Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Med Microbiol ; 56(Pt 1): 56-65, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17172518

RESUMEN

The development of rapid and sensitive molecular techniques for the detection of Vibrio species would be useful for the surveillance of sporadic infections and management of major outbreaks. Comparative sequence analysis of the ftsZ gene in the predominant Vibrio species that cause human disease revealed distinct alleles for each examined species, including Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus. Light Upon eXtension (LUX) real-time PCR assays were developed to target these species-specific polymorphisms, and were successful in rapidly differentiating the major pathogenic Vibrio species. Luminex liquid microsphere array technology was used to develop a comprehensive assay capable of simultaneously detecting V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus. These assays permitted the identification of a presumptive V. parahaemolyticus isolate as Vibrio alginolyticus, which was verified using additional molecular characterization.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Proteínas del Citoesqueleto/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Vibrio/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/instrumentación , Secuencia de Bases , ADN Bacteriano/química , ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , Variación Genética , Microesferas , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Filogenia , Polimorfismo Genético , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Homología de Secuencia de Ácido Nucleico , Especificidad de la Especie , Vibrio/clasificación , Vibrio cholerae/genética , Vibrio parahaemolyticus/genética , Vibrio vulnificus/genética
3.
PLoS One ; 8(2): e57339, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23437374

RESUMEN

Serotyping is the long-standing gold standard method to determine E. coli H antigens; however, this method requires a panel of H-antigen specific antibodies and often culture-based induction of the H-antigen flagellar motility. In this study, a rapid and accurate method to isolate and identify the Escherichia coli (E. coli) H flagellar antigen was developed using membrane filtration and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Flagella were isolated from pure culture, digested with trypsin, and then subjected to LC-MS/MS using one of two systems (Agilent-nano-LC-QSTAR XL or Proxeon-nano-LC-LTQ-Orbitrap XL). The resulting peptide sequence data were searched against a custom E. coli flagella/H antigen database. This approach was evaluated using flagella isolated from reference E. coli strains representing all 53 known H antigen types and 41 clinical E. coli strains. The resulting LC-MS/MS classifications of H antigen types (MS-H) were concordant with the known H serogroup for all 53 reference types, and of 41 clinical isolates tested, 38 (92.7%) were concordant with the known H serogroup. MS-H clearly also identified two clinical isolates (4.9%) that were untypeable by serotyping. Notably, successful detection and classification of flagellar antigens with MS-H did not generally require induction of motility, establishing this proteomic approach as more rapid and cost-effective than traditional methods, while providing equitable specificity for typing E. coli H antigens.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/aislamiento & purificación , Escherichia coli/química , Flagelos/química , Proteómica/métodos , Serotipificación/métodos , Antígenos Bacterianos/clasificación , Antígenos Bacterianos/genética , Cromatografía Liquida , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Filtración , Humanos , Membranas Artificiales , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem
4.
Can J Microbiol ; 53(3): 398-403, 2007 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17538649

RESUMEN

Several real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods are currently available to rapidly detect the presence of a specific DNA sequence. When used for detection of pathogenic organisms, the turnaround time for PCR-based methods is much lower than for traditional culture techniques. This study compared the sensitivity of three real-time PCR methods when detecting the Escherichia coli pathogenic gene eae to determine which method is most effective in identifying very low levels of the organism. The three methods were used to detect the eae gene over a range of DNA concentrations. The differences in sensitivity were statistically significant (p<0.05), and SYBR Green I PCR was found to have the lowest detection limit of the three; LUX primers had the highest detection limit. Therefore, using a defined DNA concentration for detecting the eae gene, SYBR Green I is the best alternative.


Asunto(s)
Adhesinas Bacterianas/genética , Escherichia coli O157/genética , Escherichia coli O157/patogenicidad , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Benzotiazoles , Cartilla de ADN , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , Diaminas , Escherichia coli O157/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Compuestos Orgánicos , Quinolinas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Polimerasa Taq/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA