RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To define the prevalence, distribution, and characteristics of patients with VEXAS who have confirmed vasculitis. METHODS: Patients with VEXAS syndrome, verified by positive UBA1 mutation, were included. Chart review was performed to identify. PATIENT: characteristics and outcomes. Vasculitis diagnosis was based on either histopathology showing vascular inflammation or non-invasive angiography findings. Summary statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. All were male with a median age of onset of 66.9 years (IQR 60.1, 72.7). Median (IQR) follow up was 3.8(2.2-5.5) years during which 21 patients (23.6%) had evidence of vasculitis. Vasculitis subtypes included small vessel vasculitis (19.1%), cutaneous medium vessel vasculitis (2.2%), and large vessel vasculitis (2.2%). No patient had more than one vessel size involved. Histopathology in small vessel vasculitis patients was consistent with cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis in the majority, though one patient had leukocytoclastic peritubular capillaritis on renal biopsy. Cranial symptoms (headache, vision changes, or jaw pain) were noted in 18.0%. Two additional patients not experiencing cranial symptoms exhibited large vessel involvement with confirmed carotid thickening on non-invasive angiography; one of these had a positive temporal artery biopsy. CONCLUSION: VEXAS syndrome manifests as a variable vessel vasculitis in a quarter of patients, with cutaneous small and medium vessel involvement being particularly common. Some patients may have positive ANCA serologies or even renal vasculitis leading to misdiagnosis. Cranial symptoms are common and may mimic giant cell arteritis, though documented large vessel inflammation is rare.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor and is approved for the preventative treatment of migraine in adults. CGRP is involved in the regulation of vasomotor tone under physiologic and pathologic conditions, including hypertension. While there has not been evidence of hypertension in preclinical models or clinical trials, post-marketing data suggest erenumab may be associated with hypertension. This led to a warning in the United States Food and Drug Administration prescribing information for erenumab. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of worsening blood pressure (BP) after initiation of erenumab in patients with migraine and how this is associated with hypertension. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective cohort study evaluating patients at a tertiary headache or neurology department. Systolic and diastolic BPs were compared between the initial visit prior to initiation of erenumab, and follow-up visit while on erenumab. Worsening BP was defined as moving from a lower stage to a higher stage of BP, as defined by the American Heart Association. Serious adverse vascular events were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 335 patients were included in the final analysis (mean [SD] age of 45.7 [14.40] years, 83.9% [281/335] female). At baseline, 20.9% (70/335) of patients had a prior diagnosis of hypertension. The median (interquartile range) time to follow-up appointment from initial appointment was 20.5 (13.3-35.3) weeks. The mean (SD) BP at baseline was systolic 124.7 (15) mmHg and diastolic 77 (11) mmHg, and at follow-up was systolic 124.0 (15) mmHg and diastolic 77.8 (9) mmHg. Overall, 23.3% (78/335) of all patients had worsening BP, whereas 13/225 (3.9%) patients had improvement in their BP. Patients with atrial fibrillation were more likely to develop worsening BP (odds ratio, 4.9, 95% confidence interval 1.12-21.4; p = 0.035). There was no association between worsening BP and pre-existing hypertension, sex, body mass index, or age. One patient had non-ST elevation myocardial infarction attributed to a hypertensive emergency while on erenumab. CONCLUSION: We found that 23.3% of patients initiated on erenumab may have developed worsening BP, suggesting the need for BP monitoring in patients initiated on erenumab.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Hipertensión , Trastornos Migrañosos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Presión Sanguínea , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores de Péptido Relacionado con el Gen de Calcitonina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE®) was developed to capture symptomatic adverse events from the patient perspective. We aim to describe statistical properties of PRO-CTCAE items and summary scores and to provide evidence for recommendations regarding PRO-CTCAE administration and reporting. METHODS: Using data from the PRO-CTCAE validation study (NCT02158637), prevalence, means, and standard deviations of PRO-CTCAE items, composite scores, and mean and maximum scores across attributes (frequency, severity, and/or interference) of symptomatic adverse events were calculated. For each adverse event, correlations and agreement between attributes, correlations between attributes and composite scores, and correlations between composite, mean, and maximum scores were estimated. RESULTS: PRO-CTCAE items were completed by 899 patients with various cancer types. Most patients reported experiencing one or more adverse events, with the most prevalent being fatigue (87.7%), sad/unhappy feelings (66.0%), anxiety (63.6%), pain (63.2%), insomnia (61.8%), and dry mouth (60.0%). Attributes were moderately to strongly correlated within an adverse event (r = 0.53 to 0.77, all p < 0.001) but not fully concordant (κweighted = 0.26 to 0.60, all p < 0.001), with interference demonstrating lowest mean scores and prevalence among attributes of the same adverse event. Attributes were moderately to strongly correlated with composite scores (r = 0.67 to 0.97, all p < 0.001). Composite scores were moderately to strongly correlated with mean and maximum scores for the same adverse event (r = 0.69 to 0.94, all p < 0.001). Correlations between composite scores of different adverse events varied widely (r = 0.04 to 0.68) but were moderate to strong for conceptually related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide evidence for PRO-CTCAE administration and reporting recommendations that the full complement of attributes be administered for each adverse event, and that attributes as well as summary scores be reported.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery has the lowest proportion of women surgeons in practice of any specialty in the United States. Preliminary studies suggest that patients who are treated by physicians of the same race, ethnicity, cultural background, or gender feel more comfortable with their care and may have better outcomes. Therefore, understanding the discrepancies in the diversity of the orthopaedic surgeon workforce is crucial to addressing system-wide healthcare inequities. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does a difference exist in gender representation among practicing orthopaedic surgeons across geographic distributions and years in practice? (2) Does a difference exist in gender representation among practicing orthopaedic surgeons with regard to rural-urban setting, group practice size, and years in practice? METHODS: Orthopaedic surgeons serving Medicare patients in 2017 were identified in the Medicare Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File and Physician Compare national databases. This dataset encompasses more than 64% of practicing orthopaedic surgeons, providing a low proportion of missing data compared with other survey techniques. Group practice size, location, and Rural-urban Commuting Area scores were compared across physician gender and years in practice. Linear and logistic regressions modeled gender and outcomes relationships adjusted by years in practice. Least-square means estimates for outcomes were calculated by gender at the median years in practice (19 years) via regression models. RESULTS: According to the combined Medicare databases used, 5% (1019 of 19,221) of orthopaedic surgeons serving Medicare patients were women; this proportion increased with decreasing years in practice (R 2 0.97; p < 0.001). Compared by region, the West region demonstrated the highest proportion of women orthopaedic surgeons overall (7% [259 of 3811]). The Midwest and South regions were below the national mean for proportions of women orthopaedic surgeons, both overall (5% [305 of 6666] and 5% [209 of 4146], respectively) and in the first 5 years of practice (9% [54 of 574] and 9% [74 of 817], respectively). Women worked in larger group practices than men (median [interquartile range] 118 physicians [20 to 636] versus median 56 [12 to 338]; p < 0.001, respectively). Both genders were more likely to practice in an urban setting, and when controlling for years in practice, there was no difference between men and women orthopaedic surgeons practicing in rural or urban settings (respectively, R 2 = 0.0004 and 0.07; p = 0.89 and 0.09). CONCLUSION: Among orthopaedic surgeons, there is only one woman for every 20 men caring for Medicare patients in the United States. Although gender representation is increasing longitudinally for women, it trails behind other surgical subspecialties substantially. Longitudinal mentoring programs, among other evidenced initiatives, should focus on the more pronounced underrepresentation identified in Midwestern/Southern regions and smaller group practices. Gender-based equity, inclusion, and diversity efforts should focus on recruitment strategies, and further research is needed to study how inclusion and diversity efforts among orthopaedic surgeons improves patient-centered care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Cirujanos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Cirujanos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estados Unidos , MedicareRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We analyzed patient demographic factors involved in the development of nonmarinum, nontuberculous mycobacterial infections (NTMI) involving the upper extremity, and assessed diagnostic and prognostic values of commonly used preoperative laboratory and imaging studies, as well as factors related to recurrence of disease and patient outcomes. METHODS: Patients from 2 academic, tertiary facilities with culture-proven, nonmarinum NTMI involving the upper extremity were reviewed. Patient-related factors and clinical outcomes were extracted. The analysis was based on pathogen identification (rapid- vs slow-growing subspecies) and immune status. RESULTS: Our 76 patients had a mean age of 59 years, and 65% were male. Forty-eight percent reported an injury, and hands were frequently involved (58%). Forty-one percent were immunosuppressed (19% organ transplant recipients). The mean symptom duration prior to presentation was 203 days. The culture identification took a mean of 33 days, with 25 different species identified (subcategorized as rapid or slow growers). Seventy-seven percent had solitary lesions, with a cutaneous or subcutaneous location most common. Immunosuppressed patients were treated longer with antibiotics (243 vs 155 days in immunocompetent patients) and experienced higher rates of side effects, complications, and recurrence. All patients underwent debridement to control infection, including 4 individuals who required amputations. One-third experienced complications and/or recurrence, regardless of the organism type. CONCLUSIONS: Upper-extremity nonmarinum NTMI is often misdiagnosed, causing management delays. Early consideration in differential diagnoses of chronic, painful swelling, nodular or inflammatory lesions, or septic arthritis is crucial. Tissue biopsy with specimens for histopathology and microbiological analysis (mycobacterial smear, cultures, and broad range polymerase chain reaction) and early involvement with an infectious disease specialist are recommended. Empiric antibiotic therapy is not standard. Debridement and prolonged, directed combination antimicrobial therapy is required; however, adverse reactions are commonly encountered. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Extremidad Superior , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Extremidad Superior/microbiología , Mano , Terapia Combinada , Artritis Infecciosa/terapia , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Asking "Was it worth it?" (WIWI) potentially captures the patient perception of a treatment's benefit weighed against its harms. This exploratory analysis evaluates the WIWI questionnaire as a metric of patients' perspectives on the worthwhileness of cancer treatment. METHODS: A 3-item WIWI questionnaire was assessed at end of treatment in patients with cancer on the COMET-2 trial (NCT01522443). WIWI items were evaluated to determine their association with quality of life (QOL), treatment duration, end-of-treatment reason, patient-reported adverse events (AEs), and disease response. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients completed the questionnaire; 40 (62%), 16 (25%), and 9 (14%) patients replied yes, uncertain, and no to "Was it worthwhile for you to receive the cancer treatment given in this study?" (item 1), respectively; 39 (60%), 12 (18%), and 14 (22%) to "If you had to do it over again, would you choose to have this cancer treatment?"; and 40 (62%), 14 (22%), and 11 (17%) to "Would you recommend this cancer treatment to others?" Patients responding yes to item 1 remained on treatment longer than those responding uncertain or no (mean 23.0 vs 11.3 weeks, P<.001). Patients responding uncertain/no to item 1 discontinued treatment because of AEs more frequently than those responding yes (36% vs 7.5%, P=.004) and demonstrated meaningful decline in QOL from baseline (-2.5 vs -0.2 mean change, P<.001). Associations between WIWI responses and most patient-reported AEs or treatment efficacy did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who responded affirmatively on WIWI items remained on therapy longer, were less likely to stop treatment because of AEs, and demonstrated superior QOL. The WIWI may inform clinical practice, oncology research, and value frameworks.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Oncología Médica , Neoplasias/terapia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Use of the electronic health record (EHR) during face-to-face clinical encounters affects communication, and prior research has been inconclusive regarding its effect. This survey study assessed health care practitioner use of EHR-specific communication skills and patient and practitioner experiences and attitudes regarding EHR use during clinical encounters. METHODS: For this US-based study, we distributed previously validated surveys to practitioners and adult patients (aged >18 years) at academic primary care practices from July 1, 2018 through August 31, 2018. The electronic practitioner survey was completed first; a paper survey was administered to patients after appointments. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and the Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess for associations between key variables. RESULTS: The practitioner response was 72.9% (43/59); patient response, 45.2% (452/1,000). Practitioners reported maintaining less eye contact (79.1%), listening less carefully (53.5%), focusing less on patients (65.1%), and visits feeling less personal (62.8%). However, patients reported that practitioners provided sufficient eye contact (96.8%) and listened carefully (97.0%); they disagreed that practitioners focused less on them (86.7%) or that visits felt less personal (87.2%). Patients thought EHR use was positive (91.7%); only one-third of practitioners (37.2%) thought that patients would agree with that statement. Practitioners reported stress, burnout, and a lack of sufficient time for EHR documentation. CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy existed in this study between patient and practitioner experiences and attitudes about EHR use, which appeared to negatively affect the experience of health care practitioners but not patients. Organizations should adopt formal strategies to improve practitioner experiences with EHR use.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Adulto , Comunicación , Documentación , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of vaginal white blood cell (WBC) counts to predict sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the emergency department (ED) is incompletely characterized. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to assess the relationship between vaginal wet preparation WBC counts and STIs and to determine whether WBC counts of at least 11 WBCs per high-power field (HPF) could be useful for identifying STIs in women in the ED. METHODS: Female ED patients 18 years or older who were evaluated in a single health system between April 18, 2014, and March 7, 2017, and had a genital wet preparation WBC result were retrospectively examined using univariable and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Vaginal wet preparation WBC counts were examined for 17,180 patient encounters. Vaginal WBC counts of at least 11 WBCs/HPF were associated with increased odds of having gonorrhea, chlamydia, or trichomoniasis. When this threshold was used for the diagnosis of each STI, sensitivity ranged from 48.2% to 53.9%, and specificity ranged from 67.2% to 68.8%. CONCLUSION: Women with STIs are more likely to have higher vaginal WBC counts. However, higher vaginal wet preparation WBC counts in isolation have limited diagnostic utility for gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomoniasis. Incorporation of age, urine leukocyte esterase results, and vaginal WBC counts provided a better predictor of an STI than vaginal WBC counts alone.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Vagina/microbiología , Adulto , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/orina , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Gonorrea/orina , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos/métodos , Recuento de Leucocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/orina , Vaginitis por Trichomonas/diagnóstico , Vaginitis por Trichomonas/orinaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival outcomes and surgical radicality between women who underwent open versus robotic radical hysterectomy (RH) for early cervical cancer. METHODS: In this institutional retrospective study, patients with clinical stage IA2- IIA (FIGO 2009) squamous cell, adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix who underwent either open or robotic RH between 2000 and 2017 were identified. Parametrial width and vaginal length were re-measured from pathology slides. An inverse propensity score weighting model was used to adjust selection bias. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients were included (181 open, 152 robotic). The median follow-up time was 130 months for the open group and 53 months for the robotic group. There were 31 (17.1%) recurrences in the open and 21 (13.8%) in the robotic group. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) for the robotic and open group were 79.0% and 90.5%, respectively (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.40-4.02). Five-year overall survival (OS) were 85.8% and 95.3%, respectively (HR 3.17, 95% CI 1.76-5.70). The mean parametrial width was similar between the open and robotic groups (2.5 vs 2.4 cm, p = 0.99). Unique recurrences (38.1%, 8/21) were noted in the robotic group: 2 port-site, 4 peritoneal, and 2 carcinomatosis. The time to vaginal recurrence was shorter in the robotic group than the open group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent robotic RH had inferior PFS and OS compared to open surgery. Surgical radicality according to pathology measurements was similar between the two approaches.
Asunto(s)
Histerectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We surveyed the American Headache Society (AHS) New Investigators and Trainees Section (NITS), and International Headache Academy (IHA) attendees to better understand what they perceive as the most pressing issues for themselves as new investigators and trainees in the field of headache medicine. BACKGROUND: The NITS and IHA are intended as platforms for mentorship, leadership training, and professional development in the field of headache medicine. Identifying and addressing pressing issues among new investigators and trainees based on their perceived needs is critical to encouraging their development and success as headache medicine clinicians and researchers. METHODS: Paper surveys were administered at the NITS meeting at the November 2018 Scottsdale Headache Symposium and the January 2019 IHA. Additionally an online version was sent to the NIT listserv in November of 2018. The survey queried demographic information (gender, race, age, profession, training status, and years in practice) and asked participants to identify their top 3 most pressing issues/questions among a list of options. RESULTS: Fifty-three responses were submitted (53/255; total response rate 20.7%). Among the surveys, 18 in-person responses were from the NITS meeting (18/20; response rate 90.0%), 23 in-person responses were from the IHA (23/45; response rate 51.1%), and 12 responses were from the online survey (12/190; response rate 6.3%). No duplicate responses were submitted based on comparison of demographics. One respondent identified as a researcher exclusively and was excluded from further analyses; the rest identified as clinicians at various levels of medical training. Fifteen respondents were not members of the NITS (28.8%); the most common reason for nonmembership was lack of awareness of the section (92.8%). Overall the most pressing issues/questions included (% of respondents who ranked issue/question among top 3): Career planning (51.9%), Logistics of running a headache clinic (40.4%), and Opportunities for involvement (38.5%). Most pressing issues/questions differed depending on level of training. Working with industry was the most pressing issue/question identified by early career physicians (55.0%). Career planning was the most pressing issue/question among fellows (72.2%) and residents (64.3%). CONCLUSION: Many of the most pressing issues identified by respondents are topics that are not formally addressed in medical and research training.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Trastornos de Cefalalgia , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Liderazgo , Masculino , Tutoría , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Introduction: Bacterial urinary tract infections (UTI) and some sexually transmitted infections (STI) can have overlapping signs and symptoms or nonspecific findings, such as pyuria on urinalysis. Furthermore, results from the urine culture and the nucleic acid amplification test for an STI may not be available during the clinical encounter. We sought to determine whether gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomoniasis are associated with bacteriuria, information that might aid in the differentiation of STIs and UTIs. Methods: We used multinomial logistic regression to analyze 9,650 encounters of female patients who were aged ≥18 years and who underwent testing for STIs. The ED encounters took place from April 18, 2014-March 7, 2017. We used a multivariable regression analysis to account for patient demographics, urinalysis findings, vaginal wet-mount results, and positive or negative (or no) findings from the urine culture and testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, or Trichomonas vaginalis. Results: In multivariable analysis, infection with T vaginalis, N gonorrhoeae, or C trachomatis was not associated with having a urine culture yielding 10,000 or more colony-forming units per mililiter (CFU/mL) of bacteria compared with a urine culture yielding less than 10,000 CFU/mL or no urine culture obtained. The diagnosis of a UTI in the ED was not associated with having a urine culture yielding 10,000 or more CFU/mL compared with a urine culture yielding less than 10,000 CFU/mL. Conclusion: After adjusting for covariates, no association was observed between urine culture results and testing positive for trichomoniasis, gonorrhea, or chlamydia. Our results suggest that having a concurrent STI and bacterial UTI is unlikely.
Asunto(s)
Gonorrea , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Urinálisis , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/orina , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/orina , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/microbiología , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Gonorrea/orina , Urinálisis/métodos , Infecciones por Chlamydia/orina , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Trichomonas vaginalis/aislamiento & purificación , Bacteriuria/diagnóstico , Bacteriuria/orina , Bacteriuria/microbiología , Adulto Joven , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación , Orina/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adolescente , Tricomoniasis/diagnóstico , Tricomoniasis/orinaRESUMEN
Purpose: In the United States, the ZIP Code has long been used to collect geospatial data revealing disparities in social determinants of health. This cross-sectional study examines the distribution of eye care access in association with local socioeconomic factors at a ZIP Code level. Methods: Data from the 2020 Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services and American Community Survey were used to examine locations of 47,949 providers (17,631 ophthalmologists and 30,318 optometrists) and corresponding local socioeconomic variables (education, employment, and income). Multivariable zero-inflated negative binomial regression was used to model eye care provider count per capita in each ZIP Code area with socioeconomic factors as independent covariates. Results: For every 1% increase in percentage of population over 25 years with a bachelor's degree or higher, the expected number of providers increases by 4.4% (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.044; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.041-1.046; P < 0.001). For every 1% increase in percentage unemployment, the expected number of providers decreases by 2.7% (IRR = 0.973; 95% CI, 0.964-0.983; P < 0.001). However, for every $1000 increase in median household income, the expected number of providers decreases by 1.6% (IRR = 0.984; 95% CI, 0.983-0.986; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Disparities in access exist in areas of lower employment and educational attainment, as both have positive correlations with eye care provider access. Conversely, areas of greater median household income have lower access to providers. Translational Relevance: This research contributes to a greater field studying social determinants of health and may inform public health strategies on allocation of providers to improve equitable access to vision care.
Asunto(s)
Medicare , Oftalmólogos , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-term post-treatment surveillance imaging algorithms for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are not standardized due to debates over optimal surveillance strategy and efficacy. Consequently, current guidelines do not provide long-term surveillance imaging recommendations beyond 6 months. PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review to evaluate the impact of long-term imaging surveillance (i.e., imaging beyond 6 months following treatment completion) on survival in patients treated definitively for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science for English literature published between 2003 and 2024 evaluating the impact of long-term surveillance imaging on survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. STUDY SELECTION: 718 abstracts were screened and 95 underwent full-text review, with 2 articles meeting inclusion criteria. The Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions assessment tool was used. DATA ANALYSIS: A qualitative assessment without a pooled analysis was performed for the two studies meeting inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: No randomized prospective controlled trials were identified. Two retrospective two-arm studies were included comparing long-term surveillance imaging with clinical surveillance and were each rated as having moderate risk of bias. Each study included heterogeneous populations with variable risk profiles and imaging surveillance protocols. Both studies investigated the impact of long-term surveillance imaging on overall survival and came to a different conclusion with one study reporting a survival benefit for long-term surveillance imaging with FDG PET/CT in patients with stage III or IV disease or an oropharyngeal primary tumor and the other study demonstrating no survival benefit. LIMITATIONS: Limited heterogeneous retrospective data available precludes definitive conclusions on the impact of long-term surveillance imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient quality evidence regarding the impact of long-term surveillance imaging on survival in patients treated definitively for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. There is a lack of standardized definition of long-term surveillance, variable surveillance protocols, and inconsistencies in results reporting, underscoring the need for a prospective multi-center registry assessing outcomes. ABBREVIATIONS: HNSCC = Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma; RT= radiotherapy; NCCN = National Comprehensive Cancer Network; MPC = metachronous primary cancer; CR = complete response; OS = overall survival; CRT = chemoradiotherapy; HPV = human papillomavirus; PFS = progression-free survival; CFU = clinical follow up; NI-RADS = Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System.
RESUMEN
Objective: We describe the creation of a two-tier emergency response system with a nurse-led first responder program titled "MET-RN" (Medical Emergency Team-Registered Nurse) created for ambulatory settings supported by a critical care code blue team for escalation of care. This observational study evaluated the clinical characteristics and effects of a MET-RN program on the code blue response. Methods: A retrospective review of the MET-RN response data was assessed from January 2016 to June 2021. Data collected included time of call, call location, patient comorbidities, triage category (minor, urgent, or emergent), activation trigger, interventions performed, duration of the event, and patient disposition. In instances where the patient was admitted to the hospital, the discharge diagnosis and emergency department (ED) triage score were collected. Differences were tested using analysis of variance (ANOVA) F-tests, with Tukey post-hoc testing where applicable. Results: MET-RN responded to 6,564 encounters from January 2016 to June 2021. The most frequent trigger call was dizziness/lightheadedness, with a prevalence of 12.0%. 33.9% of the patients seen by MET-RN were transported to the ED for further evaluation. Establishing a MET-RN system led to an estimated median of 58.3% reduction in utilization of the code blue team per quarter. Conclusion: The creation of MET-RN first responder system enabled the ambulatory areas to receive minor, urgent, and emergent patient care support, leading to a decrease in utilization of the code blue team for the hospital. A two-tiered response system resulted in an improved allocation of hospital resources and kept critical care teams in high-acuity areas while maintaining patient safety.
RESUMEN
Purpose: To compare baseline characteristics and treatment of chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (oGVHD) patients in two treatment locations. Patients and Methods: Patients diagnosed with definite chronic oGVHD between September 1, 2014 and September 20, 2021 at two locations were identified. IRB-approved retrospective chart review was conducted for the following data: demographic information, ocular surface disease index (OSDI), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and treatment(s) used. Differences by site were assessed using Pearson's Chi-Square tests and two-sample t-tests; differences by time were assessed using paired t-tests. Results: At baseline, Clinic 1 (C1) patients had a worse mean OSDI score (47.8 vs 36.3, p = 0.011) and CFS in both OD (1.3 vs 0.8, p = 0.005) and OS (1.3 vs 0.6, p < 0.001) compared to Clinic 2 (C2). Comparing baseline to endpoint, C1 patients experienced an improvement in OSDI (-17.26, p < 0.001), CFS OD (-0.50, p < 0.001), and CFS OS (-0.51, p < 0.001) at C1. Change in OSDI, CFS OD, or CFS OS was not statistically significant at C2. Despite similar follow-up length, C1 demonstrated more clinic visits (10.4 vs 3.4, p < 0.001) and more treatment trials (4.9 vs 2.4, p < 0.001) compared to C2. Punctal plugs (85.5% vs 61.2%, p = 0.002), punctal cautery (69.7% vs 28.6%, p < 0.001), topical steroids (72.4% vs 22.4%, p < 0.001), and autologous serum tears (AST) (52.6% vs 8.2%, p < 0.001) were used more frequently at C1 than at C2. Conclusion: oGVHD patients at C1 experienced significant improvement in OSDI and corneal fluorescein staining and compared to patients at C2, had more frequent follow-up and use of punctal plugs, punctal cautery, topical steroids, and AST.
RESUMEN
Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) face chronic symptom burden. Online symptom assessment studies allow for recruitment of large numbers of motivated patients, but patient self-selection can lead to sampling bias. This study evaluated how gender representativeness in MPN symptom surveys and trials impacted symptom score mean estimates, using data from 4825 survey respondents and 291 trial participants with MPNs. The survey data showed that men participated at a rate roughly 50% less than what would be expected based on prevalence, and women reported higher scores than men on average for six of 10 symptoms. Together, this led to potential over estimation in six of 10 symptom score means (ranging from 5.8% to 15.3% overestimated). The trial data showed less gender-based sampling bias compared to the survey data. Studies utilizing online symptom surveys should implement study design features to recruit more men, assess for gender participation imbalances, and provide weighted estimates where appropriate.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos/epidemiología , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Anciano , Evaluación de Síntomas , Adulto , Selección de Paciente , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , InternetRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients experienced heightened anxiety during the pandemic. Also, modifications to clinical trial activities allowing for virtual platforms, local assessments, and greater flexibility were introduced to facilitate participation. We sought to evaluate the association between pandemic-related anxiety and willingness to participate in trials and how pandemic-era modifications to trial activities affect the decision to participate. METHODS: We conducted an online survey from August to September, 2021 of patients with breast cancer assessing pandemic-related anxiety; clinical trials knowledge and attitudes; willingness to participate during and before the pandemic; and how each modification affects the decision to participate. Fisher's exact tests evaluated differences in proportions and two-sample t-tests evaluated differences in means. The association of pandemic-related anxiety with a decline in willingness to participate during compared to prior to the pandemic was modeled using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 385 respondents who completed the survey, 81% reported moderate-severe pandemic-related anxiety. Mean willingness to participate in a trial was lower during the pandemic than prior [2.97 (SD 1.17) vs. 3.10 (SD 1.09), (p < 0.001)]. Severe anxiety was associated with higher odds of diminished willingness to participate during the pandemic compared to prior (OR 5.07). Each of the modifications, with the exception of opting out of research-only blood tests, were endorsed by >50% of respondents as strategies that would increase their likelihood of deciding to participate. CONCLUSIONS: While pandemic-related anxiety was associated with diminished willingness to participate in trials, the leading reasons for reluctance to consider trial participation were unrelated to the pandemic but included worries about not getting the best treatment, side effects, and delaying care. Patients view trial modifications favorably, supporting continuation of these modifications, as endorsed by the National Cancer Institute and others.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Pandemias , Participación del Paciente , Femenino , Humanos , Ansiedad/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Objective: To assess risks and benefits of cardiac intervention in adults with Down syndrome (DS). Patients and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted using data from a study we published in 2010. Patients aged 18 years or older with DS who underwent cardiac operation or percutaneous intervention from February 2009 through April 2022 (new cohort) were compared with patients in the previous study (January 1969 through November 2007; remote cohort) at Mayo Clinic. Results: In total, 81 adults (43 men; 38 women) with DS underwent 89 cardiac interventions (84 surgical; 5 percutaneous) at a mean age of 33 years. Twenty-six patients presented with complete atrioventricular canal defect (17%) or tetralogy of Fallot (15%). The most common adult procedures were valve interventions: mitral (31%), tricuspid (15%), and pulmonary (12%). Of pulmonary valve interventions in the new cohort, 33% were performed percutaneously. The postoperative mortality rate was low (1% total). The mean time between last operation and death was 16 years. Conclusion: Adults with DS can undergo cardiac operation and percutaneous intervention with low morbidity and mortality risk and good long-term survival.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report the detection rate of colorectal tumors with computed tomography (CT) performed within 1 year before diagnosis for indications other than colon abnormalities. Strategies to improve cancer detection are reported. METHODS: Two board-certified, subspecialty-trained abdominal radiologists retrospectively reviewed patient health records and CT images with knowledge of tumor location/size. Patients were classified into 3 groups: prospective (colon abnormality suggesting neoplasm documented in radiologic report), retrospective (not documented in radiologic report but detected in our retrospective review of CT images), and undetected (neither prospectively nor retrospectively detected). Retrospective detection confidence and morphologic characteristics of each tumor were also recorded. RESULTS: Of 209 included patients, 106 (50.7%) had prospectively detected tumors, 66 (31.6%) had retrospectively detected tumors, and 37 (17.7%) had undetected tumors. Asymmetric bowel wall thickening and polypoid masses were present more often in the retrospective group than in the prospective group (27% vs. 10.5% and 26% vs. 17.1%, respectively). Tumors in the ascending colon were more likely to be detected retrospectively than prospectively (odds ratio, 2.75; 95% CI 1.07-7.08; P = 0.04). Undetected tumors were smaller on average (2.9 cm) than prospective (6.0 cm) and retrospective (4.9 cm) tumors (P = 0.03). Detection confidence was lower for retrospectively detected tumors than for prospectively detected tumors (P = 0.03). Indications other than abdominal pain were most common for retrospectively detected tumors (P = 0.03). Use of intravenous contrast material was lowest in the undetected group (P = 0.003). The prospective group had more pericolonic abnormalities, regional/retroperitoneal lymph node involvement (P < 0.001), and distant metastases than did the retrospective group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Half of all colorectal tumors were not detected prospectively. Radiologists should perform meticulous colon tracking regardless of the indication for CT. The right colon merits additional examination. Polypoid and asymmetric morphologic characteristics were most often overlooked, but these characteristics can be learned to improve detection.