Localizing sites of disease in patients with rising serum prostate-specific antigen up to 1ng/ml following prostatectomy: How much information can conventional imaging provide?

PURPOSE: Accurate identification of the source of a detectable serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the postprostatectomy setting is a major challenge among the urologic community. The aim of this study was to assess positivity rates of imaging examinations performed in patients with early PSA rise after prostatectomy and to summarize the management strategies adopted in this clinical scenario. METHODS: Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study of 142 postprostatectomy patients with PSA rise up to 1ng/ml who underwent evaluation with combination of multiparametric pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)±whole-body or bone MRI, bone scintigraphy, computed tomography (CT) chest-abdomen-pelvis, 18F-fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET)/CT or 18F-sodium fluoride-PET/CT at a single tertiary cancer center. Imaging results were summarized per modality and compared with pathology findings. RESULTS: Pelvic MRI was positive in 15/142 (11%) patients (14 patients with local recurrence in the surgical bed and 1 patient with pelvic osseous metastases). Of these 15, 10 patients underwent additional imaging examinations; none revealed positive findings. Of the 127 patients with negative pelvic MRI, 54 (43%) underwent additional imaging examinations; only 1/54 had positive findings (false-positive T8 lesion on bone scintigraphy and FDG-PET/CT; biopsy was negative for cancer). Overall, 12/16 patients with positive imaging findings and 75/126 (60%) patients with negative imaging received treatment (radiation, hormones or chemotherapy). CONCLUSION: The conventional imaging identified sites of disease, almost always in the form of local recurrence, in a minority of patients with early PSA rise postprostatectomy.

An Arterial Based Complexity (ABC) Scoring System to Assess the Morbidity Profile of Partial Nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Tumor characteristics affect surgical complexity and outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN). OBJECTIVE: To develop an Arterial Based Complexity (ABC) scoring system to predict morbidity of PN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Four readers independently scored contrast-enhanced computed tomography images of 179 patients who underwent PN. INTERVENTION: Renal cortical masses were categorized by the order of vessels needed to be transected/dissected during PN. Scores of 1, 2, 3S, or 3H were assigned to tumors requiring transection of interlobular and arcuate arteries, interlobar arteries, segmental arteries, or in close proximity of the renal hilum, respectively during PN. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Interobserver variability was assessed with kappa values and percentage of exact matches between each pairwise combination of readers. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between reference scores and ischemia time, estimated blood loss, and estimated glomerular filtration rates at 6 wk and 6 mo after surgery adjusted for baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate. Fisher's exact test was used to test for differences in risk of urinary fistula formation by reference category assignment. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Pairwise comparisons of readers' score assignments were significantly correlated (all p<0.0001); average kappa = 0.545 across all reader pairs. The average proportion of exact matches was 69%. Linear regression between the complexity score system and surgical outcomes showed significant associations between reference category assignments and ischemia time (p<0.0001) and estimated blood loss (p=0.049). Fisher's exact test showed a significant difference in risk of urinary fistula formation with higher reference category assignments (p=0.028). Limitations include use of a single institutional cohort to evaluate our system. CONCLUSIONS: The ABC scoring system for PN is intuitive, easy to use, and demonstrated good correlation with perioperative morbidity. PATIENT SUMMARY: The ABC scoring system is a novel anatomy-reproducible tool developed to help patients and doctors understand the complexity of renal masses and predict the outcomes of kidney surgery.