Alternative monotherapy or add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy whose seizures do not respond to the first monotherapy: an Italian multicenter prospective observational study.

A prospective multicenter observational study was undertaken on children and adults with epilepsy in whom first monotherapy failed, to assess indications and effects of alternative monotherapy vs. polytherapy. Patients were followed until 12-month remission, drug withdrawal, or up to 18months. Monotherapy and polytherapy were compared for patients' baseline features, indication, retention time, remission, adverse events (AE), quality of life, and direct and indirect costs. Included were 157 men and 174 women, aged 2-86years. Of the patients, 72.2% were switched to alternative monotherapy. Baseline treatment was changed for lack of efficacy (73.9%) or adverse events (26.1%). Two hundred forty-three completed the study (remission: 175; 72.0%). Retention time, hospital admissions, days off-work and off-school, and quality of life did not differ between the two treatment groups. Patients were followed for 365.3person-years. Three hundred eighty-three incident AEs were reported by 46.4% of patients in monotherapy and 40.2% in polytherapy (serious AEs: 9.6% vs. 8.7%, mostly nondrug-related).

The epidemiology and treatment of ALS: focus on the heterogeneity of the disease and critical appraisal of therapeutic trials.

Abstract Effective treatments for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have remained elusive. Only riluzole, a drug thought to affect glutamate metabolism, improves survival albeit to modest extent. Explanations for the negative results of therapeutic trials include a likely heterogeneity, both in disease susceptibility and pathogenic mechanisms, and faulty methodology of clinical trials. Further understanding of these factors will lead to improvements in patient stratification, and in the design of future clinical trials.

Incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Geographical differences in the incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have been reported in the literature but comparisons across previous studies are limited by different methods in case ascertainment and by the relatively small size of the studied populations. To address these issues, the authors undertook a pooled analysis of European population based ALS registries. METHODS: All new incident ALS cases in subjects aged 18 years old and older were identified prospectively in six population based registries in three European countries (Ireland, UK and Italy) in the 2 year period 1998-1999, with a reference population of almost 24 million. RESULTS: Based on 1028 identified incident cases, the crude annual incidence rate of ALS in the general European population was 2.16 per 100 000 person years; 95% CI 2.0 to 2.3), with similar incidence rates across all registries. The incidence was higher among men (3.0 per 100 000 person years; 95% CI 2.8 to 3.3) than among women (2.4 per 100 000 person years; 95% CI 2.2 to 2.6). Spinal onset ALS was more common among men compared with women, particularly in the 70-80 year age group. Disease occurrence decreased rapidly after 80 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: ALS incidence is homogeneous across Europe. Sex differences in incidence may be explained by the higher incidence of spinal onset ALS among men, and the age related disease pattern suggests that ALS occurs within a susceptible group within the population rather than being a disease of ageing.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, physical exercise, trauma and sports: results of a population-based pilot case-control study.

Our objective was to investigate exposure to physical exercise and trauma in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) compared to the general population. Previous studies in this area have yielded conflicting results. Using population-based ALS registries from Italy, the UK and Ireland, newly diagnosed patients with definite, probable or possible ALS were enrolled in a case- control study with two age- and sex-matched controls for each patient. Source, intensity and duration of physical activity and history of trauma were recorded. We here present the results of a pilot investigation. We studied 61 patients and 112 controls. Forty-one per cent of cases and 17.0% of controls (p = 0.001) had blue-collar occupations; 13.1% versus 3.6% reported strenuous physical activity at work (p = 0.05). Compared with controls, ALS patients had a longer exposure to work-related (10.7 vs. 7.3 years; p = 0.02) and sport-related physical exercise (9.6 vs. 5.2 years; p = 0.005). Three patients (0 controls) reported professional sports (p = 0.04). Traumatic events were similar. Blue collar occupation (OR 4.27; 95% CI 1.68-10.88) and duration of sport-related physical exercise (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.00-1.05) were independent variables in multivariate analysis. We concluded that ALS is associated with physical exercise but not with traumatic events.

Outcome measures and prognostic indicators in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

The purpose of the study was to assess frequency and predictors of disability measures in ALS. One hundred and fourteen newly diagnosed patients resident in eight administrative districts of Lombardy, Italy (population 4,947,554), included in a population-based registry, were followed for 2570 person-months (mean 22.5 months). The cumulative time-dependent risk of wheelchair, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, and assisted ventilation was estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictors of disability (age, sex, disease duration at diagnosis, type of onset, El-Escorial diagnosis) were assessed with the Cox proportional hazard function. During follow-up, 29 patients (25.4%) became wheelchair bound, 51 (44.7%) received gastrostomy, and 47 (41.2%) received assisted ventilation. The median time to loss of ambulation was 46.7 months (95% CI 36.5-56.8). The median time to gastrostomy and assisted ventilation was 31.1 months (95% CI 26.8-35.4) and 34.6 months (95% CI 29.6-39.6), respectively. Spinal onset ALS was the only predictor of loss of ambulation. Predictors of gastrostomy were older age, definite ALS, and shorter disease duration. Shorter disease duration was the only predictor of assisted ventilation. In conclusion, patients with ALS differ in terms of measures and predictors of disability. These factors are sources of bias and confounding in randomized clinical trials.

Follow-up of elderly patients with urogenital cancers: Evaluation of geriatric care needs and related actions.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) with subsequent investigation of healthcare patterns in older patients with urological cancers undergoing initial surgery or radiotherapy, to verify the usefulness of the incorporation of geriatric principles in future care plans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. From November 2011 to March 2015, CGA was offered to all patients aged 70+ years treated with radiotherapy or surgery at seven tertiary centers. Patients were classified as fit, vulnerable, or frail according to Balducci's definition. CGA and follow-up data were collected by two trained evaluators at 6 and 12months. The information collected was not available to the caring physicians during follow-up. RESULTS: CGA was performed in 453 patients with prostate cancer (295), bladder cancer (126), or kidney cancer (32). 40% of patients with prostate cancer were fit, 47% vulnerable, and 13% frail. The corresponding values for renal cancer were 25%, 40%, and 34%, and for bladder cancer, 21%, 42%, and 37%. During follow-up, 60% of patients with cardiac diseases, 42% of those with diabetes/other metabolic disorders, 35% of those with hypertension, and 35% of those with respiratory diseases were followed by a specialist (for these severe/extremely severe comorbidities). Of 16 patients with ADL impairment and 63 with IADL impairment, only 4 (25%) and 6 (10%), respectively, were referred to a rehabilitation service. Only one case was referred to a geriatrician. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate clinical care patterns are advisable to improve quality of survivorship in older patients with urological cancers.

Risk factors for tumor occurrence in patients with myasthenia gravis.

There is still uncertainty regarding risk factors for cancer occurrence in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of extrathymic neoplasms in patients with MG and the factors associated with tumor occurrence. The archives of four tertiary MG centers were consulted and patients were interviewed on the main clinical features of the disease, the presence and type(s) of extrathymic neoplasms and other autoimmune disorders, and their symptomatic and immunosuppressant treatments (with detailed schedules). A retrospective cohort survey was undertaken comparing the demographic and clinical variables of patients with extrathymic neoplasms to those of the remaining MG population. 2,479 patients were traced and interviewed personally or through informants. The sample included 1,490 women and 989 men (mean age 54.7 years). Other autoimmune disorders were present in 216 cases (8.7%). Thymectomy was performed in 1,549 cases (62.5%), thymic hyperplasia and thymoma being the most common findings. Acetylcholinesterase-inhibitors were the most common treatment (93.5%), followed by steroids (64.3%), azathioprine (35.0%), plasma exchange (13.2%), immunoglobulins (7.5%), cyclosporine (5.3%), and cyclophosphamide (5.0%). 221 patients (8.9%) had one or more extrathymic tumors, 168 of which occurred after disease onset. Patients with and without extrathymic neoplasms were followed for 14.8 and 13.9 years, respectively. Variables shown by multivariate analysis to be associated with increased neoplastic risk included older age, thymoma and immunoglobulin use. Extrathymic tumors are a common finding in patients with MG and tend to be associated with age, thymoma, and immunoglobulin use.

Reliability of the El Escorial diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The El Escorial diagnostic criteria are the most commonly used in clinical studies and therapeutic trials in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The accuracy of the El Escorial criteria was tested in clinical practice, but the reliability is unknown when the diagnosis of ALS must be assessed on the basis of medical records. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of the El Escorial criteria for the diagnosis of ALS in different settings. DESIGN AND METHODS: Semistructured forms were used to include the main diagnostic information on 20 patients with definite (n = 6), probable (n = 6), possible (n = 6), and suspected ALS (n = 2) and 19 patients with clinical conditions considered in the differential diagnosis. Agreement was tested by comparing the diagnosis made by the attending physician (the 'gold standard') with that of 4 raters with different backgrounds: a teaching neurologist with research and practical experience in the field of motor neuron disorders, a neurologist with specific interest in motor neuron disorders and neurophysiological background, a neurophysiologist, and a general neurologist with only occasional ALS patients. Sources of disagreement were discussed and the agreement was tested further on the medical records of 98 additional cases taken from an ongoing ALS registry. Eight additional cases (ALS: 4; other conditions: 4) were examined directly by the 4 raters. RESULTS: The interrater agreement on the medical records was poor (overall kappa 0.05-0.29). When the differential diagnosis was made between ALS (all diagnostic levels) and other conditions, interrater agreement was at best modest, with moderate variations when raters were compared in pairs (kappa 0.03-0.58) and when each rater was compared with the physician (kappa 0.27-0.51). Agreement was higher after direct examination of the patients (kappa 0.33-1) and increased significantly on the medical records after training (overall kappa 0.52-0.79). However, concordance was low (overall kappa 0.08-0.36), even after training, at the lowest diagnostic level (definite to suspected ALS vs. other conditions). CONCLUSIONS: The El Escorial criteria are a poor diagnostic indicator when patients' records are examined. Although medical education significantly improves the reliability of the criteria, concordance is still modest when the diagnosis includes suspected ALS.