Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Causes Control ; 32(10): 1185-1191, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34160709

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate time-to-treatment and survival time in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who presumptively were not diagnosed in a hospital. METHODS: Colorectal tumor-level data from Georgia Cancer Registry (GCR) was merged with American Hospital Association data for 2010-2015 using hospital identification number. Patients with tumors lacking a diagnosis hospital in the GCR were classified as presumptive non-hospital diagnosis (PNHD). Cox proportional hazard models were used to model PNHD and time-to-treatment and time-to-death following cancer diagnosis, stratified by race and controlling for personal and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: PNHD (n = 6,885, 29.6%) was associated with a lower likelihood of treatment at a given point in time (i.e., longer time-to-treatment), but did not differ for Black (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.82) and White (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.76) patients. Time-to-death was longer (i.e., better survival) with PNHD, which also did not differ for Black (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.76) and White (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.75) patients. These results were not explained by confounding factors or differences in tumor stage at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: These observations warrant further research to understand whether there are potentially modifiable factors associated with the diagnosing location that can be used to benefit patient treatment trajectory and survival.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Hospitales , Humanos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA