Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surg Endosc ; 36(5): 3489-3494, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34382122

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that in conventional open surgery, approximately 10% of surgical gloves are perforated during surgery without being noticed. To protect both the patient and medical staff from harm, double gloving or changing gloves routinely at certain intervals during surgery is recommended. However, whether these protective measures are also necessary for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is unknown because the actual perforation rate during laparoscopic procedures is unclear. METHODS: Seventy-seven laparoscopic colorectal surgeries were evaluated, and a total of 616 surgical gloves used in the surgeries were collected for analysis. The presence of glove perforation was tested by the standard water-leak test method (EN455-1). RESULTS: Seven perforations were detected (1.1%). The duration of the laparoscopic procedure was not a statistically significant risk factor for glove perforation (p = 0.41). Postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs) were observed in 12 cases (15.6%), but there was no significant correlation between the presence of glove perforation and SSI (p = 0.92). According to the bacterial cultivation results, the majority of causative agents of SSI were enterobacteria, which belong to the major gut flora. CONCLUSION: Although the perforation rate was considerably lower than that in open surgery, surgical glove perforation occurred during laparoscopic procedures. Double gloving in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is recommended not to prevent SSI but to protect medical workers from harmful infections after direct contact with the patient.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Laparoscopía , Guantes Quirúrgicos , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Cureus ; 15(11): e49705, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38033444

RESUMEN

A 77-year-old man presented to the Department of Internal Medicine with a chief complaint of abdominal pain. During the outpatient examination, a computed tomography (CT) scan showed gallstones. The patient developed worsening abdominal pain and fever and was admitted to the emergency department. He was diagnosed with cholecystitis and hospitalized. Treatment with antimicrobial agents was initiated. On the second day of hospitalization, the patient developed a fever of 39°C, hypotension, and oliguria. An emergency CT scan was performed, which showed gas production in the gallbladder. He was diagnosed with emphysematous cholecystitis, and emergency percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage was performed. The patient was transferred to the high-care unit, and intensive care was initiated. On the eighth day, a follow-up CT scan showed an abscess in the gallbladder bed, and drainage was performed percutaneously. His general condition gradually improved, and he was discharged from the hospital on day 24. The patient was readmitted for cholecystectomy three months after the initial admission. The prognosis of sepsis caused by Clostridium perfringens is extremely poor, with a mortality rate of 70%-100%. We present a case of emphysematous cholecystitis successfully treated with multimodal treatment despite the presence of sepsis due to Clostridium perfringens and discuss the possible prognostic factors by reviewing the literature.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA