Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 45
Filtrar
1.
J Med Ethics ; 43(5): 346-349, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28039284

RESUMEN

Next-generation sequencing is increasingly used in clinical practice for the diagnosis of Mendelian diseases. Because of the high likelihood of secondary findings associated with this technique, the process of informing patients is beset with new challenges. One of them is regarding the type of secondary findings that ought to be disclosed to patients. The aim of this research is to propose a practical implementation of the notion of actionability, a common criteria justifying the disclosure of secondary findings but whose interpretation varies greatly among professionals. We distinguish three types of actionability corresponding to (1) well-established medical actions, (2) patient-initiated health-related actions and (3) life-plan decisions. We argue that actionability depends on the characteristics of the mutation or gene and on the values of patients. In discussing the return of secondary findings, it is important that the physician tries to get an impression of the specific situation and values of patients. Regarding variants of uncertain clinical significance in actionable genes, we found that different understandings of autonomy lead to different conclusions and that, for some of them, it may be legitimate to refrain from returning uncertain information.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas/diagnóstico , Pruebas Genéticas/ética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Hallazgos Incidentales , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Terminología como Asunto
2.
Bioethics ; 31(3): 199-208, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27767219

RESUMEN

Assisting suicide is legal in Switzerland if it is offered without selfish motive to a person with decision-making capacity. Although the 'Swiss model' for suicide assistance has been extensively described in the literature, the formally and informally protected liberties and claims of assistors and recipients of suicide assistance in Switzerland are incompletely captured in the literature. In this article, we describe the package of rights involved in the 'Swiss model' using the framework of Hohfeldian rights as modified by Wenar. After outlining this framework, we dissect the rights involved in suicide assistance in Switzerland, and compare it with the situation in England and Germany. Based on this approach, we conclude that in Switzerland, claim rights exist for those requesting suicide assistance, and for those who are considering providing such assistance, even though no entitlements exist toward suicide assistance. We then describe the implementation of the 'Swiss model' and difficulties arising within it. Clarifying these issues is important to understand the Swiss situation, to evaluate what features of it may or may not be worth correcting or emulating, and to understand how it can impact requests for suicide assistance in other countries due to 'suicide tourism'. It is also important to understand exactly what sets Switzerland apart from other countries with different legislations regarding suicide assistance.


Asunto(s)
Comparación Transcultural , Eutanasia/ética , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos Humanos , Suicidio Asistido/ética , Inglaterra , Eutanasia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Alemania , Humanos , Suicidio Asistido/legislación & jurisprudencia , Suiza
3.
Rev Med Suisse ; 14(616): 1523, 2018 Aug 29.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30156788
4.
Rev Med Suisse ; 14(628): 2139, 2018 Nov 21.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30462405
5.
Rev Med Suisse ; 14(590): 163, 2018 Jan 17.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29341536
6.
Rev Med Suisse ; 14(603): 859, 2018 Apr 18.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29668152
7.
Rev Med Suisse ; 13(576): 1667, 2017 Sep 27.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28953340
8.
Rev Med Suisse ; 13(549): 387, 2017 Feb 08.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28708365
10.
Bull Acad Natl Med ; 195(4-5): 1023-31, 2011.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22375368

RESUMEN

The controversy surrounding PGD has not abated in recent times. This is especially the case for PGD-based tissue typing, which is used to select a future child who could serve as a stem cell donor for an older sick sibling. We examine three types of ethical argument cited against PGD in general, and specifically against tissue-typing PGD. These arguments focus on the moral status of the early embryo, the eugenics issue, and the charge that the future child is being exploited. We conclude that none of these three arguments is unassailable, and that it is the reproductive freedom of couples considering PGD that should prevail.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Preimplantación/ética , Eugenesia , Femenino , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/ética , Humanos , Embarazo
13.
Rev Med Suisse ; 12(521): 1115, 2016 Jun 01.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27487683
16.
Rev Med Suisse ; 11(483): 1571, 2015 Aug 26.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26502589
17.
Rev Med Suisse ; 11(496): 2255, 2015 Nov 25.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26742358
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA