RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Infected native aneurysms (INAs) of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries are uncommon, but potentially fatal. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has recently been introduced as a durable treatment option, with outcomes comparable to those yielded by conventional open repair. However, owing to the rarity of the disease, the strengths and limitations of each treatment remain uncertain. The present study aimed to separately assess post-open repair and post-EVAR outcomes and to clarify factors affecting the short-term and late prognosis after each treatment. METHODS: Using a nationwide clinical registry, we investigated 600 patients treated with open repair and 226 patients treated with EVAR for INAs of the abdominal aorta and/or common iliac artery. The relationships between preoperative or operative factors and postoperative outcomes, including 90-day and 3-year mortality and persistent or recurrent aneurysm-related infection, were examined. RESULTS: Prosthetic grafts were used in >90% of patients treated with open repair, and in situ and extra-anatomic arterial reconstruction was performed in 539 and 57 patients, respectively. Preoperative anemia and imaging findings suggestive of aneurysm-enteric fistula were independently associated with poor outcomes in terms of both 3-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.62; P = .046, and HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.12-4.46; P = .022, respectively) and persistent or recurrent infection (odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.04-4.49; P = .039, and OR, 4.96; 95% CI, 1.81-13.55; P = .002, respectively) after open repair, whereas omental wrapping or packing and antibiotic impregnation of the prosthetic graft for in situ reconstruction contributed to improved 3-year survival (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.92; P = .019, and HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88; P = .014, respectively). Among patients treated with EVAR, abscess formation adjacent to the aneurysm was significantly associated with the occurrence of persistent or recurrent infection (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.06-4.72; P = .034), whereas an elevated preoperative white blood cell count was predictive of 3-year mortality (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.00-3.13; P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Profiles of prognostic factors differed between open repair and EVAR in the treatment of INAs of the abdominal aorta and common iliac artery. Open repair may be more suitable than EVAR for patients with concurrent abscess formation.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Ilíaco , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Masculino , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Anciano , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirugía , Aneurisma Ilíaco/mortalidad , Aneurisma Ilíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Ilíaco/microbiología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidad , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Recurrencia , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The hospital-based cancer registry is used extensively for research to support cancer control activities by providing an overview of how cancer treatments are provided nationwide. This study aimed to shed light on the quality and characteristics of treatment data in the hospital-based cancer registry using the linked dataset on gastric cancer. METHODS: Using the nationally linked data of the hospital-based cancer registry and the health services utilization data, the treatment data in the hospital-based cancer registry for patients who were newly diagnosed with gastric cancer in 2016 and 2017 and received the first course of treatment at their own institutions were examined. The agreement rates between registry data and utilization data were analyzed by stage, treatment, age, period from the date of diagnosis to the date of treatment and hospital type. RESULTS: The sensitivity of open surgery, laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic treatment tended to decrease in advanced stages, whereas the sensitivity of chemotherapy and radiation therapy increased. Specificity was high for all treatments and stages, at Ë90%. Sensitivity by age was slightly different for chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but specificities did not differ.For all treatments, the longer the time from diagnosis to treatment implementation, the higher the coverage rate. CONCLUSIONS: The hospital-based cancer registry recorded the treatment performed appropriately. It is necessary to interpret the data from the hospital-based cancer registry whilst keeping in mind that, chemotherapy and radiation therapy are registered less frequently than surgical treatments administered.
Asunto(s)
Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Japón/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Purpose: To elucidate the relationship between in-hospital mortality and the institutional factors of intensive care units (ICUs), with a focus on the intensivist-to-bed ratio. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a Japanese ICU database, including adult patients admitted between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021. We used a multilevel logistic regression model to investigate the associations between in-hospital mortality and the following institutional factors: the intensivist-to-bed ratios on weekdays or over weekends/holidays, different work shifts, hospital-to-ICU-bed ratio, annual-ICU-admission-to-bed ratio, type of hospital, and the presence of other medical staff. Results: The study population comprised 46â 503 patients admitted to 65 ICUs. The in-hospital mortality rate was 8.1%. The median numbers of ICU beds and intensivists were 12 (interquartile range [IQR] 8-14) and 4 (IQR 2-9), respectively. In-hospital mortality decreased significantly as the intensivist-to-bed ratio at 10 am on weekdays increased: the average contrast indicated a 20% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1%-38%) reduction when the ratio increased from 0 to 0.5, and a 38% (95% CI: 9%-67%) reduction when the ratio increased from 0 to 1. The other institutional factors did not present a significant effect. Conclusions: The intensivist-to-bed ratio at 10 am on weekdays had a significant effect on in-hospital mortality. Further investigation is needed to understand the processes leading to improved outcomes.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The effect of the days of the week on the short-term outcomes after elective surgeries has been suggested; however, such data on esophagectomies remain limited. This study aimed to investigate the association between the day of the week and mortality rates after elective esophagectomy using a large-scale clinical database in Japan. METHODS: The data of elective esophagectomies, registered in the National Clinical Database in Japan, for esophageal cancer treatment between 2012 and 2017 were analyzed. We hypothesized that the later days of the week could have higher odds ratios of death after elective esophagectomy. With 22 relevant clinical variables and days of surgery, 90-day mortality was evaluated using hierarchical logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Ninety-day mortality rates among 33,980 patients undergoing elective esophagectomy were 1.8% (range, 1.5-2.1%). Surgeries were largely concentrated on earlier days of the week, whereas esophagectomies performed on Fridays accounted for only 11.1% of all cases. Before risk adjustment, lower odds ratios of 90-day mortality were found on Tuesday and a tendency towards lower odds ratios on Thursday. In the hierarchical logistic regression model, 21 independent factors of 90-day mortality were identified. However, the adjusted odds ratios of 90-day mortality for Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday were 0.87, 1.09, 0.85, and 0.88, respectively, revealing no significant difference. CONCLUSION: The results imply that the variation in 90-day mortality rates after esophagectomy on different days of the week may be attributed to differing preoperative risk factors of the patient group rather than the disparity in medical care provided.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Humanos , Esofagectomía/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The relationship between board certification, clinical guideline implementation, and quality of gastric cancer surgery remains unclear. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire survey was administered to departments registered in the National Clinical Database (NCD) of Japan between October 2014 and January 2015. Quality indicators (QIs) based on the Donabedian model were evaluated. Structural QIs (e.g., affiliations with academic societies and board certifications) and process QIs (adherence to clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer) were assessed using risk-adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for surgical mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models with a generalized estimating equation were used. RESULTS: A total of 835 departments performing 40,992 distal gastrectomies and 806 departments performing 19,618 total gastrectomies responded. Some certified institutions and physicians showed significant associations, with lower AORs for surgical mortality. Important process QIs included pre- and postoperative abdominal CT scanning, endoscopic resection based on progression, curative resection with D2 dissection for advanced gastric cancer, laparoscopic surgery, and HER2 testing for patients with unresectable recurrent gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple structural and process QIs are associated with surgical mortality after gastrectomy in Japan. Measuring and visualizing QIs may enhance healthcare improvements.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Japón , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Certificación , Gastrectomía , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To clarify the influence of surgical volume on the mortality and morbidity of gastrointestinal perforation in children in Japan. METHODS: We collected data on pediatric patients with gastrointestinal perforation between 2017 and 2019, from the National Clinical Database. The surgical volumes of various institutions were classified into three groups: low (average number of surgeries for gastrointestinal perforation/year < 1), medium (≥ 1, < 6), and high (≥ 6). The observed-to-expected (o/e) ratios of 30-day mortality and morbidity were calculated for each group using an existing risk model. RESULTS: Among 1641 patients (median age, 0.0 years), the 30-day mortality and morbidity rates were 5.2% and 37.7%, respectively. The 30-day mortality rates in the low-, medium-, and high-volume institutions were 4.9%, 5.3%, and 5.1% (p = 0.94), and the 30-day morbidity rates in the three groups were 26.8%, 39.7%, and 37.7% (p < 0.01), respectively. The o/e ratios of 30-day mortality were 1.05 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.26), 1.08 (95% CI 1.01-1.15), and 1.02 (95% CI 0.91-1.13), and those of 30-day morbidity were 1.72 (95% CI 0.93-2.51), 1.03 (95% CI 0.79-1.28), and 0.95 (95% CI 0.56-1.33), respectively. CONCLUSION: Surgical volume does not have significant impact on the outcomes of pediatric gastrointestinal perforation in Japan.
Asunto(s)
Morbilidad , Humanos , Niño , Recién Nacido , JapónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic limited the delivery of medical resources. Although surgeries are triaged according to disease severity and urgency, a delay in diagnosis and surgery can be detrimental. We conducted this study to analyze data on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric surgery for different diseases or disorders. METHODS: We compiled and compared data on pediatric surgical cases from 2018 to 2020, using the National Clinical Database. The number of diseases, severity, complication rates, mortality rates by disease/disorder, and the COVID-19 pandemic areas were analyzed. RESULTS: The total number of cases of pediatric surgery in 2018, 2019, and 2020 was 50,026, 49,794, and 45,621, respectively, reflecting an 8.8% decrease in 2020 from 2018 and an 8.4% decrease in 2020 from 2019. A decrease was observed when the number of patients with COVID-19 was high and was greater in areas with a low infection rate. There was a marked decrease in the number of inguinal hernia cases. The number of emergency room visits and emergency surgeries decreased, but their relative proportions increased. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic decreased the number of pediatric surgeries, reflecting the limitations of scheduled surgeries and infection control measures.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Pediatría , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , LactanteRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There remains a lack of evidence regarding the optimal abdominal approach, including laparoscopy, hand-assisted, and open laparotomy for minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy. We aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative complications, particularly pulmonary complications, between laparoscopy and open laparotomy for minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy using nationwide Japanese databases. METHODS: Data from patients in the National Clinical Database (NCD) who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were analyzed. The incidence of pulmonary complications was compared between abdominal laparoscopy and laparotomy after matching the propensity scores (PS) from preoperative factors to account for confounding bias. Laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) was also compared to hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS). RESULTS: Of the 24,790 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2018 and 2021, data from 12,633 underwent thoracoscopic procedure. The proportion of patients who experienced pulmonary complications did not significantly differ between the laparoscopy group and the laparotomy group after matching (664/3195 patients, 20.8% versus 702/3195 patients, 22.0%; P = 0.25). No difference in the incidence of pulmonary complications was observed among patients treated using the laparoscopic approach (508/2439 patients, 20.8% in the LAS group versus 498/2439 patients, 20.4% in the HALS group; P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: We observed no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications between laparoscopy and laparotomy for thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Short-term outcomes were similar between the laparoscopic-assisted approach and the hand-assisted approach. This study provides valuable insights into the optimal abdominal approach for thoracoscopic esophagectomy using data from a nationwide database that reflect real-world clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Laparoscopía , Laparotomía , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía , Incidencia , Japón , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Toracoscopía/métodosRESUMEN
Substantial numbers of variants of unknown significance (VUSs) have been identified in BRCA1/2 through genetic testing, which poses a significant clinical challenge because the contribution of these VUSs to cancer predisposition has not yet been determined. Here, we report 10 Japanese patients from seven families with breast or ovarian cancer harboring the BRCA2 c.7847C>T (p.Ser2616Phe) variant that was interpreted as a VUS. This variant recurs only in families from Japan and has not been reported in the global general population databases. A Japanese patient with Fanconi anemia with compound heterozygous variants c.7847C>T (p.Ser2616Phe) and c.475+1G>A in BRCA2 was reported. In silico predictions and quantitative cosegregation analysis suggest a high probability of pathogenicity. The clinical features of the variant carriers were not specific to, but were consistent with, those of patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. A validated functional assay, called the mixed-all-nominated-in-one-BRCA (MANO-B) method and the accurate BRCA companion diagnostic (ABCD) test, demonstrated the deleterious effects of the variant. Altogether, following the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines, this variant satisfied the "PS3," "PM2," "PM3," and "PP3" criteria. We thus conclude that the BRCA2 c.7847C>T (p.Ser2616Phe) variant is a "likely pathogenic" variant that is specifically observed in the Japanese population, leading to a breast and ovarian cancer predisposition.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Linaje , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Pruebas Genéticas , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to clarify the clinical features, postoperative outcomes, and prognostic factors in patients with endograft infection in the abdominal aorta and iliac artery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Endograft infection in the abdominal aorta and iliac artery is a potentially fatal condition. However, due to its rarity, clinical characteristics and optimal treatment strategy remain to be established. METHODS: In this nationwide retrospective cohort study, we investigated 112 patients who underwent surgical treatment for endograft infection in the abdominal aorta and/or iliac artery between 2011 and 2017 using a Japanese clinical registry. We examined the relationships between the preoperative and operative factors and the outcomes after surgery including persistent or recurrent infection related to the endograft and 90-day and 3-year mortality. RESULTS: The median period between the index endograft placement and surgery for infection was 369.5 days. Persistent or recurrent endograft-related infection occurred in 34 patients (30.4%). The cumulative overall survival rates at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were 90.2%, 76.5%, 66.7%, 50.9%, and 31.5%, respectively. Partial removal or total preservation of the infected endograft was independently associated with short-term and late mortality. Preoperative anemia and imaging findings suggestive of fistula development to the gastrointestinal tract also showed an independent association with late mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical intervention for endograft infection in the abdominal aorta and iliac artery was associated with a high risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Total removal of the infected endograft should be attempted because partial removal or total preservation can lead to a poor prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are few studies on the impact of a colorectal-specific technically certified surgeon on good surgical outcomes for laparoscopic low anterior resection in the real world. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection with the participation of a certified colorectal surgeon. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese nationwide database. SETTING: This study was conducted as a project for the Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery. PATIENTS: This study included 41,741 patients listed in the National Clinical Database who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection performed by certified, noncertified, and colorectal-specific certified surgeons, according to the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System, from 2016 to 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative mortality rate and anastomotic leak rate were the primary outcome measures. RESULTS: Overall 30-day mortality and operative mortality were 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively, without significant differences between all kinds of certified and noncertified surgeon groups. Overall anastomotic leak rate was 9.3%, with a significant difference between the 2 groups. Colorectal- and stomach-certified groups had lower 30-day mortality and operative mortality than the biliary-certified and noncertified groups. The anastomotic leak rate was the lowest in the colorectal-certified group. Based on a logistic regression analysis using the risk-adjusted model, operative mortality was significantly higher in the biliary-certified group than in the colorectal-certified group. Moreover, anastomotic leak rate was significantly lower in the colorectal-certified group than in the stomach-certified and noncertified groups. LIMITATIONS: This study was a retrospective study, and there was a possibility of different definitions of anastomotic leak due to the use of a nationwide database. CONCLUSIONS: The participation of a colorectal-specific certified surgeon may decrease the risk of operative mortality and anastomotic leak for laparoscopic low anterior resection. CIRUJANO COLORRECTAL ALTAMENTE CALIFICADO PROVOCA RESULTADOS QUIRRGICOS FAVORABLES A CORTO PLAZO PARA LA RESECCIN ANTERIOR BAJA LAPAROSCPICA EVALUACIN DE LA BASE DE DATOS NACIONAL JAPONESA: ANTECEDENTES:Hay pocos estudios sobre el impacto de un cirujano certificado técnicamente especializado en cáncer colorrectal con un buen resultado quirúrgico para la resección anterior baja laparoscópica en el mundo real.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados a corto plazo de la resección anterior baja laparoscópica con la participación de un cirujano colorrectal certificado.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que utilizó una base de datos nacional japonesa.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó como un proyecto para la Sociedad Japonesa de Cirugía Endoscópica y la Sociedad Japonesa de Cirugía Gastroenterológica.PACIENTES:este estudio incluyó a 41 741 pacientes incluidos en la base de datos clínica nacional que se sometieron a una resección anterior baja laparoscópica realizada por cirujanos certificados, no certificados y certificados específicamente colorrectales, según el Sistema de calificación de habilidades quirúrgicas endoscópicas de 2016 a 2018.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La tasa de mortalidad operatoria y la tasa de fuga anastomótica fueron los resultados primarios.RESULTADOS:La mortalidad general a los 30 días y la mortalidad operatoria fueron del 0,2 % y el 0,3 %, respectivamente, sin diferencias significativas entre los grupos de todos los tipos de cirujanos certificados y no certificados. La tasa global de fuga anastomótica fue del 9,3 %, con una diferencia significativa entre los dos grupos. Los grupos con certificación colorrectal y estomacal tuvieron una mortalidad a los 30 días y una mortalidad operatoria más bajas que los grupos con certificación biliar y sin certificación. La tasa de fuga anastomótica fue la más baja en el grupo certificado colorrectal. Con base en un análisis de regresión logística utilizando el modelo ajustado por riesgo, la mortalidad operatoria fue significativamente más alta en el grupo con certificación biliar que en el grupo con certificación colorrectal. Además, la tasa de fuga anastomótica fue significativamente más baja en el grupo con certificación colorrectal que en los grupos con certificación estomacal y sin certificación.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio fue retrospectivo y existía la posibilidad de diferentes definiciones de fuga anastomótica debido al uso de una base de datos nacional.CONCLUSIONES:La participación de un cirujano certificado en video específico colorrectal puede disminuir el riesgo de mortalidad operatoria y fuga anastomótica para la resección anterior baja laparoscópica. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Japón , Cirujanos , Especialización , CertificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Prosthetic graft infection (PGI) after open abdominal aortic and iliac artery reconstruction is life threatening. However, because it is rare and frequently difficult to diagnose, robust evidence on its treatment and optimal management strategies are lacking. This study aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics and surgical treatment outcomes of this condition and to identify pre-operative and operative factors affecting its prognosis. METHODS: This was a nationwide cohort study. Using a nationwide clinical registry system, patients who were treated surgically for PGI after open abdominal aortic and iliac artery reconstruction between 2011 and 2017 were investigated, and their profiles and clinical courses were analysed. The relationships between the pre-operative and operative factors and the post-operative outcomes, including death and persistent or recurrent graft related infection, were evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 213 patients. The median duration between the index arterial reconstruction and surgical treatment for PGI was 644 days. Fistula development to the gastrointestinal tract was confirmed during surgery in 53.1% of patients. The cumulative overall survival rates at 30 and 90 days, one, three, and five years were 87.3%, 74.8%, 62.2%, 54.5%, and 48.1%, respectively. Pre-operative shock was the only factor independently associated with 90 day and three year death. Short term and late mortality rates, as well as the rate of persistent or recurrent graft related infection, did not differ significantly between patients treated with total removal of the infected graft and those treated with partial removal of the graft. CONCLUSION: Surgery for PGI after open reconstruction of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries is complex, and the post-operative mortality rate remains high. Partial removal of the infected graft may be an alternative in selected patients with limited extent of infection.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment is an established method for popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES), which, however, mainly derives from single centre experiences where PAES cases are centralised and treated periodically. This study evaluated clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for PAES in a clinical setting where PAES cases were not centralised. METHODS: Multicentre, retrospective cohort study using a national clinical registry. From a Japanese nationwide clinical registry, data for patients who underwent surgical treatment for PAES between 2013 and 2018, including 58 limbs from 41 institutes, were retrieved and evaluated. Patency was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 36 ± 19 years, 78% were male, and the incidence of PAES was 0.24 limbs/centre/year, reflecting a clinical setting where PAES cases are not centralised. The most frequent arterial symptom was intermittent claudication (90%). Computed tomography was performed in 57 limbs (98%) for the diagnosis, however active manoeuvres such as dorsiflexion and plantarflexion during the examination was performed in only 13 limbs (22%), and occlusion of the popliteal artery was present in 38 limbs (66%) at diagnosis. Regarding surgical treatment, myotomy alone was performed in only seven limbs (12%), and other limbs were revascularised. Mean follow up was 26 ± 20 months, and surgical treatment was effective as it relieved symptoms in > 96% of limbs, with five year primary and secondary patency of the surgical treatment for PAES of 72% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results of surgical treatment were acceptable even in a clinical setting where PAES cases were not centralised. However, a low incidence of active manoeuvres performed during the examination and a high incidence of occlusion at diagnosis suggests there may be delayed or underdiagnosis of PAES in Japan, and increased awareness for PAES is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas , Síndrome de Atrapamiento de la Arteria Poplítea , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Japón/epidemiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/cirugíaRESUMEN
For the 23rd Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan, data from 20 889 newly registered patients and 42 274 previously registered follow-up patients were compiled from 516 institutions over a 2-year period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015. Basic statistics compiled for patients newly registered in the 23rd survey were cause of death, past medical history, clinical diagnosis, imaging diagnosis, treatment-related factors, pathological diagnosis, recurrence status, and autopsy findings. Compared with the previous 22nd survey, the population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was older at the time of clinical diagnosis, had more female patients, had more patients with non-B non-C HCC, had smaller tumor diameter, and was more frequently treated with hepatectomy. Cumulative survival rates were calculated for HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) by treatment type and background characteristics for patients newly registered between 2004 and 2015 whose final outcome was survival or death. The median overall survival and cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated by dividing patients by combinations of background factors (number of tumors, tumor diameter, Child-Pugh grade, or albumin-bilirubin grade) and by treatment type (hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and systemic therapy). The same values were also calculated according to registration date by dividing patients newly registered between 1978 and 2015 into five time period groups. The data obtained from this nationwide follow-up survey are expected to contribute to advancing clinical research and treatment of primary liver cancer in the world.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Proficiency of the operating surgeon is one of the most critical factors potentially associated with reductions in complications and surgery-related mortality. With video-rating systems having shown potential for assessing laparoscopic surgeons' proficiency, the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was developed by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery to subjectively assess the proficiency of laparoscopic surgeons by rating applicants' non-edited case videos. We conducted a study to evaluate how ESSQS skill-qualified (SQ) surgeon involvement influences short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy performed for gastric cancer. METHODS: Data from the National Clinical Database regarding laparoscopic distal and total gastrectomy performed for gastric cancer between January 2016 and December 2018 were analyzed. Operative mortality, defined as 30-day mortality or 90-day in-hospital mortality, and anastomotic leakage rates were compared per involvement vs. non-involvement of an SQ surgeon. Outcomes were also compared per involvement of a gastrectomy-, colectomy-, or cholecystectomy-qualified surgeon. The association between the area of qualification and operative mortality/anastomotic leakage was also analyzed with a generalized estimating equation logistic regression model used to account for patient-level risk factors and institutional differences. RESULTS: Of 104,093 laparoscopic distal gastrectomies, 52,143 were suitable for inclusion in the study; 30,366 (58.2%) were performed by an SQ surgeon. Of 43,978 laparoscopic total gastrectomies, 10,326 were suitable for inclusion; 6501 (63.0%) were performed by an SQ surgeon. Gastrectomy-qualified surgeons outperformed non-SQ surgeons in terms of both operative mortality and anastomotic leakage. They also outperformed cholecystectomy- and colectomy-qualified surgeons in terms of operative mortality or anastomotic leakage in distal and total gastrectomy, respectively. CONCLUSION: The ESSQS appears to discriminate laparoscopic surgeons who can be expected to achieve significantly improved gastrectomy outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Cirujanos , Humanos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Japón , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We previously developed risk models for mortality and morbidity after low anterior resection using a nationwide Japanese database. However, the milieu of low anterior resection in Japan has undergone drastic changes since then. This study aimed to construct risk models for 6 short-term postoperative outcomes after low anterior resection, i.e., in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, anastomotic leakage, surgical site infection except for anastomotic leakage, overall postoperative complication rate, and 30-day reoperation rate. METHODS: This study enrolled 120,912 patients registered with the National Clinical Database, who underwent low anterior resection between 2014 and 2019. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to generate predictive models of mortality and morbidity using preoperative information, including the TNM stage. RESULTS: We developed new risk prediction models for the overall postoperative complication and 30-day reoperation rates for low anterior resection, which were absent from the previous version. The concordance indices for each endpoint were 0.82 for in-hospital mortality, 0.79 for 30-day mortality, 0.64 for anastomotic leakage, 0.62 for surgical site infection besides anastomotic leakage, 0.63 for complications, and 0.62 for reoperation. The concordance indices of all four models included in the previous version showed improvement. CONCLUSION: This study successfully updated the risk calculators for predicting mortality and morbidity after low anterior resection using a model based on vast nationwide Japanese data.
Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Morbilidad , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Postoperative complications after esophagectomy can be severe or fatal and impact the patient's postoperative quality of life and long-term outcomes. The aim of the present study was to develop the best possible model for predicting mortality and complications based on the Japanese Nationwide Clinical Database (NCD). METHODS: Data registered in the NCD, on 32,779 patients who underwent esophagectomy via a thoracic approach for malignant esophageal tumor between January, 2012 and December, 2017, were used to create a risk model. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate after esophagectomy was 1.0%, and the operative mortality rate was 2.3%. Postoperative complications included pneumonia (13.8%), anastomotic leakage (13.2%), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (11.1%), atelectasis (4.9%), and chylothorax (2.5%). Postoperative artificial respiration for over 48 h was required by 7.8% of the patients. Unplanned intubation within 30 postoperative days was performed in 6.2% of the patients. C-indices evaluated using the test data were 0.694 for 30-day mortality and 0.712 for operative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a good risk model for predicting 30-day mortality and operative mortality after esophagectomy based on the NCD. This risk model will be useful for the preoperative prediction of 30-day mortality and operative mortality, obtaining informed consent, and deciding on the optimal surgical procedure for patients with preoperative risks for mortality.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Enfermedades no Transmisibles , Humanos , Esofagectomía/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction after curative lobectomy, its association with the type of lobectomy, and how postoperative new-onset arrhythmia contributes to postoperative cerebral infarction. METHODS: The subjects of this analysis were 77,060 patients who underwent curative lobectomy for lung cancer between 2016 and 2018 according to the National Clinical Database. Incidences of postoperative cerebral infarction and postoperative new-onset arrhythmia were analyzed. Moreover, mediation analysis was performed to evaluate the causal pathway between postoperative new-onset arrhythmia and postoperative cerebral infarction. RESULTS: Postoperative cerebral infarction occurred in 110 (0.7%) patients after left upper lobectomy and in 85 (0.7%) patients after left lower lobectomy. Left upper lobectomy and left lower lobectomy were associated with a higher likelihood of postoperative cerebral infarction than right lower lobectomy. Left upper lobectomy was the strongest independent predictor of postoperative new-onset arrhythmia. However, in the mediation analysis, the odds ratio for cerebral infarction did not change after the addition of the factor of postoperative new-onset arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: Cerebral infarction occurred significantly more often not only after left upper lobectomy, but also after left lower lobectomy. Postoperative new-onset arrhythmia was less likely to be related to cerebral infarction after left upper lobectomy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neumonectomía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Japón/epidemiología , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/complicaciones , Infarto Cerebral/epidemiología , Infarto Cerebral/etiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A research subgroup was established by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery to improve the health care quality in the Chushikoku area of Western Japan. METHODS: The records of four surgical procedures were extracted from the Japanese National Clinical Database and analyzed retrospectively to establish the association between hospital characteristics, defined using a combination of hospital case-volume and patients' hospital travel distance, and the incidences of perioperative complications of ≥ Grade 3 of the Clavien-Dindo classification after gastroenterological surgery. RESULTS: This study analyzed 11,515 cases of distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, 4,705 cases of total gastrectomy for gastric cancer, 4,996 cases of right hemicolectomy for colon cancer, and 5,243 cases of lower anterior resection for rectal cancer, with composite outcome incidences of 5.6%, 10.2%, 5.5%, and 10.7%, respectively. After adjusting for patient characteristics and surgical procedures, no association was identified between the hospital category and surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: The findings of our study of the Chushikoku region did not provide positive support for the consolidation and centralization of hospitals, based solely on hospital case volume. Our grouping was unique in that we included patient travel distance in the analysis, but further investigations from other perspectives are needed.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Japón/epidemiología , Hospitales , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the aging of society and increasingly longer of life expectancy, elderly patients with esophageal cancer are more commonly encountered. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for operative mortality after esophagectomy in elderly patients. METHODS: We used data from the National Clinical Database of Japan. After cleaning the data, 10,633 records obtained from 861 hospitals were analyzed. A risk model for operative mortality was developed using risk factors from the entire study population. Then, odds ratios (OR) were compared between age categories using this risk model. RESULTS: In this study, 1959 (18.4%) patients were ≥ 75 years (defined as "elderly" in this study). Eighteen variables, including T4b, N2-N3, and M1 in the TNM classification, were included in the risk model for operative mortality. The ORs increased in age categories < 65, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years for N2-N3 (1.172, 1.200, and 1.588, respectively), and M1 (2.189, 3.164, and 4.430, respectively). Based on these results, we also focused on residual tumors, which are caused by extensive tumor development. The operative mortality in the elderly group with residual tumors increased to more than twice than that in the non-elderly groups (15.9 vs. 5.5 or 6.5%) and was much higher than that in elderly patients without residual tumors (15.9 vs. 4.6%). CONCLUSION: We should carefully select the treatment for elderly patients with highly advanced tumors, which result in N2-N3 and M1, to avoid unfavorable short-term outcomes. In addition, R0 resection is important in preventing operative mortality among elderly patients.