Prospective Single-Center Study of SuperPulsed Thulium Fiber Laser in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Initial Clinical Data.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to present our clinical experience of using the thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). METHODS: A prospective clinical study performed after the IRB approval (Sechenov University, Russia). Patients with stones <30 mm were treated with SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser (SP TFL) (NTO IRE-Polus, Russia) through a 200-µm-diameter fiber. Stone size, density, the duration of the operation, and laser on time (LOT) were measured. Based on the surgeon's feedback, retropulsion and intraoperative visibility were also assessed (Likert scale). Stone-free rates (SFRs) were assessed with a low-dose CT scan 90 days after the operation. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and December 2019, 153 patients (mean age 54 ± 2.8 years) underwent RIRS with SP TFL (mean stone density 1,020 ± 382 HU). Median stone volume was 279.6 (139.4-615.8) mm3. Median LOT was 2.8 (IQR 1.6-6.6) min with median total energy for stone ablation 4.0 (IQR 2.1-7.17) kJ, median ablation speed was 1.7 (1.0-2.8) mm3/s, median ablation efficacy was 13.3 (7.3-20.9) J/mm3, and energy consumption was 170.3 (59.7-743.3) J/s. Overall, the SFR (at 3 months) was 89%. The overall complication rate was 8.4%. Retropulsion was present in 23 (15.1%) patients. Visibility was estimated as optimal in most patients, with poor visibility reported in only 13 (8.5%) patients. CONCLUSION: The SP TFL is a safe and efficient tool in lithotripsy, irrespective of the stone type and density. Retropulsion is minimal and visibility is maintained with SP TFL. Nonetheless, further clinical studies are needed to ensure optimal comparison with conventional holmium:YAG lithotripsy.

Acute kidney injury in COVID-19: are kidneys the target or just collateral damage? A comprehensive assessment of viral RNA and AKI rate in patients with COVID-19.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To investigate the possible effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on kidney function and assess the rate of viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) shedding/detection in urine. RECENT FINDINGS: Most of the research on the topic suggests that for the moment our ability to estimate whether SARS-CoV-2 is a direct causative agent in acute kidney injury (AKI) or whether it has a cytokine storm effect is limited. During our prospective assessment of 333 patients with COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) it was found that frequency of AKI of 9.6% (32 cases). Despite previous data suggestive of the ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 in urine, we were unable to identify any traces of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) in our group. Both COVID-19 severity (odds ratio, OR = 23.09, confidence interval, CI 7.89-67.57, P < 0.001) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) history (OR = 7.17, CI 2.09-24.47, P = 0.002) were associated with the AKI rate. SUMMARY: AKI is a relatively frequent condition for patients with COVID-19 and is normally correlated with the severity of the disease and the patient's history of CKD. The available data fail to address whether SARS-CoV-2 mRNA is present in urine, whereas our prospective trial data suggest that mRNA is undetectable in urine irrespective of the severity of the disease.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in larger kidney stones. Could SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser change the game?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article was to compare retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) efficacy and safety with SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser (SP TFL) for stones 20 mm and larger. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with large kidney stones (20 mm and larger) were recruited to undergo PCNL or RIRS with SP TFL lithotripsy. Both groups were comparable in terms of stone size and density, operation time, laser-on time (LOT), stone-free rate, residual fragments and complication rate. Stone retropulsion and visibility were assessed based on the surgeon's feedback using Likert scales. RESULTS: A total of 14 and 56 patients were included in the RIRS and PCNL groups, respectively. The mean stone density was 833.8 ±298.3 HU in the RIRS group and 882.3 ±408.5 HU in the PCNL group (p = 0.072). The median LOT was 11.7 (10.0-15.5) min for RIRS and 10.0 (6.0-12.1) min for PCNL (p = 0.207). The median total energy for stone ablation was 13.8 (11.8-25.0) kJ for RIRS and 12.0 (7.0-20.1) kJ for PCNL (p = 0.508). The median ablation speed was 3.9 (3.9-5.7) mm3/sec for RIRS and 5.0 (4.6-11.3) mm3/sec for PCNL (p = 0.085). We found a significant correlation between retropulsion and the type of surgery performed: with higher retropulsion in the PCNL (r = 0.298 with p = 0.012). The stone-free rate at 3-months was 85.7% in RIRS and 89.3% in PCNL (p = 0.505). CONCLUSIONS: SP TFL is a safe and effective modality for lithotripsy for both, RIRS and PCNL, achieving minimal retropulsion and good visibility. No discrepancies in procedure duration, complications, or LOT were identified between the different modalities.

Long-Term Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A 5-Year Single-Center Experience.

Objective: To analyze the long-term efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Materials and Methods: A total of 127 patients who underwent HoLEP at our institution between 2013 and 2015 were included. Patients were observed for 5 years postoperatively. We evaluated the length of the surgery, the mass of the removed tissue, prostate-specific antigen level, the maximal flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), the length of catheterization and hospitalization, and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and IPSS quality of life (QoL) at each clinic visit. Results: PVR, Qmax, IPSS, and QoL all improved significantly immediately after the operation (p < 0.001). By the end of the 5th postoperative year, all the parameters showed a statistically meaningful decline: Qmax reduced by 5.8 mL/s (22.6%) and IPSS by 1.4 points (29.1%). Around 8.6% of the patients continued therapy with α-blockers. There were no differences in efficacy by the age of the patients or the volume of the prostate. Long-term complications and need for repeat operations were not affected by the volume of the prostate or patient age. Conclusions: The improvement of PVR, Qmax, IPSS, and QoL score seen in the early postoperative period after performing HoLEP remains evident at 5 years postoperatively. Long-term complications and the need for reoperation do not depend on the age of the patient or on the initial volume of the prostate.