control, and unipedal balance was employed to test the notion of right hemisphere specialization for impedance control. Evaluation was conducted on young adults, in the contexts of separate (Experiment 1) and integrated (Experiment 2) performance of the probing tasks. Results from the aiming task showed equivalent movement linearity toward the target between the right and left feet across experiments. Analysis of unipedal balance revealed that increased stance stability when supported on the left leg was observed when performing simultaneously the aiming task with the contralateral foot, but not in the context of isolated task performance. These results are inconsistent with the proposition of left hemisphere specialization for dynamic control in the lower limbs, and suggest that specialization of the right hemisphere for impedance control can be observed in balance control when stance is associated with voluntary movements of the contralateral lower limb.

Motor repertoire and gray matter plasticity: Is there a link?

There is a considerable amount of evidence sustaining that aerobic exercise causes positive modifications in gray matter density (GMD), especially in the hippocampus and anterior cingulate cortex. However, recent experimental researches with motor learning paradigms are consistently showing that increasing cardiorespiratory capacity is not the only mechanism able to promote positive outcomes in GMD with exercise. In the present study, we present a theoretical suggestion that expanding one's motor repertoire is another primary mechanism related to the increases in GMD. Motor repertoire can be understood as the number of movement possibilities and motor skills that can be performed by a person. Supporting our suggestion, professional athletes present higher GMD than controls, and experimental protocols repeatedly observes positive changes in GMD following motor learning. The relationship between physical inactivity, amputation, and lower GMD values also gives further support for the hypothesis. Follow-up studies monitoring GMD before and after training programs that stimulate new motor skill learning are essential to confirm this proposition. The brain regions related to sensory processing of the motor tasks and the cortical areas related to motor control (e.g., primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area) are probably the ones most affected by plastic changes. If the hypothesis turns out to be reliable, dancing, gymnastics, and other movement-rich activities are thoroughly encouraged for this purpose. Therefore, this approach might be used to attenuate GMD loss related to aging or another condition, such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's.

Changing handedness: What can we learn from preference shift studies?

Handedness is a dynamic and complex aspect of human behavior. Changing it through practice, either willingly or obliged by some reason, requires a considerable amount of effort. Analyzing studies that presented handedness shifts may expand our comprehension of this phenomenon, since knowing how to change it might provide insights into how it develops. Therefore, we reviewed the outcomes of handedness shifts. The results suggest that neural asymmetries related to handedness are likely a consequence of lateralized practice since they correlate with modifications in the behavioral patterns. Clearly, practice is not the only factor influencing handedness development, but it seems to play a significant role in the formation and consolidation of neural and behavioral asymmetries. Another key finding of our review is the suggestion of a ceiling effect for the capacity to change handedness direction and degree, considering none of the reviewed studies reported complete shifts in behavioral measures and brain activation patterns.

Efeito da potencialização pós-ativação no torque isométrico do tríceps braquial em adultos / Effect of postactivation potentiation on isometric torque of the brachii triceps in adults

Objetivo: Analisar o efeito de contrações voluntárias isométricas máximas e da eletroestimulação no torque isométrico e na ativação muscular do tríceps braquial em adultos fisicamente ativos. Métodos: Dezenove homens foram submetidos a testes de força isométrica (FI) como pré-teste, por meio de contração voluntária isométrica máxima durante 10 segundos e atividades condicionantes (ACs) randomizadas: isometrias durante 7, 10 e 12 segundos e eletroestimulação em 70 e 120Hz por 10 segundos cada. Após as ACs, foram realizadas duas contrações voluntárias isométricas máximas de 10 segundos com intervalo de 4 e 8 minutos, respectivamente. A atividade elétrica do tríceps braquial (porções medial e lateral) foi registrada. Resultados: Não foi verificado efeito em nenhuma das condições para o torque máximo ou médio, bem como para atividade elétrica do tríceps braquial (P>0,05). Conclusão: O intervalo adotado entre as ACs e o teste de FI não foi suficiente para induzir a melhoria do torque isométrico. (AU)

Objective: To analyze the effect of maximal voluntary isometric contractions and of electroestimulation on isometric torque and muscle activation of the brachii triceps in physically active adult males. Methods: Nineteen men underwent isometric force tests as pre-test, through 10-second long maximal voluntary isometric contractions and conditioning activities randomized: isometric contraction during 7, 10 and 12 seconds and electric stimulation in 70 and 120 Hz for 10 seconds each. After the conditioning activities, two voluntary isometric contractions were performed for 10 seconds with interval of 4 and 8 minutes, respectively. The muscle electrical activity of brachii triceps (medial and lateral portion's) was measured. Results: It was not verified effect in any conditions to maximal or mean torque (P>0.05), likewise to muscle electrical activity of brachii triceps (P>0.05). Conclusion: The interval adopted among the conditioning activities and the isometric force test was not enough to induce the isometric torque improvement. (AU)