RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study describes the complication profile of modern cryoablation utilizing probes as an adjuvant during open surgical treatment of orthopedic tumors. METHODS: A retrospective, single-surgeon study was performed for patients receiving cryoprobe cryoablation. Demographic information, malignancy-related and operative details, and clinical courses were collected. Outcomes assessed included rates of complications, recurrence, and correlations between the number of probes or cryoablation cycles performed. RESULTS: In this 148-patient study, 67.6% had metastatic carcinoma to bone, 27.7% had benign bone tumors, and 4.7% had soft tissue tumors. An average of 3.4 ± 1.7 cryoablation probes were utilized and 1.7 ± 0.6 freezing cycles were performed. The overall cohort aggregate complication rate was 16.9%. These complications included postoperative fracture (3.4%), nerve palsy (2.7%), wound complications (7.4%), and infection (3.4%). The number of cycles and probes was significantly correlated with the incidence of aggregate complications in the overall cohort (Pearson = 0.162, p = 0.049) and metastatic bone cohort (Pearson = 0.222, p = 0.027). There were 13 recurrences. CONCLUSION: This study describes the complication rates involving cryoablation probes used as surgical adjuvants. Greater probe number usage was correlated with increased aggregate complications in patients with metastatic disease to bone; meanwhile, more treatment cycles were associated with increased aggregate complications in the overall cohort.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The timing of events in the management of osteosarcoma may be critical for patient survivorship; however, the prognostic value of factors such as onset of symptoms or initiation of therapy in these patients has not been studied. This study sought to review the literature reporting treatment of osteosarcoma to determine the utility of event timing as a prognostic indicator. Due to significant heterogeneity in the literature, this study was conducted as a scoping review to assess the current state of the literature, identify strengths and weaknesses in current reporting practices, and to propose avenues for future improvement. MAIN BODY: This review screened 312 peer-reviewed studies of osteosarcoma in any anatomic location published in an English journal for reporting of an event timing metric of any kind in a population of 6 or more. Thirty-seven studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were assessed for level of evidence, quality, and event timing metric. Reviewers also collated: publication year, population size, population age, tumor site, tumor type, surgical treatment, and adjuvant medical treatment. Extracted event timing data were further characterized using nine standardized categories to enable systematic analysis. The reporting of event timing in the treatment of osteosarcoma was incomplete and heterogenous. Only 37 of 312 (11.9%) screened studies reported event timing in any capacity. The period between patient-reported symptom initiation and definitive diagnosis was the most reported (17/37, 45.9%). Symptom duration was the second most reported period (10/37, 27.0%). Event timing was typically reported incidentally and was never rigorously incorporated into data analysis or discussion. No studies considered the impact of event timing on a primary outcome. The six largest studies were assessed in detail to identify pearls for future researchers. Notable shortcomings included the inadequate reporting of the definition of an event timing period and the pooling of patients into poorly defined timing groups. CONCLUSIONS: Inconsistent reporting of event timing in osteosarcoma treatment prevents the development of clinically useful conclusions despite evidence to suggest event timing is a useful prognostic indicator. Consensus guidelines are necessary to improve uniformity and utility in the reporting of event timing.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Osteosarcoma , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Humanos , Osteosarcoma/diagnóstico , Osteosarcoma/terapia , PronósticoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogenous group of malignant tumors that represent approximately 1% of adult malignancies. Although these tumors occur throughout the body, the majority involved the lower extremity. Management may involve amputation but more commonly often includes wide local resection by an oncologic surgeon and involvement of a plastic surgeon for reconstruction of larger and more complex defects. Postoperative wound complications are challenging for the surgeon and patient but also impact management of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. To explore risk factors for wound complications, we reviewed our single-institution experience of lower-extremity soft tissue sarcomas from April 2009 to September 2016. We identified 127 patients for retrospective review and analysis. The proportion of patients with wound complications in the cohort was 43.3%. Most notably, compared with patients without wound complications, patients with wound complications had a higher proportion of immediate reconstruction (34.5% vs 15.3%; P = 0.05) and a marginally higher proportion who received neoadjuvant radiation (30.9% vs 16.7%; P = 0.06).
Asunto(s)
Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Adulto , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sarcoma/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While treatment-induced tissue necrosis is a well-documented predictor of patient survival in malignant bone tumors, its prognostic value in soft tissue sarcomas is controversial. A prior study from our institution did not find a prognostic value to tumor necrosis. We analyze a more extensive database of high-grade soft tissue sarcomas treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or both to re-evaluate if the degree of tumor necrosis alone can be used as a predictive factor for local recurrence, metastasis, and disease-specific survival. METHODS: Two hundred and seven patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy and wide excision. Tumor treatment response was determined by histopathologic analysis, and patients were followed for local recurrence, metastasis, or death. RESULTS: Tumor necrosis ≥ 90% correlates with improved disease-free survival with univariate analysis, but this does not reach statistical significance on multivariate analysis. Age and tumor volume were found to be the only independent predictors of disease-free survival on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the use of necrosis to prognosticate survival and alter chemoradiation regimens in high grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. Larger studies are needed to definitively address the prognostic value of necrosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prognostic
Asunto(s)
Terapia Neoadyuvante , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Sarcoma/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Factores de Edad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Necrosis , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Pronóstico , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Sarcoma/terapia , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/terapiaRESUMEN
We report a case of rapid recurrence of a giant cell tumor (GCT) of the distal radius in a 24-year-old woman following the cessation of long-term denosumab therapy. GCT of bone is a histologically benign tumor with multinucleated giant cells on a background of mononuclear giant cells usually presenting as a well-defined epi-metaphyseal lytic lesion without sclerotic margins. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody to the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), has proven to be an effective neoadjuvant treatment for GCT. The tumor in this case had demonstrated a good response with sustained control for over 2 years while on denosumab therapy. However, within 2 months of cessation of therapy, the tumor demonstrated rapid recurrence and progression with growth, osteolysis, and increased soft tissue component. Despite reinitiating denosumab therapy, there was progressive tumor growth and destruction, ultimately necessitating below-the-elbow amputation. This case illustrates the need for maintenance of denosumab therapy for GCT of bone or definitive surgical treatment prior to its cessation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Denosumab/administración & dosificación , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Adulto , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Radio (Anatomía)/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose is to present normal and abnormal imaging findings associated with endoprosthetic reconstruction after limb-salvage surgery. CONCLUSION: Endoprosthetic reconstruction varies with the location and size of the tumor, implant designs, and complications. Radiologists need to be aware of associated imaging findings seen in postoperative infection, tumor recurrence, and hardware failure. With a thorough understanding of the normal postoperative radiographic findings after complex reconstructions, subsequent abnormalities are readily identified and timely diagnosis can be obtained.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Neoplasias Femorales/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Prótesis e Implantes , Tibia/cirugía , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Diseño de Prótesis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Reoperación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Medicare Advantage healthcare plans may present undue impediments that result in disparities in patient outcomes. This study aims to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent STS resection based on enrollment in either traditional Medicare (TM) or Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. The Premier Healthcare Database was utilized to identify all patients ≥65 years old who underwent surgery for resection of a lower-extremity STS from 2015 to 2021. These patients were then subdivided based on their Medicare enrollment status (i.e., TM or MA). Patient characteristics, hospital factors, and comorbidities were recorded for each cohort. Bivariable analysis was performed to assess the 90-day risk of postoperative complications. Multivariable analysis controlling for patient sex, as well as demographic and hospital factors found to be significantly different between the cohorts, was also performed. From 2015 to 2021, 1858 patients underwent resection of STS. Of these, 595 (32.0%) had MA coverage and 1048 (56.4%) had TM coverage. The only comorbidities with a significant difference between the cohorts were peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.027) and hypothyroidism (p = 0.022), both with greater frequency in MA patients. After controlling for confounders, MA trended towards having significantly higher odds of pulmonary embolism (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.98, 95% confidence interval (95%-CI): 0.58-6.79), stroke (aOR: 1.14, 95%-CI: 0.20-6.31), surgical site infection (aOR: 1.59, 95%-CI: 0.75-3.37), and 90-day in-hospital death (aOR 1.38, 95%-CI: 0.60-3.19). Overall, statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes were not achieved in this study. The authors of this study hypothesize that this may be due to study underpowering or the inability to control for other oncologic factors not available in the Premier database. Further research with higher power, such as through multi-institutional collaboration, is warranted to better assess if there truly are no differences in outcomes by Medicare subtype for this patient population.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Surgical excisions of upper and lower extremity malignancies are increasing annually, due in part to the rising incidence of sarcomas. The purpose of this study is to compare readmissions, reoperation rate, and complications following surgical excision of soft/connective tissue vs bone malignancies of the upper and lower extremities. Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was queried from 2016-2017 to conduct a retrospective analysis of 16,435 patients diagnosed with malignant neoplasms of the long bone (ULLB, n = 1,433) and soft tissue (ULST, n = 2,049) of the upper limb and malignant neoplasms of the long bone (LLLB, n = 5,422) and soft tissue (LLST, n = 7,531) of the lower limb. Patients who underwent surgical excision of their neoplasms were included. Binomial multivariate logistic regression was used to compare complications, nonelective readmission rates, and reoperation rates between the two groups at 30 and 90 days. Results: Average age of the ULST group was 61.88, with 36% female. Average age of the ULLB group was 44.97, with 41.90% female. Average age of the LLST group was 60.96, with 46.90% female. Average age of the LLLB group was 43.09, with 42.60% female. The ULST group had lower odds of readmission within 30 days (p=0.263), which became significant within 90 days of surgery (p=0.045). The LLST group had significantly higher odds of infection, reoperation within 30 to 90 days of the index surgery compared to the LLLB group (p < 0.0001). The LLST group had significantly lower odds of readmission within 30 (p=0.04) and 90 days (p=0.015) of the index surgery. Conclusion: Patients in the ULST group had significantly lower odds of 90-day readmission compared to the ULLB group. There were also significantly lower odds of 30- and 90-day readmission in the LLST group compared to the LLLB group. However, the LLST group had significantly higher odds of infection and reoperation within 30 and 90 days compared to the LLLB group.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endoprosthetic distal femoral replacement (DFR) is a well-established salvage procedure following resection of malignant tumors within the distal femur. Use of an all-polyethylene tibial (APT) component is cost-effective and avoids failure due to locking-mechanism issues and backside wear, but limits modularity and the option for late liner exchange. Due to a paucity of literature we sought to answer three questions: (1) What are the most common modes of implant failure for patients undergoing cemented DFR with APT for oncologic indications? (2) What is the survivorship, rate of all-cause reoperation, and rate of revision for aseptic loosening of these implants? And (3) Is there a difference in implant survivorship or patient demographics between cemented DFRs with APT performed as a primary reconstruction vs those performed as a revision procedure? AIM: To assess outcomes of cemented DFRs with APT components used for oncologic indications. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent DFR between December 2000 to September 2020 was performed using a single-institutional database. Inclusion criteria consisted of all patients who underwent DFR with a GMRS® (Global Modular Replacement System, Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, United States) cemented distal femoral endoprosthesis and APT component for an oncologic indication. Patients undergoing DFR for non-oncologic indications and patients with metal-backed tibial components were excluded. Implant failure was recorded using Henderson's classification and survivorship was reported using a competing risks analysis. RESULTS: 55 DFRs (55 patients) with an average age of 50.9 ± 20.7 years and average body mass index of 29.7 ± 8.3 kg/m2 were followed for 38.8 ± 54.9 mo (range 0.2-208.4). Of these, 60.0% were female and 52.7% were white. The majority of DFRs with APT in this cohort were indicated for oncologic diagnoses of osteogenic sarcoma (n = 22, 40.0%), giant cell tumor (n = 9, 16.4%), and metastatic carcinoma (n = 8, 14.6%). DFR with APT implantation was performed as a primary procedure in 29 patients (52.7%) and a revision procedure in 26 patients (47.3%). Overall, twenty patients (36.4%) experienced a postoperative complication requiring reoperation. The primary modes of implant failure included Henderson Type 1 (soft tissue failure, n = 6, 10.9%), Type 2 (aseptic loosening, n = 5, 9.1%), and Type 4 (infection, n = 6, 10.9%). There were no significant differences in patient demographics or rates of postoperative complications between the primary procedure and revision procedure subgroups. In total, 12 patients (21.8%) required a revision while 20 patients (36.4%) required a reoperation, resulting in three-year cumulative incidences of 24.0% (95%CI 9.9%-41.4%) and 47.2% (95%CI 27.5%-64.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates modest short-term survivorship following cemented DFR with APT components for oncologic indications. Soft tissue failure and endoprosthetic infection were the most common postoperative complications in our cohort.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The proximal femur is the most common site of surgery for bone metastases, and stabilization may be achieved through intramedullary fixation (IMN) or endoprosthetic reconstruction (EPR). Intramedullary devices are less expensive, less invasive, and may yield improved function over endoprostheses. However, it is unclear which, if either, has any advantages. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether function, complications, and survivorship differed between the two approaches. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 158 patients with 159 proximal femur metastatic lesions treated with surgical stabilization. Forty-six were stabilized with IMN and 113 were treated with EPR. The minimum followup was 0.25 months (mean, 16 months; median, 17 months; range, 0.25-86 months). RESULTS: The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 24 of 30 (80%) after IMN and 21 of 30 (70%) after EPR. There were 12 complications (26%) in the IMN group, including 10 nonunions, six of which went on to mechanical failure. There were complications in 20 of 113 (18%) of the EPR group, which consisted of 10 dislocations (9%) and 10 infections (9%). There were no mechanical failures with EPR. Both implants remained functional for the limited lifespan of these patients in each group at all time intervals. EPRs were associated with increased implant longevity compared with IMNs (100% versus 85% 5-year survival, respectively) and a decreased rate of mechanical failure (0% versus 11%, respectively) when compared with the intramedullary devices. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with metastatic disease to the proximal femur may live for long periods of time, and these patients may undergo stabilization with either IMN or EPR with comparable functional scores and the implant survivorship exceeding patient survivorship at all time intervals. Endoprostheses demonstrate a lower mechanical failure rate and a higher rate of implant survivorship without mechanical failure than IMN devices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Neoplasias Femorales/complicaciones , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Prótesis e Implantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Clavos Ortopédicos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Neoplasias Femorales/secundario , Fracturas Espontáneas/etiología , Fracturas Espontáneas/cirugía , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Falla de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/secundario , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Four decades ago, specialized chemotherapy regimens turned osteosarcoma, once considered a uniformly fatal disease, into a disease in which a majority of patients survive. Though significant survival gains were made from the 1960s to the 1980s, further outcome improvements appear to have plateaued. This study aims to comprehensively review all significant, published data regarding osteosarcoma and outcome in the modern medical era in order to gauge treatment progress. Our results indicate that published survival improved dramatically from 1960s to 1980s and then leveled, or in some measures decreased. Recurrence rates decreased in the 1970s and then leveled. In contrast, published limb salvage rates have increased significantly every recent decade until the present. Though significant gains have been made in the past, no improvement in published osteosarcoma survival has been seen since 1980, highlighting the importance of a new strategy in the systemic management of this still very lethal condition.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Destructive metastatic lesions about the acetabulum result in pain and functional limitations. We assessed whether periacetabular reconstruction (PAR) improves quality of life by examining outcome measures of pain, function, and mobility. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with a mean follow-up of 23.6 months (range, 0.5-112 months) were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent modified Harrington reconstruction with periacetabular screws, cement, and total hip arthroplasty. RESULTS: The mean preoperative MSTS score of 14 (47%, 14/30) improved to 20 (67%, 20/30) after the procedure. Thirty-five patients who were alive 1 month after the procedure were reviewed for outcome. Postoperatively, patients reported a significant improvement in pain (P < 0.0001), mobility (P < 0.0385), and function (P < 0.0186). Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves showed 59% implant- and 55% patient survival at 2 years; and 49% implant- and 39% patient survival at 5 years. Complications included infection (16%, 6/37) and instability (16%, 6/37). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with PAR has shown good results with improved postoperative functional scores. Implants will generally exceed life expectancy and are an option to restore quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/cirugía , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Biopsy tissue can be obtained through a fine needle, a wider coring needle, or through an open surgical incision. Though much literature exists regarding the diagnostic yield of these techniques individually, none compare accuracy of diagnosis in the same mass. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked how the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration, core biopsy, and open surgical biopsy compare in regard to identifying malignancy, establishing the exact diagnosis, and guiding the appropriate treatment of soft tissue masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 57 patients with palpable extremity soft tissue masses, performing fine-needle aspiration, followed by core biopsy, followed by surgical biopsy of the same mass. RESULTS: Open surgical biopsy was 100% accurate on all accounts. With regard to determining malignancy, fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy had 79.17% and 79.2% sensitivity, 72.7% and 81.8% specificity, 67.9% and 76% positive predictive value, 82.8% and 84.4% negative predictive value, and an overall accuracy of 75.4% and 80.7%, respectively. In regard to determining exact diagnosis, fine-needle aspiration had a 33.3% accuracy and core biopsy had a 45.6% accuracy. With regard to eventual treatment, fine-needle aspiration was 38.6% accurate and core biopsy was 49.1% accurate. CONCLUSIONS: In soft tissue mass diagnosis, core biopsy is more accurate than fine-needle aspiration on all accounts, and open biopsy is more accurate than both in determining malignancy, establishing the exact diagnosis, and the guiding appropriate treatment.
Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Biopsia/métodos , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , California , Extremidades , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Reconstruction of the Type II pelvic resection is challenging. Currently available reconstructive options have inherent problems including graft and implant failure, pain, poor function, and high major complication rates. The periacetabular reconstruction (PAR) endoprosthesis was designed to be secured with internal fixation and bone cement to the remaining ilium and support a reconstructed acetabulum. This construct potentially avoids the complications of graft or hardware failure, while maintaining early mobilization, comfort, limb lengths, and function. We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients who underwent Type II pelvic resection and reconstruction with the PAR endoprosthesis, analyzing function, complications, and survivorship. The minimum followup was 13 months (mean, 29.4 months; range, 13 to 108 months). We compared the PAR data with the literature for the Mark II saddle endoprosthesis. The PAR's average MSTS score was 20.8 (67%), major complications occurred in 14 (56%), and implant survivorship was 84% at 2 years and 60% at 5 years. The rate of failure at the ilium-saddle interface was lower and implant survivorship higher than those in the published literature for the Mark II saddle. We recommend use of the PAR endoprosthesis for reconstruction of large defects following Type II pelvic resection. The modified saddle design provides greater inherent stability, allowing for faster rehabilitation and improved longevity without increased complications and is an improvement over the currently available saddle prostheses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case series. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/cirugía , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Prótesis e Implantes , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Ilion/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Huesos Pélvicos/patología , Huesos Pélvicos/cirugía , Diseño de Prótesis , Falla de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Radiografía , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Because of skeletal muscle's density and vascularity, its transection with standard electrocautery can be tedious. In a pilot study we asked whether a linear cutting stapling device decreased surgical time, blood loss, transfusion rates, and complications in patients undergoing above-knee amputation when compared to traditional electrocautery. We retrospectively reviewed 11 patients with above-knee amputation cases using a linear cutting stapling device over a 10-year period and compared those to 13 patients in whom we used electrocautery. The patients treated with the linear cutting stapling device had an average of 97 minutes of surgical time, 302 cc blood loss, and 1.55 units transfusion, compared to an average 119 minutes, 510 cc, and 2.15 units, respectively, with the electrocautery cases. Despite the trends, these parameters, as well as major complications, were similar in these two small groups. In skeletal muscle transection, we believe the linear cutting stapler is a reasonable and potentially cost-effective technical alternative to electrocautery, possibly resulting in less blood loss and shorter surgical time with similar rates of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Electrocoagulación/métodos , Pierna/cirugía , Engrapadoras Quirúrgicas , Muslo/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica/métodos , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Probabilidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to highlight the importance of radiologic studies in assessing the appropriateness of total scapular resection and total shoulder prosthetic reconstruction and to examine the role of imaging in evaluating for postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Evolving surgical and reconstructive techniques for treatment of shoulder girdle tumors require radiologists to familiarize themselves with novel imaging findings associated with these procedures. Readers will better understand the indications for limbsparing surgery with total shoulder prosthetic reconstruction, normal postoperative radiologic findings, and common complications.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Prótesis e Implantes , Escápula/cirugía , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: F-18 FDG PET has been used to grade sarcomas and assess response to therapy in advanced disease. Certain chemotherapy agents are thought to induce an inflammatory response in the tumor bed that can make interpretation of post-therapy FDG PET scans difficult. A review of our experience with PET in assessing therapy response in osseous and soft tissue sarcomas (OSTS) is presented. METHODS: This is a retrospective study (January 1999 to December 2004) of 14 patients with histologic diagnosis of OSTS, who had 2 consecutive PET examinations for evaluation of chemotherapy response. The group included 8 men and 6 women, with age range of 18 to 56 years (average, 36 +/- 14). Semiquantitative assessment of FDG uptake was performed by calculating maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) before and after treatment. The response to therapy was assessed independently by tumor necrosis at post-therapy surgery and according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria for PET. The follow-up PET examinations were performed at an interval of 28 to 166 days (average, 90 +/- 45). All patients ended the ifosfamide regimen at 7 to 36 (average, 16 +/- 9) days before the follow-up PET scans. Five of them received methotrexate, adriamycin, and/or cisplatin as well. RESULTS: Based on the EORTC criteria alone, 3 patients (21.4%) had progression of disease (increase in SUVmax of 29%-69%; mean, 48% +/- 20%), 5 patients (35.7%) had stable disease, and 6 patients (42.8%) had partial response (decrease in SUVmax of 27%-84%; mean, 62% +/- 23%). Across all patients, the tumor necrosis postchemotherapy ranged from 5% to 100% (mean, 64% +/- 34%). In 8 patients (57.1%) the tumor necrosis correlated with the SUVmax changes. However, for 3 patients, the SUVmax changes indicated partial response despite necrosis of fewer than 90% of the surgical specimens, whereas 3 patients with >90% tumor necrosis had SUVmax changes indicative of stable disease. CONCLUSION: The pathologically determined degree of necrosis postneoadjuvant chemotherapy was concordant with PET-assessed EORTC classification of response in 57.1% of the cases. However, a significant number of patients had discrepancies, which may be in part explained by chemotherapy-induced inflammation. The latter should be considered during post-therapy PET interpretation in OSTS.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ifosfamida/uso terapéutico , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiofármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Metastatic tumors of the hand bones are very rare. This report presents three cases of metastatic lesions involving the bones of the hand. These metastases, with adenocarcinoma of the lung as the primary malignancy, were the first clinical presentation of adenocarcinoma in two of these patients. The hamate bone was involved in one patient and the proximal phalanx of the ring finger was involved in the other patient. The third patient developed metastatic disease to the distal phalanx 8 months after initial diagnosis. The authors emphasize that a lytic lesion in the hand may be the first clinical sign of a malignancy or progression to metastatic disease.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Falanges de los Dedos de la Mano , Hueso Ganchoso , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Anciano , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , RadiografíaRESUMEN
Solid aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is a rare subtype of ABC that most commonly involves the small bones of the hands or feet. We present a case of a solid ABC of the distal humerus in a 52-year-old man with a history of chronic kidney disease and renal cell carcinoma. On imaging with plain radiographs, CT, and MRI, this expansile lucent lesion with solid internal enhancement had an appearance that overlapped with metastasis or brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism. On 18F-FDG PET-CT, this lesion was hypermetabolic with an SUVmax of 9.9. Only 37 cases of solid ABC have previously been reported to involve the long bones in the literature, and only 4 in the humerus. We review the clinical, imaging, and histopathological findings and differential diagnosis of solid ABC, and highlight the usefulness of identifying the USP6 gene rearrangement on FISH to distinguish this lesion from other lesions with secondary ABC formation.