Advancing Dialogue About Consent and Molecular HIV Surveillance in the United States: Four Proposals Following a Federal Advisory Panel's Call for Major Reforms.

Policy Points Molecular HIV surveillance and cluster detection and response (MHS/CDR) programs have been a core public health activity in the United States since 2018 and are the "fourth pillar" of the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative launched in 2019. MHS/CDR has caused controversy, including calls for a moratorium from networks of people living with HIV. In October 2022, the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA) adopted a resolution calling for major reforms. We analyze the policy landscape and present four proposals to federal stakeholders pertaining to PACHA's recommendations about incorporating opt-outs and plain-language notifications into MHS/CDR programs.

Criminal Code reform of HIV non-disclosure is urgently needed: Social science perspectives on the harms of HIV criminalization in Canada.

The criminalization of HIV non-disclosure represents a significant issue of concern among people living with HIV, those working across the HIV sector, public health practitioners, and health and human rights advocates around the world. Recently, the government of Canada began a review of the criminal law regarding HIV non-disclosure and invited feedback from the public about potential reforms to the Criminal Code. In light of this public consultation, this commentary examines social science research from Canadian scholars that documents the intersecting damaging effects of HIV criminalization. Canadian social scientists and other researchers have shown that HIV criminalization is applied in uneven and discriminatory ways, impedes HIV prevention efforts, perpetuates HIV stigma, and has a damaging impact on the daily lives of people living with HIV. We argue that there is an urgent need for reforms that will significantly restrict how the criminal law is applied to HIV non-disclosure.

RéSUMé: La criminalisation de la non-divulgation du VIH est une question très préoccupante pour les personnes vivant avec le VIH, celles qui travaillent dans le secteur du VIH, les praticiens et praticiennes de la santé publique et les porte-parole de la santé et des droits de la personne du monde entier. Récemment, le gouvernement du Canada a amorcé un examen du droit criminel portant sur la non-divulgation du VIH et a invité le public à commenter d'éventuelles réformes du Code criminel. À la lumière de cette consultation publique, notre commentaire porte sur les études en sciences sociales menées au Canada qui font état des effets croisés préjudiciables de la criminalisation du VIH. Des spécialistes des sciences sociales et d'autres chercheuses et chercheurs canadiens ont montré que la criminalisation du VIH est appliquée de façon inégale et discriminatoire, qu'elle nuit aux efforts de prévention du VIH, qu'elle perpétue la stigmatisation liée au VIH et qu'elle a des effets dommageables sur la vie quotidienne des personnes vivant avec le VIH. Nous soutenons qu'il existe un besoin urgent de réformes pour restreindre de façon appréciable l'application du droit criminel à la non-divulgation du VIH.

Beyond criminalization: reconsidering HIV criminalization in an era of reform.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper reviews recent studies examining the application of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific criminal laws in North America (particularly the United States and Canada). In the wake of the development of new biomedical prevention strategies, many states in the United States (US) have recently begun to reform or repeal their HIV-specific laws. These findings can help inform efforts to 'modernize' HIV laws (or, to revise in ways that reflect recent scientific advances in HIV treatment and prevention). RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies suggest that HIV-specific laws disproportionately impact Black men, white women, and Black women. The media sensationally covers criminal trials under these laws, especially when they involve Black defendants who they often describe in racialized terms as predators. Activists contest these laws and raise concerns about new phylogenetic HIV surveillance techniques that have the potential to be harnessed for law enforcement purposes. SUMMARY: These findings collectively raise urgent concerns for the continued use of HIV-specific criminal laws. These policies disproportionately impact marginalized groups - particularly Black men. Media coverage of these cases often helps to spread misinformation and stigmatizing rhetoric about people living with HIV and promulgate racist stereotypes. Although well-intentioned, new phylogenetic HIV surveillance technologies have the potential to exacerbate these issues if law enforcement is able to gain access to these public health tools.

Alternatives to sharing COVID-19 data with law enforcement: Recommendations for stakeholders.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, in some jurisdictions, police have become involved in enforcing coronavirus-related measures. Relatedly, several North American jurisdictions have established COVID-19 data sharing protocols with law enforcement. Research across a range of fields has demonstrated that involving police in matters of public health disproportionately impacts the most vulnerable and does more harm than good. This is reflected in the consensus against COVID-19 criminalization that has emerged among civil society organizations focused on HIV, human rights, and harm reduction. The European Data Protection Board has also released guidelines against re-uses of COVID-19 data for law enforcement purposes. This article offers an overview of the harms of criminalizing illnesses and strategies for health stakeholders to seek alternatives to sharing COVID-19 data with police agencies while facilitating interoperability with healthcare first responders. It also presents case studies from two North American jurisdictions - Ontario and Minnesota - that have established routine COVID-19 data sharing with police. We recommended seven alternatives, including designating COVID-19 data as sensitive and implementing segmented interoperability with first responder agencies. These guidelines can help ensure that health information technology platforms do not become vehicles for the criminalization of COVID-19, and that health data stay within the health system.

Human rights, public health and COVID-19 in Canada.

Faced with the extraordinary global public health crisis of COVID-19, governments across Canada must decide, often with limited and imperfect evidence, how to implement measures to reduce its spread. Drawing on a health and human rights framework, this commentary explores several features of the Canadian response to date that raise human rights concerns. Our discussion focuses on criminal law, fines, data collection, and so-called snitch lines. We argue that the approach of governmental and public health authorities must be grounded in the best available scientific evidence and align with human rights standards. Our aim is to encourage dialogue within the public health community in Canada about the importance of human rights-based responses to COVID-19.

RéSUMé: Face à la crise de santé publique sans précédent que représente la COVID-19 à l'échelle mondiale, les gouvernements des provinces et territoires du Canada doivent décider, souvent en se fondant sur des preuves limitées et imparfaites, comment mettre en œuvre des mesures pour réduire sa propagation. En s'appuyant sur un cadre de travail relatif à la santé et aux droits de la personne, cette analyse explore plusieurs éléments de la réponse canadienne apportée à ce jour qui soulèvent des préoccupations en matière de droits de la personne. Notre analyse porte en particulier sur le droit criminel, les amendes, la collecte de données et ce qu'on appelle les « lignes de dénonciation ¼. Nous estimons que l'approche des autorités gouvernementales et de santé publique doit être fondée sur les preuves scientifiques disponibles les plus solides et s'aligner sur les normes en matière de droits de la personne. Nous avons pour objectif d'encourager le dialogue au sein de la communauté du secteur de la santé publique au Canada sur l'importance des réponses à la COVID-19 fondées sur les droits de la personne.

Journeying together: A visual exploration of "engagement" as a journey in HIV programming and service delivery.

The experiences of people living with, or impacted by HIV, who participate in research and programming are relatively-well documented. However, how stakeholders within the HIV sector understand engagement, or how it functions discursively, is undertheorized. We used a comparative case study design and photovoice to explore engagement in three community-based organizations providing HIV programs or services in Toronto, Canada. We invited stakeholders to photograph their subjective understandings of engagement. We employ a visual and thematic analysis of our findings, by focusing on participants' use of journey metaphors to discuss engagement within and across sites. Visual metaphors of journey were employed by participants to make sense of their experience, and demonstrated that for many, engagement was a dynamic, affective and relational process. Our findings illustrate how journey may be an apt metaphor to explore the relational, contingent and socio-spatial/political specificities of engagement within and across HIV organizations. We conclude with a discussion on implications for practice.