FDA's Office of Orphan Products Development: providing incentives to promote the development of products for rare diseases.

There are nearly 30 million Americans that suffer from at least one of the more than 7000 rare diseases identified to date. Therapies for treating, preventing, or diagnosing rare diseases have been limited due to various reasons. Incentives are provided to sponsors in an effort to promote the development of therapies for rare diseases and to encourage the availability of therapeutically superior drugs or biologics. This paper will discuss the mission of the Office of Orphan Products Development within the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the specific programs within the office and the relation to incentives provided, achievements of the programs, and continued challenges in rare disease product development.

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on US Food and Drug Administration-funded clinical trials and natural history studies for rare diseases.

BACKGROUND: Since 1983, the Orphan Product Grants Program, administered by the US Food and Drug Administration, provides funding for clinical trials and natural history studies in rare diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic created new challenges in rare disease product development. This study sought to determine the effects of the pandemic on rare disease studies using data from grantees of this program, and determine lessons learned that can potentially be applied to future trials in rare diseases. METHODS: All grants that were being funded by the Orphan Products Grants Program between March 2020 and March 2021 were included in the study. Data was gathered from grantees and described the effects of the pandemic on multiple aspects of the studies including enrollment, patient follow-up, protocol, and budget. RESULTS: There were 62 grants active during the study period, and of these 54 (87%) were clinical trials and 8 (13%) were natural history studies. 94% of the grantees reported their studies being affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the addition of virtual capabilities was reported by 34 (55%) of grantees. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested two important lessons learned. First, virtual capabilities, when appropriate, can be an important component of trials because they decrease the travel burden on participants and reduce in-person risks, which should increase patient recruitment and retention. Second, building in flexibility in clinical trials is critical in the post-COVID era and could include increasing the use of multi-site trials, clinical networks, and innovative designs and collaborations to speed up trials without compromising study data.

FDA orphan products clinical trial grants: assessment of outcomes and impact on rare disease product development.

BACKGROUND: The Office of Orphan Products Development (OOPD) of the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has awarded over 700 grants to conduct clinical trials of medicals products for rare diseases since 1983, leading to over 70 marketing approvals. However, despite recent progress in rare disease product development, thousands of rare diseases still have no approved treatments. An assessment of this clinical trial grants program was undertaken to provide an in-depth analysis of the characteristics and outcomes of the program. Results of this analysis will be used to inform future goals of the program, as well as internal data collection to continue to maximize the program's impact in supporting rare disease product development. RESULTS: Between fiscal years 2007-2011, OOPD funded 85 clinical trial grants. These grants spanned 18 therapeutic areas, included all pre-approval phases (Phases 1-3), and approximately 75% of the grants studied small molecule drugs. Nine (11%) product approvals, of seven drugs and two devices, were at least partially supported by grants funded within this 5-year timeframe. Four of the seven drugs approved were new molecular entities (NMEs). The average time from funding to approval was seven years. We also found a suggested association between collaboration with multiple types of stakeholders and the success of grants, where we defined success as either positive or negative study findings or a future marketing approval. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical trials funded by OOPD provided valuable information for future product development, and there were a notable number of approvals that occurred using the support of the grants program. There was a suggested association between collaboration and successful outcomes. Efficient and innovative trial designs and collaboration among stakeholders appear vital to continue to effectively bring products to rare disease patients. Ongoing program assessments will ensure that the funding continues to be used to optimally meet the treatment needs of the rare disease community.

Therapies for rare diseases: therapeutic modalities, progress and challenges ahead.

Most rare diseases still lack approved treatments despite major advances in research providing the tools to understand their molecular basis, as well as legislation providing regulatory and economic incentives to catalyse the development of specific therapies. Addressing this translational gap is a multifaceted challenge, for which a key aspect is the selection of the optimal therapeutic modality for translating advances in rare disease knowledge into potential medicines, known as orphan drugs. With this in mind, we discuss here the technological basis and rare disease applicability of the main therapeutic modalities, including small molecules, monoclonal antibodies, protein replacement therapies, oligonucleotides and gene and cell therapies, as well as drug repurposing. For each modality, we consider its strengths and limitations as a platform for rare disease therapy development and describe clinical progress so far in developing drugs based on it. We also discuss selected overarching topics in the development of therapies for rare diseases, such as approval statistics, engagement of patients in the process, regulatory pathways and digital tools.

Precision Medicines' Impact on Orphan Drug Designation.

The incentives provided under the Orphan Drug Act (ODA) have been credited for catalyzing the marketing approval of drugs for the treatment of rare diseases by the US Food and Drug Administration. Orphan drug designation, the granting of special status to drugs or biologics ("drugs") for the treatment of rare diseases, one of the ODA's key incentive programs, has seen major increases in volume over recent years. The new era of precision medicine and the development of therapies directed toward smaller "orphan" subsets of common diseases have been suggested as being a major driver. We evaluated the basis for orphan drug designations and orphan subsets in relation to the impact of precision medicines. We found that the increasing numbers of orphan drug designation determinations were not driven by precision medicines separating common diseases into orphan subsets and that orphan subsets overall also represented a relatively small proportion of designations.