Long-term trajectories of ambulatory impairment in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory impairment is a common and complex manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS), and longitudinal patterns are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To characterize longitudinal walking speed trajectories in a general MS patient population and in those with early disease (⩽ 5 years from onset), identify subgroups with similar patterns, and examine associations with individual attributes. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort study design, latent class growth analysis was applied to longitudinal timed 25-foot walk (T25-FW) data from 7683 MS patients, to determine T25-FW trajectories. Associations were evaluated between trajectory assignment and individual attributes. Analyses were repeated for 2591 patients with early disease. RESULTS: In the general patient population, six trajectories were discerned, ranging from very minimal to very high impairment at baseline, with variability in impairment accrual. The clusters with moderate to very high walking impairment were associated with being female, older and Black American, longer symptom duration, progressive course, and depressive symptoms. In the early disease subset, eight trajectories were discerned that included two subgroups that rapidly accrued impairment. CONCLUSION: We identified novel subgroups of MS patients will distinct long-term T25-FW trajectories. These results underscore that socially disadvantaged and economically marginalized MS patients are the most vulnerable for severe ambulatory impairment.

Stopping disease-modifying therapy in relapsing and progressive multiple sclerosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To assess the reasons for considering discontinuation of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs)in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Relevant aspects of the natural history, pathology, and immunology are analyzed. RECENT FINDINGS: A number of retrospective observational studies in aggregate indicate that stopping DMTs may be attempted in older individuals with stable disease. Prognostic factors have been identified informing about the risk of recurrence of disease activity after DMT discontinuation. SUMMARY: Several clinical scenarios provide a rationale to stop DMTs in people with MS. Cumulative evidence has been gathered recently allowing us to more precisely weigh the risks against the benefits. This information aids in the decision process.

Perspectives of individuals with multiple sclerosis on discontinuation of disease-modifying therapies.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic research in multiple sclerosis (MS) has focused on the development of treatments with little investigation regarding the possibility of discontinuation of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). OBJECTIVE: To understand the opinion of individuals with MS concerning stopping DMTs and the factors that influence the decision-making process. METHODS: A mixed method approach was used starting with three focus groups from which a survey was developed. This survey was sent to 1000 participants in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis registry who met inclusion criteria (age ⩾45 years; on most recent DMT for ⩾5 years). Descriptive analysis and structural equation modeling were used. RESULTS: Of 1000 participants receiving the survey, 377 provided complete responses and met inclusion criteria. Only 11.9% of participants reported that if their disease was considered stable, they would consider coming off medications. A high level of external locus of control in influential others such as physicians significantly decreased the likelihood of considering discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Most individuals with MS report being unlikely to consider stopping MS therapy if their disease was considered "non-active." As the results of studies concerning DMT discontinuation are obtained, information from providers will be an important part of individuals' decision-making process.

Insulin secretory effect of sitagliptin: assessment with a hyperglycemic clamp combined with a meal challenge.

Sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor (DPP-4), sustains activity of the incretin hormones GLP-1 and GIP and improves hyperglycemia in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It has however proven challenging to quantify the effect of sitagliptin on rates of insulin secretion (ISR) during a prandial challenge. The tight feedback governance of ISR by plasma glucose means that in the face of treatment-related lowering of postprandial glycemia, corresponding stimulation of ISR is lessened. We postulated that sustaining a stable level of moderate hyperglycemia before and during a meal challenge (MC) would be a platform that enables greater clarity to assess the effect of sitagliptin on ISR and an approach that could be valuable to evaluate novel targets that increase insulin secretion directly and by augmenting incretins. A hyperglycemic clamp (HGC) at 160 mg/dl was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers (without diabetes) for 6 h; 3 h into the HGC, MC was administered while maintaining stable hyperglycemia of the HGC for an additional 3 h. Modeling of C-peptide response was used to calculate ISR. In crossover design of three periods (sitagliptin twice and placebo once), the effect of sitagliptin vs. placebo on ISR and the reproducibility of the response to sitagliptin were assessed. Sitagliptin increased ISR compared with placebo by 50% and 20% during the HGC alone and the HGC-MC phases, respectively ( P < 0.001 for both). There was an associated significant treatment-based increase in circulating insulin, as well as active levels of GLP-1. Robust reproducibility of the sitagliptin-mediated ISR response was observed; the intraclass correlation value was 0.94. The findings delineate the effect of sitagliptin to stimulate insulin secretion, and these benchmark data also demonstrate that an HGC-MC can be a useful platform for interrogating therapeutic targets that could potentially modulate ISR via direct action on beta-cells as well as by augmenting release or action of incretins.

The MSOAC approach to developing performance outcomes to measure and monitor multiple sclerosis disability.

BACKGROUND: The Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium (MSOAC) was formed by the National MS Society to develop improved measures of multiple sclerosis (MS)-related disability. OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess the current literature and available data on functional performance outcome measures (PerfOs) and (2) to determine suitability of using PerfOs to quantify MS disability in MS clinical trials. METHODS: (1) Identify disability dimensions common in MS; (2) conduct a comprehensive literature review of measures for those dimensions; (3) develop an MS Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) data standard; (4) create a database of standardized, pooled clinical trial data; (5) analyze the pooled data to assess psychometric properties of candidate measures; and (6) work with regulatory agencies to use the measures as primary or secondary outcomes in MS clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Considerable data exist supporting measures of the functional domains ambulation, manual dexterity, vision, and cognition. A CDISC standard for MS ( http://www.cdisc.org/therapeutic#MS ) was published, allowing pooling of clinical trial data. MSOAC member organizations contributed clinical data from 16 trials, including 14,370 subjects. Data from placebo-arm subjects are available to qualified researchers. This integrated, standardized dataset is being analyzed to support qualification of disability endpoints by regulatory agencies.

Prevalence and Predictors of Depression Among Patients With Epilepsy, Stroke, and Multiple Sclerosis Using the Cleveland Clinic Knowledge Program Within the Neurological Institute.

BACKGROUND: Neurological conditions carry a high risk of depression. Given this risk, the Neurological Institute (NI) at Cleveland Clinic has initiated systematic screening for depression using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) embedded within its electronic medical record and its data capture system, the Knowledge Program (KP)1. OBJECTIVE: We sought to (1) estimate the prevalence of depression among patients with epilepsy, stroke, and multiple sclerosis (MS); (2) identify risk factors for depression within each disease; and (3) determine differential risks and predictors across neurological disorders. METHODS: The KP1 database provided information on approximately 23,000 visits involving 7946 outpatients with epilepsy, stroke, or MS seen in neurology specialty clinics. The primary outcome measure was depression as defined as a PHQ-9 ≥ 10. RESULTS: Overall, the point prevalence of depression was 29.0%. For stroke, epilepsy, and MS, prevalence of depression was 23% (95% CI: 21-25%), 33% (95% CI: 31-35%), and 29% (95% CI: 28-30%), respectively. For all 3 conditions, increasing disease severity and decreased health-related quality of life were independent predictors of depression. In multivariable models, there was a significant interaction between age and condition, and condition with disease severity. In stroke and MS, increasing age was associated with reduced odds for depression, whereas in epilepsy, increasing age was associated with an increased odds for depression. CONCLUSIONS: Although depression is common among patients with neurological disorders, our data suggest that predictors of depression such as age and disease severity varied by condition, supporting important possible phenomenological and pathophysiological differences of depression across these neurological conditions.

Refinement of an Instrument to Measure the Needs of Parents of Sick Children in the Context of Family Centered Care.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to refine an instrument to capture the perceived needs of parents whose children are seriously ill. This article describes the psychometric properties of the Parents' Needs Scale (PNS), a translated, revised 22-item short form from an original instrument that was developed and tested on parents of children with cancer in Hong Kong. METHODS: The study was done in three stages that included (a) factor analysis of two samples recruited from clinics in Northern Virginia of parents of children with cancer (n = 74) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) (n = 30); (b) known groups validity testing with two groups of parents recruited in a parallel study on children with special needs (n = 15) and a control group of well children (n = 23); and (c) concurrent validity testing on the subsample of parents of children with special needs using the known measure of Impact on the Family Scale (IFS). Data collection for the stages included mailed questionnaires and follow-up telephone interviews. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis using the common factor approach identified two domains: (1) needs related to my child's illness and (2) needs unrelated to my child's illness. The factorial structure was followed by item scaling tests to determine item-level convergence and discriminative validity, as well as scale reliability for the two domains (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93 and 0.90). Domain-level discriminant validity tests yielded significant differences on several expected characteristics of the child and/or family based on the literature. The final 22-item scale was reworded and used to establish known groups validity by comparing the two groups of children with acute illnesses from the previous study with two control groups of parents of children who were well or children with special needs but not acutely ill, yielding significant results on both factors (p < 0.001). A final test of concurrent validity was performed on the parents of children with special needs measures of parent need with their reported impact on the family yielding significant correlations on predicted variables. CONCLUSIONS: The PNS can measure parents' needs with demonstrated psychometric validity and reliability.

Processing speed test: Validation of a self-administered, iPad®-based tool for screening cognitive dysfunction in a clinic setting.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive dysfunction is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and has important consequences for daily activities, yet, unlike motor function, is not routinely assessed in the clinic setting. We developed the Processing Speed Test (PST), a self-administered iPad®-based tool to measure MS-related deficits in processing speed. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the PST is valid for screening cognitive dysfunction by comparing it to the paper-and-pencil Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). METHODS: We assessed PST test-retest reliability, sensitivity of PST and SDMT in discriminating MS patients from healthy controls (HC), convergent validity between PST and SDMT, correlations between T2 lesion load and PST and SDMT, and PST performance with and without technician present during administration. RESULTS: PST had excellent test-retest reliability, was highly correlated with SDMT, was slightly more sensitive than SDMT in discriminating MS from HC groups, and correlated better with cerebral T2 lesion load than did SDMT. Finally, PST performance was no different with or without a technician in the testing environment. CONCLUSION: PST has advantages over SDMT because of its efficient administration, scoring, and potential for medical record or research database integration. PST is a practical tool for routine screening of processing speed deficits in the MS clinic.

Idio Scale Judgment: evaluation of a new method for estimating responder thresholds.

PURPOSE: To pilot the newly developed Idio Scale Judgment method for estimating the amount of score change that matters to patients (i.e., change thresholds). METHODS: An online panel of 500 participants diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) responded to the Neuro-QoL fatigue scale and to demographic and clinical questions. Participants compared their own fatigue to that represented by seven short form summaries (SFSs) that were located relatively close to their own fatigue levels. They judged these as representing the same, greater, or less fatigue than their own. We calculated the distances between patients' own levels of fatigue and the location of SFSs they endorsed as a change that would make a difference in daily life. These distances were used as estimates of change thresholds. Logically inconsistent judgments were tabulated and associations with clinical and demographic variables were estimated. RESULTS: Change thresholds based on mean individual thresholds for consequential change were calculated for improvement (-3.5) and worsening (3.2). The majority of participants had no logically inconsistent judgments (69%). Having one or more reversals in judgment was not significantly associated with education or fatigue score, but was weakly associated with age, gender, and MS type and moderately associated with ratings of confidence in SFS comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: As piloted, Idio Scale Judgment had a number of design strengths. Participants made comparisons to levels of fatigue that were within range of their own, and their judgments were contextualized in personally relevant consequences. The design lends itself to collection of data in large samples allowing evaluation of the range of judgments. Some study limitations could be mitigated with modifications. We concluded that the Idio Scale Judgment has substantial promise as a new tool for estimating change thresholds.

Linearity of ß-cell response across the metabolic spectrum and to pharmacology: insights from a graded glucose infusion-based investigation series.

The graded glucose infusion (GGI) examines insulin secretory response patterns to continuously escalating glycemia. The current study series sought to more fully appraise its performance characteristics. Key questions addressed were comparison of the GGI to the hyperglycemic clamp (HGC), comparison of insulin secretory response patterns across three volunteer populations known to differ in ß-cell function (healthy nonobese, obese nondiabetic, and type 2 diabetic), and characterization of effects of known insulin secretagogues in the context of a GGI. Insulin secretory response was measured as changes in insulin, C-peptide, insulin secretion rates (ISR), and ratio of ISR to prevailing glucose (ISR/G). The GGI correlated well with the HGC (r = 0.72 for ISR/G, P < 0.01). The insulin secretory response in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) was significantly blunted (P < 0.001), whereas it was significantly increased in obese nondiabetics compared with healthy nonobese (P < 0.001). Finally, robust (P < 0.001 over placebo) pharmacological effects were observed in T2DM and healthy nonobese volunteers. Collectively, the findings of this investigational series bolster confidence that the GGI has solid attributes for assessing insulin secretory response to glucose across populations and pharmacology. Notably, the coupling of insulin secretory response to glycemic changes was distinctly and uniformly linear across populations and in the context of insulin secretagogues. (Clinical Trial Registration Nos. NCT00782418, NCT01055340, NCT01373450).

Validating Neuro-QoL short forms and targeted scales with people who have multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, progressive, and disabling disease of the central nervous system with dramatic variations in the combination and severity of symptoms it can produce. The lack of reliable disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures for use in clinical trials prompted the development of the Neurology Quality of Life (Neuro-QOL) instrument, which includes 13 scales that assess physical, emotional, cognitive, and social domains, for use in a variety of neurological illnesses. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research paper is to conduct an initial assessment of the reliability and validation of the Neuro-QOL short forms (SFs) in MS. METHODS: We assessed reliability, concurrent validity, known groups validity, and responsiveness between cross-sectional and longitudinal data in 161 recruited MS patients. RESULTS: Internal consistency was high for all measures (α = 0.81-0.95) and ICCs were within the acceptable range (0.76-0.91); concurrent and known groups validity were highest with the Global HRQL question. Longitudinal assessment was limited by the lack of disease progression in the group. CONCLUSIONS: The Neuro-QOL SFs demonstrate good internal consistency, test-re-test reliability, and concurrent and known groups validity in this MS population, supporting the validity of Neuro-QOL in adults with MS.

Factors associated with clinically significant increased walking time in multiple sclerosis: results of a survival analysis of short-term follow-up data from a clinical database.

BACKGROUND: Because multiple sclerosis (MS) is variable and unpredictable, if symptom worsening could be predicted, patients may feel better prepared to manage changes in function. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to study the prediction of walking impairment in MS. METHODS: We retrieved data for all MS patients at our center (2008-2009), including baseline and follow-up timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) times. We assessed the incidence of ≥20% worsening in T25FW by developing two survival models: (1) disease course and (2) Multiple Sclerosis Performance Scales (MSPS) score. The outcome was days until ≥20% worsening in T25FW. Covariates were disease subtype, years since diagnosis, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score, and demographics. Data were interval censored; missing data were handled with multiple imputation. RESULTS: Of 1544 patients, 309 (20%) experienced ≥20% worsening T25FW. For disease course, time to worsening was significantly shorter for secondary progressive vs. relapsing-remitting disease (p < 0.001). For MSPS, patients with lower baseline MSPS scores progressed more slowly (p = 0.001). In both models, sex, baseline T25W, and time since diagnosis were significantly associated with worsening. In the disease course model, PHQ 9 score may be related to worsening (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest factors associated with worsening in T25FW and a potential approach to establishing indicators associated with clinically significant change.

Creating meaningful cut-scores for Neuro-QOL measures of fatigue, physical functioning, and sleep disturbance using standard setting with patients and providers.

PURPOSE: To establish clinically relevant classifications of health outcome scores for four Neuro-QOL measures (lower extremity function, upper extremity function, fatigue, and sleep disturbance). METHODS: We employed a modified educational standard-setting methodology to identify cut-scores for symptom severity. Clinical vignettes were developed to represent graduated levels of symptom severity. A clinician panel and a panel of persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) were recruited, and, in separate, 1-day meetings, the panelists identified adjacent vignettes they judged to represent the threshold between two levels of severity for a given domain (e.g., threshold between a vignette that indicated "no problems" with sleep and the adjacent one that represented "mild problems" with sleep). Working independently, each panel (PwMS and clinicians) reached consensus on its recommended thresholds for each of the four targeted measures. Cut-scores were defined as the mean location for each pair of threshold vignettes. RESULTS: PwMS and clinician panels derived identical thresholds for severity levels of lower extremity function and sleep disturbance, but slightly different ones for upper extremity function and fatigue. In every case of divergence, PwMS set higher thresholds for more severe classifications of symptoms (by 0.5 SDs) than did clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: The modified bookmarking method is effective for defining thresholds for symptom severity based on self-reported outcome scores and consensus judgments. Derived cut-scores and severity levels provide an interpretative context for Neuro-QOL scores. Future studies should explore whether these findings can be replicated and evaluate the validity of the classifications compared to external criteria.

Disentangling Multiple Sclerosis and depression: an adjusted depression screening score for patient-centered care.

Screening for depression can be challenging in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients due to the overlap of depressive symptoms with other symptoms, such as fatigue, cognitive impairment and functional impairment, for MS patients. The aim of this study was to understand these overlapping symptoms and subsequently develop an adjusted depression screening tool for better clinical assessment of depressive symptoms in MS patients. We evaluated 3,507 MS patients with a self-reported depression screening (PHQ-9) score using a multiple indicator multiple cause modeling approach. Our models showed significant differential item functioning effects denoting significant overlap of depressive symptoms with all MS symptoms under study and good model fit. The magnitude of the overlap was especially large for fatigue. Adjusted depression screening scales were formed based on factor scores and loadings that will allow clinicians to understand the depressive symptoms separate from other symptoms for MS patients for improved patient care.

Vision in a phase 3 trial of natalizumab for multiple sclerosis: relation to disability and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA), a sensitive measure of visual function in multiple sclerosis (MS), demonstrated treatment effects as a secondary outcome measure in the Phase 3 trial of natalizumab, AFFIRM. In these posttrial analyses, we studied the relation of visual function to quality of life (QOL), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. METHODS: At baseline and at 52 and 104 weeks in AFFIRM, patients underwent binocular testing of LCVA (1.25% and 2.5% contrast) and high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA). Vision-specific QOL was assessed by the Impact of Visual Impairment Scale (IVIS), whereas the SF-36 Health Survey and Visual Analog Scale were administered as generic QOL measures and the EDSS as a measure of neurologic impairment. RESULTS: Among QOL measures, IVIS scores showed the most significant correlations with visual dysfunction at all time points in the trial (r= -0.25 to -0.45, P < 0.0001 for LCVA and HCVA). Higher MRI T1- and T2-lesion volumes were also associated with worse vision scores at all time points (P < 0.0001). Clinically meaningful worsening (progression) of LCVA was noted in substantial proportions of patients in AFFIRM and was prevalent even among those without EDSS progression over 2 years (21.9% with LCVA progression at 2.5% contrast; 26.2% at 1.25% contrast). HCVA worsened in only 3.7% of patients without EDSS progression. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of visual function, particularly as measured by LCVA, was common in AFFIRM, occurring in >20% of patients. Both LCVA and HCVA scores reflect vision-specific aspects of QOL, but LCVA provides information about disability progression not entirely captured by the EDSS. Vision represents a key dimension of outcome assessment for MS and adds valuable information on disability and QOL that can be useful to clinicians.

A meta-analysis of confidence and judgment accuracy in clinical decision making.

The overconfidence bias occurs when clinicians overestimate the accuracy of their clinical judgments. This bias is thought to be robust leading to an almost universal recommendation by clinical judgment scholars for clinicians to temper their confidence in clinical decision making. An extension of the Meta-Analysis of Clinical Judgment (Spengler et al., 2009) project, the authors synthesized over 40 years of research from 36 studies, from 1970 to 2011, in which the confidence ratings of 1,485 clinicians were assessed in relation to the accuracy of their judgments about mental health (e.g., diagnostic decision making, violence risk assessment, prediction of treatment failure) or psychological issues (e.g., personality assessment). Using a random effects model a small but statistically significant effect (r = .15; CI = .06, .24) was found showing that confidence is better calibrated with accuracy than previously assumed. Approximately 50% of the total variance between studies was due to heterogeneity and not to chance. Mixed effects and meta-regression moderator analyses revealed that confidence is calibrated with accuracy least when there are repeated judgments, and more when there are higher base rate problems, when decisions are made with written materials, and for earlier published studies. Sensitivity analyses indicate a bias toward publishing smaller sample studies with smaller or negative confidence-accuracy effects. Implications for clinical judgment research and for counseling psychology training and practice are discussed.

Disposition and metabolism of the cathepsin K inhibitor odanacatib in humans.

Odanacatib is a selective inhibitor of the cathepsin K enzyme that is expressed in osteoclasts involved in the degradation of bone organic matrix, and is being developed as a novel treatment of osteoporosis. Odanacatib has demonstrated increases in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women and is undergoing a pivotal phase III trial. The absorption, metabolism, and excretion of [(14)C]odanacatib were studied in healthy male volunteers (n = 6) after a single oral dose of 25 mg (100 µCi). Plasma, urine, and fecal samples were collected at intervals up to 34 days postdose. The pharmacokinetics of odanacatib were characterized by slow absorption (mean time to achieve maximum plasma concentration of 14.2 hours) and long apparent elimination half-life (mean t1/2 96.7 hours); 74.5% of the dose was recovered in feces and 16.9% in urine, resulting in a total recovery of 91.4%. Seven metabolites were identified in urine; the major pathway (methyl hydroxylation producing M8 and its derivatives) was largely dependent on CYP3A. Metabolites and odanacatib accounted for 77% and 23% of urinary radioactivity, respectively. In fecal extracts, the only radioactive components identified were odanacatib (60.9%) and M8 (9.5%). The fraction of odanacatib in feces derived from absorbed drug was estimated using a bioavailability value obtained from the results of a separate intravenous study. Collectively, the data indicate that odanacatib has a long t1/2 on account of its low metabolic intrinsic clearance, and that metabolism (principally mediated by CYP3A) and excretion of intact parent compound account for ∼70% and ∼30% of the clearance of odanacatib in humans.

Validity of the Neurology Quality-of-Life (Neuro-QoL) measurement system in adult epilepsy.

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder that results in recurring seizures and can have a significant adverse effect on health-related quality of life (HRQL). The Neuro-QoL measurement initiative is an NINDS-funded system of patient-reported outcome measures for neurology clinical research, which was designed to provide a precise and standardized way to measure HRQL in epilepsy and other neurological disorders. Using mixed-method and item response theory-based approaches, we developed generic item banks and targeted scales for adults and children with major neurological disorders. This paper provides empirical results from a clinical validation study with a sample of adults diagnosed with epilepsy. One hundred twenty-one people diagnosed with epilepsy participated, the majority of which were male (62%) and Caucasian (95%), with a mean age of 47.3 (SD=16.9). Baseline assessments included Neuro-QoL short forms and general and external validity measures. The Neuro-QoL short forms that are not typically found in other epilepsy-specific HRQL instruments include Stigma, Sleep Disturbance, Emotional and Behavioral Dyscontrol, and Positive Affect and Well-Being. Neurology Quality-of-Life short forms demonstrated adequate reliability (internal consistency range=.86-.96; test-retest range=.57-.89). Pearson correlations (p<.01) between Neuro-QoL forms of emotional distress (anxiety, depression, stigma) and the QOLIE-31 Emotional Well-Being subscale were in the moderate-to-strong range (r's=.66, .71 and .53, respectively), as were relations with the PROMIS Global Mental Health subscale (r's=.59, .74 and .52, respectively). Moderate correlations were observed between Neuro-QoL Social Role Performance and Satisfaction and the QOLIE-31 Social Function (r's=.58 and .52, respectively). In measuring aspects of physical function, the Neuro-QoL Mobility and Upper Extremity forms demonstrated moderate associations with the PROMIS Global Physical Function subscale (r's=.60 and .61, respectively). Neuro-QoL measures of perceived cognitive function (executive function and general concerns) produced moderate-to-strong correlations with the QOLIE-31 Cognition subscale (r's=.65 and .75, respectively) and moderate relations with the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (r's=.51 and .69, respectively). Finally, the Neuro-QoL Fatigue measure demonstrated moderate associations with the QOLIE-31 Energy/Fatigue subscale (r=-.65), Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (r=.69), and the Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale (r=.50). Five Neuro-QoL short forms demonstrated statistically significant responsiveness to change at 5-7months, including Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Depression, Positive Affect and Well-Being, and Emotional and Behavioral Dyscontrol. Overall, Neuro-QoL instruments showed good evidence for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and responsiveness to change over several months. These results support the validity of Neuro-QoL to measure HRQL in adults with epilepsy.

Comparison of time to clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life in neurological disorders in patients treated with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab.

Aim: To assess time to improvement in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) domains for patients treated with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab. Methods: Patients enrolled in the MS PATHS network who initiated treatment with either natalizumab or ocrelizumab rated the Neuro-QoL domains of physical function, symptoms, emotional health, cognitive function and social ability. Results: Time to clinically meaningful improvement was significantly shorter with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab for cognitive function (event time ratio [95% CI]: 0.37 [0.24-0.57]; p < 0.001), sleep disturbance (0.45 [0.28-0.72]; p = 0.001), social role participation (0.37 [0.21-0.66]; p = 0.001) and social role satisfaction (0.5 [0.31-0.8]; p = 0.004). Conclusion: Natalizumab had shorter time to clinically meaningful improvement in cognitive, sleep, and social role Neuro-QoL domains versus ocrelizumab.

Knowledge of treatment-related benefits associated with medication choices, including improvement of quality of life (QoL), are strong influential factors for patients to start and continue their therapies. Little is known about patient-reported time to onset of functional improvement upon the initiation of medications for multiple sclerosis (MS). The Multiple Sclerosis Partners Advancing Technology and Health Solutions (MS PATHS) network, a repository of collaborative international data on routine MS management, includes patient-reported information on the health-related QoL using the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) measure. This study included data from 883 eligible patients enrolled in MS PATHS, with the aim of assessing and comparing the time to improvement in physical, mental and social health for patients treated with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab using Neuro-QoL. Natalizumab and ocrelizumab are both high-efficacy treatment options for relapsing forms of MS. The results demonstrated that, compared with ocrelizumab, natalizumab treatment led to faster effect on mental and social health, as well as quicker improvements in physical functioning in the arms and hands. Overall, it took shorter time for natalizumab-treated patients to achieve better QoL compared with ocrelizumab. These findings highlight the importance of QoL in disease management and provide a patient perspective for healthcare providers when making decisions about high-efficacy treatments for their patients with MS.