Environmental impact of single-use and reusable flexible cystoscopes.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the carbon footprint and environmental impact of single-use and reusable flexible cystoscopes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed the expected clinical lifecycle of single-use (Ambu aScope™ 4 Cysto) and reusable (Olympus CYF-V2) flexible cystoscopes, from manufacture to disposal. Performance data on cumulative procedures between repairs and before decommissioning were derived from a high-volume multispecialty practice. We estimated carbon expenditures per-case using published data on endoscope manufacturing, energy consumption during transportation and reprocessing, and solid waste disposal. RESULTS: A fleet of 16 reusable cystoscopes in service for up to 135 months averaged 207 cases between repairs and 3920 cases per lifecycle. Based on a manufacturing carbon footprint of 11.49 kg CO2 /kg device for reusable flexible endoscopes and 8.54 kg CO2 /kg device for single-use endoscopes, the per-case manufacturing cost was 1.37 kg CO2 for single-use devices and 0.0017 kg CO2 for reusable devices. The solid mass of single-use and reusable devices was 0.16 and 0.57 kg, respectively. For reusable devices, the energy consumption of reusable device reprocessing using an automated endoscope reprocessor was 0.20 kg CO2 , and per-case costs of device repackaging and repair were 0.005 and 0.02 kg CO2 , respectively. The total estimated per-case carbon footprint of single-use and reusable devices was 2.40 and 0.53 kg CO2 , respectively, favouring reusable devices. CONCLUSION: In this lifecycle analysis, the environmental impact of reusable flexible cystoscopes is markedly less than single-use cystoscopes. The primary contributor to the per-case carbon cost of reusable devices is energy consumption of reprocessing.

Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence among a Nationally Representative Sample of Women, 2005-2016: Findings from the Urologic Diseases in America Project.

PURPOSE: Urinary incontinence is frequently underreported and underdiagnosed in the clinical setting. We analyzed 12 years of data from a large, nationally representative sample of women in the United States to assess the prevalence, severity, and daily impact of urinary incontinence and its subtypes at the population level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 15,003 women aged ≥20 years who participated in the 2005-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We estimated the prevalence of urinary incontinence in the prior year, overall and by subtype (stress, urgency or mixed). Among women with urinary incontinence, we additionally assessed symptom severity using the validated 4-level Incontinence Severity Index, as well as impact on daily activities. RESULTS: The 2005-2016 prevalence of any urinary incontinence was 53%; 16% of women had mixed urinary incontinence, 26% had stress only and 10% had urgency only. While urgency urinary incontinence and mixed urinary incontinence were highest among women aged ≥60 years, stress urinary incontinence was highest among women aged 40-59 years. NonHispanic Black women had higher prevalence of urgency urinary incontinence and lower prevalence of stress urinary incontinence compared to other racial/ethnic groups. Of women with urinary incontinence, 30% reported moderate or severe symptoms, which were more common among older than younger women. In addition, 24% of women with urinary incontinence reported that the condition affected their daily activities. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a high prevalence of urinary incontinence among a nationally representative population of women in the United States, with many reporting that urinary incontinence affected their daily activities. Age and racial/ethnic trends varied by urinary incontinence subtype.

Evidence-based quality and accuracy of YouTube videos about nephrolithiasis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality and accuracy of online videos about the medical management of nephrolithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To evaluate trends in online interest, we first examined the frequency of worldwide YouTube searches for 'kidney stones' from 2015 to 2020. We then queried YouTube with terms related to symptoms and treatment of kidney stones and analysed English-language videos with >5000 views. Quality was assessed using the validated DISCERN instrument. Evidence-based content analysis of video content and viewer comments was performed. RESULTS: Online searches for videos about kidney stones doubled between 2015 and 2019 (P < 0.001). We analysed 102 videos with a median (range) number of views of 46 539 (5024-3 631 322). The mean (sd) DISCERN score was 3.0 (1.4) out of 5, indicating 'moderate' quality; scores were significantly higher for the 21 videos (21%) authored by academic hospitals (mean 3.7 vs 2.8, P = 0.02). Inaccurate or non-evidence-based claims were identified in 23 videos (23%); none of the videos authored by academic institutions contained inaccurate claims. Videos with inaccurate statements had more than double the viewer engagement (viewer-generated comments, 'thumbs up' and 'thumbs down' ratings) compared to videos without inaccuracies (P < 0.001). Among viewer comments, 43 videos (43%) included comments with inaccurate or non-evidence-based claims, and a large majority (82 videos, 80%) had 'chatbot' recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Interest in YouTube videos about nephrolithiasis has doubled since 2015. While highly viewed videos vary widely in quality and accuracy, videos produced by academic hospitals have significantly fewer inaccurate claims. Given the high prevalence of stone disease and poor-quality videos, patients should be directed to evidence-based content online.

A micro-costing analysis of outpatient flexible cystoscopy: implications for adoption of single-use flexible cystoscopes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the total cost of outpatient flexible cystoscopy associated with reusable device purchase, maintenance, and reprocessing, and to assess potential cost benefits of single-use flexible cystoscopes. METHODS: Cost data regarding the purchasing, maintaining, and reprocessing of reusable flexible cystoscopes were collected using a micro-costing approach at a high-volume outpatient urology clinic. We estimated the costs to facilities with a range of annual procedure volumes (1000-3000) performed with a fleet of cystoscopes ranging from 10 to 25. We also compared the total cost per double-J ureteral stent removal procedure performed using single-use flexible cystoscopes versus reusable devices. RESULTS: The cost associated with reusable flexible cystoscopes ranged from $105 to $224 per procedure depending on the annual procedure volume and cystoscopes available. As a practice became more efficient by increasing the ratio of procedures performed to cystoscopes in the fleet, the proportion of the total cost due to cystoscope reprocessing increased from 22 to 46%. For ureteral stent removal procedures, the total cost per procedure using reusable cystoscopes (range $165-$1469) was higher than that using single-use devices ($244-$420), unless the annual procedure volume was sufficiently high relative to the number of reusable cystoscopes in the fleet (≥ 350 for a practice with ten reusable cystoscopes, ≥ 700 for one with 20 devices). CONCLUSION: The cost of reprocessing reusable cystoscopes represents a large fraction of the total cost per procedure, especially for high-volume facilities. It may be economical to adopt single-use cystoscopes specifically for stent removal procedures, especially for lower-volume facilities.

Contemporary considerations in the management and treatment of lower pole stones.

The presence of lower pole stones poses a unique challenge due to the anatomical considerations involved in their management and treatment. Considerable research has been performed to determine the optimal strategy when faced with this highly relevant clinical scenario. Standard options for management include observation, shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Indeed, each approach confers a distinct set of risks and benefits, which must be placed into the context of patient preference and expected outcomes. The current state of practice reflects a combination of lessons learned from managing calculi not only in the lower pole, but also from other locations within the kidney as well.

Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery: An Expert Panel Consensus.

PURPOSE: Opioids are frequently overprescribed after surgery. The 2018 AUA position statement on opioid use suggests using the lowest dose and potency to achieve pain control but the lack of procedure specific prescribing guidelines contributes to wide variation in prescribing patterns. To address this gap we aimed to develop opioid prescribing recommendations through an expert panel consensus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 15-member multidisciplinary expert panel included representatives from 5 stakeholder groups. A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to develop recommendations for postoperative opioid prescribing. Recommendations were made for opioid naïve patients without chronic pain conditions. The panel used oxycodone 5 mg equivalents to define the number of prescribed tablets. RESULTS: Procedure specific recommendations were developed for 16 endourological and minimally invasive urological procedures. The panel agreed that not all patients desire or require opioids and, thus, the minimum recommended number of opioid tablets for all procedures was 0. Consensus ranges were identified to allow prescribed quantities to be aligned with expected needs. The maximum recommended quantity varied by procedure from 0 tablets (3 procedures) to 15 tablets (6 procedures) with a median of 10 tablets. Attending urologists typically voted for higher opioid quantities than nonattending panel members. The panel identified 8 overarching strategies for opioid stewardship, including contextualizing postoperative pain management with patient goals and preferences, and maximizing nonopioid therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure specific guidelines for postoperative opioid prescribing may help align individual urologist prescribing habits with consensus recommendations. These guidelines can aid quality improvement efforts to reduce overprescribing in urology.

Trends in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, 2004 to 2013: the Urologic Diseases in America Project.

PURPOSE: Our current understanding of recent trends in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia is incomplete, particularly in younger men. The 2018 Urologic Diseases in America Project attempted to fill this gap by analyzing multiple large administrative claims databases which include men of all ages and permit longitudinal followup. To our knowledge we report these findings for the first time in the scientific literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2 data sources used in this study included the de-identified Optum® Clinformatics® Data Mart database for men 40 to 64 years old and the Medicare 5% Sample for men 65 years old or older. To assess trends in lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia related medication prescriptions and surgical procedures from 2004 to 2013 we created annual cross-sectional cohorts and a longitudinal cohort of patients with incident lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia and 5 years of followup. RESULTS: The use of medications related to lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia increased with age, particularly among men 40 to 60 years old. While medication use increased with time, surgical procedures decreased. Increasing age correlated with a higher rate of surgical procedures in the longitudinal cohort. Younger men were more likely to elect treatments of lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia which reportedly optimize sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: Medication use increased and surgery decreased during the study period. Treatment approaches to lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia varied greatly by patient age. While the minority of men in the fifth and sixth decades of life required treatment, a sharp increase in treatment use was seen between these decades. Younger men were more likely to elect less invasive surgical options. Future studies of lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia should focus on age specific treatment selection.

National Trends in the Surgical Management of Urinary Incontinence among Insured Women, 2004 to 2013: The Urologic Diseases in America Project.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine national trends in the surgical management of urinary incontinence in women in the United States from 2004 to 2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the CDM (Optum® de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart) for women 18 to 64 years old and the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Medicare 5% Sample for women 65 years old or older. We created annual cross-sectional cohorts and assessed trends in the annual prevalence of urinary incontinence related surgical procedures overall and by age, race/ethnicity and geographic region. RESULTS: We observed a decline in the percent of women with urinary incontinence who underwent surgical treatment according to the CMS (from 4.7% in 2004 to 2.7% in 2013) and the CDM (from 12.5% in 2004 to 9.1% in 2013). This trend persisted independently of age, race/ethnicity and geographic region. Slings were the most common procedure but started to decline in 2011, ultimately decreasing by about 50% during the study period. Compared to other groups the prevalence of urinary incontinence related surgical procedures, including slings, was highest among women 35 to 54 years old and White women, and lowest among women residing in the Northeast. These sociodemographic patterns persisted with time. During the study period injection procedures remained stable, sacral neuromodulation increased slightly but remained uncommon and suspension decreased to nearly 0% of all anti-incontinence procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of female urinary incontinence experienced several shifts from 2004 to 2013, including a decline in sling procedures. Age, racial/ethnic and regional differences in treatment persisted with time. Improved understanding of the drivers of these trends may help direct future development of treatments of pelvic floor disorders.

Infrequent use of clinical trials registries in published systematic reviews in urology.

OBJECTIVE: Validity of systematic reviews may be affected by non-publication of statistically non-significant or unfavorable clinical trial results. One function of clinical trial registries is to make these non-published studies available and thereby reduce potential publication bias. We aim to assess the use of clinical trial registries in published systematic reviews in urology. METHODS: We identified all systematic reviews published in the five highest-impact general urology journals that publish original research between January 1 and December 31, 2017. Full-text analysis was performed to determine if protocols included searching clinical trial registries meeting WHO Registry Network criteria. RESULTS: Of a total of 204 search results, 92 were included in the analysis as systematic reviews. The majority searched the MEDLINE (91, 98%), EMBASE (69, 75%), and Cochrane (49, 53%) databases. Based on published methods, only 16 (17%) systematic reviews searched any clinical trial registries: 14 (15%) ClinicalTrials.gov, 6 (6%) WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and 2 (2%) ISRCTN registry. Rates of searching clinical trial registries were low regardless of the journal: 8 of 34 (24%) in European Urology; 2 of 10 (20%) in BJU International; 3 of 17 (18%) in Urology; 2 of 18 (11%) in The Journal of Urology; and 1 of 13 (8%) in World Journal of Urology. CONCLUSION: The majority of recently published systematic reviews in urology do not routinely search clinical trial registries. Inclusion of these registries can help identify unpublished trial data, which may improve the quality of systematic reviews by reducing publication bias.

Individual renal unit urine sampling to identify unilateral metabolic defects
.

AIMS: Preventing kidney stone recurrence relies on detecting and modifying urine chemistry abnormalities. The assumption is that an abnormality is due to a global metabolic defect present in both kidneys. However, we hypothesize that clinically significant unilateral defects may exist. We aimed to identify these patients by sampling urine from each renal unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults undergoing retrograde upper urinary tract surgery were eligible for inclusion. Excluded were patients with a solitary kidney, suspected urothelial malignancy, or urinary tract infection. Following informed consent, all patients proceeded to the operating room. After induction of anesthesia, cystoscopy with ureteral catheterization was performed with urine collected via gravity drainage for 10 minutes. Urine samples with adequate volume were analyzed for chemistry concentrations. A difference greater than the 75th percentile between matched pairs was considered significant. For urine pH, a difference of 0.5 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were screened for eligibility with only 13 (28%) electing to enroll in the study (26 renal units). All subjects underwent successful bilateral ureteral catheterization with no adverse events observed or later reported. The mean (± SD) urine volume captured from the right and left renal units was 5.0 ± 7.4 cm3 and 6.6 ± 6.4 cm3, respectively. Urine was only captured from paired renal units in 8 participants (8/13; 62%). Of these 8 participants, 5 (5/8; 63%) had at least 1 unilateral metabolic defect. CONCLUSION: Unilateral renal unit urine sampling is safe and feasible. However, captured urine volumes are small and variable, but chemical analysis can still be performed. Unilateral defects in renal electrolyte handling are relatively common, but the clinical implications of these differences are still yet to be determined.
.

Dusting versus Basketing during Ureteroscopy-Which Technique is More Efficacious? A Prospective Multicenter Trial from the EDGE Research Consortium.

PURPOSE: There is scant evidence in the literature to support dusting vs active basket extraction during ureteroscopy for kidney stones. We prospectively evaluated and followed patients to determine which modality produced a higher stone-free rate with the fewest complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Members of the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence research consortium prospectively enrolled patients with a renal stone burden ranging from 5 to 20 mm in this study. A holmium laser was used and all patients were stented postoperatively. Ureteral access sheaths were used in 100% of basketing cases while sheaths were optional when dusting. The primary study outcome was the stone-free rate at 6 weeks as determined by x-ray and ultrasound. RESULTS: A total of 84 and 75 patients were enrolled in the basketing and dusting arms, respectively. Stones in the dusting group were significantly larger (mean ± SD stone area 96.1 ± 65.3 vs 63.3 ± 46.0 mm2, p <0.001). The stone-free rate was significantly higher in the basketing group on univariate analysis (74.3% vs 58.2%, p = 0.04) but not on multivariate analysis (1.9 OR, 95% CI 0.9-4.3, p = 0.11). In patients who underwent a basketing procedure operative time was 37.7 minutes longer than in those treated with a dusting procedure (95% CI 23.8-51.7, p <0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates, hospital readmissions or additional procedures between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The stone-free rate was higher for active basket retrieval of fragments at short-term followup on univariate analysis but not on multivariate analysis. There was no difference in postoperative complications or procedures. The 2 techniques should be in the armamentarium of the urologist.

Kidney stone composition in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
.

INTRODUCTION: Urolithiasis is a globally-distributed disease; however, its prevalence varies across countries and regions. Countries in the Middle East have been reported to have particularly high nephrolithiasis prevalence rates. To date, however, we have an incomplete understanding of the composition of stones seen in this region. Therefore, we performed a study to characterize stone composition over a 14-year period in the Eastern Province of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all adult patients who had the composition of their upper urinary tract calculi analyzed at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare (JHAH) between 1999 and 2013 was performed. Patient demographics and pathology results were obtained from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: A total of 1,747 stones were analyzed in the study period. The results are presented in the Table. Male patients predominated (79%). For both men and women, the majority of stones were calcium oxalate: 85.2% male, 85.9% female. Uric acid stones were the next most common: 10.1% male; 9.0% female. Overall, there were no significant differences between gender with regards to the distribution of stone types. CONCLUSION: This study represents one of the largest characterizations of stone composition in the Middle East. There remains a significant gender disparity in stone prevalence in the Eastern Province of KSA, with males affected to a significantly greater extent. Calcium oxalate is the most common type of stone, and this is true for both men and women. Future investigations of dietary and environmental factors can build on these initial epidemiologic findings.
.

Urine kidney injury markers do not increase following gastric bypass: a multi-center cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: To determine if markers of kidney injury correlate with urinary oxalate excretion. If so, such biomarkers might be early predictors of oxalate nephropathy. Gastric bypass surgery for obesity is known to be associated with postoperative hyperoxaluria, which can lead to urolithiasis and kidney damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were recruited from four large academic centers > 6 months following completion of gastric bypass surgery. Patients provided a spot urine sample for analysis of three markers of kidney injury: 8-iso-Prostaglandin F2 α, N-acetyl- ß -D-Glucosaminidase, and Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin. Patients also provided 24 hour urine samples for stone risk analysis. RESULTS: A total of 46 study patients provided samples, the average age was 48.4 +/- 11.3. There were 40 women and 6 men. There was no difference in the level of any of the three inflammatory markers between the study group and the reference range generated from healthy non-hyperoxaluric subjects. Neither oxalate excretion nor supersaturation of calcium oxalate correlated with any of the injury markers. There was no difference noted between those with hyperoxaluria (n = 17) and those with normoxaluria (n = 29) with respect to any of the injury markers. CONCLUSIONS: Though hyperoxaluria was common after bypass surgery, markers of kidney injury were not elevated after surgery. No correlation was found between urine oxalate excretion and any of the injury markers.

Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II.

PURPOSE: This Guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the surgical management of patients with kidney and/or ureteral stones. The summary presented herein represents Part II of the two-part series dedicated to Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. Please refer to Part I for introductory information and a discussion of pre-operative imaging and special cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature (search dates 1/1/1985 to 5/31/2015) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed studies relevant to the surgical management of stones. The review yielded an evidence base of 1,911 articles after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. These publications were used to create the Guideline statements. Evidence-based statements of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendation were developed based on benefits and risks/burdens to patients. Additional directives are provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions when insufficient evidence existed. RESULTS: The Panel identified 12 adult Index Patients to represent the most common cases seen in clinical practice. Three additional Index Patients were also created to describe the more commonly encountered special cases, including pediatric and pregnant patients. With these patients in mind, Guideline statements were developed to aid the clinician in identifying optimal management. CONCLUSIONS: Proper treatment selection, which is directed by patient- and stone-specific factors, remains the greatest predictor of successful treatment outcomes. This Guideline is intended for use in conjunction with the individual patient's treatment goals. In all cases, patient preferences and personal goals should be considered when choosing a management strategy.

Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I.

PURPOSE: This Guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the surgical management of patients with kidney and/or ureteral stones. The summary presented herein represents Part I of the two-part series dedicated to Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. Please refer to Part II for an in-depth discussion of patients presenting with ureteral or renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature (search dates 1/1/1985 to 5/31/2015) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed studies relevant to the surgical management of stones. The review yielded an evidence base of 1,911 articles after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. These publications were used to create the Guideline statements. Evidence-based statements of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendation were developed based on benefits and risks/burdens to patients. Additional directives are provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions when insufficient evidence existed. RESULTS: The Panel identified 12 adult Index Patients to represent the most common cases seen in clinical practice. Three additional Index Patients were also created to describe pediatric and pregnant patients with such stones. With these patients in mind, Guideline statements were developed to aid the clinician in identifying optimal management. CONCLUSIONS: Proper treatment selection, which is directed by patient- and stone-specific factors, remains the greatest predictor of successful treatment outcomes. This Guideline is intended for use in conjunction with the individual patient's treatment goals. In all cases, patient preferences and personal goals should be considered when choosing a management strategy.

Challenging Case: Stones.

A 40-year-old woman presents to the emergency department after a motor vehicle accident, and a CT scan revealed no injuries but incidentally notes three non-obstructing stones in the left kidney of 3, 4, and 5 mm in size. She is completely asymptomatic and has no history of urolithiasis.

A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm.

PURPOSE: Flexible ureteroscopy is rapidly becoming a first line therapy for many patients with renal and ureteral stones. However, current understanding of treatment outcomes in patients with isolated proximal ureteral stones is limited. Therefore, we performed a prospective, multi-institutional study of ureteroscopic management of proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm to better define clinical outcomes associated with this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with proximal ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm were prospectively identified. Patients with concomitant ipsilateral renal calculi or prior ureteral stenting were excluded from study. Flexible ureteroscopy, holmium laser lithotripsy and ureteral stent placement was performed. Ureteral access sheath use, laser settings and other details of perioperative and postoperative management were based on individual surgeon preference. Stone clearance was determined by the results of renal ultrasound and plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 71 patients 44 (62%) were male and 27 (38%) were female. Mean age was 48.2 years. ASA(®) score was 1 in 12 cases (16%), 2 in 41 (58%), 3 in 16 (23%) and 4 in 2 (3%). Mean body mass index was 31.8 kg/m(2), mean stone size was 7.4 mm (range 5 to 15) and mean operative time was 60.3 minutes (range 15 to 148). Intraoperative complications occurred in 2 patients (2.8%), including mild ureteral trauma. Postoperative complications developed in 6 patients (8.7%), including urinary tract infection in 3, urinary retention in 2 and flash pulmonary edema in 1. The stone-free rate was 95% and for stones smaller than 1 cm it was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible ureteroscopy is associated with excellent clinical outcomes and acceptable morbidity when applied to patients with proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm.