Non-inferiority analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous 300 mg monthly natalizumab administration: A post hoc analysis of the REFINE study.

To quantify the probability that monthly intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) natalizumab (NTZ) had similar efficacy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), non-inferiority of efficacy of NTZ-SC versus NTZ-IV on combined MRI unique active lesions number (CUAL) was explored re-analysing the REFINE data set. Non-inferiority margins were selected equal to 25%/33%/50% fractions of the effect size of NTZ-IV versus placebo observed in the AFFIRM study. Ninety-nine RRMS were included. NTZ-SC resulted not inferior to NTZ-IV on CUAL for all margins at 2.5% significance level, and, in worst-case scenario, its effect over NTZ-IV did not exceed 3.5% (or 2.8%) of the effect of NTZ-IV versus placebo.

Exploring the therapeutic potential of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in progressive multiple sclerosis-a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to determine the value of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) as a therapeutic intervention for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) based on a systematic review of the current literature. METHODS: All studies from the databases PubMed and Google Scholar published in English before February 2024 which provided individual data for PMS patients were systematically reviewed. PICO was defined as population (P), primary progressive MS and secondary progressive MS patients; intervention (I), treatment with aHSCT; comparison (C), none, disease-modifying therapy treated/relapsing-remitting MS cohorts if available; outcome (O), transplant-related mortality, progression-free survival (PFS) and no evidence of disease activity. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies met the criteria including 665 patients with PMS (74 primary progressive MS, 591 secondary progressive MS) and 801 patients with relapsing-remitting MS as controls. PFS data were available for 647 patients. PMS patients showed more severe disability at baseline than relapsing-remitting MS patients. The average transplant-related mortality for PMS in 10 studies was 1.9%, with 10 deaths in 528 patients. PFS ranged from 0% to 78% in PMS groups 5 years after treatment initiation, demonstrating a high variability. No evidence of disease activity scores at 5 years ranged from 0% to 75%. CONCLUSION: Based on the available data, aHSCT does not halt progression in people with PMS. However, there appears to be evidence of improved outcome in selected patients. Due to the heterogeneity of the available data, more comprehensive clinical trials assessing the efficacy of aHSCT across different patient groups are urgently needed to reduce variability and improve patient stratification.

Cost and effectiveness of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a highly effective one-off treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS), potentially representing an optimal front-loading strategy for costs. OBJECTIVE: Exploring cost/effectiveness of AHSCT and high-efficacy disease-modifying treatments (HE-DMTs) in RR-MS, estimating costs at our centre in Italy, where National Health Service (NHS) provides universal health coverage. METHODS: Costs (including drugs, inpatient/outpatient management) for treatment with AHSCT and HE-DMTs were calculated as NHS expenditures over 2- and 5-year periods. Cost-effectiveness for each treatment was estimated as "cost needed to treat" (CNT), i.e. expense to prevent relapses, progression, or disease activity (NEDA) in one patient over n-years, retrieving outcomes from published studies. RESULTS: Costs of AHSCT and HE-DMTs were similar over 2 years, whereas AHSCT was cheaper than most HE-DMTs over 5 years (€46 600 vs €93 800, respectively). When estimating cost-effectiveness of treatments, over 2 years, mean CNT of HE-DMTs for NEDA was twofold that of AHSCT, whereas it was similar for relapses and disability. Differences in CNT were remarkable over 5 years, especially for NEDA, being mean CNT of HE-DMTs €382 800 vs €74 900 for AHSCT. CONCLUSIONS: AHSCT may be highly cost-effective in selected aggressive RR-MS. Besides priceless benefits for treated individuals, cost-savings generated by AHSCT may contribute to improving healthcare assistance at a population level.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on disease activity in multiple sclerosis patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is still debated whether the COVID-19 pandemic affected disease activity in people with autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study, therefore, was to explore the impact of COVID-19 in people with MS (pwMS) not receiving continuative disease-modifying therapy (DMT) after previous treatment with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included pwMS treated with AHSCT who were in disease remission without receiving DMTs during the pandemic and who were followed up at our centre during the study period. Data on SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination were recorded, with details of adverse events and clinical-radiological disease activity. RESULTS: A total of 36 pwMS (31 females; 86%) were included, of whom 23 (64%) had relapsing-remitting (RR-MS) and 13 had secondary progressive MS (SP-MS). Thirty-three pwMS (92%) received anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. Thirteen patients (36%) developed mild to moderate COVID-19 a median (range) of 58 (4-224) months after AHSCT; seven (54%) of these patients were not yet vaccinated. Transient neurological symptoms after vaccination or infection were reported in 9% and 36% of the patients, respectively. The rate of new inflammatory events (relapses or asymptomatic magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] activity) after AHSCT increased from 0.006 (one asymptomatic new lesion/159 patient-years) before the pandemic to 0.083 (five relapses plus two cases of asymptomatic MRI activity/84 patient-years) since the pandemic start (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: People with MS with a history of highly active disease, who are untreated or receiving moderate-efficacy DMTs might be more vulnerable to disease reactivation, possibly elicited by exogenous triggers. Careful monitoring and further investigation are warranted to ascertain whether special precautions are needed in these cases.

Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: Recent Advances.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is increasingly considered a treatment option for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), an autoimmune demyelinating and degenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS). AHSCT persistently suppresses inflammation and improves the disease course in large proportions of patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) MS. Aim of this article is to review the relevant new knowledge published during the last 3 years. RECENT FINDINGS: Laboratory studies reported confirmatory and new insights into the immunological and biomarker effects of AHSCT. Retrospective clinical studies confirmed excellent outcomes in RRMS, showing possible superior effectiveness over standard therapies and suggesting a possible benefit in early secondary progressive (SP) MS with inflammatory features. New data on risks of infertility and secondary autoimmunity were also reported. Further evidence on the high effectiveness and acceptable safety of AHSCT strengthens its position as a clinical option for aggressive RRMS. Further research is needed to better define its role in treatment-naïve and progressive forms of MS, ideally within randomised clinical trials (RCTs).

Safety and tolerability of SARS-Cov-2 vaccination in patients with myasthenia gravis: A multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, myasthenia gravis (MG) patients have been identified as subjects at high risk of developing severe COVID-19, and thus were offered vaccination with priority. The lack of direct data on the safety and tolerability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in MG have contributed to vaccine hesitancy. To address this issue, the safety and tolerability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were assessed in a large cohort of MG patients from two referral centers. METHODS: Patients with confirmed MG diagnosis, consecutively seen between October and December 2021 at two MG centers, were enrolled. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and information regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection/vaccination were extracted from medical reports and/or collected throughout telephonic or in-person interviews. RESULTS: Ninety-eight (94.2%) of 104 patients included were administered at least two vaccine doses 4 weeks before the interview or earlier, and among them, 63 of 98 (64.2%) have already received the "booster" dose. The most frequently used vaccines were BNT162b2-Pfizer-BioNTech and mRNA-1273-Moderna. Overall, only minor side effects were reported, most commonly local pain and fever. MG worsening after vaccination was observed in eight of 104 (7.7%) cases. The frequency of worsening among muscle-specific tyrosine kinase MG cases (3/9, 33.3%) was significantly higher compared to other serological subgroups. Spontaneous symptom regression was observed in six of eight cases. Twelve of 104 (11.5%) patients had SARS-CoV-2 infection, and none of the SARS-CoV-2-infected MG patients worsened after vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the safety and tolerability of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, which should be strongly recommended in MG patients, who could be at higher risk of complications if exposed to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus low-dose immunosuppression in secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Effectiveness of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) is well known, but in secondary-progressive (SP)-MS it is still controversial. Therefore, AHSCT activity was evaluated in SP-MS using low-dose immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide (Cy) as a comparative treatment. METHODS: In this retrospective monocentric 1:2 matched study, SP-MS patients were treated with intermediate-intensity AHSCT (cases) or intravenous pulses of Cy (controls) at a single academic centre in Florence. Controls were selected according to baseline characteristics adopting cardinality matching after trimming on the estimated propensity score. Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses were used to estimate survival free from relapses (R-FS), survival free from disability progression (P-FS), and no evidence of disease activity 2 (NEDA-2). RESULTS: A total of 93 SP-MS patients were included: 31 AHSCT, 62 Cy. Mean follow-up was 99 months in the AHSCT group and 91 months in the Cy group. R-FS was higher in AHSCT compared to Cy patients: at Year 5, 100% versus 52%, respectively (p < 0.0001). P-FS did not differ between the groups (at Year 5: 70% in AHSCT and 81% in Cy, p = 0.572), nor did NEDA-2 (p = 0.379). A sensitivity analysis including only the 31 "best-matched" controls confirmed these results. Three neoplasms (2 Cy, 1 AHSCT) and two fatalities (2 Cy) occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides Class III evidence, in SP-MS, on the superior effectiveness of AHSCT compared to Cy on relapse activity, without differences on disability accrual. Although the suppression of relapses was observed in the AHSCT group only, AHSCT did not show advantages over Cy on disability, suggesting that in SP-MS disability progression becomes based more on noninflammatory neurodegeneration than on inflammation.

Impact of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation on disability and brain atrophy in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is a valuable option in aggressive relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), but its efficacy in secondary progressive (SP)-MS is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: Assessing efficacy of aHSCT in SP-MS by clinical-radiological outcomes. METHODS: Open-label monocentric retrospective study enrolling consecutive SP-MS patients treated with BEAM-aHSCT in the period 1999-2016. RESULTS: In total, 26 SP-MS patients with moderate-severe disability were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) at years 5 and 10 after aHSCT were, respectively, 42% and 30%. Out of 16 patients who worsened, only 6 patients (23% overall) maintained continuous disability accrual (CDA), whereas 10 patients stabilized following one single-step Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening. CDA-free survival was 74% at 5-10 years. No relapses or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity were reported, thus no evidence of disease activity (NEDA)-3 corresponded to PFS. Annualized rate of brain atrophy (AR-BVL) normalized after 1 year in 55% of the cases analysed (12/22). CONCLUSION: BEAM-aHSCT halted CDA and normalized AR-BVL in most of the treated patients, inducing long-term remission of inflammatory activity at a median follow-up of 99 months (range 27-222). These data suggest that CDA might still be mainly driven by inflammation in a subgroup of SP-MS and could therefore be reversed by treatments. CDA should be analysed independently from any isolated disability worsening.

Prevalence of disability improvement as a potential outcome for multiple sclerosis trials.

BACKGROUND: The concept of improvement of disability recently emerged as a new target in multiple sclerosis (MS) studies since the approval of new potent drugs and for testing drugs for neuroprotection and repair. OBJECTIVE: To propose a simple estimator for assessing and comparing the prevalence of improvement over time between groups. METHODS: The prevalence of a transient condition takes into account the incidence and the duration of such condition. We propose here the application of a modified Kaplan-Meier estimator to evaluate and compare between groups the prevalence of improvement over time in a cohort of 121 patients treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. RESULTS: The prevalence of improvement after 5 years from transplant was 50.3% (95%CI: [38.0-63.0]) in relapsing-remitting patients and 6.5% (95%CI: [0-17.8]) in secondary-progressive patients (p < 0.001). Such a difference wouldn't be evident considering the traditional cumulative probability of improvement at 5 years (55.5% in relapsing-remitting vs 33.4% in secondary-progressive patients, p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: This study shows the relevance of a new estimator of prevalence of improvement in MS. This estimator gives simple information on whether a drug can induce a durable improvement in disability and can be considered a potential outcome for trials assessing drugs for neuroprotection or repair.

The role of chemotherapy in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune disorders: From lymphoablative to myeloablative conditioning protocols.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a medical procedure used mainly for the treatment of onco-hematologic disorders. Over the last two decades, autologous HSCT has been explored for the treatment of neurologic autoimmune diseases (ADs), being multiple sclerosis (MS) the most frequent indication in this setting. HSCT is characterized by the sequential administration of a conditioning regimen (CR) and the infusion of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), previously collected either by the individual himself in the autologous transplant (AHSCT), or by a healthy donor in allogeneic HSCT. CR consists of the administration of high-dose chemotherapy and/or total body irradiation (TBI), that in ADs is usually associated with an immunodepleting serotherapy, either by an animal-derived polyclonal serum or a monoclonal antibody (MoAb), to induce intense immunosuppression. CRs are classified according to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) guidelines for HSCT in ADs in three grades of intensity according to the degrees of depletion of the hemato-lymphopoietic system induced. In the present chapter, after a brief overview of mobilization and CR adopted in the neurologic autoimmune setting, the role of chemotherapy in HSCT will be discussed, providing a historical perspective on the use of different regimens and summarizing the available evidence on potential associations between CR and outcomes.

Immune cell reconstitution following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a multistep procedure aimed at eradicating the immune system and replacing it with a new one reconstituted from hematopoietic stem cells which in autologous HSCT (AHSCT) have previously been harvested from the same individual. Over the last two decades, AHSCT has been developed as a treatment option for people affected by aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS), and it exerts a long-standing effect on new inflammation-driven disease activity. The rationale for the use of AHSCT in MS will be discussed, starting from the first observations on experimental models. The mechanisms and kinetics of repopulation (i.e., quantitative recovery) and reconstitution (i.e., qualitative changes) of the immune cell populations will be explored, focusing on immune reconstitution of the T and B cells compartments and briefly covering changes in the innate immune system. Finally, potential immunologic markers of response to treatment will be reviewed. Insights into the supposed mechanism(s) of action of AHSCT will be provided, discussing the leading hypothesis of the "rebuilding" of a newly tolerant immune system, and examining the apparent paradox of the long-standing control of disease activity despite a relatively short-term immunosuppressive effect of the procedure.

Successful switch to ofatumumab after liver injury associated with ocrelizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis: a case report.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a potential adverse event of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), as well as of methylprednisolone pulsed therapy used in case of MS relapse. DILI may be induced by different mechanisms, including idiosyncratic reaction, autoimmune hepatitis or viral reactivation. In patients receiving the humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) ocrelizumab, DILI has been rarely reported and was mostly associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. Here we present the case of a woman with highly active relapsing-remitting MS who had experienced two episodes of DILI while receiving different DMTs, and was successfully switched to ofatumumab, a fully human anti-CD20 mAb, after a further event associated with ocrelizumab treatment and unrelated to HBV reactivation. Despite sharing the mechanism of action, differences in structure, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, and use of ancillary drugs (only needed for ocrelizumab) may have accounted for the successful switch. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a successful switch from ocrelizumab to ofatumumab due to DILI. Ofatumumab may therefore represent a valid therapeutic option for patients experiencing DMTs- and ocrelizumab-induced liver injury, providing that HBV reactivation has been ruled out.

Spinal cord size as promising biomarker of disability outcomes after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers predictive of disability outcomes in individual multiple sclerosis (MS) patients undergoing autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) are currently lacking. As correlations between spinal cord atrophy and clinical disability in MS were previously described, in this study spinal cord size was investigated in MS patients treated with AHSCT, exploring whether baseline spinal cord volume may predict disability progression after AHSCT. METHODS: relapsing-remitting (RR-) and secondary-progressive (SP-) MS patients treated with AHSCT (BEAM/ATG regimen) at a single academic centre in Florence, who performed at least two standardized brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) scans (acquired between one-year pre-AHSCT to 5 years after AHSCT) were included. Cervical spinal cord atrophy was estimated as upper cervical spinal cord cross-sectional area (SCCSA). Brain volume loss (BVL) was analysed at the same timepoints. RESULTS: Eleven (8 RR-; 3 SP-) MS patients were included. Over a median follow-up of 66 (range 37 - 100) months, no relapses nor brain MRI activity were observed; disability progressed in 2 cases (both SP-MS). Baseline SCCSA was associated with EDSS change between pre- and one-year post-AHSCT. Compared to patients who stabilized, patients who progressed after AHSCT tended to have lower SCCSA at C4 level at baseline and year 1 after AHSCT. Longitudinal changes in SCCSA or BVL did not correlate with EDSS change. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline pre-AHSCT SCCSA, but not its longitudinal changes nor BVL, predicted EDSS change within the two years following AHSCT. SCCSA may represent a biomarker of treatment response and a promising screening tool for assessing patient eligibility for high-impact treatments such as AHSCT.

Leptomeningeal enhancement in multiple sclerosis: a focus on patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Background: Leptomeningeal enhancement (LME) is considered an MRI marker of leptomeningeal inflammation in inflammatory neurological disorders, including multiple sclerosis (MS). To our knowledge, no disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been demonstrated to affect LME number or morphology so far. Methods: Monocentric study investigating the frequency and number of LME in a cohort of people with (pw)MS who performed a 3 T brain MRI with a standardized protocol (including a post-contrast FLAIR sequence), and exploring the impact of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) on this marker. In a longitudinal pilot study, consecutive MRIs were also analyzed in a subgroup of pwMS, including patients evaluated both pre- and post-AHSCT. Results: Fifty-five pwMS were included: 24/55 (44%) had received AHSCT (AHSCT group) and 31 other treatments (CTRL group). At least one LME was identified in 19/55 (35%) cases (42 and 29% in the AHSCT and CTRL groups, respectively; p = 0.405). In the AHSCT group, LME number correlated with age at AHSCT (R = 0.50; p = 0.014), but not with age at post-treatment MRI. In the longitudinal pilot study (n = 8), one LME disappeared following AHSCT in 1/4 patients, whereas LME number was unchanged in the remaining four pwMS from the CTRL group. Discussion: These results suggest that AHSCT may affect development and persistence of LME, strengthening the indication for early use of effective therapies bioavailable within the central nervous system (CNS), and therefore potentially targeting compartmentalized inflammation.

Disease Modifying Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis: New Rays of Hope to Combat Disability?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most prevalent chronic autoimmune inflammatory- demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system (CNS). It usually begins in young adulthood, mainly between the second and fourth decades of life. Usually, the clinical course is characterized by the involvement of multiple CNS functional systems and by different, often overlapping phenotypes. In the last decades, remarkable results have been achieved in the treatment of MS, particularly in the relapsing- remitting (RRMS) form, thus improving the long-term outcome for many patients. As deeper knowledge of MS pathogenesis and respective molecular targets keeps growing, nowadays, several lines of disease-modifying treatments (DMT) are available, an impressive change compared to the relative poverty of options available in the past. Current MS management by DMTs is aimed at reducing relapse frequency, ameliorating symptoms, and preventing clinical disability and progression. Notwithstanding the relevant increase in pharmacological options for the management of RRMS, research is now increasingly pointing to identify new molecules with high efficacy, particularly in progressive forms. Hence, future efforts should be concentrated on achieving a more extensive, if not exhaustive, understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying this phase of the disease in order to characterize novel molecules for therapeutic intervention. The purpose of this review is to provide a compact overview of the numerous currently approved treatments and future innovative approaches, including neuroprotective treatments as anti-LINGO-1 monoclonal antibody and cell therapies, for effective and safe management of MS, potentially leading to a cure for this disease.

Should autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation be offered as a first-line disease modifying therapy to patients with multiple sclerosis?

In multiple sclerosis (MS), progression independent of new focal inflammation may commence shortly after disease onset, and it is increasingly revealed that the risk of disability accrual is reduced by early use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (HE-DMTs). People with aggressive MS may therefore benefit from early treatment with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), a procedure inducing maximal immunosuppression followed by immune reconstitution, demonstrated to be superior to DMTs in one randomized clinical trial. However, in current practice prior failure to HE-DMTs is typically required to establish the indication for AHSCT. In the present article, the available evidence on the potential role of AHSCT as first-line treatment in aggressive MS and the rationale for its early use will be summarized. Proposed definitions of aggressive MS that could help identifying MS patients eligible for early treatment with AHSCT will also be discussed.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Autoimmune Neurological Diseases: An Update.

Over the last two decades, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been explored as a potential therapeutic strategy for autoimmune diseases refractory to conventional treatments, including neurological disorders. Although both autologous (AHSCT) and allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) were investigated, AHSCT was preferentially developed due to a more favourable safety profile compared to allo-HSCT. Multiple sclerosis (MS) represents the most frequent neurological indication for AHSCT, but increasing evidence on the potential effectiveness of transplant in other autoimmune neurological diseases is emerging, although with a risk-benefit ratio overall more uncertain than in MS. In the present work, the rationale for the use of HSCT in neurological diseases and the experimental models that prompted its clinical application will be briefly covered. Case series and prospective studies exploring the use of HSCT in autoimmune diseases other than MS will be discussed, covering both frequent and rare neurological disorders such as myasthenia gravis, myopathies, and stiff-person syndrome. Finally, an updated summary of ongoing and future studies focusing on this issue will be provided.

Case report: 3D intracranial vessel wall MRI in Susac syndrome: potential relevance for diagnosis and therapeutic management.

Background: Susac syndrome (SS) is a rare immune-mediated vasculitis affecting retina, inner ear and brain. Assessment of central nervous system (CNS) involvement is currently based on standard brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. Accuracy of three dimensional (3D)-vessel wall imaging (VWI) was compared to standard sequences and contrast-enhanced-3D T2-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (CE-FLAIR) to assess CNS disease activity in two cases of definite SS. Methods: Brain MRI scan and retinal fluorescein angiogram (RFA) were performed at disease onset and at 1, 3, and 6 months after induction therapy start. CE-FLAIR and VWI based on 3D black-blood proton density weighted (PDW) with and without gadolinium were added to standard sequences on a 3 Tesla MRI scanner. Results: Contrast enhanced-VWI (CE-VWI) detected an abnormal diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement (LME) in both cases at onset and during follow-up. Pathological enhancement on CE-VWI persisted at 6-month brain MRI, despite absence of new lesions and disappearance of LME on CE-FLAIR. Follow-up RFA revealed new arterial wall hyperfluorescence in both cases. Conclusions: VWI may represent a useful tool for diagnosing and monitoring CNS disease activity in SS patients, as confirmed by concordance with RFA, leading treatment's choice and timing. Moreover, CE-VWI seemed at least as sensitive as CE-FLAIR in detecting LME, possibly being superior to the latter in posterior fossa. LME remission might be not accurate in predicting suppression of CNS inflammation in SS.

Safety and effectiveness of the booster dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in people with multiple sclerosis: A monocentric experience.

BACKGROUND: Long-term data on the effectiveness and safety of the booster dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in people affected by multiple sclerosis (pwMS) are lacking, hence a retrospective monocentric study exploring these issues was undertaken. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PwMS who had received the booster dose of anti-COVID19 mRNA vaccines (either Comirnaty or Spikevax) according to the national regulation were included. The occurrence of adverse events or disease reactivation and SARS-CoV-2 infection were recorded up to last follow-up. Factors predictive of COVID-19 were explored using logistic regression analyses. A two-tailed p-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen pwMS were included: 80 females (70%); median age at the booster dose 42 years (range 21 - 73); 106/114 patients (93%) were receiving a disease-modifying treatment at vaccination. The median follow-up after the booster dose was 6 (range 2 - 7) months. Adverse events were experienced in 58% of the patients, being mild to moderate in most cases; 4 reactivations of MS were observed, two of which occurring within 4 weeks after the booster. SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in 24/114 (21%) cases, occurring a median of 74 days (5-162) after the booster dose and requiring hospitalisation in 2 patients. Six cases received direct antiviral drugs. Age at vaccination and time between the primary vaccination cycle and the booster dose were independently and inversely associated with the risk of COVID-19 (HR 0.95 and 0.98, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of the booster dose in pwMS showed an overall good safety profile and protected 79% of the patients from SARS-CoV-2 infection. The observed association between the risk of infection after the booster dose and both younger age at vaccination and shorter interval period to the booster dose suggest that unobserved confounders, possibly including behavioural and social factors, play a relevant role in determining the individual propensity to get infected with COVID-19.