Experiences of moral distress in a COVID-19 intensive care unit: A qualitative study of nurses and respiratory therapists in the United States.

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed extraordinary stress on frontline healthcare providers as they encounter significant challenges and risks while caring for patients at the bedside. This study used qualitative research methods to explore nurses and respiratory therapists' experiences providing direct care to COVID-19 patients during the first surge of the pandemic at a large academic medical center in the Northeastern United States. The purpose of this study was to explore their experiences as related to changes in staffing models and to consider needs for additional support. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with sixteen nurses and four respiratory therapists via Zoom or by telephone. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, identifiers were removed, and data was coded and analyzed thematically. Five major themes characterize providers' experiences: a fear of the unknown, concerns about infection, perceived professional unpreparedness, isolation and alienation, and inescapable stress and distress. This manuscript analyzes the relationship between these themes and the concept of moral distress and finds that some, but not all, of the challenges that providers faced during this time align with previous definitions of the concept. This points to the possibility of broadening the conceptual parameters of moral distress to account for providers' experiences of treating patients with novel illnesses while encountering institutional and clinical challenges.

Intensive care unit nurses living through COVID-19: A qualitative study.

AIMS: To understand how nurses experience providing care for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in intensive care units. BACKGROUND: As hospitals adjust staffing patterns to meet the demands of the pandemic, nurses have direct physical contact with ill patients, placing themselves and their families at physical and emotional risk. METHODS: From June to August 2020, semi-structured interviews were conducted. Sixteen nurses caring for COVID-19 patients during the first surge of the pandemic were selected via purposive sampling. Participants worked in ICUs of a quaternary 1,000-bed hospital in the Northeast United States. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, identifiers were removed, and data were coded thematically. RESULTS: Our exploratory study identified four themes that describe the experiences of nurses providing care to patients in COVID-19 ICUs during the first surge: (a) challenges of working with new co-workers and teams, (b) challenges of maintaining existing working relationships, (c) role of nursing leadership in providing information and maintaining morale and (d) the importance of institutional-level acknowledgement of their work. CONCLUSIONS: As the pandemic continues, hospitals should implement nursing staffing models that maintain and strengthen existing relationships to minimize exhaustion and burnout. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: To better support nurses, hospital leaders need to account for their experiences caring for COVID-19 patients when making staffing decisions.

Strengthening new graduate nurse residency programs in critical care: recommendations from nurse residents and organizational stakeholders.

BACKGROUND: Thirty-four new graduate nurses participated in a critical care nurse residency program in preparation for opening a new intensive care unit. At the end of the program, multi-constituent focus groups were held to assess program effectiveness. METHOD: Participants included 34 new graduate nurses, 18 preceptors and staff nurse partners, five clinical nurse specialists, and five nurse directors. Twelve focus groups were held; groups included four to eight nurses from the same role group. Two independent reviewers analyzed recordings and transcripts of focus group content to identify themes. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: program design, developing nursing expertise, program impact on the unit, future expectations, and communication. Comments were used to guide program improvements and offer new insights for residency programs in acute and critical care. CONCLUSION: Obtaining structured input from multiple program stakeholders is beneficial in evaluating a program's impact and identifying areas for improvement.

Encountering the social determinants of health on a COVID-19 ICU: Frontline providers' perspectives on inequality in a time of pandemic.

Efforts to improve health equity may be advanced by understanding health care providers' perceptions of the causes of health inequalities. Drawing on data from in-depth interviews with nurses and registered respiratory therapists (RRTs) who served on intensive care units (ICUs) during the first surge of the pandemic, this paper examines how frontline providers perceive and attribute the unequal impacts of COVID-19. It shows that nurses and RRTs quickly perceived the pandemic's disproportionate burden on Black and Latinx individuals and families. Providers attribute these inequalities to the social determinants of health, and also raise questions about how barriers to healthcare access may have made some patients more vulnerable to the worst consequences of COVID-19. Providers' perceptions of inequality and its consequences on COVID-19 ICUs were emotionally impactful and distressing, suggesting that this is a critical moment for offering clinicians practical strategies for understanding and addressing the persistent structural inequities that cause racial inequalities in health.

Performance of the novel Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS) in hospital practice.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nutritional screening in paediatric inpatients is important. However, there is a lack of validated screening tools for this population. In this study the development of a nurse administered paediatric malnutrition screening tool is described and its performance evaluated. METHODS: The Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS) rate BMI, weight loss, dietary intake and predicted effect of the current condition on nutritional status, with a score of 0-2 for each element. Patients with total score of 2 or more are referred for dietetic review. A four month pilot phase was conducted in three medical and one surgical wards of a tertiary hospital and the general paediatric ward of a district general hospital. Performance of the tool was assessed by auditing completion rates, yield, impact on dietetic workload, and by evaluating dietitians' feedback. RESULTS: 1571 patients (72% of admissions) were screened of whom 158 (10%) scored at high risk. Non-screened children were younger and had a shorter length of hospital stay. Of the 125 patients who scored at high risk, between the 2nd and 4th month of the pilot, 66 (53%) were assessed by a dietitian of whom 86% were judged to be at true risk of malnutrition and 50% of these were new to the dietetic service. Dietetic workload did not increase significantly during the pilot phase although the proportion of referrals from the acute receiving wards increased. Dietitians' feedback was positive, with recognition that PYMS identified patients at risk of malnutrition who may not have otherwise been referred. CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition screening by nurses using the new PYMS score is feasible for paediatric inpatients, identifies children at risk of malnutrition and uses available resources efficiently.