ALDH1A3-mTOR axis as a therapeutic target for anticancer drug-tolerant persister cells in gastric cancer.

Tumors consist of heterogeneous cell populations that contain cancer cell subpopulations with anticancer drug-resistant properties called "persister" cells. While this early-phase drug tolerance is known to be related to the stem cell-like characteristic of persister cells, how the stem cell-related pathways contribute to drug resistance has remained elusive. Here, we conducted a single-cell analysis based on the stem cell lineage-related and gastric cell lineage-related gene expression in patient-derived gastric cancer cell models. The analyses revealed that 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) induces a dynamic change in the cell heterogeneity. In particular, cells highly expressing stem cell-related genes were enriched in the residual cancer cells after 5-FU treatment. Subsequent functional screening identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3 (ALDH1A3) as a specific marker and potential therapeutic target of persister cells. ALDH1A3 was selectively overexpressed among the ALDH isozymes after treatment with 5-FU or SN38, a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor. Attenuation of ALDH1A3 expression by RNA interference significantly suppressed cell proliferation, reduced the number of persister cells after anticancer drug treatment and interfered with tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model. Mechanistically, ALDH1A3 depletion affected gene expression of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) cell survival pathway, which coincided with a decrease in the activating phosphorylation of S6 kinase. Temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, reduced the number of 5FU-tolerant persister cells. High ALDH1A3 expression correlated with worse prognosis of gastric cancer patients. These observations indicate that the ALDH1A3-mTOR axis could be a novel therapeutic target to eradicate drug-tolerant gastric cancer cells.

mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab to treat liver-only metastases of colorectal cancer that are unsuitable for upfront resection (TRICC0808): a multicenter phase II trial comprising the final analysis for survival.

BACKGROUND: The TRICC0808 trial is a phase II multi-institutional trial that investigated the efficacy of preoperative mFOLFOX6 + bevacizumab (BV) therapy for liver-only metastasis that is unsuitable for upfront resection. The R0 resection rate in the efficacy analysis has been reported to be 44.4%, and the final analysis for survival was conducted (data fixation on February 16, 2015). METHODS: Six cycles of mFOLFOX6 + BV therapy were applied to patients with liver-only metastases, which were > 5 cm in diameter or more than four tumors (H2 and H3), and hepatectomy was performed if possible. Primary and secondary endpoints were the R0 hepatectomy rate and overall survival (OS), respectively. RESULTS: Of 46 patients registered, OS was analyzed for 45 patients in whom the 3-year OS rate from the starting date of chemotherapy was 44.0% with a 33.6-month median survival time (MST). The 3-year OS rate of 31 patients with hepatectomy, including resection after an additional chemotherapy, was 61.3% with a 43.1-month MST, which was significantly better than 0% of the 3-year OS rate with a 21.0-month MST of 14 patients without hepatectomy (p value < 0.0001). In 24 patients who underwent hepatectomy after six cycles of protocol chemotherapy, the 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 8.3%, with a 36.8-month MST. CONCLUSIONS: This final analysis of the TRICC0808 trial revealed a better long-term survival in patients with hepatectomy after mFOLFOX6 + BV therapy, although most examined patients eventually developed recurrence. Thus, hepatectomy after chemotherapy might improve the survival in patients with advanced liver metastases, although cure remains difficult.

Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Early clinical trials conducted primarily in Japan have shown that TAS-102, an oral agent that combines trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride, was effective in the treatment of refractory colorectal cancer. We conducted a phase 3 trial to further assess the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in a global population of such patients. METHODS: In this double-blind study, we randomly assigned 800 patients, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive TAS-102 or placebo. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: The median overall survival improved from 5.3 months with placebo to 7.1 months with TAS-102, and the hazard ratio for death in the TAS-102 group versus the placebo group was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.81; P<0.001). The most frequently observed clinically significant adverse events associated with TAS-102 were neutropenia, which occurred in 38% of those treated, and leukopenia, which occurred in 21%; 4% of the patients who received TAS-102 had febrile neutropenia, and one death related to TAS-102 was reported. The median time to worsening performance status (a change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [on a scale of 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no symptoms and higher numbers indicating increasing degrees of disability] from 0 or 1 to 2 or more) was 5.7 months with TAS-102 versus 4.0 months with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.78; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with refractory colorectal cancer, TAS-102, as compared with placebo, was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival. (Funded by Taiho Oncology-Taiho Pharmaceutical; RECOURSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01607957.).

Serum leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein-1 with fucosylated triantennary N-glycan: a novel colorectal cancer marker.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 are used in clinical practice as tumor markers to diagnose or monitor colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, However, their specificities and sensitivities are not ideal, and novel alternatives are needed. In this study, mass spectrometry was used to search for screening markers, focusing on glycan alterations of glycoproteins in the sera of CRC patients. METHODS: Glycopeptides were prepared from serum glycoproteins separated from blood samples of 80 CRC patients and 50 healthy volunteers, and their levels were measured by liquid chromatography time-of flight mass spectrometry (LC-TOF-MS). RESULTS: Leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein-1 with fucosylated triantennary N-glycan (LRG-FTG) was identified as CRC marker after evaluating 30,000 candidate glycopeptide peaks. The average LRG-FTG level in CRC patients (1.25 ± 0.973 U/mL) was much higher than that in healthy volunteers (0.496 ± 0.433 U/mL, P < 10- 10), and its sensitivity and specificity exceeded those of CA19-9. The combination of CEA and LRG-FTG showed a complementary effect and had better sensitivity (84%), specificity (90%), and AUC (0.91 by ROC analysis) than each marker alone or any other previously reported marker. LRG-FTG alone or combined with CEA also corresponded well with patient response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We identified LRG-FTG as a new CRC marker, with a sensitivity and specificity exceeding CA19-9. The combination of LRG-FTG and CEA showed much higher sensitivity and specificity than each marker alone. Further validation beyond this initial exploratory cohort is warranted.

Retrospective study of RAS/PIK3CA/BRAF tumor mutations as predictors of response to first-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: After analysis of minor RAS mutations (KRAS exon 3, 4/NRAS) in the FIRE-3 and PRIME studies, an expanded range of RAS mutations were established as a negative predictive marker for the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibody treatment. BRAF and PIK3CA mutations may be candidate biomarkers for anti-EGFR targeted therapies. However, it remains unknown whether RAS/PIK3CA/BRAF tumor mutations can predict the efficacy of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer. We assessed whether selection according to RAS/PIK3CA/BRAF mutational status could be beneficial for patients treated with bevacizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: Of the 1001 consecutive colorectal cancer patients examined for RAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF tumor mutations using a multiplex kit (Luminex®), we studied 90 patients who received combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated according to mutational status. RESULTS: The ORR was higher among patients with wild-type tumors (64.3%) compared to those with tumors that were only wild type with respect to KRAS exon 2 (54.8%), and the differences in ORR between patients with wild-type and mutant-type tumors were greater when considering only KRAS exon 2 mutations (6.8%) rather than RAS/PIK3CA/BRAF mutations (18.4%). There were no statistically significant differences in ORR or PFS between all wild-type tumors and tumors carrying any of the mutations. Multivariate analysis revealed that liver metastasis and RAS and BRAF mutations were independent negative factors for disease progression after first-line treatment with bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Patient selection according to RAS/PIK3CA/BRAF mutations could help select patients who will achieve a better response to bevacizumab treatment. We found no clinical benefit of restricting combination therapy with bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with EGFR-wild type tumors.

RAS mutation is a prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer patients with metastasectomy.

Studies have demonstrated a relationship between clinical outcomes after curative resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) and gene mutations of the EGFR pathway; however, no studies have examined metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients with metastasectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between gene mutations of EGFR pathway and clinical outcomes after metastasectomy in mCRC patients. A total of 1,053 patients histopathologically confirmed CRC received a genotyping test for the EGFR pathway from February 2012 to October 2013. Detailed information was obtained through review of medical records. Gene mutations of EGFR pathway were analyzed by Luminex assay. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to compare the survival outcomes by gene mutation status. A total of 132 patients received metastasectomy. The frequencies of KRAS exon 2, KRAS exon 3.4, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations were 38.6% (51/132), 3.6% (5/132), 5.1% (7/132), 5.1% (7/132), and 8.7% (12/132), respectively. With a median follow-up of 84.1 months (57.2-NA) for a survivor, the 4-year OS rate was 65.6% for mCRC with RAS mutation, and 81.3% for mCRC with wild-type RAS (p < 0.05). We observed a statistically significant correlation for only the RAS mutation and OS. In multivariate analysis, RAS mutation and liver metastasis were independent factors for shorter OS. There were no significant differences between gene mutations of EGFR pathway and recurrence free survival. RAS mutation in mCRC metastasectomy patients was associated with shorter overall survival.

Phase 1 study on S-1 and oxaliplatin therapy as an adjuvant after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

of Background Data The effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer has been confirmed in various studies. However, no adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) classified to stage IV has been established. Objectives We conducted a phase 1 study of S-1 and oxaliplatin to determine the recommended dose (RD) in patients with CLM as adjuvant therapy in two institutes. Methods S-1 and oxaliplatin were administered from day 1 to day 14 of a 3-week cycle as a 2-h infusion every 3 weeks, respectively. The initial doses of S-1 and oxaliplatin were fixed to 80 mg/m(2) and 100 mg/m(2), respectively (level 1). We scheduled in the protocol a dose change of S-1 and oxaliplatin to level 2 (S-1: 80 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin: 130 mg/m(2)) or level 0 (S-1: 65 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin: 100 mg/m(2)) depending on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at level 1 in six patients. Results Because DLT occurred in one among the initial six patients at level 1, the doses were increased to level 2 in the next six patients. At level 2, grade 3 leukopenia and neutropenia occurred in one (16.7 %) and two (33.3 %) patients, respectively, in the absence of non-hematological event. Because no DLT occurred at level 2, we suggest that the RD can be set to the level 2 dose. The median number of cycles delivered at RD was 8. The mean relative dose intensity of S-1 and oxaliplatin at RD was 0.90 and 0.63, respectively. Conclusion In a patient undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, 80 mg/m(2) of S-1 and 130 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin are recommended as adjuvant therapy. A further study is required to confirm the efficacy and safety of this regimen on a larger scale.

Chemotherapy is effective for stage I gastric cancer in patients with synchronous esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic endoscopy occasionally shows synchronous early gastric cancer (EGC) and esophageal cancer (EC) in the same patient. The treatment plan for these comorbid cancers is unclear because, as EGC is commonly treated surgically, information on post-chemotherapy outcomes for EGC are lacking, although chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy are important in treating EC. Here, we evaluated whether unresected EGC could be safely observed while synchronous EC is treated with chemotherapy in patients with both cancers. METHODS: We enrolled 30 patients with both EGC and EC who were treated with 5-FU plus cisplatin (FP) from January 2006 to September 2013, and who were evaluated with endoscopy before chemotherapy, and approximately every 3 months afterwards. RESULTS: The response rate to FP for EGC was 46.8 %. Notably, five cases (16.7 %) had clinically complete responses with no progressive disease. Progression-free survival was 100 % at 6 months and 96.2 % at 1 year. In univariate analysis, FP was significantly more effective for mixed-type and undifferentiated adenocarcinoma than for differentiated adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: FP was effective for EGC. EGC was stable without progression for more than 6 months while patients underwent FP treatment for EC. We consider observing EGC with no treatment during chemotherapy for EC to be appropriate disease management.

UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*6 and *28 polymorphisms as indicators of initial dose level of irinotecan to reduce risk of neutropenia in patients receiving FOLFIRI for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced neutropenia is associated with UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*6 and *28 polymorphisms. This prospective study investigated whether using these polymorphisms to adjust the initial dose of CPT-11 as part of FOLFIRI treatment in colorectal cancer patients might improve safety. METHODS: All data were collected by a physician. The relationship between UGT1A1 polymorphisms and first-cycle neutropenia, reasons for treatment discontinuation, and time-to-treatment failure were evaluated. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the risk of neutropenia. RESULTS: A total of 795 patients were divided into wild-type (*1/*1) (50.1 %), heterozygous (*28/*1, *6/*1) (41.1 %), and homozygous (*28/*28, *6/*6, *28/*6) (8.8 %) groups, in which the median starting dose of CPT-11 was 143.0, 143.0, and 115.0 mg/m(2), respectively. First-cycle grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 17.3, 25.4, and 28.6 % of these patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia was significantly greater in the heterozygous and homozygous groups than in the wild-type group [odds ratio (OR) 1.67; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.16-2.42; p = 0.0060, and OR 2.22; 95 % CI 1.22-4.02; p = 0.0088, respectively]. Age (OR 1.77; 95 % CI 1.24-2.53; p = 0.0017), coelomic fluid (OR 1.84; 95 % CI 1.05-3.25; p = 0.0343), and non-reduction in starting dose (OR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.08-2.18; p = 0.0176) were also identified as significant risk factors. CONCLUSION: The risk of neutropenia was higher in the heterozygous and homozygous groups at initiation of CPT-11 treatment. This suggests that when a reduction in dose is required in patients harboring two variant alleles, the decrease should be approximately 20 %.

A multicenter phase II trial of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab to treat liver-only metastases of colorectal cancer that are unsuitable for upfront resection (TRICC0808).

BACKGROUND: A phase II clinical trial was conducted on colorectal cancer patients with only liver metastases (focal diameter exceeds 5 cm or the number of liver metastases is ≥5; H2·H3) to evaluate the liver resection rate and safety after 6 cycles of mFOLFOX6+bevacizumab (BV) therapy. METHODS: mFOLFOX6+BV therapy was applied for 6 cycles to the patients with H2·H3 liver only metastasis. Hepatectomy was considered after the sixth cycle as a rule, and was performed if possible. The primary endpoint was the curative hepatectomy rate (R0 resection rate). RESULTS: Forty-six patients were registered and 45 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Of the 19 patients rated as unresectable before therapy, 18 completed 6 cycles of mFOLFOX6+BV therapy and subsequently underwent hepatectomy (16 were R0-resected). Of the 26 initially unresectable patients, 6 underwent hepatectomy (4 were RO-resected). The overall R0 resection rate was 44.4% (20/45). Chemotherapy-associated grade 3 or higher adverse events included neutrophil decreased (17.4%) and leukocyte decreased (8.7%), fatigue (6.5%) etc. Only hypertension (6.5%) and venous thromboembolism (2.2%) were BV-associated grade 3 or higher adverse events. Among the 25 patients who underwent hepatectomy, intraoperative/postoperative complications included grade 3 wound infections (2 cases), biloma, delayed wound healing and intraperitoneal abscess (each 1 case). CONCLUSIONS: In colorectal cancer patients with liver-only metastases, mFOLFOX6+ BV therapy yielded a high hepatectomy rate and a high percentage of initially unresectable and subsequently resectable cases. The chemotherapy associated adverse events and hepatectomy complications were both within acceptable ranges.

Does anti-p53 antibody status predict for clinical outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND: TP53 gene mutation is widely known as one of the determinants of impaired chemosensitivity. p53 is a tumor-suppressor protein in humans encoded by the TP53 gene. Some studies have shown that TP53 gene mutation and accumulation of the p53 protein are closely related with serum anti-p53 antibody positivity. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive significance of the serum p53 antibody status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Ninety patients treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy were enrolled, including 70 whose KRAS genotype was revealed at the beginning of treatment. Before chemotherapy initiation, the serum p53 antibody level was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using MESACUP® anti-p53 test kits. The cutoff value for positivity was 1.3 U/mL, as calculated previously. The KRAS genotype of the tumor samples was analyzed using the Luminex® assay. RESULTS: Overall response rates of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria were 77.7 % (42/54) in anti-p53-negative patients and 69.4 % (25/36) in anti-p53-positive patients. The odds ratio was 1.07. Median overall survival was 36.1 months in the anti-p53-positive patients, and not available in the anti-p53-negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95 % confidence interval, 0.37-1.77; P = 0.61). The corresponding values for median progression-free survival were 13.3 months and 14.6 months (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95 % confidence interval, 0.41-1.17; P = 0.17), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Serum anti-p53 antibody positivity did not predict chemoresistance in mCRC treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy.

Multicenter phase II study of FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab after discontinuation of oxaliplatin-based regimen for advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer (CR0802).

BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab regimen with irinotecan (180 mg/m(2)) in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer who were of the wild-type or heterozygous group for UGT1A1*28 and *6 polymorphisms and discontinued to oxaliplatin-based regimen, prospectively. METHODS: The study population consisted of patients who had discontinued oxaliplatin-based regimen for any reason. The primary endpoint was the response rate. FOLFIRI and bevacizumab regimen [irinotecan: 180 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil infusion: 2400 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil bolus: 400 mg/m(2), levofolinate calcium: 200 mg/m(2), bevacizumab: 5 mg/kg] was repeated every 2 weeks for up to 24 cycles. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were enrolled; 93 patients were evaluated on safety, 94 patients on efficacy. The response rate was 10.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.7-18.3%). The median time to treatment failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.8-4.8 months), 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.1-6.2 months), and 14.5 months (95% CI: 11.8-17.0 months), respectively. The treatment-related death was 1.1%, and the early death ≤30 days after the last study treatment was 1.1%. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 60.2% for neutropenia, 23.7% for leukopenia, 9.7% for diarrhea, 6.5% for anorexia, and 5.4% for fatigue. All these adverse events and other adverse events were controllable. CONCLUSIONS: FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab regimen with an initial irinotecan dose of 180 mg/m(2) exhibited an adequate antitumor effect and was confirmed to be manageable and tolerable in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer, who had discontinued oxaliplatin-based regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000001817 .

Risk Factors Exacerbating Hand-Foot Skin Reaction Induced by Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin with or without Bevacizumab Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOx) ± bevacizumab therapy is associated with a high incidence of hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), hindering treatment. However, timing of onset and risk factors remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the development of HFSR and risk factors for its exacerbation to a serious condition in CapeOx ± bevacizumab therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively examined patients with colorectal cancer receiving CapeOx ± bevacizumab therapy between October 1, 2009, and March 31, 2012. The observation period was defined as lasting until completion of 8 cycles. The relationship between cumulative dose of capecitabine and cumulative proportion of patients developing HFSR was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Risk factors for exacerbation of HFSR to a serious condition were assessed by multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Data for 203 patients were analyzed. For patients treated at cumulative capecitabine doses of 100 000 mg/m(2) and 200 000 mg/m(2), Grade 1 HFSR occurred in ≥80% and ≥90%, respectively, and moderate-to-severe HFSR (Grade 2+) occurred in ≥10% and ≥20%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed significant associations with diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 4.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.86-12.34; P = 0.001), concomitant use of bevacizumab (OR = 6.01; 95% CI = 2.20-16.41; P = 0.001), history of fluorinated pyrimidine administration (OR = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.10-5.33; P = 0.027), and early onset (within 21 days) of Grade 1 HFSR (OR = 3.78; 95% CI = 1.64-8.70; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HFSR in CapeOx therapy is a cumulative toxicity and risk of exacerbation to a serious condition increases with diabetes, concomitant use of bevacizumab, history of fluorinated pyrimidine administration, and onset of Grade 1 HFSR within 21 days.

[Three cases of fatal thrombocytopenia after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy].

Oxaliplatin is a platinum salt that is particularly effective for treating gastrointestinal tumors. However, some reports state that oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy triggers fatal thrombocytopenia. Myelosuppression is recognized as the main cause of oxaliplatin-related thrombocytopenia, and other mechanisms for this side effect have been suggested, including splenic sequestration of platelets related to oxaliplatin-induced liver damage and immune thrombocytopenia. Other causes of thrombocytopenia such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and pseudothrombocytopenia should also be considered. We encountered 3 patients who developed fatal thrombocytopenia after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and describe the differential diagnosis of fatal thrombocytopenia here.

TAS-102 monotherapy for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatments that confer survival benefit are needed in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102-a novel oral nucleoside antitumour agent. METHODS: Between August 25, 2009, and April 12, 2010, we undertook a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial in Japan. Eligible patients were 20 years or older; had confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma; had a treatment history of two or more regimens of standard chemotherapy; and were refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. Patients had to be able to take oral drugs; have measurable lesions; have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of between 0 and 2; and have adequate bone-marrow, hepatic, and renal functions within 7 days of enrolment. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to either TAS-102 (35 mg/m(2) given orally twice a day in a 28-day cycle [2-week cycle of 5 days of treatment followed by a 2-day rest period, and then a 14-day rest period]) or placebo; all patients received best supportive care. Randomisation was done with minimisation methods, with performance status as the allocation factor. The randomisation sequence was generated with a validated computer system by an independent team from the trial sponsor. Investigators, patients, data analysts, and the trial sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in the per-protocol population. The study is in progress and is registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, number JapicCTI-090880. FINDINGS: 112 patients allocated to TAS-102 and 57 allocated to placebo made up the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up was 11·3 months (IQR 10·7-14·0). Median overall survival was 9·0 months (95% CI 7·3-11·3) in the TAS-102 group and 6·6 months (4·9-8·0) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for death 0·56, 80% CI 0·44-0·71, 95% CI 0·39-0·81; p=0·0011). 57 (50%) of 113 patients given TAS-102 in the safety population had neutropenia of grade 3 or 4, 32 (28%) leucopenia, and 19 (17%) anaemia. No patient given placebo had grade 3 or worse neutropenia or leucopenia; three (5%) of 57 had grade 3 or worse anaemia. Serious adverse events occurred in 21 (19%) patients in the TAS-102 group and in five (9%) in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: TAS-102 has promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who are refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies.

A multicenter phase II study of the stop-and-go modified FOLFOX6 with bevacizumab for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Currently, no prospective data exists to support a "stop-and-go" modified FOLFOX6 regimen with bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this regimen in first-line mCRC patients. Eligible patients (age ≥20 years) had previously untreated mCRC; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2; and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. The modified FOLFOX6 regimen and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. After 8 cycles, patients received maintenance therapy with simplified LV5FU2 and bevacizumab until completion of 8 cycles or disease progression. After maintenance therapy, patients received another 8 cycles of modified FOLFOX6 with bevacizumab until completion of 8 cycles or disease progression. We recruited 50 patients between August 2007 and January 2009. The overall response rate was 48% (80% confidence interval [CI]; 38.2-58) with outcomes as follows: complete response, n = 1; partial response, n = 23; stable disease, n = 21; progression, n = 1; and not evaluated, n = 4. Median time to treatment failure was 7.7 months (80% CI: 6.2-8.0), and median progression-free survival was 12.8 months (80% CI: 10.8-14). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (40%), nausea (4%), diarrhea (14%), thrombosis (4%), and hypertension (4%) et al. Grade 1, 2, or 3 peripheral neuropathy was reported in 38%, 40%, and 10% of patients, respectively. The stop-and-go modified FOLFOX6 and bevacizumab regimen is effective and well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy for mCRC patients.

Clinical outcome of biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice caused by colorectal and gastric cancers.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the prognostic factors for patients with obstructive jaundice due to advanced colorectal and gastric cancers who had undergone percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. METHODS: Baseline variables and clinical outcomes were evaluated for 92 consecutive patients treated with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. RESULTS: Of the 92 patients, 32 (35%) had colorectal cancer and the remaining 60 (65%) had gastric cancer. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was successfully achieved in 74 (80%) patients, and 39 of them could receive subsequent chemotherapy. The median survival after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was 273 days in the 39 patients who had undergone successful percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and subsequent chemotherapy, 65 days in 35 patients who had undergone successful percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage but who had not received subsequent chemotherapy and 34 days in the remaining 18 patients who had undergone unsuccessful percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (P < 0.001). Multiple liver metastases and hepatic hilar bile duct stricture were independently associated with unsuccessful percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Poor performance status, multiple liver metastases, presence of ascites, multiple prior chemotherapy administrations, undifferentiated type histology and high serum CA19-9 level were independently associated with a poor prognosis. A prognostic index calculated based on the number of these six factors was used to classify the patients into a good-risk group (index ≤2) (n = 56) and a poor-risk group (index ≥3) (n = 36). The median survival time and 2-month survival rate for the two groups were 163 and 44 days, respectively, and 85.7 and 33.3%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As regards the introduction of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice due to colorectal and gastric cancers, careful patient selection might be necessary. A prognostic model seems to be useful for making decisions as to whether percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage is indicated for particular patients.

[A case of transverse colon cancer with multiple liver metastases and hepatic pedicle lymph node involvement showing pathological complete response by XELOX plus bevacizumab].

A 70-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography(CT)and colonoscopy revealed transverse colon cancer with multiple liver metastases, with involvement of the hepatic pedicle and superior mesenteric artery lymph nodes. The patient received eight courses of XELOX plus bevacizumab, and CT showed a decrease in the size of the liver metastases and hepatic pedicle lymphadenopathy. Right hemicolectomy, partial hepatectomy, and hepatic pedicle lymph node resection were performed. Histopathological examination of the resected tissue revealed no residual cancer cells, suggesting a pathological complete response. The patient remains well 7 months after operation, without any signs of recurrence. Surgical resection should be considered for patients with initially unresectable colon cancer with liver metastases and hepatic pedicle lymph nodes involvement if systemic chemotherapy is effective.

Circulating tumor cells as a surrogate marker for determining response to chemotherapy in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of circulating tumor cells (CTC) as a surrogate marker of the clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in order to identify Japanese patients responsive to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Between January 2007 and April 2008, 64 patients with mCRC were enrolled in this prospective study. The treatment regimen was oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Collection of CTC from whole blood was performed at baseline and at 2 and 8-12 weeks after initiation of chemotherapy. Isolation and enumeration of CTC was performed using immunomagnetics. Patients with ≥3 CTC at baseline and at 2 and 8-12 weeks had a shorter median progression-free survival (8.5, 7.3 and 1.9 months, respectively) than those with <3 CTC (9.7, 10.4 and 9.1 months, respectively) (log-rank test: P = 0.047, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Patients with ≥3 CTC at 2 and 8-12 weeks had a shorter median overall survival (10.2 and 4.1 months, respectively) than those with <3 CTC (29.1 and 29.1 months, respectively) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). A spurious early rise in carcinoembryonic antigen level was observed in 11 patients showing a partial response. In contrast, no rise in early CTC level was observed among responders. Our data support the clinical utility of CTC enumeration in improving our ability to accurately assess treatment benefit and in expediting the identification of effective treatment regimens for individual Japanese patients.

Circulating endothelial progenitors and CXCR4-positive circulating endothelial cells are predictive markers for bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy is a standard option in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of circulating endothelial cell progenitors (CEPs) and phenotypical circulating endothelial cells (CECs) as surrogate markers of clinical outcome in mCRC patients to identify responders to bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 69 patients with measurable mCRC were enrolled in this prospective study. Whole blood samples were analyzed before initiation of treatment and on days 4 and 14. Phenotypical CECs and CEPs were then isolated and enumerated by using flow cytometry. RESULTS: CEP levels of less than 0.04% on day 4 were significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (P < .001, P = .002, respectively) as compared with levels of 0.04% or more. In addition, CXCR4-positive CEC levels of less than 20% at baseline were significantly associated with longer PFS and OS as compared other indicators investigated (P < .001, P = .002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of CEPs on day 4 and proportion of CXCR4-positive CECs at baseline were correlated with the prognosis of bevacizumab combination chemotherapy, suggesting that these surrogate markers may play a core role in the selection of candidates for bevacizumab treatment.