Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cas Lek Cesk ; 163(3): 94-97, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38981732

RESUMEN

Postoperative pneumonia is the most common complication in patients after lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The tolerable incidence of this complication ranges from 5 to 8 %. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of initial risk factors on the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing lung resection for NSCLC. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital Ostrava between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. All adult patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy for primary NSCLC during the study period were included in the study. A total of 350 patients were included in the study. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 10.9%. Analysis of baseline risk factors did not show a statistically significant association with the incidence of this complication. The only statistically significant finding was a longer hospital stay in patients with postoperative pneumonia. The risk of postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer cannot be clearly explained by the initial risk factors examined alone. The complex nature of this risk also requires a comprehensive approach to prevention, including both patient-centred measures and improved postoperative care.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neumonectomía , Neumonía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Femenino , Neumonía/etiología , Neumonía/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación
2.
Surg Endosc ; 37(12): 9208-9216, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37857921

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer poses a significant challenge with high mortality rates. Minimally invasive surgical approaches, including the uniportal thoracoscopic technique, offer potential benefits in terms of recovery and patient compliance. This study focuses on evaluating the radicality of mediastinal lymphadenectomy during uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection, specifically assessing the reachability of established lymphatic stations. METHODS: A comparative study was conducted at the University Hospital Ostrava from January 2015 to July 2022, focusing on the evaluation of radicality in mediastinal lymphadenectomy across three patient subgroups: uniportal thoracoscopic approach, multiportal thoracoscopic approach, and thoracotomy approach. The study implemented the routine identification and excision of 8 lymph node stations from the respective hemithorax to assess the radicality of lymph node harvesting. RESULTS: A total of 428 patients were enrolled and evaluated. No significant differences were observed in the number of lymph nodes removed between the subgroups. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 6.50 in the left hemithorax and 6.49 in the right hemithorax. The 30-day postoperative morbidity rate for the entire patient population was 27.3%, with 17.5% experiencing minor complications and 6.5% experiencing major complications. Statistically significant differences were observed in major complications between the uniportal approach and the thoracotomy approach (3.5% vs 12.0%, p = 0.002). The overall mortality rate in the study population was 3%, with a statistically significant difference in mortality between the uniportal and multiportal approaches (1.0% vs 6.4%, p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The uniportal approach demonstrated comparable accessibility and lymph node yield to multiportal and thoracotomy techniques. It is equivalent to established methods in terms of postoperative complications, with fewer major complications compared to thoracotomy. While our study indicates a potential for lower mortality following uniportal lung resection in comparison to multiportal lung resection, and demonstrates comparable outcomes to thoracotomy, it is important to approach these findings cautiously and refrain from drawing definitive conclusions.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Toracotomía , Humanos , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Neumonectomía/métodos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Pulmón/patología
3.
Ceska Gynekol ; 88(6): 405-411, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38171912

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Acute appendicitis is the most common indication for surgical intervention during pregnancy for non-gynaecological or non-obstetric causes. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of acute appendectomies in pregnant and non-pregnant patients of childbearing age. METHODS: A retrospective clinical study focused on the comparison of perioperative and postoperative outcomes of acute appendectomy in pregnant and non-pregnant patients of reproductive age between January 2012 and December 2021 at the University Hospital in Ostrava. RESULTS: A number of 308 patients underwent acute appendectomy, 25 pregnant and 283 non-pregnant. There were no statistically significant differences in age, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification, duration of complaints, baseline C-reactive protein values, sensitivity or specificity of sonography. A statistically significant difference was found in the leukocyte count between subgroups (P = 0.014) and in the number of laparoscopic procedures performed between the two subgroups (P < 0.001; 98.9% non-pregnant vs. 80.0% pregnant). There was also a statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay, with the pregnant subgroup having a longer hospital stay (P = 0.014) and a statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications between the defined subgroups (P = 0.039). Serious complications were described predominantly in the subgroup of pregnant patients, where they reached 12% compared to non-pregnant patients, where they were 2.8%. The mortality rate of the cohort was zero. CONCLUSION: The results of the study support the fact that pregnancy may be associated with complicated forms of acute appendicitis. Accurate and early diagnosis not only prevents the development of complicated forms of appendicitis but also reduces the number of negative appendectomies in pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Enfermedad Aguda , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Cas Lek Cesk ; 162(5): 207-211, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37923563

RESUMEN

Negative pressure wound therapy is a generally accepted method of treating septic or secreting wounds. In contrast to that, postoperative application of negative pressure wound therapy to primarily closed surgical wounds is referred to as closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (Ci-NPWT). According to available sources, wounds after prophylactic application of Ci-NPWT show lower complication rates, especially wound infections, and dehiscence. The literature confirms that the Ci-NPWT technique improves healing of all surgical wounds, both septic and aseptic.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Cicatrización de Heridas
5.
Surg Endosc ; 36(4): 2430-2435, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34101013

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) fellowship programme was established in 2014, allowing nine surgeons annually to obtain experience and skills in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) from specialist centres across the Europe and United States. It aligns with the strategic focus of EAES Education and Training Committee on enabling Learning Mobility opportunities. To assess the impact of the programme, a survey was conducted aiming to evaluate the experience and impact of the programme and receive feedback for improvements. METHODS: A survey using a 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate clinical, education and research experience. The impact on acquisition of new technical skills, change in clinical practice and ongoing collaboration with the host institute was assessed. The fellows selected between 2014 and 2018 were included. Ratings were analysed in percentage; thematic analysis was applied to the free-text feedbacks using qualitative analysis. RESULTS: All the fellows had good access to observing in operating theatres and 70.6% were able to assist. 91.2% participated in educational activities and 23.5% were able to contribute through teaching. 44.1% participated in research activities and 41.2% became an author/co-author of a publication from the host. 97.1% of fellows stated that their operative competency had increased, 94.3% gained new surgical skills and 85.7% was able to introduce new techniques in their hospitals. 74.29% agreed that the clinical experience led to a change in their practices. The most commonly suggested improvements were setting realistic target in clinical and research areas, increasing fellowship duration, and maximising theatre assisting opportunities. Nevertheless, 100% of fellows would recommend the fellowship to their peers. CONCLUSION: EAES fellowship programme has shown a positive impact on acquiring and adopting new MIS techniques. To further refine the programme, an individualised approach should be adopted to set achievable learning objectives in clinical skills, education and research.


Asunto(s)
Becas , Cirujanos , Competencia Clínica , Endoscopía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/educación , Estados Unidos
6.
Surg Endosc ; 35(9): 5015-5023, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32970211

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: One of the prerequisites for proper healing of the anastomosis after a colorectal resection is adequate blood supply to the connected intestinal segments. It has been proposed that adequate visualization of the blood flow using indocyanine green (ICG) could lead to the reduction in the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of intraoperative fluorescence angiography (FA) in decreasing the incidence of AL after minimally invasive low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer patients and to determine predictors of anastomotic leak. METHODS: From August 2015 to January 2019, data from 100 patients who underwent mini-invasive TME for rectal cancer using FA with indocyanine green (ICG) were prospectively collected and analyzed. They were compared with retrospectively analyzed data from a historical control group operated by one team of surgeons before the introduction of FA from November 2012 to August 2015 (100 patients). All patients from both groups were operated sequentially in one oncological center in Nový Jicín. RESULTS: The incidence of AL was significantly lower in the ICG group (19% vs. 9%, p = 0.042, χ2 test). In fifteen patients in the ICG group (15%), the resection line was moved due to insufficient perfusion. Using Pearson's χ2 test, diabetes (p = 0.036) and application of a transanal drain (NoCoil) (p = 0.032) were identified as other risk factors (RFs) for AL. CONCLUSION: The use of ICG to visualize tissue perfusion in low rectal resections for cancer can lead to a reduction of AL.


Asunto(s)
Proctectomía , Neoplasias del Recto , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Humanos , Verde de Indocianina , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Dig Surg ; 31(3): 161-8, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24992997

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate quality of life (QOL) outcomes after colorectal surgery for cancer from a 6-month perspective at a single institution. METHODS: Cohort study to prospectively assess postoperative QOL in patients who underwent elective colorectal resection at the University Hospital Ostrava. QOL was assessed using the validated Short Form 36 (SF-36v2™) questionnaire at fixed time points. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients were enrolled in the study (83 and 65 patients underwent laparoscopic and open colorectal resection, respectively). Operative time was significantly longer (161 vs. 133 min; p = 0.0073) and length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (10.7 vs. 13.1 days; p = 0.0451) in the laparoscopic group. Overall 30-day morbidity rates were lower in the laparoscopic group, but the difference was not significant (27.7 vs. 33.8%; p = 0.2116). QOL scores were comparable in both study groups before surgery (p ≥ 0.05). QOL was statistically significantly lower 2 days and 1 week after open colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic surgery. One month and 6 months after surgery, there were no statistically significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests a higher postoperative QOL during the first month after laparoscopic colorectal resection could be one of the benefits of laparoscopy.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparotomía/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , República Checa , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Tempo Operativo , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Vnitr Lek ; 60(7-8): 635-9, 2014.
Artículo en Checo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25130642

RESUMEN

Crohn's disease is often purely inflammatory, but most patients develop complicated disease with strictures or fistulae. Specific etiopathogenesis of this severe disease is not definitely clear despite research efforts and learning of many pathogenetic mechanisms. Many studies have suggested that NOD2 mutations are associated with increased risk of complicated disease. Presence of NOD2 mutation itself is just one of factors contributing to development of this disease. Genetically predisposed individuals in combination with influence of environmental factors result in a disturbed innate (i.e., disturbed intestinal barrier, Paneth cell dysfunction) and adaptive (i.e., imbalance of effector and regulatory T cells and cytokines, migration and retention of leukocytes) immune response towards a diminished diversity of commensal microbiota. Data of meta-analysis made so far provide ambiguous evidence to support top-down therapy based solely on single NOD2 mutations, but suggest that targeted early-intensive therapy for high-risk patients with two NOD2 mutations might be beneficial, but more prospective trials could answer these questions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Mutación , Proteína Adaptadora de Señalización NOD2/genética
9.
Ginekol Pol ; 95(2): 126-131, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37668390

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Acute appendicitis is the most common non-gynaecological indication for surgical intervention during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative and postoperative results of surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in the early and late stage of pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study focused on the evaluation of perioperative and postoperative results of appendectomy in pregnancy. The study included all pregnant patients who underwent laparoscopic or open appendectomy at the University Hospital Ostrava during the observed 10-year period (January 2012-December 2021). The patients were divided into two subgroups according to the stage of pregnancy in relation to the expected viability of the foetus (the viability limit was defined as the 23rd week of pregnancy). RESULTS: In the monitored 10-year period, a total of 25 pregnant patients underwent appendectomy. Comparing the two subgroups of patients, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the admission parameters. Laparoscopy was performed in 100% of the patients in the lower stage of pregnancy (< 23 g.w.) and in 61% of the subgroup of patients with more advanced pregnancy (> 23 g.w.); this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.039). Differences in subgroups regarding duration of surgery, risk of revision and 30-day postoperative morbidity were not statistically significant. In the subgroup of patients < 23 g.w., uncomplicated forms of appendicitis predominated (66%), whereas in the subgroup > 23 g.w., complicated forms predominated (69%); this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.026). When comparing the two subgroups of patients, there was a statistically significant difference in the length of hospitalization (p = 0.006). The mortality rate of the group was zero. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study confirm the fact that advanced pregnancy may be related to complicated forms of appendicitis. Therefore, early appendectomy is still the method of choice. In accordance with the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) recommendations, laparoscopic approach is preferred in pregnant patients, even in advanced pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Hospitalización , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación , Enfermedad Aguda , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Ther Clin Risk Manag ; 20: 373-379, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38912517

RESUMEN

Introduction: The management of patients with COVID-19 infection has placed great pressure on the healthcare systems around the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment outcomes of patients with rectal cancer by comparing them to those of patients with the same diagnosis in the pre-pandemic period. Methods: Retrospective data analysis of patients undergoing multimodal treatment for rectal cancer at the four university hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) and the 2-year pre-pandemic period (2018-2019). Results: A total of 693 patients (319 in the pre-pandemic period and 374 in the pandemic period) with rectal cancer were included in the study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in both study periods were comparable, as was the spectrum of surgical procedures. Palliative surgery was more common in the pandemic period (18% vs 13%, p=0.084). The proportion of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.025). There were no statistically significant differences between the study periods in the incidence/severity of post-operative complications, 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay. The number of positive resection margins was similar (5% vs 5%). Based on these results, COVID-19 had no effect on the postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant treatment was more common in the pre-pandemic period (50% vs 45%). Long-course RT was predominantly offered in the pre-pandemic period, short-course RT during the pandemic. Significantly shorter "diagnosis-surgery" intervals were observed during the pandemic (23 days vs 33 days, p=0.0002). The "surgery-adjuvant therapy" interval was similar in both analysed study periods (p=0.219). Conclusion: Our study showed, that despite concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic, multimodal treatment of rectal cancer was associated with unchanged postoperative morbidity rates, increased frequency of short-course neoadjuvant RT administration and shorter "diagnosis-surgery" intervals.

11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35258042

RESUMEN

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative administration of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) on the self-sufficiency, physical status, and nutritional status of patients undergoing elective colorectal resections. METHODS: This prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted in a single institution. Patients scheduled to undergo colorectal cancer surgery were randomized to either ONS twice per day for 7 days before surgery or no ONS. RESULTS: We enrolled 120 patients in the study. The two study groups had comparable hospital stay times and comparable numbers of postoperative complications. Laboratory parameter (albumin and prealbumin) values declined in the postoperative period, but differences between study groups were not significant. The groups had comparable arm circumference measurements, muscle mass and fat proportions, and water weights. Patient self-sufficiency in the postoperative period was comparable between groups (P=0.313). Lower limb force declined after surgery, but differences between the groups were not significant (P=0.579). CONCLUSION: Preoperative administration of ONS to patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery did not reduce postoperative morbidity or enhance recovery. Moreover, patient self-sufficiency, physical status, and nutritional status were not influenced by preoperative ONS. Patients should be properly selected for malnourishment before providing nutritional support to manage costs efficiently. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03930888).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Apoyo Nutricional , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Apoyo Nutricional/efectos adversos , Estado Nutricional , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Suplementos Dietéticos
12.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 69(1): 175-180, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36629661

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Peptic ulcer perforation presents the most serious complication of ulcer disease with mortality that varies significantly depending on the age and conditions. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was effective worldwide in 2020 and continues to date. The aim of this study was to investigate the initial clinical parameters and short-term outcomes of patients with acute peptic ulcer perforation before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic. The patients undergoing surgical modality of a simple suture of peptic ulcer perforation with/without omentoplasty in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021) and the pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019) had been incorporated in this study. RESULTS: This study included a total of 46 cases (26 in the pre-coronavirus disease 2019, 20 in the post-coronavirus disease 2019). The age, body mass index, Boey score, duration of symptoms, surgery time, and length of hospital stay were comparable in both study subgroups. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, patients were admitted with a statistically significantly lower degree of perioperative risk according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p=0.013). Notably, 30-day postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (73.1 vs. 55.0%, p=0.038). The mortality rate in the laparoscopic group was 13.6%, in the laparotomy group 41.4%, and the mortality rate was higher in pre-coronavirus disease 2019 than in post-coronavirus disease 2019 (34.6 vs. 20.0%, p=0.166). CONCLUSION: In fact, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic had not significantly influenced therapeutic management and short-term outcomes of patients undergoing acute surgical repair of peptic ulcer perforation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Laparoscopía , Úlcera Péptica Perforada , Humanos , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/diagnóstico , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/etiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , COVID-19/complicaciones , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Aguda
13.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne ; 17(3): 506-514, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36187065

RESUMEN

Introduction: Over the last decades outcomes for rectal cancer surgery have improved, with increasing survival rates. Nevertheless, functional disorders are still frequent. Aim: To evaluate sexual and urinary outcomes of miniinvasive total mesorectal excision (TME). Material and methods: Between March 2016 and June 2018 patients with rectal cancer who underwent miniinvasive TME with a sphincter-saving procedure were enrolled. The questionnaires were completed before therapy, and 6, 12, and 24 months after stoma closure. We used the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire (IIEF). Results: Ninety-eight patients completed the questionnaires. Only patients who underwent laparoscopic (39) or robotic TME (27) were enrolled. The characteristics and surgical outcomes did not differ significantly between these groups. The IPSS between the groups was comparable before and after the operation with no significant difference, increased at 6 months and then decreased consecutively. In comparison with baseline, IPSS was significantly lower in the laparoscopic and robotic groups at 6 months and was comparable to baseline at 24 months in both groups. Oppositely, the IIEF was significantly lower at 6 months after ileostomy closure in the robotic group (p < 0.05), but not in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.59) and both returned to baseline at 24 months. FSFI was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.017) 6 months after surgery and returned to baseline at 24 months in both groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopic and robotic TME showed similar functional results 2 years after stoma resection.

14.
Cureus ; 14(10): e30926, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36337818

RESUMEN

Perforation, per se, presents the most serious complication of peptic ulcer disease with a mortality rate that cannot be underestimated. Surgery is the only treatment option, which can be performed laparoscopically or via conventional laparotomy. The present study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of laparoscopy and laparotomy techniques in the surgical treatment of peptic ulcer perforation. A retrospective study design was structured to compare the perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes of 102 patients who had undergone laparoscopic and conventional repair of the perforated peptic ulcer over a six-year interval (January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021). Of these, 44 (43.1%) had undergone laparoscopic repair while 58 (56.9%) had surgical repair via conventional laparotomy. The operative time and length of hospital stay were comparable in both subgroups (p=0.984 and p =0.585). Nevertheless, 30-day postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in the open surgery subgroup (75.9% vs. 59.1%, p= 0.032). The risk of relaparotomy was similar in both study subgroups; however, suture dehiscence as a reason for surgical revision was significantly more frequent in the laparoscopic subgroup (13.6% vs 3.4%). Of note, the mortality rate in the laparoscopic group of patients was 13.6%, and in the laparotomy group 41.4%. The laparoscopic approach to peptic ulcer perforation is the procedure of choice for low-risk patients. Conventional surgery seems to be associated with a significantly higher incidence of severe postoperative complications and mortality. However, the higher mortality in these patients is probably related to their worse initial clinical condition.

15.
Cas Lek Cesk ; 149(3): 125-8, 2010.
Artículo en Checo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20429348

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Potential benefits and risks of new operation techniques can show up differently in the individual patients. The aim of this pilot study was to verify on the basis of reliable prediction of postoperative complications the possibility to create model for optimization of the operation technique in the cohort of patients operated for rectal carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved patients operated in the course of five years for rectal carcinoma by means of laparoscopic or open technique. The mathematical models of prediction of postoperative complications of individual operative techniques were derived from the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity scoring system (POSSUM). The reliability of prediction for the given technique was tested and the patients of the cohort were analyzed with regard to the "suitability" of the operation technique used. RESULTS: The study involved 91 patients operated using open technique and 67 patients operated laparoscopically with the occurrence of 45% and 39% of the postoperative complications respectively. The statistically relevant variables tested for the occurrence of postoperative complications were the "cardiac symptoms" and "severity of the surgery" for open operations, and "leukocytes" and "severity of the surgery" for the laparoscopic operations. The prediction models based on these variables showed statistically high reliability. The complications in the entire cohort would in case of ideal selection of surgical technique drop by 36%. CONCLUSION: Reliable prediction of the postoperative complications can be potentially effective tool to optimize surgical treatment for an individual patient.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Modelos Estadísticos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo
16.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne ; 15(1): 43-48, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32117485

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leak is a very serious complication in colorectal surgery. Tissue perfusion of the anastomosis plays an integral role in its multifactorial etiology. Fluorescence angiography using indocyanine green allows visualization of perfusion in real time. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative fluorescence angiography as a tool to decrease the incidence of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic or robotic low resection of the rectum for cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Intraoperative fluorescence angiography was performed sequentially in 50 patients during low rectal resection for cancer with total mesorectal excision, primary anastomosis and protective ileostomy using laparoscopic or robotic technique. The results were compared to a historical control group of 50 patients with the same procedure without the use of fluorescence angiography. RESULTS: The patient sets were comparable in basic demographic and clinical parameters. Intraoperative visualization of perfusion by fluorescence angiography was achieved in all patients without unwanted side-effects. In 6 (12%) patients, the resection line was adjusted based on the fluorescence angiography. The incidence of anastomotic leak was insignificantly lower in the group with fluorescence angiography (18% vs. 10%), which led to significantly shorter hospital stay. Other postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence angiography using indocyanine green is a safe and effective method with the potential of reducing anastomotic leak during minimally invasive low resection of the rectum for cancer.

17.
World J Gastroenterol ; 14(42): 6581-3, 2008 Nov 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19030218

RESUMEN

Retrorectal cysts are rare benign lesions in the presacral space which are frequently diagnosed in middle-aged females. We report here our experience with two symptomatic female patients who were diagnosed as having a retrorectal cyst and managed using a laparoscopic approach. The two patients were misdiagnosed as having an ovarian cystic lesion after abdominal ultrasonography. Computer tomograghy (CT) scan was mandatory to establish the diagnosis. The trocar port site was the same in both patients. An additional left oophorectomy was done for a coexisting ovarian cystic lesion in one patient in the same setting. There was no postoperative morbidity or mortality and the two patients were discharged on the 5th and 6th post operative days, respectively. Our cases show that laparoscopic management of retrorectal cysts is a safe approach. It reduces surgical trauma and offers an excellent tool for perfect visualization of the deep structures in the presacral space.


Asunto(s)
Quistes/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Quistes/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Quistes Ováricos/complicaciones , Quistes Ováricos/cirugía , Ovariectomía , Enfermedades del Recto/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Recto/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29358789

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Crohn's disease is a multifactorial inflammatory disease affecting mainly the gastrointestinal tract. The genetic factors that are involved in the disease include mainly three mutations of the gene NOD2/CARD15 (R702W, G908R, 3020insC). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the presence of these variants and disease phenotype. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 70 patients with Crohn's disease were examined for the presence of the above-mentioned mutations. The researchers used the medical records to retrospectively obtain clinical data and together with the information obtained prospectively according to the protocol they analysed the connection between gene mutations and disease phenotype. RESULTS: At least one mutation was found in 22 patients with Crohn's disease (32%), four patients were found to have two different mutations (composed heterozygotes - 6%) and six patients (9%) were homozygotes for the 3020insC gene. No significant differences were found between the groups with wild-type form and the mutated form of the NOD2 / CARD15 gene with respect to age at the time of diagnosis, form of the disease or localization according to the Montreal classification. CONCLUSION: Mutations of the NOD2 / CARD15 gene did not significantly affect the frequency of reoperations, homozygotes with 3020insC gene mutations, however, represented a high risk group. The phenotype was not related significantly to the presence of the examined mutations.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn/genética , Mutación/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Heterocigoto , Homocigoto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteína Adaptadora de Señalización NOD2/genética , Fenotipo , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación , Adulto Joven
19.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; 69(1): 175-180, Jan. 2023. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1422595

RESUMEN

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Peptic ulcer perforation presents the most serious complication of ulcer disease with mortality that varies significantly depending on the age and conditions. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was effective worldwide in 2020 and continues to date. The aim of this study was to investigate the initial clinical parameters and short-term outcomes of patients with acute peptic ulcer perforation before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic. The patients undergoing surgical modality of a simple suture of peptic ulcer perforation with/without omentoplasty in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021) and the pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019) had been incorporated in this study. RESULTS: This study included a total of 46 cases (26 in the pre-coronavirus disease 2019, 20 in the post-coronavirus disease 2019). The age, body mass index, Boey score, duration of symptoms, surgery time, and length of hospital stay were comparable in both study subgroups. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, patients were admitted with a statistically significantly lower degree of perioperative risk according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p=0.013). Notably, 30-day postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (73.1 vs. 55.0%, p=0.038). The mortality rate in the laparoscopic group was 13.6%, in the laparotomy group 41.4%, and the mortality rate was higher in pre-coronavirus disease 2019 than in post-coronavirus disease 2019 (34.6 vs. 20.0%, p=0.166). CONCLUSION: In fact, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic had not significantly influenced therapeutic management and short-term outcomes of patients undergoing acute surgical repair of peptic ulcer perforation.

20.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 54(74): 393-6, 2007 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17523282

RESUMEN

In European countries, choledochal cysts are rare anomalies of the bile tract. At the Surgery Department of the University Hospital Ostrava, a case of a patient with cystic lesion of the pancreatic head was solved. According to ultrasonography and computer tomography it was assumed to be a pancreatic pseudocyst. Only after a complete additional examination of the pancreatico-biliary system, was it diagnosed Ia-type cystic dilatation of the common bile duct, accompanied by stenosis in its terminal part. With regard to the age of the first clinical symptoms, their character and histopathological findings, congenital origin is assumed in both of these anomalies. After provisional percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, a duodenohemipancreatectomy was performed with complete cyst excision. Until now, nine months later, the patient has shown absolutely no clinical difficulties.


Asunto(s)
Quiste del Colédoco/diagnóstico , Seudoquiste Pancreático/diagnóstico , Adulto , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Pancreatocolangiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Quiste del Colédoco/cirugía , Colestasis Extrahepática/diagnóstico , Colestasis Extrahepática/cirugía , Colestasis Intrahepática/diagnóstico , Colestasis Intrahepática/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Drenaje , Endoscopía , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Seudoquiste Pancreático/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Reoperación , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA