Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Orthop ; 54: 38-45, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38524362

RESUMEN

Introduction: Historically musculoskeletal injury has substantially affected United States (US) service members. Lumbosacral spine injuries are among the most common sites of injury for service members across all US military branches and usually presents with pain in the lower back and extremities. The aim of this study is to identify and describe the 50 most-cited articles relevant to military medicine on the subject of the spine. Methods: In April 2020 Web of Science was used to search the key words: spinal cord injury, spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine, cervical spine, sacrum, sacral, cervical fusion, lumbar fusion, sacral fracture, combat, back pain, neck pain, and military. Articles published from 1900 to 2020 were evaluated for relevance to military spine orthopaedics and ranked based on citation number. The 50 most-cited articles were characterized based on country of origin, journal of publication, affiliated institution, topic, military branch, and conflict. Results: 1900 articles met search criteria. The 50 most-cited articles were cited 24 to 119 times and published between 1993 and 2017. 30 articles (60%) originated in the United States. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine accounted for the most frequent (n = 10) destination journal followed by Spine (n = 8). 37 institutions contributed to the top 50 most-cited articles. The most common article type was clinically focused retrospective analysis 36% (n = 18), clinically focused cohort study 10% (n = 5), and clinically focused cohort questionnaire, cross-sectional analysis, and randomized study 8% each (n = 4). 90% of articles were non-surgical (n = 45). The US Army had the greatest number of associated articles. Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom were the most-cited conflicts. Conclusion: The 50 most-cited articles relevant to military spine orthopaedics are predominantly clinically focused, arising from the US, and published in Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, Spine, and The Spine Journal.

2.
Global Spine J ; : 21925682241284559, 2024 Sep 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39265096

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Atypical hangman's fractures are associated with increased risk for neurologic injury due to involvement of the posterior cortex of the axis body. We present the largest single-center cohort of atypical hangman's fractures with the goal of guiding treatment decisions and outcomes based on fracture classification. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with atypical hangman's fractures treated at a single Level I trauma center between January 2010 and September 2023. 51 patients met inclusion criteria and demographic, treatment, and radiographic data were recorded and compared across the Type I and II fracture groups. RESULTS: Final treatment modalities varied significantly between the groups (P < 0.01), with hard cervical collar and invasive halo immobilization being the most prevalent treatments for fracture Types I and II respectively. One Type I fracture patient and four Type II fracture patients failed non-operative treatment, requiring surgery. Across both groups, posterior cervical fusion (73%) was the most common surgical approach. Median length of stay varied significantly between the two fracture groups (2.0 (1.0-7.0) vs 5.0 (3.0-8.0) days; P = 0.01). Irrespective of fracture type, longer hospital length of stay was associated with increased patient age (IRR = 1.02; P < 0.01), non-white race (IRR = 2.47; P = 0.01), injury caused by MVC (IRR = 1.93; P < 0.01), and the presence of non-spine orthopedic injuries (IRR = 1.72; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: While atypical Type I hangman's fractures may be managed effectively non-operatively with a hard cervical collar, atypical Type II fractures managed with a hard cervical collar are at greater risk of requiring subsequent surgical intervention.

3.
Spine J ; 24(1): 107-117, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37683769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with differential healthcare outcomes and may be proxied using the area-deprivation index (ADI). Few studies to date have investigated the role of ADI on patient-reported outcomes and clinically meaningful improvement following lumbar spine fusion surgery. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of SES on lumbar fusion outcomes using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of a single institution cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: About 205 patients who underwent elective one-to-three level posterior lumbar spine fusion. OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in PROMIS scores and achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID). METHODS: Patients 18 years or older undergoing elective one-to-three level lumbar spine fusion secondary to spinal degeneration from January 2015 to September 2021 with minimum one year follow-up were reviewed. ADI was calculated using patient-supplied addresses and patients were grouped into quartiles. Higher ADI values represent worse deprivation. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds were calculated using distribution-based methods. Analysis of variance testing was used to assess differences within and between the quartile cohorts. Multivariable regression was used to identify features associated with the achievement of MCID. RESULTS: About 205 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The average age of our cohort was 66±12 years. The average time to final follow-up was 23±8 months (range 12-36 months). No differences were observed between preoperative baseline scores amongst the four quartiles. All ADI cohorts showed significant improvement for pain interference (PI) at final follow-up (p<.05), with patients who had the lowest socioeconomic status having the lowest absolute improvement from preoperative baseline physical function (PF) and PI (p=.01). Only those patients who were in the lowest socioeconomic quartile failed to significantly improve for PF at final follow-up (p=.19). There was a significant negative correlation between socioeconomic level and the absolute proportion of patients reaching MCID for PI (p=.04) and PF (p=.03). However, while ADI was a significant predictor of achieving MCID for PI (p=.02), it was nonsignificant for achieving MCID for PF. CONCLUSIONS: Our study investigated the influence of ADI on postoperative PROMIS scores and identified a negative correlation between ADI quartile and the proportion of patients reaching MCID. Patients in the worse ADI quartile had lower chances of reaching clinically meaningful improvement in PI. Policies focused on alleviating geographical deprivation may augment clinical outcomes following lumbar surgery.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades Socioeconómicas en Salud , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 49(9): 601-608, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37163645

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a single institution cohort. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to identify features that predict delayed achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) following elective lumbar spine fusion using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Preoperative prediction of delayed recovery following lumbar spine fusion surgery is challenging. While many studies have examined factors impacting the achievement of MCID for patient-reported outcomes in similar cohorts, few studies have assessed predictors of early functional improvement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing elective one-level posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology. Patients were subdivided into two groups based on achievement of MCID for each respective PROMIS domain either before six months ("early responders") or after six months ("late responders") following surgical intervention. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine features associated with odds of achieving distribution-based MCID before or after six months follow up. RESULTS: 147 patients were included. The average age was 64.3±13.0 years. At final follow-up, 57.1% of patients attained MCID for PI and 72.8% for PF. However, 42 patients (49.4%) reached MCID for PI by six months, compared to 44 patients (41.1%) for PF. Patients with severe symptoms had the highest probability of attaining MCID for PI (OR 10.3; P =0.001) and PF (OR 10.4; P =0.001) Preoperative PROMIS symptomology did not predict early achievement of MCID for PI or PF. Patients who received concomitant iliac crest autograft during their lumbar fusion had increased odds of achieving MCID for PI (OR 8.56; P =0.001) before six months. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the majority of patients achieved MCID following elective one-level lumbar spine fusion at long-term follow-up, although less than half achieved this clinical benchmark for each PROMIS metric by six months. We also found that preoperative impairment was not associated with when patients would achieve MCID. Further prospective investigations are warranted to characterize the trajectory of clinical improvement and identify the risk factors associated with poor outcomes more accurately.


Asunto(s)
Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39004836

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a single institution cohort. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Area Deprivation Index (ADI) or Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) is more suitable for evaluating minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement following elective lumbar fusion as captured by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A total of 182 patients who underwent elective one- to two-level posterior lumbar fusion between January 2015 and September 2021. METHODS: ADI and SVI values were calculated from patient-supplied addresses. Patients were grouped into quartiles based on values; higher quartiles represented greater disadvantage. MCID thresholds for Pain Interference (PI) and Physical Function (PF) were determined via a distribution-based method. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors impacting MCID attainment. Univariate logistic regression was performed to determine which themes comprising SVI values affected MCID achievement. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that ADI and SVI quartile assignment significantly impacted achievement of MCID for PI (P=0.04 and P=0.01 respectively) and PF (P=0.03 and P=0.02 respectively). Specifically, assignment to the third ADI and SVI quartiles were significant for PI (OR: 0.39 and 0.23 respectively), and PF (OR: 0.24 and 0.22 respectively). Race was not a significant predictor of MCID for either PI or PF. Univariate logistic regression demonstrated that among SVI themes, the socioeconomic status theme significantly affected achievement of MCID for PI (P=0.01), while the housing type and transportation theme significantly affected achievement of MCID for PF (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: ADI and SVI quartile assignment were predictors of MCID achievement. While ADI and SVI may both identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes following lumbar fusion, SVI offers greater granularity in terms of isolating themes of disadvantage impacting MCID achievement.

6.
N Am Spine Soc J ; 19: 100532, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39257671

RESUMEN

Background: Several assessment tools have been developed to estimate a patient's likelihood risk of falling. None of these measures estimate the contributions of the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems to fall risk, especially in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease. Methods: Degenerative lumbar spine patients with radiculopathy (LD) and healthy subjects who were 35-70 years old without spine complaints were recruited. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected prior to testing. Fall risk assessment was completed using Computer Dynamic Posturography (CDP), a computer-controlled balance machine that allows cone of economy (CoE) and cone of pressure (CoP) measurements. All patients completed Sensory Organization Tests (SOT) which include normal and perturbed stability, both with and without visual cues. Results: In total, 43 spine patients and 12 healthy controls were included, with mean age 57.8 years, 39.5% females, and mean BMI of 29.3 kg/m2. Nearly all CoE and most CoP dimensions were found to be larger in LD patients compared to controls across nearly all subtests (p<.05), with the largest dimensions generally observed in the surrounding and support sway testing condition. In LD patients, ODI and PROMIS Pain Interference were negatively correlated with CoE and CoP measurements (p<.05). Conclusions: In this prospective study, body sway was assessed as a function of CoE and CoP using the CDP system and was found to be elevated in spine patients, especially when they experienced increasing levels of visual and vestibular stimulation. The ability to identify the primary drivers of balance disorders is essential in spine patients and may be helpful in the development of a patient-specific treatment plan, which may in the future aid with fall-prevention initiatives.

7.
World Neurosurg ; 187: e107-e114, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38616025

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine how depression state impacts postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores and achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) following lumbar fusion. Depression has been shown to negatively impact outcomes following numerous orthopedic surgeries. Situational and major clinical depression can differentially affect postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing elective 1-3 level lumbar fusion were reviewed. Patients with a formal diagnosis of major depression were classified as "clinically depressed" whereas patients with at least "mild" PROMIS Depression scores in the absence of formal depression diagnosis were deemed "situationally depressed." analysis of variance testing was used to assess differences within and between groups. Multivariate regression was used to identify features associated with the achievement of MCID. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were included. The average age was 65.9 ± 12.2 years. 75 patients (37.5%) were nondepressed, 66 patients (33.0%) were clinically depressed, and 59 patients (29.5%) were situationally depressed. Situationally depressed patients had worse preoperative physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) scores and were more likely to have severe symptoms (P = 0.001, P = 0.001). All groups improved significantly from preoperative baseline scores. All groups met MCID PF at different rates, with highest proportion of situationally depressed reaching this metric (P = 0.03). Rates of achieving MCID PI were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.47). Situational depression was predictive of achieving MCID PF (P = 0.002) but not MCID PI. CONCLUSIONS: Our study investigated the relationship between depression and postoperative PROMIS scores and identified situationally depressed patients as having the worst preoperative impairment. Despite this, the situationally depressed cohort had the highest likelihood of achieving MCID PF, suggestive of a bidirectional relationship between lumbar degenerative disease and subclinical, situational depression. These findings may help guide preoperative counseling on expectations, and patient selection.


Asunto(s)
Depresión , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Vértebras Lumbares , Recuperación de la Función , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Fusión Vertebral/psicología , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/psicología , Depresión/psicología , Depresión/etiología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diferencia Mínima Clínicamente Importante
8.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 26(6): E235-9, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23429303

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled, cadaveric implantation trial. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of revision thoracic screw fixation: with revision from unicortical screws to bicortical screws, to larger diameter screws, and the addition of bone cement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Limited data is available regarding the effect of salvage screws on fixation quality in the anterior thoracic spine. Biomechanical studies in the cervical spine and the lumbar spine demonstrate dramatic decreases in fixation in salvage situations. METHODS: Seventy-two cadaveric thoracic vertebrae from 6 specimens were DEXA scanned at T1-T12. A control screw and a second identical screw were placed in each segment. One screw was then removed and replaced with a revision screw. Varying screw diameter, the number of cortices, and the addition of 1.5 cm of bone cement was evaluated in a pairwise fashion. Comparisons were made using descriptive statistical analysis and a general linear statistical model. RESULTS: Bone mineral density had a significant effect on the pullout force. Pullout force did not vary significantly with control screw diameter. Revision of a smaller diameter bicortical to a larger diameter bicortical screw resulted in a decrease in pullout strength for 4-5 mm screws by 40.1% (P=0.02) and 5-7 mm screws by 63.7% (P=0.05). When a 4 mm bicortical screw is revised to a 5 mm unicortical screw, the pullout force decreases by 67.7% (P<0.001). There was a nonsignificant increase (44%) in pullout with revision of a unicortical 4 mm screw to a bicortical 4 mm screw. If a bicortical screw is revised to a unicortical screw with 1.5 cm of cement, the pullout strength is increased by 240% (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When the use of salvage screws is required, the surgeon should anticipate a significant decrease in the holding force compared with the original screw regardless of screw size unless a unicortical screw is revised to a bicortical screw or cement is added to the construct.


Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos , Osteoporosis/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales , Osteoporosis/fisiopatología , Vértebras Torácicas/fisiopatología
9.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 26(3): 119-26, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22143048

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate functional outcomes, fracture healing, complications, and mortality associated with posterior fusion surgery (PSF) for the management of geriatric type II odontoid fractures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Outcomes of C1-2 fusion for geriatric odontoid fractures are not well defined. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures were treated by the same spinal surgeon at a Level-1 trauma center during an 8-year period. All patients had ≥50% odontoid displacement and were treated with PSF including C1-2 (PSF group; average age, 79 y). Chart reviews were performed evaluating patient comorbidities, treatment complications, and mortality rates. At ultimate follow-up, patients had open mouth, flexion, and extension radiographs to assess fracture stability and healing. In addition, functional outcomes were assessed using Neck Disability Index (NDI), analog pain, and satisfaction questionnaire scores and compared with a group of 40 aged-matched control patients (control group; average age, 79.8 y). RESULTS: The mortality rate was 19.2%, and major complications occurred in 27% of patients. At an average 13-month follow-up (range, 3-48 mo), the fracture-healing rate was only 33%. However, no patient had mobile odontoid nonunion or instability of the C1-2 articulation. NDI scores averaged 18.1 points indicating only mild residual disability. Pain scores were low averaging only 1.8 points. NDI and pain scores did not differ significantly from aged-matched controls (P = 0.16). Treatment satisfaction scores were high. Odontoid nonunion was not associated with significantly higher levels of disability or neck pain and did not affect scores for patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: PSF for geriatric odontoid fractures is associated with moderately high levels of morbidity and mortality. Posttreatment neck pain and disability is low and does not differ significantly from aged-matched cohorts. Odontoid fracture healing after surgical stabilization does not correlate with improved functional outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Apófisis Odontoides/lesiones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tornillos Óseos , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Apófisis Odontoides/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/mortalidad , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 36(3): 213-9, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23809591

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Subfascial wound suction drains are commonly used after spinal surgery to decrease the incidence of post-operative hematoma. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding their effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To report four cases of post-operative spinal epidural hematoma causing massive neurological deficit in patients who had subfascial suction wound drains. METHODS: During an 8-year period, a retrospective review of 1750 consecutive adult spinal surgery cases was performed to determine the incidence, commonalities, and outcomes of catastrophic neurological deficit caused by post-operative spinal epidural hematoma. FINDINGS: Epidural hematoma causing major neurological deficit (American Spinal Injury Association B) was identified in 4 out of 1750 patients (0.23%). All four patients in this series had subfascial wound suction drains placed prophylactically at the conclusion of their initial procedure. RESULTS: Three patients developed massive neurological deficits with the drain in place; one patient had the drain removed at 24 hours and subsequently developed neurological symptoms during the following post-operative day. Significant risk factors for the development of hematoma were identified in two of the four patients. Average time to return to the operating room for hematoma evacuation was 6 hours (range 3-12 hours). Neurological status significantly improved in all four patients after hematoma evacuation. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative epidural hematoma causing catastrophic neurological deficit is a rare complication after spinal surgery. The presence of suction wound drains does not appear to prevent the occurrence of this devastating complication.


Asunto(s)
Hematoma Espinal Epidural/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Prótesis e Implantes/efectos adversos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Succión/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Succión/instrumentación
11.
Int J Spine Surg ; 17(4): 564-569, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37487672

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spinal injuries, whether mechanical or neurological, frequently require urgent intervention. Superior outcomes are associated with earlier intervention, which often requires operating overnight and on weekends. However, operating after hours has been associated with increased risks of complications in selected studies. The authors sought to determine whether there are differences in outcomes for "after hours" surgery compared with "during hours" surgery for spinal emergencies. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of spine surgery patients who underwent urgent surgery within 6 hours, from January 2015 through December 2019. Surgery was considered during hours if it started between 8 am and 5 pm Monday through Friday. After hours was defined as from 5 pm through 8 am on a weekday or Saturday or Sunday. We assessed 30-day outcome measures for differences between operations performed during hours or after hours. RESULTS: There were 241 spine procedures performed (49 during hours and 192 after hours). There was no significant difference between the length of operation (145.3 vs 129.8 minutes, P = 0.29), estimated blood loss (303.9 vs 274.4 mL, P = 0.61), improvement in American Spinal Injury Association scale (0.26 vs 0.24 grade, P = 0.85), 30-day return to the operating room (OR; 14.3% vs 6.8%, P = 0.09), 30-day readmission (2.0% vs 6.3% P = 0.24), intensive care unit length of stay (4.6 vs 6.3 days, P = 0.27), hospital length of stay (13.5 days vs 14.2 days, P = 0.72), or 30-day mortality (4.1% vs 7.3%, P = 0.42) for cases performed during hours compared with those after hours, respectively. On multivariate analysis, prior malignancy (P = 0.008) and blue immediate status (P = 0.004) were predictors of 30-day mortality. However, "after hours" surgery was not a predictor of 30-day return to the OR, readmission, or mortality in either univariate or multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Spine surgery must often be performed after hours. However, the time of day does not significantly impact the 30-day outcomes for emergent spine surgery.

12.
Eur Spine J ; 21 Suppl 4: S476-82, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22160172

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of intraoperative powdered vancomycin on the rates of postoperative deep spinal wound infection. The use of intraoperative powdered vancomycin as a prophylactic measure in an attempt to reduce the incidence of postoperative spinal wound infection has not been sufficiently evaluated in the existing literature. A retrospective review of a large clinical database was performed to determine the rates of deep wound infection associated with the use of intraoperative operative site powdered vancomycin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period from 2005 to 2010, 1,512 consecutive spinal surgery cases were performed by the same fellowship-trained spinal surgeon (RWM) at a level 1 trauma-university medical center. One gram of powdered vancomycin was placed in all surgical sites prior to wound closure. Eight hundred forty-nine cases were uninstrumented, 478 cases were instrumented posterior thoracic or lumbar, 12 were instrumented anterior thoracic or lumbar, 126 were instrumented anterior cervical, and 47 were instrumented posterior cervical cases. Fifty-eight cases were combined anterior and posterior surgery and 87 were revision surgeries. A retrospective operative database and medical record review was performed to evaluate for evidence of postoperative deep wound infection. RESULTS: 15 of the 1,512 patients (0.99%) were identified as having evidence of postoperative deep wound infection. At least one pre-existing risk factor for deep infection was present in 8/15 pts (54%). Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were the most commonly identified organisms (11/15 cases). The rate of deep wound infection was 1.20% (8/663) for instrumented spinal surgeries, and 0.82% (7/849) for uninstrumented surgeries. Deep infection occurred in only 1.23% (4/324) of multilevel instrumented posterior spinal fusions, 1.37% (1/73) of open PLIF procedures, and 1.23% (1/81) of single-level instrumented posterior fusions. Deep infection was not observed in any patient who had uninstrumented spinal fusion (0/64). The deep infection rate for revision surgeries was 1.15% (1/87) and 0.55% (1/183) for trauma surgery. Increased rates of complications related to powdered vancomycin use were not identified in this series. Conclusion In this series of 1,512 consecutive spinal surgeries, the use of 1 g of powdered intraoperative vancomycin placed in the wound prior to wound closure appears to associated with a low rate deep spinal wound infection for both instrumented and uninstrumented cases. Rates of deep infection for instrumented fusion surgery, trauma, and revision surgery appear to be among the lowest reported in the existing literature. Further investigation of this prophylactic adjunctive measure is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Laminectomía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación
13.
Eur Spine J ; 21(5): 855-62, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22094387

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate fracture healing, functional outcomes, complications, and mortality associated with rigid cervical collars. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with <50% odontoid displacement were treated with a rigid cervical collar for 12 weeks (Average age = 84 years). Outcome scores were compared with a group of 40 age-matched control subjects (Average age 79.3). RESULTS: At average 14.9-month follow-up, only 6% demonstrated radiographic evidence of fracture healing and 70% had mobile odontoid nonunion. NDI scores indicated only mild disability, pain scores were low, and neither differed significantly from age-matched controls. Mobile odontoid nonunion was not associated with higher levels of disability or neck pain. Mortality rate was 11.8%. Treatment complications occurred in 6% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Odontoid nonunion and instability are high in geriatric patients treated with a rigid cervical collar. Fracture healing and stability did not correlate with improved outcomes. Outcomes did not differ significantly from age-matched cohorts.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Evaluación Geriátrica , Apófisis Odontoides/lesiones , Aparatos Ortopédicos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Vértebras Cervicales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Mal Unidas/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Apófisis Odontoides/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Injury ; 53(3): 1062-1067, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34980462

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the prevalence of concomitant thoracic spinal and sternal fractures and factors associated with concomitant fractures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The sternum has been implicated in stability of the upper thoracic spine, and both bony structures are included in the stable upper thoracic cage. High force trauma to the thorax can cause multiple fractures to different upper thoracic cage components. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data of patients treated at a Level 1 Trauma Center who underwent surgery for thoracic spinal fracture between 2008-2020. We recorded presence of concomitant sternal fracture, injury characteristics, hospital course data, and demographic information. RESULTS: 107 patients with thoracic spinal fractures had a sternal fracture prevalence of 18.7%. The average age was 53.2 [15-90]. 72 (67.3%) were male and 35 (32.7%) were female, 92 (85.9%) were White, 10 (9.3%) were African American, 3 (2.8%) were Hispanic, and 2 (1.9%) were Asian. The average age of patients with sternal fractures was 48.7 years, compared to those without sternal fractures, 54.3 years (P = 0.251). Patients with T1-T7 fractures [14 of 48 (29.2%)] had a significantly higher rate of sternal fractures compared to patients with T8-T12 fractures [6 of 59 (10.2%)] (P = 0.012). Patients with additional rib (P < 0.001), scapula (P = 0.01), clavicle fractures (P = 0.01), and those with multiple other thoracic fractures (P = 0.01) had significantly higher rates of sternal fractures compared to patients without these. Patients with concomitant sternal fractures [10 of 20 (50.0%)] had a significantly higher rate of respiratory complication during their hospital course than patients without concomitant sternal fracture [40 of 87 (46.0%)] (P < 0.001). Sex, age, mechanism of injury, fracture morphology, estimated blood loss during surgery, intraoperative complications, post-surgical intubation status, and post-surgical intubation duration were not associated with sternal fractures. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of concomitant thoracic spinal fracture and sternal fracture in our series is 18.7%. T1-T7 fractures and presence of rib, scapula, and clavicle fractures were significantly associated with the presence of sternal fractures. Presence of concomitant sternal fracture was significantly associated with respiratory complication during hospital course.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Fracturas de las Costillas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de las Costillas/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Esternón/lesiones , Esternón/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía
15.
Eur Spine J ; 19(8): 1318-24, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20496037

RESUMEN

Placement of C1 lateral mass screws may be facilitated by intentional C2 root sacrifice. Functional outcomes and morbidity following intentional sacrifice of the C2 root have not been reported in the literature. The objective is to find out if intentional C2 nerve root sacrifice affects functional outcomes and operative morbidity in patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion with C1 lateral mass screws. The study is a case report. Twenty-two consecutive elderly patients (10 males, 12 females with an average age of 77 years) with C1-2 instability were treated with posterior cervical fusion using C1 lateral mass screw placement. Five patients had preservation of the bilateral C2 nerve roots (PRES group) and 18 patients had intentional sacrifice of the bilateral C2 nerve root (SAC group). Operative times, blood loss, hospital length of stay, and complications were recorded for each patient. Functional outcomes, pain, and satisfaction scores were compared between the two groups at the time of ultimate follow-up. Average follow-up time was 19.3 months (range 6-66). The SAC group demonstrated significantly decreased operative time (109.4 vs. 187 min) and a trend towards decreased blood loss (344 vs. 1,030 mL). At ultimate follow-up both groups experienced similar mild disability with no significant difference in NDI scores, analog pain, and satisfaction scores. No patient had C2 root dysesthesia, swallowing, or speech difficulty. In this small case series, intentional sacrifice of the bilateral C2 nerve root ganglion resulted in less operative time and decreased blood loss in elderly patents undergoing C1-2 posterior fusion with the Harms technique. Functional outcome, pain and satisfaction scores were not adversely affected when this technique was used in elderly patients.


Asunto(s)
Articulación Atlantoaxoidea/cirugía , Vértebra Cervical Axis/cirugía , Atlas Cervical/cirugía , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Tornillos Óseos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 33(2): 163-7, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20486536

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Serious cervical spinal injuries in organized youth football are rare. Cervical fracture with neurologic injury is rarely reported in organized youth football players with no pre-existing risk fractures for transient tetraplegia. METHODS: Case report and literature review. RESULTS: After being improperly tackled by an opponent of significantly larger body size, a player sustained a C7 posterior cervical fracture with transient tetraplegia. He was immobilized in a cervical collar and sent to a level 1 trauma center for evaluation. Initial examination showed bilateral paresthesia of the limbs with normal motor function (ASIA D). Initial radiographs of the cervical spine showed a displaced extension-compression fracture of the C7 spinous process. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine showed edema in the spinal cord in the region of the injury along with significant posterior injury. Imaging studies showed normal volumetric measurements of the spinal canal and no pre-existing risk factors for spinal stenosis or spinal cord injury. Radiographs showed that cervical fracture was healed at 9-month follow-up examination. At 1-year follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic. Radiographs showed healed fracture with no residual instability and full range of cervical spine motion on flexion-extension views. CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the potential for serious cervical spinal injuries in organized youth sports when players are physically overmatched, and improper tackling technique is used.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Vértebras Cervicales/patología , Fútbol Americano/lesiones , Cuadriplejía/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Adulto , Niño , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Cuadriplejía/patología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/patología
17.
Spine J ; 20(10): 1676-1684, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32474222

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The prevalence of C2 fractures has increased in recent years. The treatment of these fractures include halo-vest immobilization (HVI), rigid cervical collar, or spinal fusion. There is controversy regarding the management of these fractures with different institutions having their own protocols based on individualized experience. The volume-outcome relationship of HVI use for C2 fractures has not been studied. Evaluation of such relationships are important as they suggest that patients may benefit from referral to and treatment at high-volume institutions. PURPOSE: To evaluate the volume-outcome relationship in HVI use for C2 fractures in New York State. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a statewide database. PATIENT SAMPLE: We queried the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database for the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code 805.02 (closed fracture of second cervical vertebra) and procedure code 029.4 (insertion or replacement of skull tongs or halo traction device) to identify all patients who received HVI for a fracture of the second cervical vertebra between the years 2001 and 2014. Those who had isolated C2 fractures were selected. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes of interest included resource utilization characteristics (hospitalization charges and length of stay), perioperative complications, comorbidities, 30-day mortality, any readmission, and any future cervical fusion surgery. METHODS: The 2001 to 2014 Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was used to identify patients with C2 fractures who received HVI. Our key independent variable was institution volume modeled as high- (>25 halos/year), medium-, (10-25 halos/year), or low-volume (<10 halos/year) based on the total number of HVI procedures reported by hospitals during the study period. We compared outcomes with respect to hospital volume. We also compared patients by age groups: <40, 40 to 60, 60 to 80, and >80. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed for the binary variables any complication and any readmission while controlling for covariates hospital volume, age, sex, race, insurance status, and Elixhauser comorbidity mean. Statistical significance was set at a value of p<.05 for all analyses. RESULTS: In all, 625 patients with C2 fractures managed with HVI were included. Most patients were male (53%) and Caucasian (76%) with a mean age of 57. Patients at high-volume hospitals were younger (52 vs. 59 and 60 for medium- and low-volume, respectively; p<.01) and had fewer future readmissions (40% vs. 54% and 84% for medium- and low-volume, respectively; p<.01). On multivariable analysis, those with private insurance and worker's compensation had lower likelihood of future readmission compared to Medicaid patients. Patients >80 had higher rates of major in-hospital complications (52% vs. 40%, 18%, and 19% for groups 60-79, 40-59, and <40, respectively; p<.01), mortality (14% vs. 5%, 1%, and 1% for groups 60-79, 40-59, and <40, respectively; p<.01), and readmissions after the initial HVI (62% vs. 50%, 54%, and 37% for groups 60-79, 40-59, and <40, respectively; p<.01). The annual rate of HVI use for C2 fractures decreased significantly from 2001 to 2014 (0.32 to 0.06 HVI procedures per 100,000 people; p<.01) with the rate of decline being less pronounced in high-volume institutions (70% decrease vs. 85% and 90% for medium- and low-volume, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Halo vest utilization for C2 fractures in New York State has been declining over the past decade, with the decline being less pronounced in high-volume hospitals. Our hospital volume analysis suggests that HVI use in high-volume institutions is associated with a lower rate of future readmissions. This finding suggests that patients with C2 fractures may benefit from treatment at high-volume institutions. Further research to help improve referral of appropriate patients and increase access to such institutions is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Fusión Vertebral , Fijadores Externos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Aparatos Ortopédicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos
18.
Global Spine J ; 10(8): 964-972, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32875832

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes and complications following operative and nonoperative management of hyperostotic spine fractures. METHODS: Patients presenting between 2008 and 2017 to a single level 1 trauma center with hyperostotic spine fractures had their information and fracture characteristics reviewed. Bivariate analyses were conducted to compare patients across a number of characteristics and outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression models for complication and mortality were done in a stepwise fashion. RESULTS: Sixty-five ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) patients with a spine fracture met our inclusion criteria. DISH was slightly more prevalent (55% vs 45%). Overall delayed diagnosis, reoperation, mortality (at 1 year), and complication rates were high at 32%, 13%, 23%, and 57%, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression models, patients undergoing operative management had significantly increased odds of having a complication (odds ratio [OR] = 23.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.24-236.45, P = .008), while increasing age was associated with increased odds of death (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.06-1.31, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AS or DISH who fracture their spine are at high risk of complication and death. However, neither operative nor nonoperative treatment increases the odds of mortality. This study helps add to a growing, but still limited, body of literature on the characteristics of patients with spine fractures in the setting of AS or DISH.

19.
Global Spine J ; 10(2): 130-137, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32206511

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review. OBJECTIVES: To determine factors associated with unplanned readmission, complications, and mortality in patients undergoing operative management for C2 fractures. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) was queried between 2007 and 2014. Unplanned readmission, any complication, and mortality were the outcomes of interest. Bivariate statistics were calculated, and multivariate regression models were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 285 patients were enrolled. Readmission data was available for 199 patients and 11 patients (5.5% of 199 patients) had an unplanned readmission. Overall, 60 patients (21% of 285 patients) had at least 1 complication and 15 patients (5.3% of 285 patients) died. Five factors were associated with complications: transferred from another facility (odds ratio [OR] 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.51-5.98; P < .01); operative time ≥180 minutes (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.11-5.36; P = .03); at least 1 patient comorbidity (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.01-6.18; P < .05); American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 (OR 4.86, 95% CI 1.19-19.88; P = .03); and ASA class 4 (OR 7.24, 95% CI 1.66-31.66; P = .01). The only factor associated with unplanned readmission was having at least one postoperative complication (OR 7.10, 95% CI 1.04-48.59; P < .05), while patients who were partially or totally dependent from a functional standpoint were at increased odds of death (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.12-14.08; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with functional limitations have increased odds of death, while patients with postoperative complications have increased odds of unplanned readmission. Being transferred from an outside facility, having an operative time ≥180 minutes, having at least one comorbidity, and being classified as ASA class 3 or 4 increase patient odds of complication.

20.
JIMD Rep ; 54(1): 54-60, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32685351

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy (INAD) is a rare, autosomal recessive disease due to defects in PLA2G6 and is associated with lipid peroxidation. RT001 is a di-deuterated form of linoleic acid that protects lipids from oxidative damage. METHODS: We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and effectiveness of RT001 in two subjects with INAD (subject 1: 34 months; subject 2: 10 months). After screening and baseline evaluations, subjects received 1.8 g of RT001 BD. PK analysis and clinical evaluations were made periodically. MAIN FINDINGS: Plasma levels of deuterated linoleic acid (D2-LA), deuterated arachidonic acid (D2-AA), D2-LA to total LA, and D2-AA to total AA ratios were measured. The targeted plasma D2-LA ratio (>20%) was achieved by month 1 and maintained throughout the study. RBC AA-ratios were 0.11 and 0.18 at 6 months for subjects 1 and 2; respectively. No treatment-related adverse events occurred. Limited slowing of disease progression and some return of lost developmental milestones were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Oral RT001 was administered safely in two subjects with INAD. Early findings suggest that the compound was well tolerated, metabolized and incorporated in the RBC membrane. A clinical trial is underway to assess efficacy.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA