RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Evaluate the safety profile of expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (eASC) for the treatment of severe community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b/2a trial. Patients with severe CABP were enrolled to receive intravenous infusions of Cx611 or placebo. The primary objective was safety including hypersensitivity reactions, thromboembolic events, and immunological responses to Cx611. The secondary endpoints included the clinical cure rate, ventilation-free days, and overall survival (Day 90). RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were randomized and received infusions (Cx611: n = 42]; placebo: n = 41]. The mean age was similar (Cx611: 61.1 [11.2] years; placebo: 63.4 [10.4] years). The number of AEs and treatment-emergent AEs were similar (243; 184 and 2; 1) in Cx611 and placebo respectively. Hypersensitivity reactions or thromboembolic events were similar (Cx611: n = 9; placebo: n = 12). Each study arm had similar anti-HLA antibody/DSA levels at Day 90. The clinical cure rate (Cx611: 86.7%; placebo: 93.8%), mean number of ventilator-free days (Cx611: 12.2 [10.29] days; placebo: 15.4 [10.75] days), and overall survival (Cx611: 71.5%; placebo: 77.0%) did not differ between study arms. CONCLUSION: Cx611 was well tolerated in severe CABP. These data provide insights for future stem cell clinical study designs, endpoints and sample size calculation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03158727 (retrospectively registered: May 09, 2017). Full study protocol: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/27/NCT03158727/Prot_000.pdf.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Neumonía Bacteriana , Tromboembolia , Humanos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Open respiratory secretion suctioning with a catheter causes pain and tracheobronchial mucosal injury in intubated patients. The goal of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) is to move secretions proximally and noninvasively by generating a high peak expiratory air flow. Nebulized hypertonic saline with hyaluronic acid (HS-HA) may facilitate suctioning by hydration. We assessed the safety and tolerance of a single session of airway clearance with MI-E and HS-HA in critically ill intubated patients. METHODS: Adults with a cuffed artificial airway were randomized to (1) open suctioning, (2) open suctioning after HS-HA, (3) MI-E, or (4) MI-E with HS-HA. Adverse events, pain and sedation/agitation scores, and respiratory and hemodynamic variables were collected before, during, and 5-min and 60-min post intervention. RESULTS: One-hundred twenty subjects were enrolled and completed the study. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was 22 (16-28); median (IQR) age was 69.0 (57.0-75.7) y, and 90 (75%) were male. Baseline respiratory and hemodynamic variables were comparable. Adverse events occurred in 30 subjects (25%), with no between-group differences. Behavioral pain equivalents and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale were higher during suctioning in groups 1 (P < .001) and 2 (P < .001). Independent predictive variables for higher pain and agitation/sedation scores were study groups 1 and 2 and simultaneous analgosedation, respectively. Noradrenaline infusion rates were lower at 60 min in groups 2 and 4. PaO2 /FIO2 had decreased at 5 min after open suctioning in group 1 and increased at 60 min in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no difference in adverse events. MI-E avoids pain and agitation.
RESUMEN
Background: LUNG INJURY COVID-19 (clinicaltrials.gov NCT 21/399-E) is a registry-based prospective observational cohort study to evaluate long-term outcomes and recovery 12 months after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection according to severity. Methods: Three hundred five coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors were included (moderate, 162; severe, 143). Twelve months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, there was resolution of respiratory symptoms (37.9% in severe vs 27.3% in moderate pneumonia; Pâ =â .089). Results: Exertional dyspnea was present (20% in severe vs 18.4% in moderate; Pâ =â .810). Abnormalities on chest radiology imaging were detected more often in severe COVID-19 infection vs moderate infection (29% vs 8.8%; Pâ <â .001). Pulmonary function testing (forced spirometry or diffusion) performed at 12 months of mean follow-up according to protocol detected anomalies in 31.4% of patients with severe COVID-19 courses and in 27.7% of moderate patients. Risk factors associated with diffusion impairment at 12 months were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10; Pâ =â .008), forced expiratory volume in 1 second predicted at follow-up (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; Pâ =â .017), and dyspnea score at follow-up (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.43-6.97; Pâ =â .004). Computed tomography (CT) scans performed at 12 months of mean follow-up showed evidence of fibrosis in almost half of patients with severe COVID-19 courses, who underwent CT according to protocol. Conclusions: At 12 months from infection onset, most patients refer to symptoms, particularly muscle weakness and dyspnea, and almost one-third of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia had impaired pulmonary diffusion and abnormalities on chest radiology imaging. These results emphasize the importance of systematic follow-up after severe COVID-19, with appropriate management of pulmonary sequelae.
RESUMEN
This study aimed to assess the efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A) in the treatment of infections due to Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in critically ill patients. A multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted in critically ill patients receiving C/A for GNB infections. We evaluated demographic data, localisation and severity of infection, clinical and microbiological outcomes, and mortality. A total of 68 patients received C/A for serious GNB infections. The main infections were respiratory (33.8%), intra-abdominal (22.1%) and urinary tract infections (10.3%); bacteraemia was found in 22 cases (32.4%). Most infections were complicated by septic shock (58.8%) or sepsis (36.8%) and most of them required life-supporting therapies. Enterobacterales (79.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.1%) were the most frequently isolated bacteria; 84.2% of isolates were carbapenem-resistant. Thirty-four patients (50.0%) received C/A in combination with other antimicrobials. Fifty patients (73.5%) presented a favourable clinical response. Microbiological eradication was documented in 25 cases (36.8%). No significant differences were found in clinical response between patients treated with monotherapy or combined therapy (79.4% vs. 67.6%; P = 0.27). Overall intensive care unit (ICU) mortality was 41.2%. Univariate analysis showed that 30-day all-cause mortality was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with bacteraemia, previous corticosteroid use and the need of life-supporting therapies. C/A appears to be an effective therapy for severe infections due to GNB, including carbapenem-resistant isolates, in critically ill patients. C/A combination therapy was not associated with a higher clinical response. Mortality correlated significantly with the presence of bacteraemia, previous corticosteroid use and the need for life-supporting therapies.
Asunto(s)
Ceftazidima , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) for treating infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) in critically ill patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective and observational study was conducted in critically ill patients receiving different C/T dosages and antibiotic combinations for P. aeruginosa infections. Demographic data, localisation and severity of infection, clinical and microbiological outcome, and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients received C/T for P. aeruginosa serious infections. The main infections were nosocomial pneumonia (56.2%), intra-abdominal infection (10.5%), tracheobronchitis (8.4%), and urinary tract infection (6.3%). Most infections were complicated with sepsis (49.5%) or septic shock (45.3%), and bacteraemia (10.5%). Forty-six episodes were treated with high-dose C/T (3 g every 8 hours) and 38 episodes were treated with standard dosage (1.5 g every 8 hours). Almost half (44.2%) of the patients were treated with C/T monotherapy, and the remaining group received combination therapy with other antibiotics. Sixty-eight (71.6%) patients presented a favourable clinical response. Microbiological eradication was documented in 42.1% (40/95) of the episodes. The global ICU mortality was 36.5%. Univariate analysis showed that 30-day mortality was significantly associated (P < 0.05) with Charlson Index at ICU admission and the need of life-supporting therapies. CONCLUSIONS: C/T appeared to be an effective therapy for severe infections due to P. aeruginosa in critically ill patients. Mortality was mainly related to the severity of the infection. No benefit was observed with high-dose C/T or combination therapy with other antibiotics.
Asunto(s)
Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/mortalidad , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , España , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The difficulties involved in performing autopsies of patients who had died due to COVID-19 required the use of alternative methods in order to obtain tissue samples of affected organs. We describe the technique of core needle aspiration, without ultrasonographic guidance, which we used in 19 cadavers and which produced a high yield in lungs, heart (>94%) and liver (>89%), thus enabling the study of the morphological changes produced by SARS-CoV-2.
Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/métodos , COVID-19/patología , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/instrumentación , Encéfalo/patología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Cadáver , Humanos , Riñón/patología , Hígado/patología , Pulmón/patología , Miocardio/patología , Bazo/patologíaRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Linezolid resistance is extremely uncommon in Staphylococcus aureus. OBJECTIVE: To report an outbreak with linezolid and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (LRSA) in an intensive care department and the effective control measures taken. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Outbreak study of consecutive critically ill patients colonized and/or infected with LRSA at an intensive care department of a 1000-bed tertiary care university teaching hospital in Madrid, Spain. Patients were placed under strict contact isolation. Daily updates of outbreak data and recommendations for the use of linezolid were issued. Extensive environmental sampling and screening of the hands of health care workers were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Linezolid use and clinical and epidemiological characteristics and outcomes using minimal inhibitory concentrations, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and polymerase chain reaction of LRSA isolates. RESULTS: Between April 13 and June 26, 2008, 12 patients with LRSA were identified. In 6 patients, LRSA caused ventilator-associated pneumonia and in 3 patients it caused bacteremia. Isolates were susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, glycopeptides, tigecycline, and daptomycin. Genotyping identified 1 predominant clone and 3 other types. Cfr-mediated linezolid resistance was demonstrated in all isolates. Potential hospital staff carriers and environmental samples were negative except for one. Six patients died, 5 of them in the intensive care unit, with 1 death attributed to LRSA infection. Linezolid use decreased from 202 defined daily doses in April 2008 to 25 defined daily doses in July 2008. Between July 2008 and April 2010, no new cases have been identified in the weekly surveillance cultures or diagnostic samples. CONCLUSIONS: The first clinical outbreak, to our knowledge, with LRSA mediated by the cfr gene developed at our center, was associated with nosocomial transmission and extensive usage of linezolid. Reduction of linezolid use and infection-control measures were associated with the termination of the outbreak.
Asunto(s)
Acetamidas/farmacología , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Oxazolidinonas/farmacología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Acetamidas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Femenino , Genotipo , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Linezolid , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxazolidinonas/uso terapéutico , España/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificaciónAsunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Cefiderocol , Cefalosporinas , Enfermedad Crítica , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The introduction of clinical information systems (CIS) in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) offers the possibility of storing a huge amount of machine-ready clinical data that can be used to improve patient outcomes and the allocation of resources, as well as suggest topics for randomized clinical trials. Clinicians, however, usually lack the necessary training for the analysis of large databases. In addition, there are issues referred to patient privacy and consent, and data quality. Multidisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, data engineers, machine-learning experts, statisticians, epidemiologists and other information scientists may overcome these problems. A multidisciplinary event (Critical Care Datathon) was held in Madrid (Spain) from 1 to 3 December 2017. Under the auspices of the Spanish Critical Care Society (SEMICYUC), the event was organized by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Critical Data Group (Cambridge, MA, USA), the Innovation Unit and Critical Care Department of San Carlos Clinic Hospital, and the Life Supporting Technologies group of Madrid Polytechnic University. After presentations referred to big data in the critical care environment, clinicians, data scientists and other health data science enthusiasts and lawyers worked in collaboration using an anonymized database (MIMIC III). Eight groups were formed to answer different clinical research questions elaborated prior to the meeting. The event produced analyses for the questions posed and outlined several future clinical research opportunities. Foundations were laid to enable future use of ICU databases in Spain, and a timeline was established for future meetings, as an example of how big data analysis tools have tremendous potential in our field.
Asunto(s)
Macrodatos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica , Investigación Interdisciplinaria/métodos , Aprendizaje Automático , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Investigación Interdisciplinaria/organización & administración , EspañaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Catheter suctioning of respiratory secretions in intubated subjects is limited to the proximal airway and associated with traumatic lesions to the mucosa and poor tolerance. "Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation" exerts positive pressure, followed by an abrupt drop to negative pressure. Potential advantages of this technique are aspiration of distal airway secretions, avoiding trauma, and improving tolerance. METHODS: We applied insufflation of 50 cmH2O for 3 s and exsufflation of - 45 cmH2O for 4 s in patients with an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy cannula requiring secretion suctioning. Cycles of 10 to 12 insufflations-exsufflations were performed and repeated if secretions were aspirated and visible in the proximal artificial airway. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected before and 5 and 60 min after the procedure. Subjects were followed during their ICU stay until discharge or death. RESULTS: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation was applied 26 times to 7 male and 6 female subjects requiring suctioning. Mean age was 62.6 ± 20 years and mean Apache II score 23.3 ± 7.4 points. At each session, a median of 2 (IQR 1; 2) cycles on median day of intubation 11.5 (IQR 6.25; 25.75) were performed. Mean insufflation tidal volume was 1043.6 ± 649.9 ml. No statistically significant differences were identified between baseline and post-procedure time points. Barotrauma, desaturation, atelectasis, hemoptysis, or other airway complication and hemodynamic complications were not detected. All, except one, of the mechanical insufflation-exsufflation sessions were productive, showing secretions in the proximal artificial airway, and were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggest that mechanical insufflation-exsufflation may be safe and effective in patients with artificial airway. Safety and efficacy need to be confirmed in larger studies with different patient populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2017-005201-13 (EU Clinical Trials Register).
RESUMEN
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are able to provoke diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) with absence or low levels of ketone bodies in urine and slightly elevated blood glucose levels, which could delay the diagnosis; however, the presence of high urine output, due to the excretion of glucose, can help to identify the true cause.
RESUMEN
Severe lower respiratory tract infection is a common issue in Intensive Care Units that causes significant morbidityand mortality. The traditional diagnostic-therapeutic approachhas been grounded on taking respiratory samples and/or bloodcultures as soon as possible and starting empirical antibiotictherapy addressed to cover most likely pathogens based onthe presence of the patients risk factors for certain microorganisms, while waiting for the culture results in the following 48-72 hours to adequate the antibiotic treatment to thesensitivity profile of the isolated pathogen. Unfortunately, thisstrategy leads to use broad-spectrum antibiotics more timesthan necessary and does not prevent possible therapeuticfailures. The recent development of rapid molecular diagnostic techniques, based on real time polymerase chain reaction(RT-PCR), makes it possible to determine the causative agentand its main resistance pattern between 1 and 5 hours aftersampling (depending on each technique), with high precision,some of them reaching a negative predictive value greaterthan 98%, facilitating the very early withdrawal of unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics. Its high sensitivity can alsodetect unsuspected pathogens based on risk factors, allowingadequate treatment in the first hours of stay. This short review discusses the potential usefulness of these techniques incritically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infection andadvocates their immediate implementation in clinical practice. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía/microbiología , 24966 , Unidades de Cuidados IntensivosRESUMEN
Infectious diseases are disorders caused by many different microorganisms that produce clinical conditions with a wide variation in patient-rated symptoms and severity. Therefore, different diagnostic and prognostic tools are needed to help make the most accurate decisions at each moment of patient's care with suspected infection. This mini review will analyse how some biomarkers reduce the level of uncertainty in the making decision process at some phases of sepsis, including prompt identification of septic patients, early initiation of empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobials, regimen and duration
La patología infecciosa puede ser debida a microorganismos muy diferentes que producen cuadros clínicos con una expresividad muy variada tanto en los síntomas como en la gravedad. Por ello, se necesitan diferentes herramientas diagnósticas y pronósticas que ayuden a tomar las decisiones más adecuadas en cada momento de la atención a un paciente con sospecha de infección. En esta mini revisión se analizará cómo algunos biomarcadores disminuyen el nivel de incertidumbre en la toma de decisiones clínicas en algunas fases de la atención a la sepsis, como puede ser la propia identificación del paciente séptico, la necesidad de iniciar tratamiento antimicrobiano, el tipo y su duración
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/diagnóstico , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores/análisis , Sepsis/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Transmisibles/fisiopatología , Ácido Láctico/análisis , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/análisis , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High levels of endotoxin have been reported as a risk factor for mortality in critical patients. Toraymyxin® is a column designed to remove circulating blood endotoxin by direct hemoperfusion widely used in Japan. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of direct hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin® (DHP-PMX) as an adjuvant treatment in patients with severe sepsis due to intestinal perforation in terms of hemodynamic function and coagulation abnormalities. METHODS: Prospective cohort study with a historical control group. Cohort 1: prospective cohort undergoing two sessions of DHP-PMX (n=14). Cohort 2: retrospective historical cohort (n=7). The anticoagulation regime was used according to the protocol of each centre and to the special conditions of each patient. RESULTS: Mean norepinephrine dose was significantly reduced (0.9 ± 0.5 µg/kg/min pre-first DHP-PMX vs 0.3 ± 0.4 µg/kg/min post-second DHP-PMX treatment, p<0.05). Central venous pressure (CVP) and stroke volume variation (SVV) remained without significant changes during the study, as well as cardiac index (CI) in patients with initial CI ≥ 2.5 L/min/m2. CI significantly increased in patients with initial CI<2.5 L/min/m2 (2.1 ± 0.4 pre-first DHP-PMX vs 3.4 ± 0.4 pre-second DHP-PMX session, p=0.01). Mean platelet count pre-first and post-second DHP-PMX decreased significantly (213.9 x 10(3) ± 138.5 x 10(3) platelets/mm3 vs 91.0 x 10(3) ± 53.5 x 10(3) platelets/mm3, p=0.03), without significant changes during each DHP-PMX treatment. Patients did not experience bleeding nor complications derived from DHP-PMX treatments. Survival rates at 28 and 56 days did not differ significantly between cohort 1 and 2 (21.4% vs 42.9%; 42.9% vs 57.1%; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Performing two sessions of DHP-PMX treatment in a cohort of patients with abdominal sepsis is a feasible adjuvant therapeutic approach, safe in terms of coagulation abnormalities, can be done with different anticoagulation protocols, improves hemodynamic status and may impact on survival.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Hemoperfusión/métodos , Perforación Intestinal/complicaciones , Polimixina B/uso terapéutico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Equilibrio Ácido-Base , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Coagulación Sanguínea , Gasto Cardíaco/fisiología , Presión Venosa Central/fisiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Hemoperfusión/efectos adversos , Hemoperfusión/instrumentación , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Selección de Paciente , Polimixina B/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/etiología , Sepsis/microbiología , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
El progresivo aumento de las bacterias gramnegativas multirresistentes, especialmente en personas con factores de riesgo, pero también en otras que sufren infecciones comunitarias, hace cada vez más difícil elegir una terapia antibiótica adecuada. Los mayores problemas los generan las bacterias productoras de β-lactamasas de espectro extendido (BLEE) y las productoras de carbapenemasas. Se discutirá en esta mini-revisión la conveniencia de administrar un carbapémico en los casos sospechosos de infección por BLEE que luego se puede modificar según CMI en el antibiograma y una combinación de antibióticos en los casos de infección por gérmenes productores de carbapenemasas, siendo especialmente importante que la combinación incluya un carbapémico y/o colistina a dosis altas (AU)
The increasing number of multidrug resistant gram negative bacteria, particularly in patients with risk factors, but in those who suffer community infections as well, is doing more and more difficult to choose the appropriate treatment. The most challenging cases are due to the production of extended-spectrum-β-lactamases (ESBL) and carbapenemases. This mini-review will discuss the adequacy of administering carbapenems when suspecting infections due to ESBL that could be modified after knowing the MIC of the isolated bacteria and the combined therapy in cases of carbapenemases, being particularly important to include a carbapenem and/or colistine at high dosages in this combination (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos , Penicilinasa/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodosRESUMEN
Antecedentes. Los niveles altos de endotoxina se han identificado como un factor de riesgo para la mortalidad en pacientes críticos. Toraymyxin® es un cartucho diseñado para eliminar la endotoxina de la sangre circulante por medio de hemoperfusión directa ampliamente utilizado en Japón. Objetivos. Evaluar el efecto de la hemoperfusión directa con Toraymyxin® (HPD-PMX) como tratamiento adyuvante en pacientes con sepsis grave secundaria a perforación intestinal en términos de función hemodinámica y anormalidades de la coagulación. Métodos. Estudio de cohortes prospectivo con un grupo control histórico. Cohorte 1 (n=14): tratada de forma prospectiva con dos sesiones de DHP-PMX. Cohorte 2 (n=7): grupo histórico retrospectivo. El régimen de anticoagulación utilizado fue dejado a libertad de cada centro según práctica local y condiciones especiales de cada paciente. Resultados. La dosis media de noradrenalina se redujo significativamente (0,9 ± 0,5 μg/kg/min antes de la primera hemoperfusión con DHP-PMX vs 0,3 ± 0,4 μg/kg/min tras la segunda, p<0,05). La presión venosa central (PVC) y la variación del volumen sistólico (VVS) permanecieron sin cambios significativos durante el tratamiento, así como el índice cardiaco (IC) en los pacientes con un IC inicial ≥ 2,5 L/min/m2. El IC aumentó significativamente en los pacientes con IC inicial ≤ 2,5 L/min/ m2 (2,1 ± 0,4 antes de la primera hemoperfusión vs 3,4 ± 0,4 tras la segunda sesión, p=0,01). El recuento plaquetario medio descendió significativamente entre antes de la primera sesión y después de la segunda (213,9x103 ± 138,5x103 plaquetas/ mm3 vs 91,0x103 ± 53,5x103 plaquetas/mm3, p=0,03), sin cambios significativos durante cada tratamiento. Los pacientes no experimentaron hemorragias o complicaciones derivadas de los tratamientos con HPD-PMX. La supervivencia al día 28 y día 56 no difirió significativamente entre la cohorte 1 y 2 (21,4% vs. 42,9%; 42,9% vs. 57,1%; respectivamente)...(AU)
Background. High levels of endotoxin have been reported as a risk factor for mortality in critical patients. Toraymyxin® is a column designed to remove circulating blood endotoxin by direct hemoperfusion widely used in Japan. Objectives. To evaluate the effect of direct hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin® (DHP-PMX) as an adjuvant treatment in patients with severe sepsis due to intestinal perforation in terms of hemodynamic function and coagulation abnormalities. Methods. Prospective cohort study with a historical control group. Cohort 1: prospective cohort undergoing two sessions of DHP-PMX (n=14). Cohort 2: retrospective historical cohort (n=7). The anticoagulation regime was used according to the protocol of each centre and to the special conditions of each patient. Results. Mean norepinephrine dose was significantly reduced (0.9 ± 0.5 μg/kg/min pre-first DHP-PMX vs 0.3 ± 0.4 μg/kg/min post-second DHP-PMX treatment, p<0.05). Central venous pressure (CVP) and stroke volume variation (SVV) remained without significant changes during the study, as well as cardiac index (CI) in patients with initial CI≥2.5 L/min/m2. CI significantly increased in patients with initial CI<2.5 L/min/m2 (2.1±0.4 pre-first DHP-PMX vs 3.4 ± 0.4 pre-second DHP-PMX session, p=0.01). Mean platelet count pre-first and post-second DHP-PMX decreased significantly (213.9x103 ± 138.5x103 platelets/mm3 vs 91.0x103 ± 53.5x103 platelets/mm3, p=0.03), without significant changes during each DHP-PMX treatment. Patients did not experience bleeding nor complications derived from DHP-PMX treatments. Survival rates at 28 and 56 days did not differ significantly between cohort 1 and 2 (21.4% vs 42.9%; 42.9% vs 57.1%; respectively)...(AU)