RESUMEN
To analyze the efficacy and safety of high-frequency VNS versus control (low-frequency VNS or no VNS) in patients with DRE using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). An electronic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL); 12 RCTs reporting seizure frequency or treatment response in studies containing a high-frequency VNS treatment arm (conventional VNS or transcutaneous VNS [tVNS]) compared to control (low-frequency VNS or no VNS) were included. Seizure frequency, treatment response (number of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency), quality of life (QOL), and adverse effects were analyzed. Seizure frequency was reported in 9 studies (718 patients). Meta-analysis with random-effects models favored high-frequency VNS over control (standardized mean difference = 0.82, 95%-CI = 0.39-1.24, p < .001). This remained significant for subgroup analyses of low-frequency VNS as the control, VNS modality, and after removing studies with moderate-to-high risk of bias. Treatment response was reported in 8 studies (758 patients). Random-effects models favored high-frequency VNS over control (risk ratio = 1.57, 95%-CI = 1.19-2.07, p < .001). QOL outcomes were reported descriptively in 4 studies (363 patients), and adverse events were reported in 11 studies (875 patients). Major side effects and death were not observed to be more common in high-frequency VNS compared to control. High-frequency VNS results in reduced seizure frequency and improved treatment response compared to control (low-frequency VNS or no VNS) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Greater consideration for VNS in patients with DRE may be warranted to decrease seizure frequency in the management of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria , Estimulación del Nervio Vago , Protocolos Clínicos , Epilepsia Refractaria/etiología , Epilepsia Refractaria/terapia , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Convulsiones/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estimulación del Nervio Vago/efectos adversos , Estimulación del Nervio Vago/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) is an important determinant of functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA). Current guidelines recommend a BP target of 185/110 mmHg before IV-tPA bolus and maintaining it at less than 180/105 mmHg for the first 24 hours. However, the effect of blood pressure on various outcome measures after systemic thrombolysis remains unclear. METHODS: Following a systematic search of Medline and EMBASE, all observational studies reporting effect of pretreatment BP on 90-day functional outcome as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and/ or incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in AIS patients receiving thrombolytic therapy were included. RESULTS: Of 2181 studies screened, 26 studies, involving 38,937 subjects, met inclusion criteria. Higher prethrombolysis systolic BP was significantly-associated with poorer 90-day functional outcome (Mean difference 3.87 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-6.56) and increased incidence of sICH (Mean difference 5.31; 95% CI 2.22-8.40). When studies were stratified by different cut-offs for functional outcome (mRS 0-1 versus 0-2) and definitions of sICH used (Randomized controlled trials or SITS-MOST), there was no significant difference in mean difference between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that higher prethrombolysis SBP was associated with poorer outcomes in thrombolysed acute ischemic stroke patients. This may suggest that more aggressive lowering of BP below the current recommendations prior to thrombolysis could be beneficial. The effect of early BP trends after tPA infusion could not be evaluated due to limited available data. Ongoing randomized clinical trials, like ENCHANTED, may provide further insights into the current guidelines and optimal BP levels.
Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Recuperación de la Función , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This systematic review aims to answer the following research questions: (1) What are the existing community-based interventions for initiating advance care planning (ACP) conversations and quality end-of-life (EoL) planning behaviours in nonterminally ill adults internationally? (2) What are the effects of community-based interventions on the initiation of ACP conversations and EoL planning behaviours of nonterminally ill adults in the community?