Global recurrence rates in diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Recurrence rates of diabetic foot ulcers vary widely in the published literature. The aim of this systematic review is to estimate recurrence rates of diabetic foot ulcers. We did a PubMed search and performed a review of reference lists for studies reporting recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers. The weighted relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for recurrence was estimated. Forty-nine studies reporting recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers were included. A pooled estimate for recurrence rate was 22.1% per person-year (py) (95% CI, 19.0-25.2%). Recurrence rate was 24.9% per py in Europe (95% CI, 20.0%-29.7%), 17.8% per py in North America (95% CI, 12.7%-22.9%), 16.9% per py in Africa (95% CI, 4.7%-29.0%), and 17.0% per py in Asia (95% CI, 11.1%-23.0%). Turkey had the highest recurrence rate of 44.4% per py (95% CI, 24.9%-63.9%), and Bangladesh had the lowest of 4.3% per py (95% CI, 2.3%-6.3%). Recurrence rates of diabetic foot ulcers before 2002, between 2002 and 2008, and after 2008 were 22.2% per py (95% CI, 17.6%-26.8%), 21.9% per py (95% CI, 17.0%-26.8%), and 21.8% per py (95% CI, 16.3%-27.2%), respectively. Recurrence rates of diabetic foot ulcers are high. Recurrence rates vary widely in different regions and have decreased recently. More attention towards recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers is urgently required.

Efficacy of Autologous Platelet-Rich Gel for Diabetic Foot Wound Healing: A Meta-Analysis of 15 Randomized Controlled Trials.

Objectives: The meta-analysis was performed to summarize the available evidence and determine the healing effectiveness of autologous platelet-rich gel (APG) on diabetic foot (DF) wounds. Approach: PubMed and The Cochrane Library and CNKI databases were searched to identify prior randomized controlled trials. Methodological qualities of included studies were assessed using Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention. Healing rate was considered the primary outcome; the secondary outcomes included healing time and adverse events. Results: Fifteen studies involving a total of 827 subjects were analyzed in the meta-analysis. Considering the primary outcome, the average healing rate in APG group was 85.8% and ranged from 68.4% to 100%. Relatively, the control group was 57.4% and ranged from 18.2% to 75.0%. Eligible studies were compared with a fixed effects model (I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.496), indicating a higher healing rate with APG (risk ratio [RR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-1.57, z = 8.50, p < 0.001). The leave-one-out sensitivity analysis is robust. Considering the secondary outcomes, APG therapy needed less time (weighted mean difference -10.75 days, 95% CI: -11.67 to 8.86 days, z = 14.34, p < 0.001) and had fewer adverse events (RR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.25-0.76, z = 2.94, p = 0.003). Innovation: APG therapy is an innovative and effective approach to promote DF wound healing and reduce healing time and adverse events. Conclusion: The meta-analysis demonstrates that APG therapy has a positive effect on the treatment of DF wounds. However, additional well-designed and high-quality studies are needed to reach a conclusion with more confidence.

Association Between Cigarette Smoking and Diabetic Foot Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The role of smoking for wound healing in patients with diabetic foot has been unclear. This meta-analysis examined the relationship between cigarette smoking and diabetic foot wound healing. Observational studies for the association between smoking and diabetic foot wound healing of patients were systematically searched through PubMed and Wanfang Data, published up to June 2018. Healing rates of wounds were recognized as outcomes. Meta-analysis models were chosen by heterogeneity. A total of 3388 eligible studies were identified, of which 18 met all our inclusion criteria. In the smoking group, healing rate had an average of 62.1%, ranging from 20.0% to 89.6%; in the nonsmoking group, healing rate had an average of 71.5%, ranging from 40.2% to 93.8%. A significant association was found between smoking and the healing of diabetic foot wounds ( z = 3.08; P = .002), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.70 (95% CI = 0.56-0.88), based on a random-effects model. Meta-regression analyses indicated that the heterogeneity did not come from publication year ( t = -0.50, P = .622) or overall healing rate ( t = 0.16, P = .872). The leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was robust; sensitivity analysis for pooled estimate of adjusted ORs had an OR of 0.20 (95% CI = 0.07-0.56; z = 3.08; P = .002). Subgroup analysis had an OR of 0.62 (95% CI = 0.41-0.95; z = 2.21; P = .027) in retrospective cohort studies and had an OR of 0.75 (95% CI = 0.57-0.99; z = 2.02; P = .043) in prospective cohort studies. Our meta-analysis indicated that smoking had an overall negative effect on the wound healing of diabetic foot individuals. This study provides evidence for the harm of smoking to diabetic foot and may help reduce the medical and economic burden on poor healing of diabetic foot.

Radiographic verification of pedicle screw pilot hole placement in thoracic spine using Kirschner wires versus spiral wires.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of the pedicle screw pilot holes placement in thoracic spine using the spiral wires as the guide pin. METHODS: The pedicle screw pilot holes were drilled within the center of the pedicle and the lateral and medial pedicle walls were violated in 9 human dried thoracic vertebrae. Kirschner wires or spiral wires were separately placed in the holes, and then the posteroanterior and lateral radiographs were taken. The radiographs were evaluated by 3 experienced spine surgeons and 3 young orthopedists. After radiographs were shown to these observers, they combined the posteroanterior and lateral radiographs in each place and determined whether the pedicle screw pilot hole violated the pedicle cortex or not. The results were analyzed by a statistical software. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the method using spiral wires to detect pedicle pilot hole placement were significantly higher than those of using Kirschner wires. With a true posteroanterior radiograph, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the method using spiral wires approximated or attained 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The method of intrapedicular pilot hole placement verification using spiral wires is effective for guiding the accurate placement of pedicle screws.