Development and Validation of a Prediction Score for Low-Cardiac-Output Syndrome After Adult Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to develop a simple prediction score to help identify patients at high risk of low-cardiac-output syndrome after adult cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective, observational study. SETTING: At a tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who underwent on-pump cardiac surgery between April 2016 and March 2021. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 2,806 patients retained for final analyses, 355 (12.7%) developed low-cardiac-output syndrome. Using a stepwise backward variable selection procedure applied to a multivariate logistic regression, a prediction model, including 8 risk factors, could be identified-preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min according to the Cockcroft formula or preoperative dialysis, combined surgery, nonelective surgery, mitral valve surgery for mitral valve regurgitation, history of extracardiac arteriopathy, preoperative hemoglobin <13 g/dL, and New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. A clinical prediction score was derived from the regression coefficients. The model had a good discriminative ability, with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.8 (95% CI: 077-0.84). Using a threshold value of 5, the score had a 68% sensitivity, 79% specificity, a positive-predictive value of 33%, and a negative-predictive value of 94%. These results were validated on a validation sample using the bootstrap resampling technique. CONCLUSIONS: The authors developed a clinical score to facilitate the prediction of low- cardiac-output syndrome after adult cardiac surgery. This could help tailor patient management by contributing to the early identification of those at high risk of postoperative low cardiac output.

On-table Extubation After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of "on-table" extubation after minimally-invasive heart valve surgery. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective observational study. SETTING: At a tertiary referral academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent nonemergent isolated heart valve surgery through a minithoracotomy approach between January 2016 and August 2021. INTERVENTION: All patients were treated by 1 of the 6 cardiac anesthesiologists of the hospital. Only some of them practiced "on-table" extubation, and the outcome of patients extubated "on-table" was compared to those extubated in the intensive care unit (ICU). MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the occurrence of any postoperative respiratory complication during the entire hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included the use of inotropes and vasopressors, de novo atrial fibrillation, and lengths of stay in the ICU and the hospital. A total of 294 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 186 (63%) were extubated "on-table." Cardiopulmonary bypass duration was significantly longer, and moderate intraoperative hypothermia was significantly more frequent in patients extubated in the ICU. After adjustment for these confounders and for the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II using a multivariate logistic model, no association was found between the extubation strategy and postoperative pulmonary complications (adjusted odds ratio = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.40-1.77; p = 0.64). "On-table" extubation was associated with a lower risk of postoperative pneumonia and fewer vasopressors requirements. CONCLUSION: "On-table" extubation was not associated with an increased incidence of respiratory complications. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm these results and determine whether "on-table" extubation offers additional benefits.