Five-Year Breast Surgeon Experience in LYMPHA at Time of ALND for Treatment of Clinical T1-4N1-3M0 Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a source of postoperative morbidity for breast cancer survivors. Lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA) is a technique used to prevent BCRL at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We report the 5-year experience of a breast surgeon trained in LYMPHA and investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent LYMPHA following ALND for treatment of cT1-4N1-3M0 breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with cT1-4N1-3M0 breast cancer was performed in patients who underwent ALND with and without LYMPHA. Diagnosis of BCRL was made by certified lymphedema therapists. Descriptive statistics and lymphedema surveillance data were analyzed using results of Fisher's exact or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Logistic regression and propensity matching were performed to assess the reduction of BCRL occurrence following LYMPHA. RESULTS: In a 5-year period, 132 patients met inclusion criteria with 76 patients undergoing LYMPHA at the time of ALND and 56 patients undergoing ALND alone. Patients who underwent LYMPHA at the time of ALND were significantly less likely to develop BCRL than those who underwent ALND alone (p = 0.045). Risk factors associated with BCRL development were increased patient age (p = 0.007), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.003), and, in patients undergoing LYMPHA, number of positive nodes (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: LYMPHA may be successfully employed by breast surgeons trained in lymphatic-venous anastomosis at the time of ALND. While research efforts should continue to focus on prevention and surveillance of BCRL, LYMPHA remains an option to reduce BCRL and improve patient quality of life.

Utilization of minimally invasive breast biopsy for the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous needle biopsy, also known as minimally invasive breast biopsy (MIBB), has become the gold standard for the initial assessment of suspicious breast lesions. The purpose of this study is to determine modern rates of MIBB and open breast biopsy. METHODS: The Florida Agency for Health Care Administration outpatient surgery and procedure database was queried for patients undergoing open surgical biopsy and MIBB between 2003 and 2008. RESULTS: Although there was an increase in the use of MIBB, the overall rate of open surgical biopsy remained high (∼30%). A reduction in the open biopsy rate from 30% to 10% could be associated with a charge reduction of >$37.2 million per year. CONCLUSIONS: The current rate of open surgical breast biopsy remains high. Interventions and quality initiatives are warranted, which could lead to a reduction in unnecessary operations for women, improved patient care, and a reduction in breast health care costs.