Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Nanobiotechnology ; 17(1): 52, 2019 Apr 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30971278

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Currently, the main goal of cancer research is to increase longevity of patients suffering malignant cancers. The promising results of BCc1 in vitro and vivo experiments made us look into the effect of BCc1 nanomedicine on patients with cancer in a clinical trial. METHODS: The present investigation was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, and multicenter study in which 123 patients (30-to-85-year-old men and women) with metastatic and non-metastatic gastric cancer, in two separate groups of BCc1 nanomedicine or placebo, were selected using a permuted block randomization method. For metastatic and non-metastatic patients, a daily dose of 3000 and 1500 mg was prescribed, respectively. Overall survival (OS) as the primary endpoint and quality of life (measured using QLQ-STO22) and adverse effects as the secondary endpoints were studied. RESULTS: In metastatic patients, the median OS was significantly higher in BCc1 nanomedicine (174 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 82.37-265.62]) than in placebo (62 days [95% CI 0-153.42]); hazard ratio (HR): 0.5 [95% CI 0.25-0.98; p = 0.046]. In non-metastatic patients, the median OS was significantly higher in BCc1 nanomedicine (529 days [95% CI 393.245-664.75]) than in placebo (345 days [95% CI 134.85-555.14]); HR: 0.324 [95% CI 0.97-1.07; p = 0.066]. The QLQ-STO22 assessment showed a mean difference improvement of 3.25 and 2.29 (p value > 0.05) in BCc1 nanomedicine and a mean difference deterioration of - 4.42 and - 3 (p-value < 0.05) in placebo with metastatic and non-metastatic patients, respectively. No adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: The findings of this trial has provided evidence for the potential capacity of BCc1 nanomedicine for treatment of cancer. Trial registration IRCTID, IRCT2017101935423N1. Registered on 19 October 2017, http://www.irct.ir/ IRCT2017101935423N1.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Nanocompuestos/química , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Animales , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nanomedicina/métodos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Manejo del Dolor , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Indian J Gynecol Oncol ; 21(1): 3, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36466117

RESUMEN

Background: Mastectomy as a surgical treatment in women with breast cancer causes a change in their body image due to the loss of femininity and body integrity, decreased sense of sexual attractiveness, and dissatisfaction with the presence of surgical scars. The present study was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Farsi version of the body image scale for breast cancer survivors. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 204 women with a mastectomy referred to Kermanshah's surgery and oncology office in 2021. Face and content validity were evaluated qualitatively. Construct validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis (with maximum likelihood and Promax rotation) and confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients were used to verify internal consistency. Results: The mean age of the participants was 46.57 (SD = 9.47). One factor was extracted that explained 46.56% of the total variance of body image. The factor load of the items varied between 0.561 and 0.801. The results of CFA also showed that the final model has a perfect fit: CMIN = 20.931; DF = 13; CMIN/FD = 1.610; p = 0.074; GFI = 0.972; AGFI = 0.939; IFI = 0.985; CFI = 0.985; TLI = 0.975; PNFI = 0.595; PCFI = 0.610; RMSEA = 0.055. internal consistency based on Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients was 0.856 and 0.861, respectively. Conclusion: The Farsi version of the body image scale for breast cancer survivors has good construct validity and may be used in various studies in clinical and research settings.

3.
J Med Case Rep ; 13(1): 210, 2019 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31288853

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous occurrence of colorectal malignancy with pelvic kidney has been considered a rare phenomenon. A review of the related literature revealed three previous reports of rectal cancer and pelvice kidney. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report describe the case of 40-year-old Asian man with complaints of bleeding and a feeling of discomfort in his anus. A colonoscopy revealed a raised large multilobulated mass in his rectum. Multiple biopsies of the lesion were done after detecting a tumor in his rectum 4 cm above the dentate line; a diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma was made by pathological examinations. Subsequent investigations, carried out by computed tomography (CT) scans, incidentally showed an ectopic pelvic kidney. Because of the progress of the rectal cancer, our patient was a candidate for neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Six weeks after radiotherapy, he underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery maintaining the ectopic kidney after using a coloanal anastomosis for additional curative surgery. A very low anterior resection surgery was performed to maintain the ectopic kidney. Thereafter, adjuvant chemotherapy was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the proximity of the tumor to the pelvic viscera, especially the ectopic kidney, the probability of inadequate abscission of the lesion in surgery and radiotherapy, as well as complications and localized relapse were increased so that the kidney could be maintained. Carrying out careful pre-treatment examinations can result in maintaining an ectopic kidney and its daily conditioned function dependent on the status of the patient, including the proximity of the ectopic kidney to the tumor, anatomical position, and prior damage. The lesson learned from the present case is that radiotherapy and surgery are possible treatments in the presence of pelvic kidney and rectal cancer without incurring renal damage.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Riñón/anomalías , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Humanos , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA