Fluoroscopy of spontaneous breathing is more sensitive than phrenic nerve stimulation for detection of right phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Right phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) is a typical complication of cryoballoon ablation of the right-sided pulmonary veins (PVs). Phrenic nerve function can be monitored by palpating the abdomen during phrenic nerve pacing from the superior vena cava (SVC pacing) or by fluoroscopy of spontaneous breathing. We sought to compare the sensitivity of these 2 techniques during cryoballoon ablation for detection of PNP. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 133 patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation were monitored with both SVC pacing and fluoroscopy of spontaneous breathing during ablation of the right superior PV. PNP occurred in 27/133 patients (20.0%). Most patients (89%) had spontaneous recovery of phrenic nerve function at the end of the procedure or on the following day. Three patients were discharged with persistent PNP. All PNP were detected first by fluoroscopic observation of diaphragm movement during spontaneous breathing, while diaphragm could still be stimulated by SVC pacing. In patients with no recovery until discharge, PNP occurred at a significantly earlier time (86 ± 34 seconds vs. 296 ± 159 seconds, P < 0.001). No recovery occurred in 2/4 patients who were ablated with a 23 mm cryoballoon as opposed to 1/23 patients with a 28 mm cryoballoon (P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopic assessment of diaphragm movement during spontaneous breathing is more sensitive for detection PNP as compared to SVC pacing. PNP as assessed by fluoroscopy is frequent (20.0%) and carries a high rate of recovery (89%) until discharge. Early onset of PNP and use of 23 mm cryoballoon are associated with PNP persisting beyond hospital discharge.

Left atrial pressure as predictor for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation.

PURPOSE: Identification of reliable risk factors for recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has important implications. Left atrial (LA) pressure is a largely observator-independent parameter that can easily be determined after transseptal puncture. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of LA pressure for AF recurrence after PVI. METHODS: Two hundred five consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF scheduled for first PVI were included. Baseline clinical data were collected. During PVI, LA pressure was determined invasively after transseptal puncture. PVI was performed with radiofrequency or cryoenergy, and patients were followed for 25 ± 7 months. RESULTS: One hundred five (51 %) patients had AF recurrence. Patients with persistent AF prior to ablation had significantly more recurrences than patients with paroxysmal AF (70.1 vs. 42.0 %, p < 0.001). Mean LA pressure was significantly higher in patients with recurrence of AF (13.4 ± 7.1 vs. 11.0 ± 5.2 mmHg, p = 0.007), as was mean LA volume index (40.1 ± 18.5 vs. 33.0 ± 11.2 mL/m(2), p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, mean LA pressure was predictive in patients with normal or mildly enlarged LA, while AF type was not predictive. For each 1-mmHg increase in LA pressure, the risk of AF recurrence increased by 11 % in this subgroup. In patients with moderately or severely enlarged LA, AF type was predictive whereas LA pressure was not. CONCLUSION: LA pressure, AF type, and LA volume index are independent predictors for recurrence of AF after PVI. LA pressure may be helpful especially in patients with small atria, where AF type is not predictive.