Heidelberg ETV score to assess success of ETV in patients with occlusive hydrocephalus: a retrospective single-center study.

In aqueduct stenosis, pressure difference below and above level of obstruction leads to bulging of third ventricular floor (TVF) and lamina terminalis (LT). Endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy (ETV) is the standard treatment in these patients. We tried to assess success of ETV depending on those two radiological changes in aqueduct stenosis. We implemented "Heidelberg ETV score" retrospectively to assess the state of TVF as well as LT in same manner in midsagittal MR image. Every patient had a preoperative, direct, 3-months and one-year postoperative score from -2 to + 2. We correlated the scores to clinical course to decide whether the score is reliable in defining success of ETV. Between 2017-2021, 67 (mean age 25.6 ± 23.9y) patients treated with ETV were included. Success rate of primary and Re-ETVs was 91% over 46.8 ± 19.0 months. A marked shift of score to the left after surgery in success group was noticed through the distribution of score immediate postoperative, 3-months later; 70.2% showed (+ 2) before surgery, 38.9% scored (0) after surgery and 50.9% showed further score drop to (-1) 3 months later, p < 0.001. In cases of failure, there was initial decrease after surgery followed by increase with ETV-failure (mean time to failure: 7.2 ± 5.7 months) in 100%. Significant difference was noticed in Heidelberg score at postoperative 1-year- and failure-MRI follow-up between two groups, p < 0.001. Heidelberg score describes anatomical changes in third ventricle after ETV and can serve in assessment of MR images to define success of the procedure in patients with aqueduct stenosis.

ShuntScope-Guided Versus Free-Hand Technique for Ventricular Catheter Placement: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Intraventricular Catheter Tip Position and Complication Rate.

BACKGROUND: The position of the ventricular catheter (VC) is essential for a proper function of cerebrospinal fluid diversion system. A ShuntScope-guided (SG) method might be helpful in reducing complications. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of catheter placement and the complication and revision rates between SG and free-hand (FH) techniques. METHODS: This is a retrospective study based on a prospectively acquired database of patients who underwent VC placement between September 2018 and July 2021. Accuracy of catheter placement was graded on postoperative imaging using the 3-point Hayhurst grading system. Complication and revision rates were documented and compared between both groups with an average follow-up period of 20.84 months. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were included. The SG technique was used in 29 patients (mean age was 6.3 years, 1.4-27.7 years, 48.1% females), and the FH technique was used in 28 patients (mean age was 26.7 years, 0.83-79.5 years, 67.9% female). The success rate for the optimal placement of the VC with grade I on the Hayhurst scale was significantly higher in the SG group (93.1%) than in the FH group (60.7%), p = 0.012. The revision rate was higher in the FH group with 35.7% versus 20.7% in the SG group, p = 0.211. CONCLUSION: VC placement using the SG technique is a safe and effective procedure, which enabled a significantly higher success rate and lower revision and complication rate. Accordingly, we recommend using the SG technique especially in patients with difficult anatomy.

Reliability and accuracy of intraoral radiography, cone beam CT, and dental MRI for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions at zirconia implants - an ex vivo feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability and accuracy of intraoral radiography (IR), cone-beam-computed tomography (CBCT), and dental magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) in measuring peri­implant bone defects around single zirconia implants. METHODS: Twenty-four zirconia implants were inserted in bovine ribs with various peri­implant defect sizes and morphologies. True defect extent was measured without implant in CBCT. Defects were measured twice in IR, CBCT, and dMRI with the inserted implant by three experienced readers. Reliability was assessed by ICC, accuracy by the Friedman test, and post-hoc-Tukey's test. RESULTS: A comparable good to excellent intra- and inter-reader reliability was observed for all modalities (intra-/inter-rater-CC range for IR; CBCT; dMRI: 0.81-0.91/0.79;0.87-0.97/0.96;0.87-0.95/0.94). Accuracy was generally high, with mean errors below 1 mm in all directions. However, measuring defect depth in the mesiodistal direction was significantly more accurate in dMRI (0.65 ± 0.38 mm) compared to IR (2.71 ± 1.91 mm), and CBCT (1.98 ± 1.97 mm), p-values ≤ 0.0001 respectively ≤ 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Osseous defects around zirconia implants can be reliably measured in IR/CBCT/dMRI in the mesiodistal directions. In addition, CBCT and dMRI allow assessment of the buccolingual directions. dMRI provides a comparable accuracy in all directions, except for the mesiodistal defect depth, where it outperforms IR and CBCT.