Emicizumab prophylaxis in infants with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors: Illustrative real-world cases to support shared decision-making.

INTRODUCTION: Emicizumab has been shown to be safe and effective for prevention of bleeds in patients with severe haemophilia A (SHA), both with and without inhibitors. The subcutaneous administration and long half-life make emicizumab an attractive option for prophylaxis in infants with SHA, however data to inform treatment decisions in this younger age group are almost absent. AIM: The aim of this report is to share real world experience to illustrate how the availability of emicizumab has shifted the prophylaxis paradigm in the management of infants with SHA. METHOD: We selected four cases from our own cohort of infants with SHA to outline the rationale for emicizumab prophylaxis in a range of scenarios familiar to paediatric haemophilia treaters. RESULTS: In Case 1 emicizumab was commenced at 7 days following initial treatment of neonatal ICH with a FVIII infusion. In Case 2 emicizumab was commenced at 5 weeks due to parental anxiety regarding the potential for ICH during infancy. Case 3 commenced emicizumab at 15 months in lieu of standard primary prophylaxis. Case 4 switched to emicizumab prophylaxis at 14 months after a period of primary prophylaxis with FVIII concentrates to alleviate parental anxiety regarding future inhibitor development. No patient had any bleeding events after commencement of emicizumab (median follow up 12 months), and no drug-related adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Despite the paucity of data in infants with SHA the potential role of emicizumab prophylaxis should be discussed with families when clinically relevant, with decisions tailored to individual need.

Demonstration of a novel Xp22.2 microdeletion as the cause of familial extreme skewing of X-inactivation utilizing case-parent trio SNP microarray analysis.

BACKGROUND: We report a kindred referred for molecular investigation of severe hemophilia A in a young female in which extremely skewed X-inactivation was observed in both the proband and her clinically normal mother. METHODS: Bidirectional Sanger sequencing of all F8 gene coding regions and exon/intron boundaries was undertaken. Methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes were utilized to investigate skewed X-inactivation using both a classical human androgen receptor (HUMARA) assay, and a novel method targeting differential methylation patterns in multiple informative X-chromosome SNPs. Illumina Whole-Genome Infinium microarray analysis was performed in the case-parent trio (proband and both parents), and the proband's maternal grandmother. RESULTS: The proband was a cytogenetically normal female with severe hemophilia A resulting from a heterozygous F8 pathogenic variant inherited from her similarly affected father. No F8 mutation was identified in the proband's mother, however, both the proband and her mother both demonstrated completely skewed X-chromosome inactivation (100%) in association with a previously unreported 2.3 Mb deletion at Xp22.2. At least three disease-associated genes (FANCB, AP1S2, and PIGA) were contained within the deleted region. CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesize that true "extreme" skewing of X-inactivation (≥95%) is a rare occurrence, but when defined correctly there is a high probability of finding an X-chromosome disease-causing variant or larger deletion resulting in X-inactivation through a survival disadvantage or cell lethal mechanism. We postulate that the 2.3 Mb Xp22.2 deletion identified in our kindred arose de novo in the proband's mother (on the grandfather's homolog), and produced extreme skewing of X-inactivation via a "cell lethal" mechanism. We introduce a novel multitarget approach for X-inactivation analysis using multiple informative differentially methylated SNPs, as an alternative to the classical single locus (HUMARA) method. We propose that for females with unexplained severe phenotypic expression of an X-linked recessive disorder trio-SNP microarray should be undertaken in combination with X-inactivation analysis.