Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 70(5): 11-12, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35598139

RESUMEN

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cause of, and accounts for almost 90% of all liver cancers. Data from India is limited especially due to cancer not being a reportable disease and in view of wide variation in diagnostic modalities. This document is a result of a consensus meeting comprising Hepatologists, Interventional Radiologists, Hepatobiliary surgeons, medical and surgical Oncologists nominated by the Association of Physicians of India and Gastroenterology Research Society of Mumbai. The following Clinical Practice Guidelines for practicing physicians is intended to act as an up to date protocol for clinical management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The document comprises seven sections with statements and sub-statements with strength of evidence and recommendation.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Gastroenterología , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Médicos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Humanos , India , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia
2.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 33(8): 1436-1444, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29377271

RESUMEN

Achalasia cardia (AC) is a frequently encountered motility disorder of the esophagus resulting from an irreversible degeneration of neurons. Treatment modalities are palliative in nature, and there is no curative treatment available for AC as of now. Significant advancements have been made in the management of AC over last decade. The introduction of high resolution manometry and per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has strengthened the diagnostic and therapeutic armamentarium of AC. High resolution manometry allows for the characterization of the type of achalasia, which in turn has important therapeutic implications. The endoscopic management of AC has been reinforced with the introduction of POEM that has been found to be highly effective and safe in palliating the symptoms in short-term to mid-term follow-up studies. POEM is less invasive than Heller's myotomy and provides the endoscopist with the opportunity of adjusting the length and orientation of esophageal myotomy according to the type of AC. The management of achalasia needs to be tailored for each patient, and the role of pneumatic balloon dilatation, POEM, or Heller's myotomy needs to be revisited. In this review, we discuss the important aspects of diagnosis as well as management of AC. The statements presented in the manuscript reflect the cumulative efforts of an expert consensus group.


Asunto(s)
Consenso , Acalasia del Esófago/diagnóstico , Acalasia del Esófago/terapia , Manometría/métodos , Miotomía/métodos , Dilatación/métodos , Esofagoscopía , Fundoplicación/métodos , Miotomía de Heller/métodos , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Am Heart J ; 166(3): 409-13, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24016487

RESUMEN

Prompt and accurate identification of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the presence of left bundle-branch block (LBBB) remains difficult. The 2004 STEMI guideline recommended emergent reperfusion therapy to patients with suspected ischemia and new or presumably new LBBB. These recommendations have led to frequent false catheterization laboratory activation and inappropriate fibrinolytic therapy because most patients with suspected ischemia and new or presumably new LBBB do not have acute coronary artery occlusion on angiography. The new 2013 STEMI guideline makes a drastic change by removing previous recommendations. Therefore, patients with suspected ischemia and new or presumably new LBBB would no longer be treated as STEMI equivalent. The new guideline fails to recognize that some patients with suspected ischemia and LBBB do have STEMI, and denying reperfusion therapy could be fatal. The Sgarbossa electrocardiography criteria are the most validated tool to aid in the diagnosis of STEMI in the presence of LBBB. A Sgarbossa score of ≥3 has a superb specificity (98%) and positive predictive value for acute myocardial infarction and angiography-confirmed acute coronary occlusion. Thus, we propose a diagnosis and triage algorithm incorporating the Sgarbossa criteria to quickly and accurately identify, among patients presenting with chest pain and new or presumably new LBBB, those with acute coronary artery occlusion. This is a high-risk population in which reperfusion therapy would be denied by the 2013 STEMI guideline. Our algorithm will also significantly reduce false catheterization laboratory activation and inappropriate fibrinolytic therapy, the inevitable consequence of the 2004 STEMI guideline.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo de Rama/diagnóstico , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Reperfusión Miocárdica/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Triaje/normas , Bloqueo de Rama/cirugía , Comorbilidad , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Electrocardiografía , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Riesgo
4.
J Electrocardiol ; 45(4): 361-367, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22575807

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the prevalence of true acute myocardial infarction and the need for emergent revascularization among patients with new or presumably new left bundle branch block (nLBBB) for whom the primary percutaneous coronary intervention protocol was activated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 802 patients, 69 (8.6%) had nLBBB. The chief presenting symptom was chest pain or cardiac arrest in 36 patients (52.2%) and shortness of breath in 15 (21.7%). Less than 30% of the patients had elevated cardiac troponin-I, and less than 10% had elevated creatine kinase-MB. Only 11.6% of the patients underwent emergent revascularization; the rate was higher for patients who presented with chest pain or cardiac arrest or shortness of breath than for patients who presented with other symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Acute myocardial infarction and the need for emergent revascularization are relatively uncommon among patients who present with nLBBB, especially when symptoms are atypical. Current guidelines for primary percutaneous coronary intervention protocol activation for nLBBB should be reconsidered.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo de Rama/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Bloqueo de Rama/diagnóstico , Bloqueo de Rama/terapia , Forma MB de la Creatina-Quinasa/sangre , Electrocardiografía , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Troponina I/sangre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA