Evaluation of the impact of technical physicians on improving individual patient care with technology.

BACKGROUND: The rapid introduction of technical innovations in healthcare requires that professionals are adequately prepared for correct clinical use of medical technology. In response to the technological transformation of healthcare, a new type of professional, the Technical Physician (TP), was created and is trained to improve individual patient care using technology tailored to the needs of individual patients. This study investigates the TPs' impact on patient care in terms of innovation, effectiveness, efficiency, and patient safety. METHOD: Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 30 TPs and 17 medical specialists (MSs) working in academic or teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. The pre-structured and open-ended interview questions focused on: 1) the perceived impact on innovation, effectiveness, efficiency, and safety, and 2) opportunities and challenges in daily work. RESULTS: TPs and MSs unanimously experienced that TPs contributed to innovation. A majority indicated that effectiveness (TP 57%; MS 71%) and efficiency (TP 67%; MS 65%) of clinical practice had increased. For safety, 87% of TPs but only 47% of MSs reported an increase. The main explanation given for TPs positive impact was combining medical and technical knowledge. Mainly organizational barriers were mentioned as a potential cause for a less visible contribution of TPs. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: TPs and MSs unanimously agreed that TPs contributed to innovating patient care through their integrative medical and technical competencies. Most TPs and MSs also reported increased effectiveness, efficiency, and safety of patient care due to the TPs' work. TPs and MSs expected that the TPs' impact on direct and indirect patient care will be enhanced once organizational barriers are removed.

How simulated patients contribute to student learning in an authentic way, an interview study.

INTRODUCTION: Simulated patients (SPs) play an instrumental role in teaching communication skills and enhancing learning outcomes. Prior research mostly focused on the SP's contribution to students' learning outcomes by providing feedback afterwards. A detailed understanding of the contribution of the SP during SP-student encounters is currently lacking although the majority of the interaction between SPs and students occurs during the SP-student encounter. Therefore, this study focuses on how SPs see their contribution to meaningful student learning experiences during SP-student encounters. METHODS: We interviewed fifteen simulated patients from one institution. We explored their perspectives on meaningful learning experiences during SP-student encounters through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: SPs view their contribution to meaningful student learning during SP-student encounters from two perspectives. A collective perspective as a member of the community of SPs and an individual perspective. From the collective perspective, SPs believe that the fact that students deal with multiple varied SP-student encounters over time is of value for meaningful learning. From the individual perspective, we noticed that SPs think, act, and react from three different positions. First, as the patient in the role description, second, as a teaching aid and third, as an individual with personal experiences, beliefs, and values. SPs mentioned that the ratio between these different positions can vary within and between encounters. CONCLUSIONS: According to SPs, we should value the variation between SPs, thereby creating meaningful variation in authentic interactions in SP-student encounters. SPs should be allowed to act and react from different positions during SP-student encounters, including their role description, as teaching aid, and based on their own experiences. In this way, SP-student encounters are optimized to contribute to meaningful student learning through authenticity.

The contribution of simulated patients to meaningful student learning.

INTRODUCTION: Communication training with simulated patients (SPs) is widely accepted as a valuable and effective means of teaching communication skills. However, it is unclear which elements within SP-student encounters make these learning experiences meaningful. This study focuses on the SP's role during meaningful learning of the student by giving an in-depth understanding of the contribution of the SP from a student perspective. METHODS: Fifteen bachelor Technical Medicine students were interviewed. Technical medicine students become technical physicians who optimize individual patient care through the use of personalized technology. Their perceptions of meaningful learning experiences during SP-student encounters were explored through in-depth, semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified that described what students considered to be important for meaningful learning experiences. First, SPs provide implicit feedback-in-action. Through this, students received an impression of their communication during the encounter. Implicit feedback-in-action was perceived as an authentic reaction of the SPs. Second, implicit feedback-in-action could lead to a process of reflection-in-action, meaning that students reflect on their own actions during the consultation. Third, interactions with SPs contributed to students' identity development, enabling them to know themselves on a professional and personal level. DISCUSSION: During SP encounters, students learn more than just communication skills; the interaction with SPs contributes to their professional and personal identity development. Primarily, the authentic response of an SP during the interaction provides students an understanding of how well they communicate. This raises issues whether standardizing SPs might limit opportunities for meaningful learning.

Perceptual Speed and Psychomotor Ability Predict Laparoscopic Skill Acquisition on a Simulator.

OBJECTIVE: Performing minimally invasive surgery puts high demands on a surgeon's cognitive and psychomotor abilities. Assessment of these abilities can be used to predict a surgeon's learning curve, to create individualized training programs, and ultimately in selection programs for surgical training. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of cognitive and psychomotor ability on the training duration and learning rate. DESIGN: A prospective quasiexperimental field study regarding the influence of cognitive and psychomotor ability, baseline measures of time to complete task, damage to tissue, and efficiency of movement, age, and gender on the number of sessions needed to reach a predefined performance level on a laparoscopy simulator. The same variables were investigated as predictors of the learning rate. SETTING: The study was performed at the Experimental Center for Technical Medicine at the University of Twente, The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: In all, 98 novices from the Master program of Technical Medicine followed a proficiency-based basic laparoscopic skills training. RESULTS: Perceptual speed (PS) predicted training duration (hazard ratio = 1.578; 95% CI = 1.084, 2.300; p = 0.017). Cognitive (b = -0.721, p = 0.014) and psychomotor ability (b = 0.182, p = 0.009) predicted the learning rate of time to complete the task. Also, the learning rate for participants with higher levels of PS was lower (b = 0.167, p = 0.036). Psychomotor ability also predicted the learning rate for damage to tissue (b = 0.194, p = 0.015) and efficiency of movement (b = 0.229, p = 0.004). Participants with better psychomotor ability outperformed other participants across all sessions on all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: PS predicted training duration in a basic laparoscopic skills training and the learning rate for the time to complete the task. Psychomotor ability predicted the learning rate for laparoscopic skill acquisition in terms of time to complete task, damage to tissue, and efficiency of movements. These results indicate early automation of basic laparoscopic skill. Careful selection of the cognitive abilities tests is advised for use in training programs and to identify individuals who need more training.