Optimizing the methodology for the assessment of bulbar conjunctival lissamine green staining.

SIGNIFICANCE: When using lissamine green for bulbar conjunctival evaluation, the most staining was observed with two applications of the same strip in the same eye, wetted with a drop of saline. The first application was 5 seconds after wetting the strip, and the second was 1 minute later, followed by immediate viewing. This suggests that bulbar staining should be viewed before the lid wiper region. PURPOSE: This study aimed to optimize the assessment of lissamine green staining of the bulbar conjunctiva by investigating the application technique and subsequent observation period. METHODS: Twenty-two participants with dry eye (as defined by the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop II) were recruited to trial five application methods in randomized order: (1) application immediately after wetting a single strip, (2) application 5 seconds after wetting a single strip, (3) application 10 seconds after wetting a single strip, (4) consecutive single application of sodium fluorescein followed by lissamine green 5 seconds after wetting, and (5) two applications using the same lissamine green strip 5 seconds after wetting, 1 minute apart. Slit-lamp photography of the conjunctiva was performed immediately following application and at 30, 60, 90, and 300 seconds after application. Three experienced (masked) practitioners independently quantified the visible punctate spots and graded the staining intensity within the images in a random order. RESULTS: Values for punctate spot count (F = 6.29, p<0.0001) and lissamine green staining intensity (F = 6.29, p<0.0001) varied significantly between the different application methods. Using two applications of the same lissamine green strip, 1 minute apart, in the same eye resulted in the greatest values for both punctate spot count and lissamine green staining intensity. Lissamine green staining decreased with time for both spot count (F = 18.87, p<0.0001) and lissamine green staining intensity (F = 11.33, p<0.0001), with the most staining found immediately after application followed by a gradual decline. There was no evidence of any interaction effect between time and application method for either measure (p>0.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS: The optimal approach for assessing bulbar conjunctival lissamine green staining involves two applications of a whole infused drop resting on the same strip for 5 seconds, applied 1 minute apart. The ocular surface should be viewed immediately after application to maximize the conjunctival staining observed.

Effect of tear supplements on signs, symptoms and inflammatory markers in dry eye.

PURPOSE: Three tear supplements were compared for their effects on the signs, symptoms and inflammatory status of subjects with dry eye disease. Assessments were made before and after both 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. METHODS: In this masked, randomized, 3-way crossover trial, eighteen dry eye subjects were recruited. At each visit, symptoms, tear evaporation rate, stability and osmolarity were measured and tear samples were analyzed for 7 inflammatory markers, using multiplex immunoassays. The 3 treatments included carboxymethylcellulose-glycerine-castor oil (CGC), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and hydroxypropyl guar (HPG). The CGC and HPG drops are emulsified lipids; CGC also contains osmoprotectants. The CMC drop is a standard aqueous polymeric supplement. RESULTS: Significant improvements were seen in symptoms (OSDI) and tear stability (NITBUT) with all 3 treatments at 4 weeks. At 4 weeks post-CGC, 6 out of 7 biomarkers demonstrated a >25% reduction (in 40% of subjects). The same reduction (>25%) was seen in 10% of the subjects for CMC and in none of the subjects for HPG. No significantly different change to either evaporation rate or tear osmolarity was found following any of the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the CGC treatment resulted in the greatest reduction in ocular biomarkers of inflammation, while all 3 treatments reduced symptoms and improved tear stability. These results indicate that subject-perceived symptomatic improvements are not necessarily associated with a reduction in objective measures of inflammation.

A Delphi approach to establishing consensus on best practice for the diagnosis and treatment of Demodex blepharitis.

Demodex blepharitis does not have agreed standardized guidelines. The aim of this study was to classify signs and symptoms and to develop appropriate management strategies for Demodex blepharitis from a consensus of expert advice. METHODS: A total of 11 anterior segment experts (ophthalmologists, optometrists and a contact lens optician) working in the United Kingdom participated in a modified 2-round Delphi panel. A mixed-methods approach was adopted and a survey questionnaire for round 1 was formulated, constructed from information in the available literature. Based on panel responses from round 1, feedback was provided and a round 2 questionnaire was formulated. More than two-thirds majority (72%) was used for consensus building. RESULTS: Based on the clinical presentation of signs and symptoms along with associated conditions and risk factors, a diagnostic algorithm was proposed for the clinical investigation of Demodex blepharitis. A treatment algorithm was also proposed with first-line and second-line treatment recommendations for Demodex blepharitis. CONCLUSION: The recommendation from this study provides the first effort in formulating clinical diagnostic algorithm and management guidelines for Demodex blepharitis. The guidelines include appropriate magnification on the slit lamp, associated signs, symptoms, risk factors and suggested management options. These guidelines can be used in a routine eyecare setting to encourage eyecare practitioners in tailoring the investigation and management of Demodex blepharitis.

Demodex Blepharitis: A Survey-Based Approach to Investigate Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Optometrists in India.

Purpose: To investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practice towards Demodex blepharitis among optometrists in India. Methods: The study was conducted in the form of an online survey using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). The survey link was distributed via direct e-mail and social media platforms, and it was comprised of 20 questions divided into two sections. The first section focused on the practitioners' demographics and their views on the general health of the eyelid. The second section of the survey was specific and aimed at obtaining information on identifying and treating Demodex blepharitis, and was only completed by those respondents who looked for Demodex mites. Results: The survey was completed by 174 optometrists. The prevalence of blepharitis in the general population was judged by the respondents to be 40%, whereas the prevalence of Demodex mites was estimated to be 29%. Interestingly, the prevalence of Demodex mites in people with blepharitis was estimated to be 30%. This estimated prevalence was substantially lower than that reported in the literature on the subject. 66% of participants believed Demodex mites to be a significant cause of ocular discomfort, whereas only 30% of participants would intervene to diagnose and manage Demodex blepharitis in their patients. Optometrists differed in their preferred method of diagnosis and management of Demodex infestation in eyelids. Conclusion: The result of this survey suggests that Demodex blepharitis is a highly under-diagnosed condition in India, with nearly 30% of surveyed optometrists managing this condition. The study also observed a lack of awareness and consensus among surveyed optometrists with regards to diagnosis and appropriate treatment methods to control Demodex infestation in eyelids.

Current approaches to soft contact lens handling training - Global perspectives.

PURPOSE: All neophyte contact lens wearers require training on how to handle contact lenses. Currently, almost no published information exists describing the most common approaches used by those involved in such training in soft contact lens wearers. This study aimed to gather information on the approaches taken by those conducting this training worldwide. METHODS: An online survey was created in English and translated to Spanish and distributed internationally via social media, conference attendees, and professional contacts. The anonymous survey included information on workplace setting of respondents, information about the typical approaches used for application and removal of soft contact lenses, length of the appointment, and success rate with their approach. Survey responses were received between May 2021 and April 2022. RESULTS: A total of 511 individuals completed the survey and responses were received from 31 countries with 48.7% from the UK. The most common approach taught for application was to have the patient hold the upper eyelashes (84.7%) and to hold the lower eyelid with the same hand as the lens (89.4%). Lenses were applied directly to the cornea by 57.7% of the respondents. The most common approach taught for lens removal was to drag the lens inferiorly from the cornea prior to removal (49.3%). Most respondents did not use videos to aid the teaching appointment (62.0%); however, they felt that their approach was successful in most cases (90). Application and removal training sessions lasted a median of 30 min and contact lenses were typically dispensed after the instructor witnessing successful application and removal three times. CONCLUSION: Various methods are adopted globally for training of application and removal of soft contact lenses, with many advising a patient-specific approach is required for success. The results of this survey provide novel insights into soft contact lens handling training in clinical practice.

Diurnal variation on tear stability and correlation with tear cytokine concentration.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of time of day on tear evaporation rate (TER) and tear break-up time, and its possible relationship with the concentration of inflammatory tear molecules (cytokines) in healthy subjects. METHODS: Participants with healthy ocular surfaces attended 3 visits, including the screening visit (V0), the 2nd visit (V1) and the 3rd visit (V2). There were 7-day intervals between visits. Participants with Dry Eye Disease (DED) were excluded by using appropriate clinical tests during V0. Clinical evaluation (TER and Non-Invasive Tear Break-Up Time (NITBUT)) and tear collection were performed during V1 and V2, between 9 and 10AM and 3-4PM. The relative humidity and temperature of the examination room were also measured. The tear fluid concentrations of 15 cytokines were measured by multiplex bead analysis. RESULTS: Seven men and 10 women (mean age ± S.D; 25.1 ± 6.63 years old) participated in the study. There were no differences in neither the TER and NITBUT outcomes, nor humidity and temperature among times or visits. Eleven out of the 15 cytokines measured were detectable in tear fluids in > 50% of the participants. In the tear levels, no significant (p > 0.05) inter- and/or intra-day differences were detected for EGF, fractalkine, IL-1RA, IL-1ß and IP-10. However, significant inter-day differences were found in the tear levels of IL-10 (p = 0.027), IFN-γ (p = 0.035) and TNF-α(p = 0.04) and intra-day differences in the tear levels of IL-8/CXCL8 (p = 0.034) and MCP-1 (p = 0.002). A significant correlation between TER and IL1-ß, IL-2, and Fractalkine (p = 0.03, p = 0.03 and p = 0.046, respectively) was found at V1. CONCLUSIONS: NITBUT and TER values had no significant variability over the course of a day (AM versus PM), or on different days in healthy participants when humidity and temperature were constant. However, some tear molecule levels did show inter- and intra-day variability, having an inconsistent and moderate correlation with TER diurnal variation.

Tear fluid biomarkers in ocular and systemic disease: potential use for predictive, preventive and personalised medicine.

In the field of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine, researchers are keen to identify novel and reliable ways to predict and diagnose disease, as well as to monitor patient response to therapeutic agents. In the last decade alone, the sensitivity of profiling technologies has undergone huge improvements in detection sensitivity, thus allowing quantification of minute samples, for example body fluids that were previously difficult to assay. As a consequence, there has been a huge increase in tear fluid investigation, predominantly in the field of ocular surface disease. As tears are a more accessible and less complex body fluid (than serum or plasma) and sampling is much less invasive, research is starting to focus on how disease processes affect the proteomic, lipidomic and metabolomic composition of the tear film. By determining compositional changes to tear profiles, crucial pathways in disease progression may be identified, allowing for more predictive and personalised therapy of the individual. This article will provide an overview of the various putative tear fluid biomarkers that have been identified to date, ranging from ocular surface disease and retinopathies to cancer and multiple sclerosis. Putative tear fluid biomarkers of ocular disorders, as well as the more recent field of systemic disease biomarkers, will be shown.