The effect of concurrent cervical spine degenerative disease on the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a national database study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine degenerative disease (CSD) can cause shoulder pain, potentially confounding the management of patients with rotator cuff tears. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between CSD and rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: A national administrative database (PearlDiver) was used to study 4 patient cohorts: (1) RCR only (RCRo), (2) RCR with concurrent CSD (RCRC), (3) RCR after a cervical spine procedure (RCRA), and (4) RCR before a cervical spine procedure (RCRB). The outcomes of RCR were compared using multivariable logistic regression, controlling for age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, as well as preoperative opioid utilization in the analysis of opioid use. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2021, a total of 889,977 patients underwent RCR. Of these patients, 784,230 (88%) underwent RCRo whereas 105,747 (12%) underwent RCRC, of whom 21,585 (2.4%) underwent cervical spine procedures (RCRA in 9670 [1.1%] and RCRB in 11,915 [1.3%]). At 2 years after RCR, compared with RCRo patients, RCRC patients had an increased risk of surgical-site infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.25, P = .0004), deep vein thrombosis (aOR = 1.17, P = .0002), respiratory complications (aOR = 1.19, P = .0164), and ipsilateral shoulder reoperations (débridement [aOR = 1.66, P < .0001], manipulation under anesthesia or arthroscopic lysis of adhesions [aOR = 1.23, P < .0001], distal clavicle excision [aOR = 1.78, P < .0001], subacromial decompression [aOR = 1.72, P < .0001], biceps tenodesis [aOR = 1.76, P < .0001], incision and drainage [aOR = 1.34, P = .0020], synovectomy [aOR = 1.48, P = .0136], conversion to shoulder arthroplasty [aOR = 1.62, P < .0001], revision RCR [aOR = 1.77, P < .0001], and subsequent contralateral RCR [aOR = 1.71, P < .0001]). At 2 years, compared with RCRC patients who did not undergo cervical spine procedures, RCRC patients who underwent cervical spine procedures had an increased risk of incision and drainage (aOR = 1.50, P = .0255), conversion to arthroplasty (aOR = 1.40, P < .0001), and revision RCR (aOR = 1.11, P = .0374), as well as a lower risk of contralateral RCR (aOR = 0.89, P = .0469). The sequence of cervical spine procedures did not affect the risk of shoulder reoperations. At 1 year, the risk of opioid use after RCR was less for RCRA patients compared with RCRB patients (aOR = 1.71 [95% confidence interval, 1.61-1.80; P < .0001] vs. aOR = 2.01 [95% confidence interval, 1.92-2.12; P < .0001]). CONCLUSION: Concurrent CSD has significant detrimental effects on RCR outcomes. Patients with concurrent CSD undergoing cervical spine procedures have a greater risk of ipsilateral shoulder reoperations but a decreased risk of contralateral RCR. The risk of prolonged opioid use was lower if RCR followed a cervical spine procedure. Concurrent CSD must be considered and possibly treated to optimize the outcomes of RCR.

Morbidity and mortality of fragility proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to a level one trauma center.

PURPOSE: Fragility fractures are a significant source of morbidity and have high associated mortality. Identifying risk factors for poor outcomes is essential for guiding treatment and for setting expectations for patients and their families. Although fragility hip fractures have been abundantly explored, there is a paucity of information regarding proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). METHODS: We retrospectively review the electronic medical records of 379 patients who presented to a level 1 trauma center with a PHF secondary to a fall. Patient demographics, handedness, comorbidities, treatment, imaging data, follow-up data, and death date (if applicable) were recorded. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 279 females and 100 males with an average age of 71.4 years. Distribution of injuries was 178 left, 141 right, and 7 bilateral. Compared with handedness, 179 were ipsilateral, 141 were contralateral, and 59 were unknown. A total of 81.3% of injuries were treated nonoperatively, whereas 18.7% were managed surgically. One-year mortality was 17.4%, and 2-year mortality was 24.0%.Males demonstrated a 2.28 increased risk of 1-year mortality (P = .004). Patients who died within 1 year of fracture had significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index scores (P < .0001) and age (P = .0003). Risk of death was significantly lower in patients who underwent surgery compared with those who were treated nonoperatively (P = .01). Patients who used an assist device before fracture had 4.2 increased risk of 1-year mortality (P < .0001). Patients who presented from nursing homes or assisted living had a 2.1 increased risk of 1-year mortality (P = .02). Patients with severe liver disease had a 5.5 increased risk of 1-year mortality (P < .0001), and those with metastatic cancer had a 13.7 increased risk of 1-year mortality (P < .0001). Bilateral fractures, side of injury in relation to handedness, rehospitalization, Neer classification, and PCP follow-up within 30 days were not associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Increased understanding risk factors for mortality after PHF will allow for more informed patient discussions regarding treatment outcomes and risk of death. Our data suggest that mortality at 1 year for fragility PHF is universally high regardless of risk factors. This risk is increased in patients who are older, functionally limited, or who have medical comorbidities. Our data demonstrate the importance of medical optimization of patients with a fragility PHF and underscore the importance of fall prevention in high-risk patients.

Merkel Cell Polyomavirus Small T Antigen Promotes Pro-Glycolytic Metabolic Perturbations Required for Transformation.

Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is an etiological agent of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), a highly aggressive skin cancer. The MCPyV small tumor antigen (ST) is required for maintenance of MCC and can transform normal cells. To gain insight into cellular perturbations induced by MCPyV ST, we performed transcriptome analysis of normal human fibroblasts with inducible expression of ST. MCPyV ST dynamically alters the cellular transcriptome with increased levels of glycolytic genes, including the monocarboxylate lactate transporter SLC16A1 (MCT1). Extracellular flux analysis revealed increased lactate export reflecting elevated aerobic glycolysis in ST expressing cells. Inhibition of MCT1 activity suppressed the growth of MCC cell lines and impaired MCPyV-dependent transformation of IMR90 cells. Both NF-κB and MYC have been shown to regulate MCT1 expression. While MYC was required for MCT1 induction, MCPyV-induced MCT1 levels decreased following knockdown of the NF-κB subunit RelA, supporting a synergistic activity between MCPyV and MYC in regulating MCT1 levels. Several MCC lines had high levels of MYCL and MYCN but not MYC. Increased levels of MYCL was more effective than MYC or MYCN in increasing extracellular acidification in MCC cells. Our results demonstrate the effects of MCPyV ST on the cellular transcriptome and reveal that transformation is dependent, at least in part, on elevated aerobic glycolysis.

What interventions add value in lateral compression type 1 fragility pelvis fractures? A retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: Fragility fractures are a large source of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Orthopaedic surgeons are regularly the main point of contact in patients with lateral compression type 1 pelvis fractures, despite many of these being treated non-operatively. This study aims to identify risk factors for mortality and elucidate which follow-up visits have the potential to improve care for these patients. Methods and materials: In all, 211 patients have been identified with fragility lateral compression type 1 fractures at a level 1 trauma centre over a 5-year period. For all patients, we recorded patient demographics, imaging data, hospital readmissions, medical complications and death dates if applicable. Results: Of the 211 patients identified, 56.4% had at least one orthopaedic follow-up, of which no patient had a clinically meaningful medical intervention initiated. 30-day readmission rate was 19%, and 1-year mortality was 24%. Male sex, need for an assist device, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and increased age were found to be statistically associated with increased risk of mortality. Patients who followed up with their primary care physician were found to have a statistically lower risk of mortality. Computed tomography scans were obtained in 70% of patients and never limited patient weight-bearing status or found any additional injury not already identified on the radiograph. Discussion/Conclusions: For patients with lateral compression type 1 type fragility fractures, orthopaedic surgeons did not offer additional clinically meaningful intervention after the time of initial diagnosis in this patient cohort. The rate of clinical follow-up with a primary care physician is relatively low despite high rates of medical comorbidity. Computed tomography scans were utilised frequently but did not change recommendations. The high rate of medical complications and lack of orthopaedic intervention suggest that we should re-evaluate the role of the orthopaedic surgeon versus the primary care physician as the primary point of medical contact for patients with these injuries.

Access to an Educational Video Preoperatively Has No Effect on Postoperative Opioid Use After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy of the Knee: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: To determine whether access to a website with an educational video would decrease postoperative opioid use in patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Methods: Enrolled patients who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy at a single center were randomized to either the intervention or control group prior to surgery. The intervention group received a card with access to an online educational video regarding opioids with their postoperative instructions; the control group did not. The online video was just over 5 minutes long and contained general information about the dangers of opioid use, how to safely dispose of unused opioids, and local support contact information. Data were collected by telephone 10 to 14 days postoperatively and analyzed with GraphPad Prism version 9.5.0. Patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, allergies, smoking, depression, alcohol abuse, American Society of Anesthesiologists level, diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes, substance abuse, employment status, workers' compensation, and sports participation were analyzed and correlated with postoperative opioid use. Results: A total of 166 patients were included in this study, with 78 in the control group and 88 in the intervention group. Mean number of pills consumed was 3 in the control group and 2.2 in the intervention group. This difference did not reach statistical significance. Patients who were obese, smokers, or diagnosed with depression both consumed more opioids and were less likely to take no narcotics postoperatively. Patients who participated in sports consumed fewer total opioids on average than those who did not. Subgroup analysis of patients with higher risk factors did not show a difference between the control and intervention groups in the average amount of opioid used or the likelihood of using no narcotics. Among all patients, 82 (49%) used no narcotics postoperatively and 90% used 8 or fewer tablets. Conclusions: Directing patients to an educational website and video is not an effective tool in decreasing opioid consumption. Patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy who are obese, active smokers, and clinically depressed or do not participate in sports are likely to use more postoperative narcotics. Regardless of access to the online educational video, half of patients used no narcotics. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective cohort.

Comparison of Humeral-Head Replacement with Glenoid-Reaming Arthroplasty (Ream and Run) Versus Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Matched-Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid component failure is a major concern after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Ream and run (RnR) is an alternative procedure that may avoid glenoid-related complications. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of RnR versus aTSA in younger patients with advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis. METHODS: This was a retrospective matched-cohort study of 110 patients who underwent aTSA and 57 patients who underwent RnR; patients were <66 years of age and had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Propensity matching was performed using 21 preoperative variables. Pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) scores, satisfaction with outcome, and revision data were analyzed. Mixed-effects models examined the association of preoperative variables with outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patient pairs were matched. All patients were male, with a mean age of 58.6 ± 7.3 years and a mean follow-up 4.4 ± 2.3 years. The aTSA cohort had better final Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. However, in the mixed-effects model analysis, arthroplasty type was not associated with outcome. At 2 years postoperatively, a significantly greater percentage of aTSA patients achieved the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the ASES (100% versus 79.2%; p = 0.01) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (89.7% versus 75%; p = 0.02) for the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. At >5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between the cohorts in the percentage who achieved the MCID, SCB, or patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the ASES, SST, and VAS for pain. Three patients underwent revision arthroplasty for pain after RnR, at a mean of 1.9 ± 1.7 years. Two patients underwent revision arthroplasty for glenoid loosening at 9.2 and 14 years after aTSA. CONCLUSIONS: RnR and aTSA had comparable outcomes in most analyses. The greater early revision rate after RnR should focus attention on optimizing patient selection and postoperative management. Revision for glenoid loosening is a concern among younger and active patients. Longer-term study is needed to better understand the relative benefits and disadvantages of these procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Fractures and Revision Arthroplasty in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroplasty With a History of Prior Fragility Fractures: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: As rates of anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (SA) continue to grow, an increase in the number of osteoporotic patients undergoing SA, including those who have sustained prior fragility fractures, is expected. The purpose of this study was to examine short-term, implant-related complication rates and secondary fragility fractures after SA in patients with and without a history of fragility fractures. METHODS: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study was done using the PearlDiver database to characterize the effect of antecedent fragility fractures in short-term complications after SA. Rates of revision SA, periprosthetic fractures, infection, and postoperative fragility fractures were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Risks of these complications were also studied in patients with and without preoperative osteoporosis treatment. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 91,212 SA patients were identified, with 13,050 (14.3%) experiencing a fragility fracture within the 3 years before SA. Two years after SA, there were increased odds of periprosthetic fracture (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68 to 2.99), fragility fracture (OR 9.11, 95% CI 8.43 to 9.85), deep infection (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.12), and all-cause revision SA (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.96) within those patients who had experienced a fragility fracture within 3 years before their SA. Patients who were treated for osteoporosis with bisphosphonates and/or vitamin D supplementation before their SA had similar rates of postoperative periprosthetic fractures, fragility fractures, and all-cause revision SA to those who did not receive pharmacologic treatment. CONCLUSION: Sustaining a fragility fracture before SA portends substantial postoperative risk of periprosthetic fractures, infection, subsequent fragility fractures, and all-cause revision SA at the 2-year postoperative period. Pharmacotherapy did not markedly decrease the rate of these complications. These results are important for surgeons counseling patients who have experienced prior fragility fractures on the risks of SA.