Overconstraint Associated With A Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Is Decreased By Using An Anterior Femoral Insertion Point In A Cadaveric Model.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate tibiofemoral knee kinematics when shifting the femoral insertion point of the modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) anterior to the lateral epicondyle. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen human knee joints were tested on a test bench in the following states: 1) native, 2) anterolateral insufficient, 3) original Lemaire (oLET; insertion point: 4 mm posterior and 8 mm proximal to the epicondyle), 4) anterior Lemaire (aLET; insertion point: 5 mm anterior and 5 mm proximal to the epicondyle). Internal tibial rotation was statically investigated under an internal tibial torque of 5 Nm in 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion. Anterior translation was statically investigated during a simulated Lachman test with an anterior translational force of 98 N. Additionally, the range of internal tibial rotation and anterior translation were dynamically investigated by a simulated pivot-shift test. Tibiofemoral kinematics were measured using an optical 3D motion analysis system. RESULTS: The aLET showed an internal tibial rotation comparable to the native state for all tested flexion angles except 90° (0°: P = 0.201; 30°: P = 0.118; 60°: P = 0.126; 90°: P = 0.026 ). The oLET showed an internal tibial rotation below the values of the native state for all tested flexion angles indicating an overconstraint (0°: P = 0.003 ; 30°: P = 0.009; 60°: P = 0.029; 90°: P = 0.029). Direct comparisons between aLET and oLET showed a significantly decreased overconstraint at 0° and 30° of flexion (P = 0.001 and P = 0.003 respectively) when using the aLET. No differences in anterior translation and internal tibial rotation were found between the oLET and aLET during simulated Lachman and pivot-shift test (P > 0.05), approximating the native state. CONCLUSIONS: An anteriorly shifted LET insertion point restored internal tibial rotation after anterolateral insufficiency to the native state while decreasing the overconstraint of internal tibial rotation induced by an LET using the originally described insertion point for small flexion angles ≤ 30°. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Using an LET insertion point anterior to the epicondyle was recently reported to lower the risk of tunnel interference and has now been shown to effectively restore internal tibial rotation in vitro in the course of the present study. Concerns of overconstraining internal tibial rotation are not diminished by this technique, but using an anterior insertion point helps to decrease overconstraint.

Treatment of cartilage defects in the patellofemoral joint with matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation effectively improves pain, function, and radiological outcomes after 5-7 years.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to evaluate midterm outcomes 5-7 years after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) in the patellofemoral joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients who had undergone MACI using the Novocart® 3D scaffold were prospectively evaluated. Clinical outcomes were determined by measuring the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) values preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months, and a mean of 6 years postoperatively. At the final follow-up, the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score was evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with 23 focal cartilage defects (19 patella and four trochlea) were available for the final follow-up. The mean defect size was 4.0 ± 1.9 cm2 (range 2.4-9.4 cm2). All clinical outcome scores improved significantly until 5-7 years after MACI (SF-36 score, 61.2 ± 19.6 to 83.2 ± 11.6; P = 0.001; IKDC score, 47.5 ± 20.6 to 74.7 ± 15.5; P < 0.001; and WOMAC, 29.8 ± 15.7 to 8.2 ± 10.3; P < 0.001). The mean MOCART score was 76.0 ± 11.0 at the final follow-up. Nineteen of the 22 patients (86.4%) were satisfied with the outcomes after 5-7 years and responded that they would undergo the procedure again. CONCLUSION: MACI in the patellofemoral joint demonstrated good midterm clinical results with a significant reduction in pain, improvement in function, and high patient satisfaction. These clinical findings are supported by radiological evidence from MOCART scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV-case series.

PEEK Interference Screws Show Significant Tunnel Enlargement After ACL Reconstruction and is Comparable to Adjustable-Length Loop Cortical Button Fixation.

Background: It is unclear whether the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interference screws for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction leads to postoperative tunnel enlargement. Femoral tunnel enlargement was further compared with adjustable-length loop cortical fixation. Methods: Eighteen patients with ACL reconstruction using hamstring grafts were retrospectively divided into two groups. Eleven patients were treated with the ACL reconstruction technique using a PEEK interference screw for femoral graft fixation. Seven patients received adjustable-length loop cortical buttons for femoral fixation. Tibial ACL graft fixation was performed using PEEK interference screws. Tunnel volume changes were assessed using computed tomography (CT) scans performed after surgery (100%) and after 1 year. The maximal tunnel diameter was measured. Results: The group with femoral screw fixation showed a mean tunnel volume change of 108.15 ± 13.7% on the tibial side and 124.07 ± 25.38% on the femoral side. The group with femoral button fixation showed a tunnel volume change of 111.12 ± 12.72% on the tibial side and 130.96 ± 21.71% on the femoral side. The differences in femoral tunnel volume changes were not significant (P = 0.562). Femoral tunnels with PEEK screw fixation showed significantly larger diameter after 12 months in comparison with button fixation (13.02 ± 1.43 mm vs. 10.46 ± 1.29 mm, P < 0.001). Conclusions: PEEK interference screws were associated with significant tibial and femoral tunnel enlargement. Femoral tunnel enlargement was comparable between PEEK interference screws and button fixation. Final femoral tunnel diameter was significantly larger with PEEK screw fixation in comparison to button fixation.

Short-term results of tibial interference screw fixation for transtibial medial meniscus posterior root pull-out repair.

Background: To evaluate the technique of transtibial pull-out repair with tibial interference screw fixation for medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tear by reporting on short-term outcomes and complications. Methods: All MMPR repairs performed between January 2019 and August 2021 (n = 70) were retrospectively screened regarding demographic data and surgical parameters. The patients were questioned for performed revision surgery, symptoms and complications. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, Lysholm Knee Score and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) questionnaires were used to evaluate clinical outcome. In cases of revision surgery for re-tear the mode of failure was intraoperatively classified (patients with re-tear were excluded from the clinical follow-up examination). The influence of demographic and treatment parameters (surgical and rehabilitation) on the incidence and mode of re-tear and clinical scores was evaluated. Results: After 2.3 ± 0.7 years, 62 patients (88.6 %) were available for follow-up. There were no direct intra- or postoperative complications. No revision was performed due to symptoms related to the tibial fixation material. The mean surgery time was 33.5 ± 10.8 min. The overall re-tear rate was 17.7 % (11 patients) of whom 10 were treated surgically and one conservatively. Primary mode of failure was suture cut-out from the meniscus (70 %). The NRS, Lysholm Knee Score and subjective IKDC were obtained in 38 patients and improved from 6.8 ± 2.4, 40.1 ± 23.9 and 32.8 ± 16.3 to 2.2 ± 2.2, 80.5 ± 16.3 and 63.0 ± 13.9, respectively (all p < 0.001). No influence was observed from demographic and treatment parameters on re-tear rates or clinical Scores. Conclusions: Tibial interference screw fixation is a fast and promising technique for MMPR transtibial pull-out repair. In the presented technique, utilizing non-absorbable locking sutures alongside tibial interfenrence screw fixation, the primary mode of failure was suture cut-out from the meniscus.