RESUMEN
Valvular disease is a complex pathological condition that impacts countless individuals around the globe. Due to limited treatments, it is crucial to understand its mechanisms to identify new targets. Valve disease may result in pulmonary venous hypertension, which is linked to compromised functioning of the alveolar and capillary membranes and hindered gas exchange. Nonetheless, the correlation between surfactant proteins (SPs) and valve disease remains unexplored. A total of 44 patients were enrolled in this study, with 36 undergoing aortic valve replacement and 8 needing a second aortic valve substitution due to bioprosthetic valve degeneration. Ten healthy subjects were also included. The results showed that patients who underwent both the first valve replacement and the second surgery had significantly higher levels of immature SP-B (proSP-B) compared to control subjects. The levels of the extra-lung collectin SP-D were higher in patients who needed a second surgery due to bioprosthetic valve degeneration, while SP-A levels remained unchanged. The research also showed that there was no reciprocal relationship between inflammation and SP-D as the levels of inflammatory mediators did not differ between groups. The present study demonstrates that circulating proSP-B serves as a reliable marker of alveolar-capillary membrane damage in patients with valvular heart disease.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Válvula Aórtica , Calcinosis , Proteína B Asociada a Surfactante Pulmonar , Humanos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/sangre , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Proteína B Asociada a Surfactante Pulmonar/sangre , Proteína B Asociada a Surfactante Pulmonar/metabolismo , Anciano , Calcinosis/sangre , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios de Casos y ControlesRESUMEN
We report a case of 62-years-old man with a previous history of squamocellular tumour at the jaw treated with cisplatin chemotherapy. Six years after the chemotherapy, a transthoracic echocardiography showed a large left atrial lateral wall mass causing mitral stenosis. The thoracic computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan confirmed the mass (66x88mm) with contrast enhancement and the coronary angiography defined it as a giant left circumflex aneurysm. The aneurysm was resected and bypass graft performed. The aetiology and the technique used to treat this aneurysm are worthy to be described.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma , Aneurisma Coronario , Cisplatino , Aneurisma Coronario/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Coronario/etiología , Aneurisma Coronario/cirugía , Angiografía Coronaria , Ecocardiografía , Atrios Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ministernotomy and right minithoracotomy are well-known minimally invasive approaches for aortic valve replacement (AVR); however, controversial opinions exist for their utilization in obese patients. The aim of this study is to check a potential positive role of minimally invasive surgery in this population. METHODS: From January 2010 to November 2019, 613 obese patients (defined by a body mass index ≥30) underwent isolated AVR at our institution. Surgical approach included standard median sternotomy (176 patients), partial upper sternotomy (271 patients), or right anterior minithoracotomy (166 patients). Intra- and postoperative data were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Patients treated with minimally invasive approaches had shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = .012) and aortic cross-clamp time (p = .022), mainly due to the higher utilization of sutureless valve implantation. They also presented advantages in terms of reduced postoperative ventilation time (p = .010), incidence of wound infection (p = .009), need of inotropic support (p = .004), and blood transfusion (p = .001). The univariable logistic regression showed the traditional full sternotomy approach as compared with ministernotomy (p = .026), active smoking (p = .009), peripheral vascular disease (p = .003), ejection fraction (p = .026), as well Logistic European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE; p = .015) as factors associated with hospital mortality. The multivariable logistic regression adjusted for the logistic EuroSCORE revealed that surgical approaches do not influence hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients with severe aortic valve pathology can be treated with minimally invasive approaches offering a less biological insult and reduced postoperative complications, but without impact on hospital mortality.
Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esternotomía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Calcific aortic stenosis is a disorder that impacts the physiology of heart valves. Fibrocalcific events progress in conjunction with thickening of the valve leaflets. Over the years, these events promote stenosis and obstruction of blood flow. Known and common risk factors are congenital defects, aging and metabolic syndromes linked to high plasma levels of lipoproteins. Inflammation and oxidative stress are the main molecular mediators of the evolution of aortic stenosis in patients and these mediators regulate both the degradation and remodeling processes. Mitochondrial dysfunction and dysregulation of autophagy also contribute to the disease. A better understanding of these cellular impairments might help to develop new ways to treat patients since, at the moment, there is no effective medical treatment to diminish neither the advancement of valve stenosis nor the left ventricular function impairments, and the current approaches are surgical treatment or transcatheter aortic valve replacement with prosthesis.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/metabolismo , Válvula Aórtica/patología , Calcinosis/metabolismo , Mitocondrias Cardíacas/fisiología , Animales , Válvula Aórtica/metabolismo , Válvula Aórtica/ultraestructura , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Autofagia , Membrana Basal/ultraestructura , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Células Endoteliales/patología , Humanos , Inflamación , Lípidos/análisis , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo III/fisiología , Estrés Oxidativo , Terapias en Investigación , Respuesta de Proteína DesplegadaRESUMEN
This study provides early results of re-operations after the prior surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection (AAD) and identifies risk factors for mortality. Between May 2003 and January 2014, 117 aortic re-operations after an initial operation for AAD (a mean time from the first procedure was 3.98 years, with a range of 0.1-20.87 years) were performed in 110 patients (a mean age of 59.8 ± 12.6 years) in seven European institutions. The re-operation was indicated due to a proximal aortic pathology in ninety cases: twenty aortic root aneurysms, seventeen root re-dissections, twenty-seven aortic valve insufficiencies and twenty-six proximal anastomotic pseudoaneurysms. In fifty-eight cases, repetitive surgical treatment was subscripted because of distal aortic pathology: eighteen arch re-dissections, fifteen arch dilation and twenty-five anastomotic pseudoaneurysms. Surgical procedures comprised a total of seventy-one isolated proximals, thirty-one isolated distals and fifteen combined interventions. In-hospital mortality was 19.6 % (twenty-three patients); 11.1 % in patients with elective/urgent indication and 66.6 % in emergency cases. Mortality rates for isolated proximal, distal and combined operations regardless of the emergency setting were 14.1 % (10 pts.), 25.8 % (8 pts.) and 33.3 % (5 pts.), respectively. The causes of death were cardiac in eight, neurological in three, MOF in five, sepsis in two, bleeding in three and lung failure in two patients. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that risk factors for mortality included previous distal procedure (p = 0.04), new distal procedure (p = 0.018) and emergency operation (p < 0.001). New proximal procedures were not found to be risk factors for early mortality (p = 0.15). This multicenter experience shows that the outcome of REAAD is highly dependent on the localization and extension of aortic pathology and the need for emergency treatment. Surgery in an emergency setting and distal re-do operations after previous AAD remain a surgical challenge, while proximal aortic re-operations show a lower mortality rate. Foresighted decision-making is needed in cases of AAD repair, as the results are essential preconditions for further surgical interventions.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/etiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Details are provided of the authors' four-year experience with minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) through a right mini-thoracotomy, using totally central cannulation. METHODS: Between November 2011 and October 2014, a total of 248 patients (143 males, 105 females; mean age 72.6 ± 11.5 years; range: 29-93 years) underwent isolated AVR through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy with total arterial and venous central cannulation. RESULTS: AVR was performed through a 4- to 6-cm skin incision at the third intercostal space. The overall cardiopulmonary bypass time was 60.4 ± 16.7 min, and the aortic cross-clamp time 47.5 ± 14.1 min. A biological prosthesis was implanted in 242 patients (97.6%), using running sutures. The median intensive care unit and hospital stays were 40.5 h (IQR 24.6) and six days (IQR 6.0), respectively. In-hospital mortality was 1.2% (3/248); among 86 patients operated on during 2014 the hospital mortality was zero. CONCLUSIONS: AVR performed via a right mini-thoracotomy with total central cannulation provided encouraging results. Adequate surgeon experience, in addition to technical expedience, are of utmost importance as demonstrated by the progressive and steady reduction in operating times. This approach may become highly competitive to a standard full sternotomy, and could become the 'new gold standard' for aortic valve surgery in the near future.
RESUMEN
Iatrogenic injuries to the circumflex coronary artery during mitral valve surgery are probably underestimated (reported rates of 0.3-1.8%). This complication arises from the artery's close proximity to the mitral annulus, particularly at the anterolateral commissure. The study aimed to assess this risk in a patient group prone to such injury. The surgical procedure utilized a minimally invasive approach and indocyanine green-based fluorescence imaging. This technique allows a real-time visualization of the circumflex artery, aiding precise placement of annular sutures and minimizing the risk of injury. The method, applied in 6 patients, integrates preoperative assessments with intraoperative fluorescence imaging, ensuring accurate arterial depiction and preventing iatrogenic damage. The study highlights the safety and efficacy of fluorescence imaging, especially in identifying vessel anomalies, indicating potential applications in various cardiac procedures.
Asunto(s)
Vasos Coronarios , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Humanos , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Verde de Indocianina , Estudios de Factibilidad , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Enfermedad IatrogénicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The benefits of mitral repair versus replacement for endocarditis are inconclusive. This study compares outcomes of patients with infective endocarditis undergoing mitral valve repair versus replacement and investigates the impact of microbial etiology. METHODS: All 251 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery for active endocarditis between 2010 and 2023 were enrolled, 180 (71.7%) replacement and 71 (28.3%) repair. To adjust for imbalances, inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied and 187 patients were obtained. RESULTS: The analysis between groups, following the application of inverse probability of treatment weighting, showed no statistically significant differences across all considered outcomes. Early and late death was observed respectively in 6 (8.5%) and 11 (15.5%) patients in the repair group versus 24 (13.3%) and 45 (25.0%) in the replacement group without statistical significance (p = 0.221 and p = 0.446). Relapse occurred in six patients (8.5%) in the repair group after a median time of 4.0 months and in six (3.3%) in the replacement after 6.9 months (p = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical strategy in mitral endocarditis has no effect on major postoperative complications, mortality, or medium/long-term survival. Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-negative Staphylococci represent a risk for early mortality and relapse. However, mitral valve repair for endocarditis can be pursued when it ensures the complete eradication of all infected tissue, particularly in cases caused by Streptococcus infection, in young patients, and after a minimum of 18 days of antibiotic therapy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite advanced diagnosis and treatment, infective endocarditis (IE) is a potentially life-threatening condition. The impact of COVID-19 on the diagnosis and outcome of the surgical treatment of IE is uncertain. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of surgically treated IE before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 535 patients who underwent valve surgical procedures for IE between January 2010 and December 2022 in a single cardiac surgery center. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the date of their operation: before (n = 393) and after (n = 142) COVID-19 onset. In order to balance the groups, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) calculated from the propensity score (PS) was applied. Weighted univariate logistic regressions were reported for outcomes; weights were derived from IPTW. Interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) according to Linden's method was used to evaluate the changes in the manifestation of IE after 11 March 2020. RESULTS: Patients from the post-COVID-19 cohort (after 11 March 2020) had a greater number of comorbidities such as diabetes (29.6% vs. 16.3% p = 0.001), hypertension (71.1% vs. 59.5% p = 0.015), and preoperative kidney injury requiring dialysis (9.2% vs. 2.5% p = 0.002), but the median additive and logistic EuroSCORE were not statistically different. In the post-COVID-19 group, we observed a greater prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus-related endocarditis (24.5% vs. 15.4% p = 0.026), a consequent reduction in Staphylococcus non aureus-related endocarditis (12.2% vs. 20.1% p = 0.048), and a decrease in aortic valve replacements (43.0% vs. 53.9%), while the number of mitral valve replacements and repair was greater (21.1% vs. 15.0% and 6.3% vs. 4.3%, respectively). No differences were found in the two groups concerning early death, death, or relapse at 1 year after surgery. Data obtained by multivariable analysis identified preoperative renal dysfunction requiring dialysis as the only common risk factor for early mortality via stratifying by time periods in analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of surgically treated IE significantly increases after the COVID-19 pandemic with a higher incidence of mitral valve involvement with respect to the aortic valve. Although a delay in surgical timing occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, data in terms of mortality and outcomes were largely unaffected.
RESUMEN
Calcification of the aortic valve (CAVDS) is a major cause of aortic stenosis (AS) leading to loss of valve function which requires the substitution by surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI). These procedures are associated with high post-intervention mortality, then the corresponding risk assessment is relevant from a clinical standpoint. This study compares the traditional Cox Proportional Hazard (CPH) against Machine Learning (ML) based methods, such as Deep Learning Survival (DeepSurv) and Random Survival Forest (RSF), to identify variables able to estimate the risk of death one year after the intervention, in patients undergoing either to SAVR or TAVI. We found that with all three approaches the combination of six variables, named albumin, age, BMI, glucose, hypertension, and clonal hemopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), allows for predicting mortality with a c-index of approximately 80 % . Importantly, we found that the ML models have a better prediction capability, making them as effective for statistical analysis in medicine as most state-of-the-art approaches, with the additional advantage that they may expose non-linear relationships. This study aims to improve the early identification of patients at higher risk of death, who could then benefit from a more appropriate therapeutic intervention.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Válvula Aórtica , Calcinosis , Aprendizaje Profundo , Humanos , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/patología , Calcinosis/cirugía , Calcinosis/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/mortalidad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Riesgo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In the last decades, 4 different scores for the prediction of mortality following surgery for type A acute aortic dissection (TAAD) were proposed. We aimed to validate these scores in a large external multicentre cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients who underwent surgery for TAAD between 2000 and 2020. Patients were enrolled from 10 centres from 2 European countries. Outcomes were the early (30-day and/or in-hospital) and 1-year mortality. Discrimination, calibration and observed/expected (O/E) ratio were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1895 patients (31.7% females, mean age 63.72 ± 12.8 years) were included in the study. Thirty-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were 21.7% (n = 412) and 22.5% (n = 427) respectively. The German Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) score shows to have the best discrimination [area under the curve (AUC) 0.671 and 0.672] in predicting as well the early and the 1-year mortality, followed by the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) model 1 (AUC 0.658 and 0.672), the Centofanti (AUC 0.645 and 0.66) and the UK aortic score (AUC 0.549 and 0.563). According to Hosmer-Lemeshow and Brier tests, the IRAD model I and GERAADA, respectively, were well calibrated for the early mortality, while the GERAADA and Centofanti for the 1-year mortality. The O/E analysis showed a marked underestimation for patients labelled as low-risk for UK aortic score and IRAD model I for both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The GERAADA score showed the best performance in comparison with other scores. However, none of them achieved together a fair discrimination and a good calibration for predicting either the early or the 1-year mortality.
Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Azidas , Desoxiglucosa/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Europa (Continente) , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) after previous cardiac surgery is usually associated with an increased risk profile. The study aim was to compare the outcome after AVR through an upper 'J' ministernotomy compared to a standard full sternotomy approach in a redo operation. METHODS: A total of 90 patients who underwent reoperative AVR at the authors' institution between October 2007 and January 2012 was retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 46 had patent bypass grafts and 44 previously had heart valve replacement or repair. Sixteen patients had endocarditis as the etiology, and 14 had prosthetic valve endocarditis. Of the 90 patients operated on, a minimally invasive upper 'J' ministernotomy was performed in 38, and a full median sternotomy in 52. The median age was 76 years (25th percentile 68.25 years; 75th percentile 79.25 years) for the minimally invasive group, and 73.5 (25th percentile 68 years; 75th percentile 78.75 years) for the full sternotomy group (p = 0.945). No statistically significant differences in terms of body mass index (p = 0.987), left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.544) and EuroSCORE (p = 0.162) were found between the two groups. Intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes, in terms of intensive care unit stay, blood loss, transfusions and sternal complications were analyzed. RESULTS: All patients underwent AVR. The median (IQR) cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were respectively 67 (28) min and 51 (28) min for the minimally invasive group, and 72 (47) min and 53.5 (28) min for the full sternotomy group (p = 0.686 and p = 0.993). The postoperative ventilation time was significantly less in ministernotomy patients (median 6 versus 8.5 h; p = 0.027). One patient affected by endocarditis died in the minimally invasive group (mortality rate 2.6%). Hospital mortality in the traditional group was 3/52 (5.8%). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery reoperation through an upper 'J' sternotomy proved to be at least as safe as the standard procedure in terms of hospital morbidity and mortality rates.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Esternotomía , Anciano , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Femenino , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías/cirugía , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Reoperación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esternotomía/métodos , Esternotomía/mortalidad , Volumen Sistólico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nowadays, one of the main goals of aortic valve surgery is to reduce the biological impact, mortality, and complications. It is well-known that long operative times in terms of the extracorporeal circulation, but above all, of the aortic cross-clamp time (ACC), represent a risk factor for mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In order to shorten the aortic cross-clamp time, many technological improvements, such as sutureless prostheses, have been introduced, but their actual effectiveness has not been proven yet. The aim of this study was to assess the 30-day outcomes of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery, focusing on the ACC length. METHODS: All 3139 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement between January 2013 and July 2022 at our institution were enrolled. The data were retrospectively collected and the baseline characteristics and intraoperative variables were recorded. In order to adjust the results according to the differences in the baseline characteristics, propensity score matching was performed and four groups of 351 patients were obtained based on the first, second, third, and fourth quartile of the ACC time. RESULTS: The patient population included 132 redo surgeries (9.4%) and 61 cases of active endocarditis (4.3%), with an overall median EuroSCORE II of 1.8 (IQR 1.2-3.1). An increase across the groups was observed in terms of the acute kidney failure (p < 0.001) incidence, the number of blood transfusions (p = 0.022), prolonged hospital stays (p < 0.001), the and respiratory failure (p < 0.001) incidence. A p of < 0.1 was found for the 30-day mortality (p = 0.079). The predictors of an early 30-day mortality were standard full sternotomy (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.14-5.40, p = 0.022), EuroSCORE II (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.16, p < 0.001), and a trend for a longer ACC time (Q4 vs. Q1: OR 2.62, 95% CI 0.89-7.68, p = 0.080). CONCLUSIONS: Shortening the operative times resulted in marked improvements of the patients' outcomes. The combined use of minimally invasive approaches and sutureless aortic valve prostheses allows for a lower 30-day events rate. New technologies should be assessed to obtain the best results with the least risk.
RESUMEN
In elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery, extracorporeal circulation affects the incidence of post-operative delirium and cognitive impairment with an impact on quality of life and mortality. In this study, a new oxygenator system (RemoweLL 2) was tested against a conventional system to assess its efficacy in reducing the onset of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction and the levels of serum inflammatory markers. A total of 154 patients (>65 y.o.) undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were enrolled and randomly assigned to oxygenator RemoweLL 2 (n = 81) or to gold standard device Inspire (n = 73) between September 2019 and March 2022. The aims of the study were to assess the incidence of delirium and the cognitive decline by neuropsychiatric tests and the MoCa test intra-hospital and at 6 months after CPB. Inflammation biomarkers in both groups were also evaluated. Before the CPB, the experimental groups were comparable for all variables. After CPB, the incidence of severe post-operative delirium showed a better trend (p = 0.093) in patients assigned to RemoweLL 2 (16.0%) versus Inspire (26.0%). Differences in enolase levels (p = 0.049), white blood cells (p = 0.006), and neutrophils (p = 0.003) in favor of RemoweLL 2 were also found. The use of novel and better construction technologies in CPB oxygenator devices results in measurable better neurocognitive and neurological outcomes in the elderly population undergoing CPB.
RESUMEN
Recent evidence indicates that reactive oxygen species play an important causative role in the onset and progression of valvular diseases. Here, we analyzed the oxidative modifications of albumin (HSA) occurring on Cysteine 34 and the antioxidant capacity of the serum in 44 patients with severe aortic stenosis (36 patients underwent aortic valve replacement and 8 underwent a second aortic valve substitution due to a degenerated bioprosthetic valve), and in 10 healthy donors (controls). Before surgical intervention, patients showed an increase in the oxidized form of albumin (HSA-Cys), a decrease in the native reduced form (HSA-SH), and a significant reduction in serum free sulfhydryl groups and in the total serum antioxidant activity. Patients undergoing a second valve replacement showed levels of HSA-Cys, free sulfhydryl groups, and total antioxidant activity similar to those of controls. In vitro incubation of whole blood with aspirin (ASA) significantly increased the free sulfhydryl groups, suggesting that the in vivo treatment with ASA may contribute to reducing oxidative stress. We also found that N-acetylcysteine and its amide derivative were able to regenerate HSA-SH. In conclusion, the systemic oxidative stress reflected by high levels of HSA-Cys is increased in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Thiol-disulfide breaking agents regenerate HSA-SH, thus paving the way to the use these compounds to mitigate the oxidative stress occurring in the disease.
Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Humanos , Albúmina Sérica , Estrés Oxidativo , Acetilcisteína/farmacología , Compuestos de SulfhidriloRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious disease, and in many cases, surgery is necessary. Whether the type of prosthesis implanted for aortic valve replacement (AVR) for IE impacts patient survival is a matter of debate. The aim of the present study is to quantify differences in long-term survival and recurrence of endocarditis AVR for IE according to prosthesis type among patients aged 40 to 65 years. METHODS: This was an analysis of the INFECT-REGISTRY. Trends in proportion to the use of mechanical prostheses versus biological ones over time were tested by applying the sieve bootstrapped t-test. Confounders were adjusted using the optimal full-matching propensity score. The difference in overall survival was compared using the Cox model, whereas the differences in recurrence of endocarditis were evaluated using the Gray test. RESULTS: Overall, 4365 patients were diagnosed and operated on for IE from 2000 to 2021. Of these, 549, aged between 40 and 65 years, underwent AVR. A total of 268 (48.8%) received mechanical prostheses, and 281 (51.2%) received biological ones. A significant trend in the reduction of implantation of mechanical vs. biological prostheses was observed during the study period (p < 0.0001). Long-term survival was significantly higher among patients receiving a mechanical prosthesis than those receiving a biological prosthesis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.546, 95% CI: 0.322-0.926, p = 0.025). Mechanical prostheses were associated with significantly less recurrent endocarditis after AVR than biological prostheses (HR 0.268, 95%CI: 0.077-0.933, p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis of the INFECT-REGISTRY shows increased survival and reduced recurrence of endocarditis after a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis implant for IE in middle-aged patients.
RESUMEN
AIMS: In the last 15 years, some observations tried to shed light on the dysregulation of the cellular self-digestion process in calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS), but the results obtained remain still controversial. This work is aimed to definitively establish the trend of autophagy in patients affected by CAVS, to analyse the putative involvement of other determinants, which impact on the mitochondrial quality control mechanisms and to explore possible avenues for pharmacological interventions in the treatment of CAVS. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational study, performed exclusively in ex vivo human samples (cells and serum), by using biochemical approaches and correlations with clinical data, describes new biological features of the calcified valve in terms of mitochondrial dysfunctions. In detail, we unveiled a significant deficiency in mitochondrial respiration and in ATP production coupled to increase production of lactates. In addition, mitochondrial population in the pathologic group is aged with significant alterations in biogenesis and mitophagy pathways. We are also reporting an updated view about autophagy accompanying the calcification process and advanced stages of the disease. We provided evidence for a rapamycin-based therapeutic strategy to revert the calcified phenotype to the wild type one. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the CAVS phenotype is featured by defects in mitochondrial quality control mechanisms and that autophagy is not activated enough to counteract cell death and sustain cell functions. Thus, boosting autophagy and mitophagy from short- to long-term reverts quite all pathological phenotypes.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Mitofagia , Anciano , Válvula Aórtica/patología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/genética , Autofagia , Calcinosis , Muerte Celular , Humanos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The need for concomitant tricuspid surgery in patients who need mitral valve surgery casts doubt on its feasibility via a minimally invasive approach. Our goal was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing concomitant mitral and tricuspid valve surgery either with a standard full sternotomy (full-MTS) or a minimally invasive approach (mini-MTS). METHODS: The outcomes of patients who had combined mitral and tricuspid valve surgery in 11 centres were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was the incidence of 30-day mortality. A propensity score matched cohort was selected to create 2 comparable groups stratified by surgery (valve replacement or repair). RESULTS: During the study period, 1048 consecutive patients had combined mitral and tricuspid valve surgery (730 full-MTS, 318 mini-MTS). The matching procedure paired 192 full-MTS to 192 mini-MTS procedures. After matching, mini-MTS was associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass [123 min, standard deviation (SD) 46, vs 102 min, SD 36, P = 0.001] and cross-clamping times (89 min, SD 34, vs 78 min, SD 29, P = 0.003). Although the hospital length of stay was shorter (8 days, interquartile range 7-12 vs 9 days, interquartile range 7-14, P = 0.034) with mini-MTS before matching, this difference disappeared after matching. No differences in other major complications or in 30-day mortality were observed: 48 deaths (4.6%), 36 of which (4.9%) occurred in patients who had a full-MTS and 12 (3.8%), in patients who had a mini-MTS (4.7% in both approaches paired by propensity). CONCLUSIONS: The mini-MTS approach proved to be safe and effective in patients requiring concomitant mitral and tricuspid surgery. We could not demonstrate any difference in short-term outcomes between the 2 surgical approaches, indicating that there is not a preferred surgical approach.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Esternotomía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esternotomía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Válvula Tricúspide/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The number of elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery is increasing. Age greater than 80âyears has been identified as a strong independent risk factor for shortand long-term survival. The current study is aimed to identify the impact of preoperative comorbidities on early and late outcomes in older patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Baseline characteristics, procedurals and postoperative complications of all patients undergoing cardiac surgery at our institution are collected. The current analysis is focused on patients aged at least 80âyears at the time of intervention and treated from January 2010 to December 2019. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality resulted as 6.3%. Redo intervention [odds ratio (OR) 2.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-5.48], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.75-5.12) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.30-3.81) were independent baseline predictors of outcome in the multivariate analysis. Prolonged extracorporeal circulation time, need for transfusion and prolonged intubation time strongly and independently predicted in-hospital mortality. During a mean follow-up of 3.6âyears 34.3% of patients died and unplanned admission (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.05-1.67), NYHA class III-IV (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.12-1.64), diabetes (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.59), COPD (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.25-2.04) and PAD (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.03-1.71) resulted as independent predictors of all-cause death. CONCLUSION: Cardiac surgery is feasible in octogenarians, with an acceptable risk of mortality. Chronological age itself should not be the main determinant of choice while referring patients for cardiac surgical intervention. Comorbidities such as COPD, PAD and diabetes need to be taken into account for risk stratification.