An Application of Evidence-Based Approaches to Engage Young People in the Design of a Global Mental Health Databank.

INTRODUCTION: Engaging youth in mental health research and intervention design has the potential to improve their relevance and effectiveness. Frameworks like Roger Hart's ladder of participation, Shier's pathways to participation and Lundy's voice and influence model aim to balance power between youth and adults. Hart's Ladder, specifically, is underutilized in global mental health research, presenting new opportunities to examine power dynamics across various contexts. Drawing on Hart's ladder, our study examined youth engagement in mental health research across high- and middle-income countries using Internet-based technologies, evaluating youth involvement in decision-making and presenting research stages that illustrate these engagements. METHODS: We conducted a directed content analysis of youth engagement in the study using primary data from project documents, weekly AirTable updates and discussions and interviews with youth and the research consortium. Using Hart's Ladder as a framework, we describe youth engagement along rungs throughout different research stages: cross-cutting research process, onboarding, formative research and quantitative and qualitative study designs. RESULTS: Youth engagement in the MindKind study fluctuated between Rung 4 ('Assign, but informed') and Rung 7 ('Youth initiated and directed') on Hart's Ladder. Engagement was minimal in the early project stages as project structures and goals were defined, with some youth feeling that their experiences were underutilized and many decisions being adult-led. Communication challenges and structural constraints, like tight timelines and limited budget, hindered youth engagement in highest ladder rungs. Despite these obstacles, youth engagement increased, particularly in developing recruitment strategies and in shaping data governance models and the qualitative study design. Youth helped refine research tools and protocols, resulting in moderate to substantial engagement in the later research stages. CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the value of youth-adult partnerships, which offer promise in amplifying voices and nurturing skills, leadership and inclusiveness of young people. Youth engagement in project decision-making progressed from lower to higher rungs on Hart's Ladder over time; however, this was not linear. Effective youth engagement requires dynamic strategies, transparent communication and mutual respect, shaping outcomes that authentically reflect diverse perspectives and mental health experiences. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There was substantial patient and public involvement in this study. This paper reports findings on youth engagement conducted with 35 young people from India, South Africa and the United Kingdom, all of whom had lived experience of mental health challenges. Youth engagement in the MindKind study was coordinated and led by three professional youth advisors (PYAs) in these contexts, who were also young people with lived experience of mental health challenges. Each of the three study sites embedded a full-time, community-based PYA within their study team to inform all aspects of the research project, including the development of informational materials and the facilitation of Young People's Advisory Group (YPAG) sessions referenced in this paper. Each PYA also consulted with a site-specific YPAG that met bi-monthly throughout the project, shaping the formation of study materials and serving as a test group in both the quantitative and qualitative studies. Youth participants in this study also contributed extensively, engaging in data collection and manuscript writing. The following youth advisory panels members (J.B., L.B., D.O.J., M.V.) and all PYAs (E.B., S.R., R.S.) in the MindKind study contributed to the writing of this manuscript and are acknowledged as co-authors.

Tackling Health Inequities: A Unique, Asynchronous Course Designed Through Peer-to-Peer Methods.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the efficacy and feasibility of an asynchronous, peer-to-peer health disparities enrichment course on postbaccalaureate prehealth students' knowledge, behaviors, and reaction to course materials. INTRODUCTION: Growing awareness of social inequities has prompted educators of prehealth and medical students to explore student education by addressing systemic healthcare issues. This cross-sectional study assessed reactions, learning, and self-reported behavior changes in students after taking the course "Social Determinants, Disparities, and Preparing for the Future of Healthcare" (SDDH). METHODS: The curriculum was designed by prehealth postbaccalaureate students for their peers. Course goals were to educate participants on social determinants of health and to build cultural and structural competence in their roles as future healthcare professionals. SDDH is an asynchronous, noncredit-bearing, 5-h online course with 10 modules covering various topics. The Kirkpatrick Model was used to assess the effectiveness of the curriculum, alongside qualitative and quantitative analyses of student performance. RESULTS: Out of the 102 active students in the prehealth program that accepted the invitation to join, 29 students successfully completed the course (rate of completion = 28%). On average, students expressed positive reactions and attitudes toward the course and experienced an observable increase in knowledge assessment scores upon curriculum completion (P-value = .0002). Students' self-reported observations demonstrated sustained behavioral change 3 months after course completion. CONCLUSION: It is critical to educate prehealth students on health disparities, structural, and cultural competence. A course such as SDDH may help prehealth students build effective communication skills for advocacy and develop an empathetic, patient-centered approach earlier on in their career pursuit. Some barriers to students completing the entire course include its length, uncredited status, and voluntary self-enrollment.

Young people's data governance preferences for their mental health data: MindKind Study findings from India, South Africa, and the United Kingdom.

Mobile devices offer a scalable opportunity to collect longitudinal data that facilitate advances in mental health treatment to address the burden of mental health conditions in young people. Sharing these data with the research community is critical to gaining maximal value from rich data of this nature. However, the highly personal nature of the data necessitates understanding the conditions under which young people are willing to share them. To answer this question, we developed the MindKind Study, a multinational, mixed methods study that solicits young people's preferences for how their data are governed and quantifies potential participants' willingness to join under different conditions. We employed a community-based participatory approach, involving young people as stakeholders and co-researchers. At sites in India, South Africa, and the UK, we enrolled 3575 participants ages 16-24 in the mobile app-mediated quantitative study and 143 participants in the public deliberation-based qualitative study. We found that while youth participants have strong preferences for data governance, these preferences did not translate into (un)willingness to join the smartphone-based study. Participants grappled with the risks and benefits of participation as well as their desire that the "right people" access their data. Throughout the study, we recognized young people's commitment to finding solutions and co-producing research architectures to allow for more open sharing of mental health data to accelerate and derive maximal benefit from research.