Application of the MRFIT smoking cessation program to a healthy, mixed-sex sample.

The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) included a smoking cessation program that was highly successful (40.3% abstinence prevalence rate at 48-month follow-up) when used with other interventions for a male, middle-aged population at high risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). Our study employed the MRFIT cessation program alone with a mixed-sex, mixed-age, healthy population. We wished to determine its effectiveness when applied in a manner similar to other smoking cessation programs. Fifty-six subjects participated in a 10-week intervention followed by maintenance or extended intervention programs. The 52% abstinence prevalence rate at the end of the 10-week intervention dropped to 32% after four months, 25% at eight months, 25% at 12 months, and 27% at 16 months. The higher cessation rates of the original MRFIT study may be related to motivation and other characteristics of the high-risk population and to the combination of the smoking component with other interventions for CHD, rather than to the characteristics of the smoking intervention itself. Although the MRFIT program is comprehensive and includes vigorous maintenance activities, it is also expensive and may not be cost-effective or as desirable as programs with slightly lower cessation rates.

Dissemination and implementation of Put Prevention into Family Practice.

INTRODUCTION: The Put Prevention into Practice (PPIP) program was developed and disseminated to address patient, clinician, and office barriers that result in less than optimal delivery of preventive services in the United States. METHODS: To study the dissemination of PPIP by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), pre- and post-dissemination surveys of knowledge about PPIP and purchase order data were obtained from the AAFP. In addition, a mail questionnaire was sent to a random sample of purchasers to study their use of PPIP. RESULTS: After two years of active promotion, 27% of AAFP members had heard about PPIP, and PPIP components were purchased by 2,004 individuals during its inital dissemination. Flow sheets, health guides, exam room wall charts, and the Clinician's Handbook of Preventive Services were the PPIP items most frequently purchased and used. Excluding the Clinician's Handbook of Preventive Services, 58% of purchasers used one or more parts of the kit with an average of less than four items used per purchaser. CONCLUSIONS: Initial dissemination and implementation of PPIP among family physicians was limited; continued promotion will likely improve dissemination of PPIP. However, this study, and others suggest that the simple availability of a kit of materials is not sufficient to enhance the delivery of preventive services as envisioned by clinicians or policy makers. Additional strategies for dissemination and implementation of preventive services will be required, such as providing external consultation services to practices, incorporation of preventive services into HMO organizations, and training of residents in strategies for change in their future practices.

Effect of smoking cessation counseling on recovery from alcoholism: findings from a randomized community intervention trial.

AIMS: To assess the effects of a smoking cessation program for recovering alcoholics on use of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs after discharge from residential treatment. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomized community intervention trial design was employed in which 12 residential drug treatment centers in Iowa, Kansas and Nebraska were matched and then randomly assigned to the intervention or control condition. PARTICIPANTS: Approximately 50 adult residents (inpatients) from each site were followed for 12 months after treatment discharge. INTERVENTION: Participating residents in the six intervention centers received a 4-part, individually tailored, smoking cessation program while those in the six control sites received usual care. FINDINGS: Both moderate and heavy drinking rates were reduced in the intervention group. Intervention site participants were significantly more likely than controls to report alcohol abstinence at both the 6-month (OR = 1.59, 95%CI: 1.09-2.35) and 12-month assessment (OR = 1.84, 95%CI: 1.28-2.92). Illicit drug use rates were comparable. Effect of the intervention on tobacco quit rates was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Counseling alcoholics in treatment to quit smoking does not jeopardize the alcohol recovery process. However, low-intensity tobacco interventions are unlikely to yield high tobacco quit rates.

Cardiovascular changes during mental stress: correlations with presence of coronary risk factors and cardiovascular disease in physicians and dentists.

Stress may play a role in the etiology of cardiovascular disease. Research showing that mental stress administered in laboratory settings causes great change in cardiovascular and hemodynamic functioning supports this hypothesis. In a small sample of physicians and dentists, those who showed greater cardiovascular reactivity (hot reactors) to stress were more likely to be hyperlipidemic or to have had a myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery. In addition, some of the nonreactive group were hypertensives taking medication, which may have blunted their response to stress. Persons with higher cholesterol, higher triglyceride levels, and lower HDL levels all showed greater increases in blood pressure (BP) in response to stress. Also, the reactive group reported less emotional support and experienced greater numbers of family-related stressful events in the previous year. The degree of aerobic fitness influenced resting hemodynamics and percentage of body fat but not reactivity to stress. Likewise, smoking did not affect reactivity, but former smokers did have a significantly elevated total systemic resistance at rest. While it is impossible to say whether reactivity causes disease, is the result of the presence of risk factors and disease, or is caused by some other factor which also contributes to disease, these results suggest that the presence of cardiovascular reactivity to mental stress is a sign of potential illness and indicates the need for further medical and risk factor study of the patient.

Depression screening scores during residential drug treatment and risk of drug use after discharge.

Depression is a highly prevalent disorder among patients in residential drug treatment, and the prognosis for recovery from chemical dependency among depressed persons is uncertain. This report presents one-year follow-up data on alcohol, cocaine, and marijuana use among patients who completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) during their inpatient stay in one of 12 residential treatment programs in the Midwest. At 12-month follow-up, CES-D scores in the depressed range were significantly associated with risk of relapse for alcohol and marijuana use, but not for cocaine use.

A model for evaluating the stressed patient in the family practice setting.

Family physicians frequently encounter patients with stress-induced medical and psychological problems. When the symptoms are severe, or the mechanisms are vague, it is often useful to perform a detailed medical, behavioral, and psychological evaluation in order to initiate effective therapy. This paper illustrates a model for evaluating stress-related and other psychosomatic problems in a family practice.

Tobacco cessation with patients recovering from alcohol and other substance abuse.

This article focuses on the problem of tobacco cessation in the patient recovering from alcohol or other substance abuse. The authors review the epidemiology of the problem, specific health risks to this population from continued tobacco use, and recent research findings that address previous treatment concerns. Recommendations for counseling by physicians are made. These include an algorithm for determining the patient's stage of readiness for making a quit attempt, specific counseling tasks based on the patients stage, and motivational counseling strategies aimed at increasing the patients motivation to quit.

Use of office-based smoking cessation activities in family practices.

BACKGROUND: Smoking is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Recommendations for increasing physician effectiveness in smoking cessation through the use of office-based activities have been disseminated, but the extent of implementation is unknown. We describe the degree to which selected family practices in Nebraska have implemented 15 specific office-based activities. METHODS: We employed a cross-sectional integrated multimethod design. A research nurse observed a target physician and his or her staff during a 1-day visit in a random sample of 89 family practices. Data collection consisted of focused observation of the practice environment, key informant interviews, medical record reviews, and in-depth interviews with the physicians. RESULTS: The majority of the practices sampled had an office environment that restricted smoking, but few used visual cessation messages or information in the waiting room offering help and encouraging patients to quit. Most had educational materials that were supplied by pharmaceutical companies for promoting nicotine replacement systems. These materials were easily accessible in more than half of the practices. Smoking cessation activities were initiated and carried out by physicians with minimal use of their staff. Smoking status was documented in 51% of the medical records reviewed but seldom in a place readily accessible to the physician. All physicians were very aware of the importance of smoking cessation counseling, and most felt confident in their skills. CONCLUSIONS: Despite identification of patient smoking as a problem, most practices were not using office-based activities to enhance and support physician counseling. New perspectives for helping practices with this task need to be explored.

Improving smoking cessation counseling by family practice residents.

BACKGROUND: While programs to train residents in smoking cessation counseling skills have been devised, few have assessed trainee behavioral changes in practice settings where residents were blind to the evaluation of their behavior. This study assessed the effectiveness of a training program in smoking cessation counseling and chart-prompting system in increasing the frequency and quality of counseling by residents at three clinic sites. METHODS: Twenty-eight residents participated in a training program that included epidemiology, discussion of attitudes, counseling techniques, videotaped examples, and small group role play. The chart-prompting system was implemented at two clinics 1 month after training. Patient exit interviews, during which information on resident counseling on smoking cessation was obtained, were conducted before training, after training, at 3-month follow-up, and at 6-month follow-up. Questionnaires assessing knowledge, attitudes, and self-perceived counseling behaviors were completed by residents at pretraining, posttraining, and 6-month follow-up periods. RESULTS: Interviews with 517 smokers were analyzed. Results showed an increase in counseling at 3-month follow-up but a regression toward baseline at 6 months. Counseling improved at clinics where chart prompting was initiated. The number of counseling behaviors decreased when the number of patients seen increased. Whether a patient received counseling was positively associated with prior contact with the physician. There was no correlation between resident self-perception and patient report. CONCLUSIONS: A training program in smoking cessation counseling and a chart-prompting system did not result in a lasting change in resident behavior. System factors may play an important role in long-term behavior change.

Current trends in tobacco prevention and cessation in Nebraska physicians' offices.

BACKGROUND: Despite years of intervention, few studies describe the extent to which recommended tobacco use prevention and cessation activities occur in community-based family practices. This study was designed to discover current practice patterns in these areas and to describe physician outcome and efficacy expectations. METHODS: An exploratory comparative case study of 11 family practices used direct observation of practices and clinical encounters, chart reviews, and in-depth interviews. Qualitative and quantitative information was gathered on (1) intensity of tobacco use prevention and cessation; (2) physicians' attitudes and beliefs regarding outcome expectations; and (3) physicians' perceptions of their ability to counsel. Qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to construct case studies for comparisons. RESULTS: Themes common to most practices included the "provision of little prevention" and "a lack of perceived need to address smokeless tobacco." Responsibility for tobacco activities fell almost solely to physicians. Although physicians felt confident in their counseling skills, the skills they identified were fairly basic. Most physicians were pessimistic about the positive effects of these activities. None of the practices was using any specifically developed "package," and pharmaceutical companies provided almost all patient education material. There was considerable variation in intensity of activities because of differences in attitudes, expectation, and background. CONCLUSIONS: To increase tobacco control activities, practice systems need to be individually evaluated to identify what is needed, how it will fit within the practice culture, and how it can best be implemented in this specific practice. One-size-fits-all interventions probably will not be widely implemented.

An ounce of prevention? Evaluation of the 'Put Prevention into Practice' program.

BACKGROUND: The "Put Prevention into Practice" (PPIP) program was designed to enhance the capacity of health care providers to deliver clinical preventive services. This study was designed to evaluate the program's effectiveness when applied to family physicians in private practice settings. METHODS: Eight Midwestern practices that had purchased PPIP kits were identified and agreed to participate in the study. A comparative case study approach encompassing a variety of data collection techniques was used. These techniques included participant observation of clinic operations and patient encounters, semistructured and key informant interviews with physicians and staff members, chart reviews, and structured postpatient encounter and office environment checklists. Content analysis of the qualitative data and construction of the individual cases were done by consensus of the research team. RESULTS: PPIP materials are not being used, even by the clinics that ordered them. Physicians already providing quality preventive services prefer their existing materials to those in the PPIP kit. Sites that are underutilizing preventive services are unable or unwilling to independently implement the PPIP program. CONCLUSIONS: Development of technical support may facilitate implementation of PPIP materials into those practices most deficient in providing preventive services. Given the diversity of practice environments it is unlikely that a "one size fits all" approach will ever be able to address the needs of all providers.

Assessing quality. As pressure mounts for clinics to deliver quality, medical practice blueprints and genograms serve as useful tools.

Increasingly, medical practices feel pressure to provide and communicate high quality patient care. Offering their insight on how a medical practice can improve quality, the authors describe the process of delivering medical care during patient encounters. Specifically, they present two methods that can be used to understand, evaluate, and improve interactions between patients and providers: medical practice blue prints and medical practice genograms.

Nicotine dependence and intentions to quit smoking in three samples of male and female recovering alcoholics and problem drinkers.

We report gender-specific data on tobacco use and quitting smoking from three studies of nicotine-related issues during alcoholism treatment. Study 1 data are from 309 alcoholism treatment professionals who were current or former smokers with a personal history of alcoholism or problem drinking. Study 2 data are from 496 smokers receiving counseling for their problems with alcohol in outpatient alcoholism treatment centers. Study 3 data are from 90 smokers receiving intensive alcoholism treatment in residential or inpatient programs. Interest in smoking cessation was high in all groups. Significant gender differences were apparent among the recovering alcoholics but not among the problem drinkers. Severity of alcohol use problems also showed some association with smoking cessation behaviors.

Practical steps to smoking cessation for recovering alcoholics.

Smoking rates among persons with a history of alcohol abuse are triple that of the general public. Strong evidence indicates that the risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease is higher in recovering alcoholics than in peers who smoke, but do not drink alcohol. Yet these persons often receive less than optimal tobacco counseling out of fear that attempts at smoking cessation will jeopardize their sobriety. Recent research, however, does not support this belief; rather, it suggests that smoking cessation may actually enhance alcohol abstinence. A model for more effective counseling of smokers in recovery is presented, including an algorithm for assessing stages of readiness to change, with activities tailored for each stage. Specific motivational counseling techniques may be useful in encouraging recovering alcoholics to progress to the point that they are ready to change their smoking behavior.

Predictors of tobacco quit attempts among recovering alcoholics.

Reported here are findings from a randomized community intervention trial that followed 90 recovering alcoholic smokers for 6 months. Because the brief (10-min) study intervention had no effect on tobacco use, intervention and control participants were pooled to identify predictors of attempts to quit smoking that may inform clinical practice. During the first 6 months after discharge from residential alcohol treatment, 31% of all participants reported having quit smoking for 48 hrs or longer. Demographic and drug use history variables did not predict quit attempts, but two baseline tobacco use variables did, specifically the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence and stage of readiness to quit smoking, p < .01. Participants with high or very high nicotine dependence scores were significantly less likely than those with moderate or low scores to attempt smoking cessation. Compared to those in precontemplation at baseline, those in the preparation stage of readiness to change were about 12 times more likely to make a serious quit attempt.

A process evaluation model for patient education programs for pregnant smokers.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and apply a process evaluation model (PEM) for patient education programs for pregnant smokers. METHODS: The preparation of a process evaluation plan required each program to define its essential "new" patient assessment and intervention procedures for each episode (visit) of patient-staff contact. Following specification of these core implementation procedures (p) by each patient education program, the PEM, developed by the Smoke-Free Families (SFF) National Program Office, was applied. The PEM consists of five steps: (1) definition of the eligible patient sample (a); (2) documentation of patient exposure to each procedure (b); (3) computation of procedure exposure rate (b/a = c); (4) specification of a practice performance standard for each procedure (d); (5) computation of an implementation index (c/d = e) for each procedure. The aggregate of all indexes (e) divided by the number of procedures (P(n)) produced a program implementation index (PII = Sigmae/P(n)). PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS: Data from four SFF studies that represent different settings were used to illustrate the application of the PEM. RESULTS: All four projects encountered moderate to significant difficulty in program implementation. As the number and complexity of procedures increased, the implementation index decreased. From initial procedures that included patient recruitment, delivery of the intervention components, and conducting patient follow ups, a variety of problems were encountered and lessons learned. CONCLUSION: This process evaluation provided specific insight about the difficulty of routine delivery of any new methods into diverse maternity care setting. The importance of pilot testing all procedures is emphasised. The application of the PEM to monitor program progress is recommended and revisions to improve program delivery are suggested.