Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gastroenterology ; 166(3): 496-502.e3, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38123023

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy procedures are critical for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of a variety of GI disorders. However, like the procedures in other medical disciplines, they are a source of environmental waste generation and energy consumption. METHODS: We prospectively collected data on total waste generation, energy consumption, and the role of intraprocedural inventory audit of a single tertiary care academic endoscopy unit over a 2-month period (May-June 2022). Detailed data on items used were collected, including procedure type (esophagogastroduodenoscopy or colonoscopy), accessories, intravenous tubing, biopsy jars, linen, and personal protective equipment use. Data on endoscope reprocessing-related waste generation and energy use in the endoscopy unit (equipment, lights, and computers) were also collected. We used an endoscopy staff-guided auditing and review of the items used during procedures to determine potentially recyclable items going to landfill waste. The waste generated was stratified into biohazardous, nonbiohazardous, or potentially recyclable items. RESULTS: A total of 450 consecutive procedures were analyzed for total waste management (generation and reprocessing) and energy consumption. The total waste generated during the study period was 1398.6 kg (61.6% directly going to landfill, 33.3% biohazard waste, and 5.1% sharps), averaging 3.03 kg/procedure. The average waste directly going to landfill was 219 kg per 100 procedures. The estimated total annual waste generation approximated the size of 2 football fields (1-foot-high layered waste). Endoscope reprocessing generated 194 gallons of liquid waste per day, averaging 13.85 gallons per procedure. Total energy consumption in the endoscopy unit was 277.1 kW·h energy per day; for every 100 procedures, amounting to 1200 miles of distance traveled by an average fuel efficiency car. The estimated carbon footprint for every 100 GI procedures was 1501 kg carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent (= 1680 lbs of coal burned), which would require 1.8 acres of forests to sequester. The recyclable waste audit and review demonstrated that 20% of total waste consisted of potentially recyclable items (8.6 kg/d) that could be avoided by appropriate waste segregation of these items. CONCLUSIONS: On average, every 100 GI endoscopy procedures (esophagogastroduodenoscopy/colonoscopy) are associated with 303 kg of solid waste and 1385 gallons of liquid waste generation, and 1980 kW·h energy consumption. Potentially recyclable materials account for 20% of the total waste. These data could serve as an actionable model for health systems to reduce total waste generation and decrease landfill waste and water waste toward environmentally sustainable endoscopy units.


Asunto(s)
Administración de Residuos , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Administración de Residuos/métodos , Instalaciones de Eliminación de Residuos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/efectos adversos , Huella de Carbono
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 659, 2022 Jul 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35906558

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all people across the globe. Regional and community differences in timing and severity of surges throughout the pandemic can provide insight into risk factors for worse outcomes in those hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS: The study cohort was derived from the Cerner Real World Data (CRWD) COVID-19 Database made up of hospitalized patients with proven infection from December 1, 2019 through November 30, 2020. Baseline demographic information, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics were obtained. We performed multivariate analysis to determine if age, race, comorbidity and regionality were predictors for mortality, ARDS, mechanical ventilation or sepsis hospitalized patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: Of 100,902 hospitalized COVID-19 patients included in the analysis (median age 52 years, IQR 36-67; 50.7% female), COVID-19 case fatality rate was 8.5% with majority of deaths in those ≥ 65 years (70.8%). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, male gender and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were independent risk factors for mortality and ARDS. Those identifying as non-Black or non-White race have a marginally higher risk for mortality (OR 1.101, CI 1.032-1.174) and greater risk of ARDS (OR 1.44, CI 1.334-1.554) when compared to those who identify as White. The risk of mortality or ARDS was similar for Blacks as Whites. Multivariate analysis found higher mortality risk in the Northeast (OR 1.299, CI 1.22-1.29) and West (OR 1.26, CI 1.18-1.34). Larger hospitals also had an increased risk of mortality, greatest in hospitals with 500-999 beds (OR 1.67, CI 1.43-1.95). CONCLUSION: Advanced age, male sex and a higher CCI predicted worse outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. In multivariate analysis, worse outcomes were identified in small minority populations, however there was no difference in study outcomes between those who identify as Black or White.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Gastro Hep Adv ; 2(1): 37-45, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36043056

RESUMEN

Background and Aims: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are present in 20% of patients with SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection (COVID-19). We studied the association of GI symptoms (in patients with COVID-19) with adverse outcomes and factors associated with poor outcomes in these patients. Methods: The study cohort included 100,902 patients from the Cerner Real-World Data COVID-19 Database of hospital encounters and emergency department visits with COVID-19 infection from December 1, 2019, to November 30, 2020. Multivariate analysis was used to study the effect of GI symptoms on adverse outcomes and the factors associated with mortality, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis, and ventilator requirement or oxygen dependence in patients with COVID-19 and GI symptoms. Results: Patients with COVID-19 and GI symptoms were significantly more likely to have ARDS (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11, 1.29), sepsis (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.14, 1.24), acute kidney injury (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.24, 1.36), venous thromboembolism (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.22, 1.52), or GI bleed (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.47, 1.79) and less likely to experience cardiomyopathy (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77, 0.99) or death (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.67, 0.75). Among those with GI symptoms, older age, higher Charlson comorbidity index scores, and use of proton pump inhibitors/H2 receptor antagonists were associated with higher mortality, ARDS, sepsis, and ventilator or oxygen requirement. Conclusion: Patients with COVID-19 who have GI symptoms have overall worse in-hospital complications but less cardiomyopathy and mortality. Older age, higher comorbidity scores, and the use of proton pump inhibitors and H2 receptor antagonists are associated with poor outcomes in these patients.

4.
Cureus ; 12(8): e9699, 2020 Aug 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32923289

RESUMEN

Recreational polypharmacy intoxication is a popular trend, particularly among adolescents and young adults. Acute liver failure is an uncommon complication of drug intoxication and has been described separately among patients intoxicated with ethanol, cocaine, and 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy). Many patients with acute liver failure will die without liver transplant, and management of drug-induced acute liver failure is complicated by the fact that polysubstance abuse may be a contraindication for liver transplant, even among young patients. Here we report a case of acute liver failure in an adolescent male secondary to recreational intoxication with ethanol, cocaine, and ecstasy. This patient was not a candidate for liver transplantation. We describe successful treatment using a molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS®) or "liver dialysis" and review the literature pertaining to management options for this type of patient.

5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(43): e22818, 2020 Oct 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33120805

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic has spread from Wuhan, China in December, 2019 to 216 countries and territories as of September 10, 2020 with 27.74 million cases and 899,911 confirmed deaths. The spectrum of disease is most commonly seen as a viral pneumonia with high grade fevers, shortness of breath, dry cough, and chest pain with radiologic evidence of bilateral, interstitial, ground glass opacities, and peripheral lung consolidation. Liver chemistries are frequently abnormal, with transaminases shown to be one-two times the upper limit of normal in most instances. The full spectrum of gastrointestinal involvement of the SARS-CoV-2 infection has yet to be fully seen.Patient concerns: We present a case of a young woman with SLE who developed severe abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, rapidly progressing to acute hepatic failure and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. She had no respiratory symptoms. DIAGNOSIS: A thorough work-up of acute liver failure including liver biopsy confirmed acute hepatitis with viral like changes. Common viral causes of liver failure were ruled out. The patient had no recent travel history. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was started on hydroxychloroquine due to SLE, treated with N-Acetyl-Cysteine, and methylprednisolone. OUTCOMES: The patient improved with resolution of encephalopathy and normalization of her liver chemistries without any development of respiratory illness. CONCLUSION: This case details a unique presentation of likely SARS-CoV-2 infection. Until now, the literature has primarily described a respiratory illness and liver injury with mild transaminase elevations. Significant liver injury progressing to acute liver failure should be considered in those with SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Fallo Hepático Agudo/virología , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Adulto , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Hepático Agudo/diagnóstico , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA