A Prospective, Randomized Trial Examining the Use of G-CSF Versus No G-CSF in Patients Post-Autologous Transplantation.

Contemporary, prospective data regarding the impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on outcomes after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT) in an era when stem cell grafts are more qualitatively robust are limited. Recent retrospective analyses have not supported a beneficial effect of post-transplantation G-CSF use on major outcomes after Auto-HSCT leading to strategies to delay or eliminate the use of G-CSF altogether in this context. To test the hypothesis that the infusion of consistently higher doses of stem cells (defined as ≥4 × 106/kg) in Auto-HSCT will obviate the need for post-transplantation G-CSF. If so, the impact of withholding G-CSF will be noninferior to the use of G-CSF in terms of length of stay (LOS). The specific objectives were to conduct a prospective, randomized clinical trial primarily examining the impact of post-transplantation G-CSF on LOS, and secondarily on engraftment, infectious complications, antibiotic usage, and incidence of engraftment syndrome after Auto-HSCT in patients receiving versus not receiving G-CSF after Auto-HSCT. Patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who underwent Pegfilgrastim plus Plerixafor-primed stem cell collection followed by Auto-HSCT were randomized to the G-CSF group (receive G-CSF starting at day 3 after Auto-HSCT) or the no G-CSF group (G-CSF withheld after Auto-HSCT). Seventy patients per arm were planned to demonstrate the primary endpoint of noninferiority in LOS between the G-CSF and the no G-CSF groups. Patient outcomes in the two groups were followed up and compared after Auto-HSCT, and an interim analysis for futility was planned when accrual reached 50%.The primary finding of this study was that despite only a 2-day longer median absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery in the no G-CSF arm (median 11 versus 13 days; P = .001), LOS was 4 days longer in patients not treated with G-CSF (median 11 days versus 15 days; P = .001). G-CSF use was associated with more robust incremental daily increases in ANC once recovered (P = .001), fewer days of febrile neutropenia (P = .001), and fewer days on antibiotics (P = .001), potentially contributing to this disproportionate finding. Inferiority in LOS in the no G-CSF group was demonstrated on the interim analysis, and the study was closed at the half-way point. There were no significant group differences in platelet recovery, documented infections, hospital readmissions, or overall survival at 1 year. Engraftment syndrome occurred in 54.3% of patients and was not related to G-CSF use. These results suggest that the increased LOS associated with the omission of G-CSF is largely due to concerns regarding the potential for infection in patients without a stable, recovered ANC in a hospital setting. Engraftment syndrome represented a significant source of febrile neutropenia further contributing to patient safety concerns and requires strategies to decrease its incidence. Infectious complications and death were not affected by the omission of G-CSF supporting a carefully monitored outpatient approach to Auto-HSCT in which white blood cell growth factor is eliminated or given as needed for documented infection. © 2023 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

An Examination of Cytomegalovirus, Socioeconomic Status, Race, and Ethnicity on Outcomes after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Transplantation.

Previous analyses of the effects of race and socioeconomic status (SES) on outcomes after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have suggested that minority populations and those in disadvantaged groups have inferior outcomes. However, the results of these studies have been inconsistent, potentially due to a multitude of factors, both medical and nonmedical, that have confounded results. In haploidentical (HI) HSCT, an expanding approach with the potential to enfranchise more minority patients, data on the effect of race and SES on outcomes are very limited. To identify and potentially correct factors that negatively impact outcomes after HI HSCT in disadvantaged groups at our institution, we performed a retrospective, multivariable analysis of the impact of race and SES as single and combined variables on HI HSCT outcomes of relapse, transplantation-related mortality, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and overall survival (OS). In addition to controlling for race and SES, all patients had HI donors and were treated with the same 2-step approach, with consistent T cell dosing and GVHD prophylaxis to further reduce the impact of confounders in this complex area. The study cohort of 239 patients was 71% Caucasian, 19.7% African American, 4.6% Hispanic, and 4.2% Asian. The majority of minority patients were in areas of higher deprivation (P = .001) and had the highest incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositivity (P = .001) and the lowest likelihood of possessing a CMV immunodominant (IMD) allele (P = .001), which was previously associated with an OS benefit. Positive CMV serostatus was highly linked to post-transplantation CMV reactivation (P = .001) which was associated with higher relapse rates (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 2.30; P = .026), higher TRM (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.09 to 4.05; P = .027), and lower OS (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.65; P = .006). The lack of a CMV IMD allele largely replicated the results of CMV reactivation on HSCT results. Although race and SES did not directly correlate with either OS or relapse incidence, non-Caucasians in a more disadvantaged group had a higher incidence of chronic GVHD (HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.08 to 6.01; P = .033) compared with Caucasians and minorities in less disadvantaged groups. Regardless of SES, minorities had a lower incidence of acute GVHD than Caucasians in a more advantaged SES group (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.90; P = .020). The primary finding of this study is that CMV reactivation was the major driver of mortality after HI HSCT. CMV reactivation may have be associated with poor HSCT outcomes in HI HSCT recipients in disadvantaged areas, most of whom were minorities. The data suggest that the prevention of post-transplantation CMV reactivation possibly could have a major impact on HI HSCT outcomes, especially in minority recipients. The finding of different GVHD manifestations between races are intriguing and merits further study.