Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 74
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(1): 189-196, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37968198

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the analgesic efficacy of postoperative deep parasternal intercostal plane (DPIP) blocks for patients having cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. DESIGN: This single-center retrospective study compared patients receiving bilateral DPIP blocks with a matched cohort of patients not receiving DPIP blocks. SETTING: Large quaternary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients admitted to the authors' institution from January 1, 2016, to August 14, 2020, for elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received ultrasound-guided bilateral DPIP blocks. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 113 patients received a DPIP block; 3,461 patients did not. The estimated multiplicative change in cumulative opioid consumption through 24 hours was 0.42 (95% CI 0.32-0.56; p < 0.001), indicating that patients receiving DPIP blocks required 60% fewer opioids than patients who did not. Proportional odds ratios for the average pain score on postoperative day (POD) 0 was 0.46 (95% CI 0.32-0.65; p < 0.001), and POD 1 was 0.67 (95% CI 0.47-0.94; p = 0.021), indicating lower pain scores for patients receiving blocks. The exploratory analysis identified an inverse correlation between DPIP blocks and atrial fibrillation incidence (2% v 15%; inverse probability of treatment weighting odds ratio 0.088, 95% CI 0.02-0.41; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The use of DPIP blocks in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy was associated with less opioid use and improved pain scores in the early postoperative period compared with patients not receiving blocks. Prospective randomized controlled studies should further elucidate the efficacy and risks of DPIP blocks in cardiac surgery.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Bloqueo Nervioso , Adulto , Humanos , Esternotomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Analgésicos Opioides , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos
2.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 37(6): 933-941, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36863984

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: No recent prospective studies have analyzed the accuracy of standard coagulation tests and thromboelastography (TEG) to identify patients with excessive microvascular bleeding following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The aim of this study was to assess the value of coagulation profile tests, as well as TEG, for the classification of microvascular bleeding after CPB. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: At a single-center academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing elective cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Qualitative assessment of microvascular bleeding post-CPB (surgeon and anesthesiologist consensus) and the association with coagulation profile tests and TEG values. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 816 patients were included in the study-358 (44%) bleeders and 458 (56%) nonbleeders. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for the coagulation profile tests and TEG values ranged from 45% to 72%. The predictive utility was similar across tests, with prothrombin time (PT) (62% accuracy, 51% sensitivity, 70% specificity), international normalized ratio (INR) (62% accuracy, 48% sensitivity, 72% specificity), and platelet count (62% accuracy, 62% sensitivity, 61% specificity) displaying the highest performance. Secondary outcomes were worse in bleeders versus nonbleeders, including higher chest tube drainage, total blood loss, transfusion of red blood cells, reoperation rates (p < 0.001, respectively), readmission within 30 days (p = 0.007), and hospital mortality (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Standard coagulation tests and individual components of TEG in isolation agree poorly with the visual classification of microvascular bleeding after CPB. The PT-INR and platelet count performed best but had low accuracy. Further work is warranted to identify better testing strategies to guide perioperative transfusion decisions in cardiac surgical patients.


Asunto(s)
Puente Cardiopulmonar , Hemorragia , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Pruebas de Coagulación Sanguínea , Tiempo de Protrombina , Tromboelastografía
3.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 37(7): 1188-1194, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36948910

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single-injection pectoral fascial plane (PECS) II blocks compared to paravertebral blocks for elective robotic mitral valve surgery. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective study that reported patient and procedural characteristics, postoperative pain scores, and postoperative opioid use for patients undergoing robotic mitral valve surgery. SETTING: This investigation was performed at a large quaternary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (age ≥18) admitted to the authors' hospital from January 1, 2016, to August 14, 2020, for elective robotic mitral valve repair who received either a paravertebral or PECS II block for postoperative analgesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received an ultrasound-guided, unilateral paravertebral or PECS II nerve block. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients received a PECS II block, and 190 patients received a paravertebral block during the study period. The primary outcome measures were average postoperative pain scores and cumulative opioid use. Secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, need for reoperation, need for antiemetics, surgical wound infection, and atrial fibrillation incidence. Patients receiving the PECS II block required significantly fewer opioids in the immediate postoperative period than the paravertebral block group, and had comparable postoperative pain scores. No increase in adverse outcomes was noted for either group. CONCLUSIONS: The PECS II block is a safe and highly effective option for regional analgesia for robotic mitral valve surgery, with demonstrated efficacy comparable to the paravertebral block.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia , Bloqueo Nervioso , Adulto , Humanos , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Analgésicos Opioides , Estudios Retrospectivos , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología
4.
Artif Organs ; 46(3): 491-500, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34403155

RESUMEN

Coagulopathy is common during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, treatment of which can be challenging given the often-limited ability for the right ventricle to accommodate volume transfusion after device initiation with 20% to 40% of patients developing right ventricular failure (RVF). Transfusion of plasma late on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) combined with ultrafiltration may replace clotting factors while reducing volume administration. We compared outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation receiving plasma on CPB and ultrafiltration with traditional transfusion practices. Co-primary outcomes needed for blood product transfusion in the first 6 and 24 hours after CPB. Secondary outcomes included metrics of morbidity and mortality. 396 patients were analyzed (59 plasma on CPB). Patients receiving plasma on CPB had a greater volume of blood products transfused (3764 vs. 2741 mL first 6 hours; 6059 vs. 4305 mL first 24 hours) in unadjusted analysis. In adjusted analysis, plasma transfusion on CPB with ultrafiltration had no significant effect on the primary outcomes of blood products given in the first 6 hours (estimated effect size 982 [-428, 2392] mL, P = .17) and 24 hours (estimated effect size 1076 [-904, 3057] mL, P = .29). Patients receiving plasma on CPB were more likely on either vasopressors or inotropes at 24 hours after ICU admission (P = .01), however, indices of coagulopathy and RVF were similar between groups. While prospective studies would be necessary to definitively evaluate the clinical utility of this strategy, no signal for benefit was observed suggesting plasma should not be used for this purpose.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Corazón Auxiliar , Plasma , Ultrafiltración , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 36(8 Pt B): 3093-3100, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35570081

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the characteristics, intraoperative, and postoperative course of patients undergoing inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. DESIGN: A single-center case series that reported demographic data and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing inferior vena cava thrombectomy. SETTING: This investigation was performed at a large quaternary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (age ≥18) admitted to the authors' hospital from January 1, 2005, to March 10, 2017, undergoing inferior vena cava thrombectomy for level III and IV renal cell carcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions were performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-five patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified, with 31 patients diagnosed with level III and 34 with level IV renal cell carcinoma. Patients with level IV tumors were significantly more likely to have greater intraoperative blood loss, had longer surgical duration and hospital stays, and had more frequently required blood products, pressors, and cardiopulmonary bypass intraoperatively. Intraoperative transesophageal echo was more frequently used in level IV thrombectomy compared to level III (91.2% v 67.7%). Of patients with level IV thrombus, 41.2% developed postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to only 3.2% with level III thrombus. The 30-day mortality was 4.6% for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma had more complex intraoperative and postoperative courses with level IV compared to level III tumor thrombus.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes , Trombosis , Adulto , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombectomía , Trombosis/cirugía , Vena Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Cava Inferior/patología , Vena Cava Inferior/cirugía
6.
Anesthesiology ; 134(3): 395-404, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33503656

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Removal of cytokines, chemokines, and microvesicles from the supernatant of allogeneic erythrocytes may help mitigate adverse transfusion reactions. Blood bank-based washing procedures present logistical difficulties; therefore, we tested the hypothesis that on-demand bedside washing of allogeneic erythrocyte units is capable of removing soluble factors and is feasible in a clinical setting. METHODS: There were in vitro and prospective, observation cohort components to this a priori planned substudy evaluating bedside allogeneic erythrocyte washing, with a cell saver, during cardiac surgery. Laboratory data were collected from the first 75 washed units given to a subset of patients nested in the intervention arm of a parent clinical trial. Paired pre- and postwash samples from the blood unit bags were centrifuged. The supernatant was aspirated and frozen at -70°C, then batch-tested for cell-derived microvesicles, soluble CD40 ligand, chemokine ligand 5, and neutral lipids (all previously associated with transfusion reactions) and cell-free hemoglobin (possibly increased by washing). From the entire cohort randomized to the intervention arm of the trial, bedside washing was defined as feasible if at least 75% of prescribed units were washed per protocol. RESULTS: Paired data were available for 74 units. Washing reduced soluble CD40 ligand (median [interquartile range]; from 143 [1 to 338] ng/ml to zero), chemokine ligand 5 (from 1,314 [715 to 2,551] to 305 [179 to 488] ng/ml), and microvesicle numbers (from 6.90 [4.10 to 20.0] to 0.83 [0.33 to 2.80] × 106), while cell-free hemoglobin concentration increased from 72.6 (53.6 to 171.6) mg/dl to 210.5 (126.6 to 479.6) mg/dl (P < 0.0001 for each). There was no effect on neutral lipids. Bedside washing was determined as feasible for 80 of 81 patients (99%); overall, 293 of 314 (93%) units were washed per protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside erythrocyte washing was clinically feasible and greatly reduced concentrations of soluble factors thought to be associated with transfusion-related adverse reactions, increasing concentrations of cell-free hemoglobin while maintaining acceptable (less than 0.8%) hemolysis.


Asunto(s)
Eliminación de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Quimiocinas , Citocinas , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/métodos , Eritrocitos/química , Reacción a la Transfusión/prevención & control , Conservación de la Sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Eritrocitos/citología , Humanos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Estudios Prospectivos
7.
J Vasc Surg ; 71(4): 1109-1118.e2, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31564581

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates and risk factors of complications related to cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) during first stage and completion fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS: We reviewed the outcomes of 293 consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized study to investigate outcomes of F-BEVAR between 2013 and 2018. Patients who received CSFD during first-stage thoracic endovascular aortic repair, index F-BEVAR, or completion of temporary aneurysm sac perfusion procedures were included in the analysis. CSFD complications were graded as severe or moderate if they were life threatening, escalated the level of care, or prolonged the hospital stay. Presence of substantial degenerative lumbar disease (DLD) was identified based on review of preoperative computed tomography. End points included technical difficulties during CSFD placement and CSFD-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients (mean age, 73 ± 8 years; 70% male) treated for 20 pararenal and 167 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms received CSFD in 240 procedures, including 51 first-stage thoracic endovascular aortic repairs, 184 index F-BEVARs, and 5 completion temporary aneurysm sac perfusion procedures. Nineteen patients (10%) had 22 CSFD-related complications after 21 aortic procedures (9%). Complications were graded as severe to moderate in 17 patients (9%). There were 12 patients (6%) with intracranial hypotension, including three (2%) who had intracranial hemorrhage and nine (5%) with post dural puncture headache requiring blood patches in six. Another six patients (3%) developed spinal hematomas resulting in paraplegia in two (1%) and transient paraparesis in two (1%). One patient had CSF leakage from the puncture site (no intervention required). Four patients had bleeding during attempted drain placement, which required postponement of F-BEVAR. Technical difficulties were experienced in 57 drain insertions (24%), more often in patients with DLD than in those without DLD (35/113 [31%] vs 22/121 [18%]; P = .03). Fluoroscopic guidance was used in 44 drain placements (18%) with a lower rate of technical difficulties compared with the blind approach (9% vs 28%; P = .01). There was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward more complications in patients with technical challenges (14% vs 7%; P = .10). Of 13 study patients who developed spinal cord injuries during aortic procedures, 4 (31%) were attributed to CSFD. CONCLUSIONS: Although CSFD is widely used to prevent ischemic spinal cord injury during complex aortic repair, the risk of major CSFD-related complications is not negligible and should be carefully weighed against its potential benefits. One-third of spinal cord injuries were caused by CSF drain placement. The use of fluoroscopic guidance may decrease the risk of CSFD-related complications.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/complicaciones , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 62: 349-355, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31449947

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Same-day cancellation of vascular surgical procedures is an undesirable occurrence with multifaceted implications into the patient's health care. Numerous factors play a role in same-day cancellations, ranging from medical causes, patient factors, or administrative and scheduling conflicts. METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records database at our large tertiary academic referral center from 2007 to 2017 was performed to identify patients scheduled for vascular surgical procedures who experienced same-day cancellation. RESULTS: Of the 17,887 scheduled vascular surgical procedures during the study period, 361 (2%) patients experienced same-day cancellations. Seventy-five percent of cancellations were determined to be nonforeseeable, 12.5% foreseeable, and 12.5% indeterminate. The most common reasons for cancellation were medical (55%), patient-initiated cancellation (12%), procedure no longer required (10%), and administrative or scheduling conflicts (10%). Twenty-six (7.3%) patients died within 30 days after their cancelled vascular operation. Most patients (69%) eventually received the planned operation, with a mean interval of 45.5 ± 135.8 days between cancellation and performance of the aforementioned procedure. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, same-day cancellations of vascular surgical procedures were infrequent (2%). Most cancellations were due to medical reasons. Although most cancellations were determined to be nonforeseeable, emphasizing foreseeable cancellations may provide opportunities to improve patient care, enhance satisfaction, and reduce future cancellations.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Citas y Horarios , Quirófanos/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Tiempo de Tratamiento/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/organización & administración , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
9.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 34(7): 1846-1852, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31928843

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Expert guidelines consistently list esophageal stricture (ES) as a contraindication to the performance of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), although anecdotally the authors are aware of patients with ES undergoing TEE without apparent complication. Therefore the authors sought to determine the outcomes of patients with ES who had undergone TEE at their institution. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective review. SETTING: Academic medical center (clinic and affiliated hospital). PARTICIPANTS: Patients with documented ES who also underwent TEE. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In a 10-year period, 1,083 TEE reports were generated for 823 patients who had a diagnosis of ES. One case of esophageal perforation occurred (1/1,083 examination reports [0.09%]) in an 85-year-old male with gastroesophageal reflux disease-related ES who had undergone esophageal dilation the same day as the TEE. In 17.2% of the TEE reports reviewed, changes to the conduct of the examination occurred, such as use of a pediatric probe or avoidance of transgastric imaging. In 8% of reviewed examinations, procedural difficulty was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with nonmalignant ES commonly present for TEE (>100 per year, on average, at the authors' institution). Severe TEE-related esophageal injury rarely occurred in patients with ES. However, changes to the conduct of the TEE examination and procedural difficulty were not infrequent in this group. Clinicians contemplating TEE in patients with ES should prepare for the possibility of altered examination conduct and possible procedural difficulty.


Asunto(s)
Perforación del Esófago , Estenosis Esofágica , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/efectos adversos , Estenosis Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Esofágica/etiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
J Card Surg ; 35(5): 1043-1050, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32248625

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are at risk for coagulopathy and bleeding requiring blood product transfusion. Acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) is a blood conservation technique shown to reduce transfusion and bleeding associated with cardiac surgery. Despite numerous advantages, little is known about the effect of ANH on coagulation testing. METHODS: Prospective observational study, 80 patients (40 controls, 40 ANH) undergoing cardiac surgery requiring CPB. Blood for coagulation testing (hemoglobin, platelet count, prothrombin time/International Normalized Ratio [PT/INR], activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT], fibrinogen, and kaolin thromboelastography [TEG]) was collected 5 minutes after protamine (Time 1), and following ANH reinfusion (or 30 minutes after Time 1) in controls (Time 2). RESULTS: Patients undergoing ANH had a significantly lower aPTT (-1.4 seconds 95% CI [-2.7, 0.0]; P = .044) and higher fibrinogen (+13 mg/dL [+1, +26]; P = .040) between Time 1 and Time 2 compared to controls. Additionally, the change in hemoglobin between Time 1 and Time 2 was significantly increased in the ANH group (+0.4 [+0.1, +0.8]; P = .024). The study also demonstrated a normalization of the platelet count, PT/INR, aPTT, and TEG values between Time 1 and Time 2 in control patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring CPB, ANH results in significant improvements of aPTT, fibrinogen and hemoglobin values; however, the true clinical significance is questionable. In the absence of ongoing surgical bleeding, there appears to be normalization of coagulation tests (excluding fibrinogen) following CPB.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/etiología , Pruebas de Coagulación Sanguínea , Transfusión Sanguínea , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Hemodilución/métodos , Hemorragia/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anciano , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/sangre , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/prevención & control , Femenino , Hemorragia/sangre , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Tromboplastina Parcial , Recuento de Plaquetas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo , Tromboelastografía
11.
Anesth Analg ; 128(6): 1168-1174, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31094784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on readmissions after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation have focused on hospital readmissions after dismissal from the index hospitalization. Because few data exist, the purpose of this study was to examine intensive care unit (ICU) readmissions in patients during their initial hospitalization for LVAD implantation to determine reasons for, factors associated with, and incidence of mortality after ICU readmission. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed from February 2007 to March 2015 of patients at our institution receiving first-time LVAD implantation. After LVAD implantation, patients dismissed from the ICU who then required ICU readmission before hospital dismissal were compared to those not requiring ICU readmission before hospital dismissal with respect to preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. RESULTS: Among 287 LVAD patients, 266 survived their initial ICU admission, of which 49 (18.4%) required ICU readmission. The most common reasons for readmission were bleeding and respiratory failure. Factors found to be univariably associated with ICU readmission were preoperative hemoglobin, preoperative aspartate aminotransferase, preoperative atrial fibrillation, preoperative dialysis, longer cardiopulmonary bypass times, and higher intraoperative allogeneic blood transfusion requirements. Multivariable analysis revealed ICU readmission to be independently associated with preoperative dialysis (odds ratio, 12.86; 95% confidence interval, 3.16-52.28; P < .001). Overall mortality at 1 year was 22.6%. Survival after hospital dismissal was worse for patients who required ICU readmission during the index hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-4.81; P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: ICU readmission after LVAD implantation occurred relatively frequently and was significantly associated with 1-year mortality after hospital dismissal. These data can perhaps be used to identify subsets of LVAD patients at risk for ICU readmission and may lead to implementation of practice changes to mitigate ICU readmissions. Future larger and prospective studies are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Anciano , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Femenino , Ventrículos Cardíacos/cirugía , Hemorragia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Anesth Analg ; 126(6): 1859-1866, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29210786

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) use is known to alter platelet activation and aggregation leading to impairment in hemostasis. Previous studies are ambiguous with regard to bleeding, transfusion, and perioperative complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of perioperative bleeding, transfusion, morbidity, and mortality in cardiac surgical patients taking SSRI/SNRIs compared with propensity-matched controls. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at our institution between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2014, were eligible for study inclusion. Patients taking SSRI/SNRI medications at the time of surgery were identified and compared against all other patients not taking SSRI/SNRI medications to produce well-matched groups via propensity score analysis. Patients taking SSRI/SNRI medications were matched in a 1:1 ratio to control patients not taking these medications based on an internally estimated propensity score. Primary outcomes included perioperative blood transfusion, chest tube output, and reoperation for bleeding. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications (renal failure, stroke or transient ischemic accident, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and perioperative myocardial infarction), intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1417 pairs of SSRI/SNRI patients and matched controls were retained for analysis. Between SSRI/SNRI patients and matched controls, there was no significant difference in postoperative chest tube output (median, 750.0 vs 750.0 mL; P = .860) or reoperation for bleeding (2.8% vs 2.5%; P = .892). Perioperative transfusion rates across all time points and blood product type were not significantly different between groups, with the overall perioperative transfusion rate for SSRI/SNRI patients 66.5% vs 64.9% for matched controls (P = .697). Patients in the SSRI/SNRI group had a higher rate of prolonged mechanical ventilation (13.1% vs 8.6%; P = .002), longer ICU LOS (median, 25.5 vs 23.8 hours; P < .001), and longer hospital LOS (median, 6.0 vs 5.0 days; P < .001). Remaining mortality and outcome data were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: SSRI/SNRI use was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding or transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. While there was prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased ICU/hospital LOS in the SSRI/SNRI group, it is unclear that this finding is the result of such medications or rather associated with the underlying psychiatric condition for which they are prescribed. The results of this study suggest that perioperative interruption of SSRI/SNRIs to reduce the risk of perioperative bleeding and transfusion is unwarranted and may risk destabilization of patients' psychiatric condition.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Transfusión Sanguínea/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/inducido químicamente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/efectos adversos
14.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 30(3): 659-64, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26703970

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study's purpose was to review non-cardiac surgery (NCS) in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) to examine perioperative management and quantify postoperative mortality and worsening heart failure. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: A single tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 57 adult patients with HOCM who underwent NCS from January 1, 1996, through January 31, 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Noncardiac surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors identified 57 HOCM patients who underwent 96 NCS procedures. Vasoactive medications were administered to the majority of NCS patients. Three patients (3%) died within 30 days of NCS, but causes of death did not appear to be cardiac in nature. Death after NCS was not significantly associated with preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.2727) or peak instantaneous systolic resting gradient (0.8828), but was associated with emergency surgery (p = 0.0002). Three patients experienced worsening heart failure postoperatively, and this was significantly associated with preoperative New York Heart Association Class III-IV symptoms compared with I-II symptoms (p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: HOCM patients safely can undergo NCS at multidisciplinary centers experienced in caring for these patients. The mortality rate in this study was less than that reported in the majority of other studies. Postoperative complications, including increasing heart failure, may occur, especially in patients with more severe preoperative cardiac symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesiólogos , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/mortalidad , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria
15.
Crit Care Med ; 43(3): 665-73, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25513786

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Robust markers of subclinical perioperative lung injury are lacking. Extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weight and pulmonary vascular permeability index are two promising early markers of lung edema. We aimed to evaluate whether extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weight and pulmonary vascular permeability index would identify patients at risk for clinically significant postoperative pulmonary edema, particularly resulting from the acute respiratory distress syndrome. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adults undergoing high-risk cardiac or aortic vascular surgery (or both) with risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weight and pulmonary vascular permeability index measurements were obtained intraoperatively and in the early postoperative period. We assessed the accuracy of peak extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weight and pulmonary vascular permeability index as predictive markers of clinically significant pulmonary edema (defined as acute respiratory distress syndrome or cardiogenic pulmonary edema) using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves. Associations between extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weight and pulmonary vascular permeability patient-important with important outcomes were assessed. Of 150 eligible patients, 132 patients (88%) had extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weight and pulmonary vascular permeability index measurements. Of these, 13 patients (9.8%) had postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome and 15 patients (11.4%) had cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weight effectively predicted development of clinically significant pulmonary edema (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.89). Pulmonary vascular permeability index discriminated acute respiratory distress syndrome from cardiogenic pulmonary edema alone or no edema (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.93). Extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weight was associated with the worst postoperative PaO2/FIO2, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and hospital stay. Peak values for extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weight and pulmonary vascular permeability index were obtained within 2 hours of the primary intraoperative insult for the majority of patients (> 80%). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative extravascular lung water indexed to predicted body weight is an early marker that predicts risk of clinically significant postoperative pulmonary edema in at-risk surgical patients. Pulmonary vascular permeability index effectively discriminated postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome from cardiogenic pulmonary edema. These measures will aid in the early detection of subclinical lung injury in at-risk surgical populations.


Asunto(s)
Permeabilidad Capilar/fisiología , Agua Pulmonar Extravascular/metabolismo , Periodo Perioperatorio , Edema Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/fisiopatología , Centros Médicos Académicos , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/fisiopatología , Biomarcadores , Peso Corporal , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Pulmón/irrigación sanguínea , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Respiración Artificial/métodos
17.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 28(1): 64-68, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24144629

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the evolution in anesthetic technique used for the first 200 patients undergoing robotic mitral valve surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective review. SETTING: A single tertiary referral academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred consecutive patients undergoing robotic mitral valve surgery using the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) at Mayo Clinic Rochester. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, surgical and anesthetic data were recorded. For analysis, patients were placed in 4 groups, each containing 50 consecutive patients, labeled Quartiles 1 to 4. Over time, there were statistically significant decreases in cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times. Significant differences in the anesthetic management were shown, with a reduction of intraoperative fentanyl and midazolam doses, and the introduction of paravertebral blockade in Quartile 2. There was a reduction of time between incision closure and extubation, and nearly 90% of patients were extubated in the operating room in Quartiles 3 and 4. Despite changes to the intraoperative analgesic management, and focus on earlier extubation, there were no differences seen in visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores over the 4 quartiles. Reductions were seen in total intensive care unit and hospital length of stay during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Changes to the practice, including efforts to limit intraoperative opioid administration and the addition of preoperative paravertebral blockade, helped facilitate earlier extubation. In the second half of the study period, close to 90% of patients were extubated in the operating room safely and without delaying patient transition to the intensive care unit.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia/métodos , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Robótica , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueo Nervioso , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 27(6): 1253-9, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23993767

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare cerebral near-infrared regional spectroscopy (NIRS) with the 12-lead electroencephalogram for the detection of ischemia during carotid artery clamping for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). DESIGN: Prospective, observational. SETTING: Single, tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety patients older than 18 undergoing elective, unilateral CEA. INTERVENTIONS: In addition to EEG monitoring, all patients underwent continuous blinded NIRS monitoring with sensors placed bilaterally above the supraorbital ridge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen patients were excluded, leaving 73 patients available for evaluation. Four patients (5.5%) required shunting based on EEG findings. Changes in cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) were assessed on the operative side using the average value for the 1 minute prior to cross-clamp and the lowest rSO2 value the first 5 minutes postclamp. Each 1% absolute decrease and each 1% relative decrease from baseline conferred a 50% increase in the need for shunt placement (OR 1.5; 95% CI (1.03-2.26); p = 0.03 and OR 1.4; 95% CI (1.02-1.81); p = 0.04 respectively). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined using significant cutoffs of≥5% absolute change or≥10% relative change. Positive predictive value was low (<25%) for both absolute and relative changes. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in rSO2 during carotid cross-clamping for CEA is associated with EEG-determined need for shunting, but the positive predictive value is low. Using the above cutoffs in the current series would have resulted in an increase in the shunt rate by approximately 20% when it was not indicated by EEG.


Asunto(s)
Electroencefalografía/métodos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/métodos , Oximetría/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Constricción , Electrocardiografía , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/prevención & control , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Oportunidad Relativa , Consumo de Oxígeno/fisiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA