Changing the culture around hospital-based nutrition.

Following a serious incident and inquest after the death of a patient due to choking at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, the Trust put in place an action plan and implemented strategies to reduce the risk of recurrence. Four key actions were identified as essential to try to reduce the risk of a similar event: introduction of a standard operating procedure for mealtimes that included a pre-meal safety 'pause'; use of an electronic communication icon to indicate modified diet/fluid requirements, from emergency department and onward as a patient is transferred; job-specific mealtime safety training; and use of bedside posters with specific dietary requirements (in line with the International Dysphagia Diet Standards Initiative Framework). A new role of Lead Educator for Nutrition was introduced to support the changes and provide training. Changes were also made to the incident reporting system to ensure easy identification of events relating to dysphagia, so that these could be monitored, themes identified and lessons shared. A series of audits following the changes have shown that more staff across disciplines and teams have accessed training on nutrition and hydration practices, wards have increased the use of the icon and posters, and successfully implemented pre-meal safety pauses. The Lead Educator for Nutrition has helped embed learning, and increased awareness and knowledge about nutrition and hydration.

Reappraising 21 years of the WHI study: Putting the findings in context for clinical practice.

Menopausal hormone treatment (MHT) is recommended for the management of menopause symptoms. The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) placebo-controlled randomised study examined the effects of continuous combined or estrogen-only MHT on the risk of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in post-menopausal women. The study was terminated prematurely after an interim analysis showed an increased risk of breast cancer diagnosis, which led to a rapid decrease in MHT use worldwide. Subsequently, limitations of the study design and its interpretation in the context of other clinical studies has contributed to a more nuanced appreciation of the risk-benefit profile of differing MHT regimens regarding risk associated with the class of progestogen prescribed, its pattern of prescription, duration of use and timing of initiation related to menopause onset. This review provides a contextual interpretation of the WHI placebo-controlled study and evaluates the impact of bioidentical MHT, with a focus on combined therapies containing micronised progesterone, on the risk of chronic NCDs in post-menopausal women.

An evaluation of menopause service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the experience of remote outpatient menopause service delivery by clinicians and patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Two surveys explored the experiences of patients and clinicians separately. Patients attending menopause clinics in the UK were directed to an online survey which included questions on demographics and on their experience of their most recent appointment. A clinician survey was shared to members of the British Menopause Society (BMS) via email and was made available on the BMS website. It contained questions on clinic characteristics and clinicians' experience of delivering remote menopause consultations. Surveys were available for completion between 01/12/2020 and 10/02/2021. RESULTS: Of 180 patients who completed the patient survey, 52% felt remote consultations were the same or better than face-to-face consultations, and 90% of patients felt a choice between remote and face-to-face consultations should be offered. Patients overall were satisfied with many aspects of care, though numerous problems were highlighted with appointment administration. Of 76 clinicians who completed the clinician survey, most found remote patient consultations either no different or a bit worse than face-to face consultations but found that they offered more flexibility. In some cases, significant rescheduling was necessary to accommodate for the clinical needs of the consultation. CONCLUSION: A 'one-size-fits-all' approach to managing the delivery of menopause care is not supported by patients or clinicians. There must be a robust process in place to avoid problems with appointment scheduling and associated communications. Lessons learned from the pandemic can help to provide holistic menopause care.

The British menopause society consensus statement on the management of estrogen deficiency symptoms, arthralgia and menopause diagnosis in women with treated for early breast cancer.

This guidance document by the British Menopause Society provides an overview of the management of women experiencing estrogen deficiency symptoms and arthralgia following a breast cancer diagnosis. It is now recommended breast cancer patients are referred to health care professionals with an expertise in menopause for management of such symptoms, which in turn often involves liaison with patients' breast cancer teams.1 However, as many women initially present to primary health care professionals for advice, this statement is aimed to support the latter in such consultations by providing information about symptom aetiology, current management strategies and controversies and identifying useful practice points. This is an updated version of the 2018 consensus statement prepared by Miss Jo Marsden Consultant Breast Surgeon, King's College Hospital, London, (retired), Mr Mike Marsh, Consultant Gynae-endocrinologist, King's College Hospital, London, Dr Anne Rigg, Consultant Medical Oncologist, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London.

Cancer-related fatigue and functional impairment - Towards an understanding of cognitive and behavioural factors.

OBJECTIVE: Fatigue is a highly prevalent and debilitating problem in women with breast cancer. This study investigated the cognitive, behavioural, interpersonal and affective responses associated with fatigue and functional impairment for women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. A nested prospective study examined factors predictive of cancer-related fatigue after three cycles of chemotherapy. METHOD: 159 women with breast cancer who were about to begin or undergoing chemotherapy completed a range of measures. Correlational and multiple regression analyses explored associations between fatigue severity, functioning and a range of psychological, behavioural, demographic and clinical variables. Forty-two patients were followed-up prospectively to examine the relationship between psychosocial variables, fatigue and functioning after three cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A range of cognitive, behavioural and affective variables were associated with increased fatigue severity and poorer functioning. Key cognitive and behavioural correlates included, all-or-nothing behaviour, avoidance behaviour, cancer-related catastrophising and critical/punishing responses from others. For the women in the nested prospective study, fatigue significantly increased after three cycles of chemotherapy. Increased fatigue was predicted by increased anxiety before starting chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural factors and cancer-specific cognitions make important contributions to cancer-related fatigue and associated impairments. Such factors are potentially amenable to change within the context of cognitive behavioural therapy.

British Menopause Society consensus statement: The risks and benefits of HRT before and after a breast cancer diagnosis.

In women at population risk of breast cancer (i.e. most), short-term exposure to hormone replacement therapy (i.e. up to five years' use) for symptom relief exceeds its potential harms, including the associated, increased risk of breast cancer diagnosis. Many women and health care professionals, however, consider this to be unacceptably high, although the degree of risk conferred appears equivalent to, or less than that of, other lifestyle risk factors for this condition. In contrast, it is recommended that symptomatic women at high baseline risk due to a family history or a biopsy-confirmed high-risk benign breast condition and those with previous breast cancer should be managed initially with lifestyle changes and non-hormonal alternatives. In a minority, whose symptoms are refractory, hormone replacement therapy and or topical estrogen can be considered but prescription should only take place after a discussion between the patient, her primary health care and breast specialist teams.

British Menopause Society consensus statement on the management of estrogen deficiency symptoms, arthralgia and menopause diagnosis in women treated for early breast cancer.

This guidance document by the British Menopause Society provides an overview of the management of women experiencing estrogen deficiency symptoms and arthralgia following a breast cancer diagnosis. It is now recommended that breast cancer patients are referred to health care professionals with an expertise in menopause for the management of such symptoms, which in turn often involves liaison with patients' breast cancer teams. However, as many women initially present to primary health care professionals for advice, this statement is aimed to support the latter in such consultations by providing information about symptom aetiology, current management strategies and controversies and identifying useful practice points.

Hormonal contraception and breast cancer, what more do we need to know?

Most women use hormonal contraception for more than 30 years and for many, this may involve exposure in their older reproductive years when baseline breast cancer risk rises steeply. Overall, the risk of breast cancer diagnosis with exposure to hormonal contraception is very small and outweighed by its contraceptive benefits but despite this, there are still outstanding questions for all methods used in clinical practice due to paucity of available evidence, lack of which should not be taken to imply safety. This is exemplified by the following assumptions: the progestogen-only pill and long-acting reversible contraceptives are 'breast-safe' options in peri-menopausal women, use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system for the management of endometrial pathology in breast cancer survivors is less likely to promote disease recurrence and the benefit all hormonal contraceptive methods confer in reducing unplanned pregnancy in women at high familial risk outweigh the risk of breast cancer diagnosis. There is no data on risk with the concurrent prescription of hormone replacement therapy in women exhibiting climacteric symptoms who are still menstruating. Advice of GPs and Community Sexual & Reproductive Health specialists will inevitably be sought about some or all these issues and in the absence of conclusive evidence from clinical studies, caution should be applied and women counselled appropriately.

The menopause specialist and breast cancer survivorship.

Due to improvement in survival rates, breast cancer is the most prevalent female malignancy in Europe and hence the management of breast cancer survivorship is garnering significant attention. Most of the health issues associated with treatment result from iatrogenic estrogen deficiency and recognition of this in the recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) menopause guidance has resulted in the recommendation for referral of breast cancer patients to menopause specialists for appropriate counselling about and management of early menopause, estrogen deficiency symptoms and lifestyle risk modification. The latter has significant implications for both all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality. Extending the role of health professionals with an interest in menopause to provide such service for breast cancer patients is necessary as this is not within the remit or expertise of specialist breast cancer teams; however it will in turn, require menopause specialists to expand and regularly update their knowledge of breast cancer and its treatment.

Is there a role for hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer?

Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy in the UK, with an overall lifetime risk of 1 in 9. Despite the high incidence, breast cancer mortality is decreasing. Approximately 40,000 women were diagnosed with breast cancer in England and Wales in 2000 but the majority will have normal or near-normal life expectancy. One of the main contributory factors to this marked improvement in survival over the last 20 years in women of all ages has been the more widespread use of systemic therapy in early-stage disease. For women with hormone-sensitive cancer, this involves adjuvant endocrine therapy that reduces estrogen synthesis (i.e. ovarian suppression in premenopausal women or aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women) or estrogen activity (the anti-estrogen tamoxifen, irrespective of menopausal status). Many women experience health and quality-of-life problems related to estrogen deficiency as a result, the commonest being vasomotor symptoms and vaginal dryness. This article summarizes and interprets key recent papers on the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in breast cancer survivors. HRT may be safe in women with receptor-negative disease or receptor-positive cancers in the presence of tamoxifen. However, there is a dearth of useful alternatives.

Managing the menopause: British Menopause Society Council consensus statement on hormone replacement therapy.

The British Menopause Society Council aims to help health professionals inform and advise women about the menopause. This guidance regarding estrogen-based hormone replacement therapy (HRT), including tibolone, which is classified in the British National Formulary as HRT, responds to the results and analysis of the randomized Women's Health Initiative studies and the observational Million Women Study. Treatment choice should be based on up-to-date information and targeted to individual women's needs. HRT still offers the potential for benefit to outweigh harm, providing the appropriate regimen has been instigated in terms of dose, route and combination.

The menopause, hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer.

Concern exists that the reduction in breast cancer risk associated with the onset of the menopause will be negated with exposure to hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Evidence from large-scale randomised HRT trials support observational data that have shown a modest increase in breast cancer risk with long-term use (i.e. >15 years) of combined therapy, although this falls following HRT cessation suggesting a growth-promoting effect. Randomised evidence demonstrates that the efficacy of anti-estrogens, aromatase inhibitors and raloxifene in the treatment and chemoprevention of breast cancer are restricted to women with oestrogen receptor positive (ER +ve) disease; however, HRT has not been associated conclusively with a predominance of hormone sensitive breast cancer. Despite stimulating the breast cancer cell growth, HRT has not been shown to increase breast cancer recurrence or mortality when prescribed to breast cancer survivors experiencing oestrogen deficiency symptoms and randomised trials have been recommended and commenced. In conjunction with controlled breast cancer trials demonstrating a therapeutic benefit of high dose estrogens and interest in the use of additive oestrogen therapy in patients developing resistance to oestrogen deprivation, the dogma that HRT is an absolute contra-indication following diagnosis is challenged.

Managing the menopause: BMS Council Consensus statement on HRT.

The British Menopause Society Council aims to help health professionals to inform and advise women about the menopause. The oestrogen plus progestogen arm of the Women's Health Initiative was stopped in July 2002. This guidance regarding hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use responds to the results and analysis that have been published since then, as well as the Million Women Study published in August 2003. Because there are few effective alternatives to HRT for vasomotor and urogenital symptoms, oestrogen-based treatments still have a major role. HRT is also most effective for the prevention of osteoporosis. Unopposed oestrogens are contraindicated in women with an intact uterus, and hence a range of oestrogen and progestogen combinations, with differing routes of delivery, now exists under the title of "HRT". Treatment choice should be based on up to date information and targeted to individual women's needs. Hormone replacement still offers the potential for benefit to outweigh harm, providing the appropriate regimen has been instigated in terms of dose, route and combination.