Ketamine for emergency sedation of agitated patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Prior studies suggest that ketamine is effective for acute agitation in the emergency department (ED) and prehospital settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the rate of sedation and need for airway management in patients given ketamine for management of acute agitation. Methods: We performed a systematic review of publications describing the use of ketamine to control agitation in the ED and prehospital settings. Studies were included if they included agitated patients, used ketamine to control agitation, occurred in the ED and prehospital setting and measured sedation status or need for airway management. Following data abstraction, a meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the rate of effective sedation and the need for airway management. Result: 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. 10 studies were conducted in the prehospital setting and 3 in the ED setting. The overall proportion of subjects receiving airway management across all 13 studies was 20% (95% CI = 0.0489-1.6505). The estimate of the proportion of subjects that achieved sedation was 85% (95% CI = 0.71-0.93). After synthesizing data from the four studies that compared ketamine to controls, ketamine was associated with increased rates of sedation (RR, 1.95 [CI, 0.47-8.1]) and increased need for intubation (RR, 2.44 [CI, 0.75-7.91]). The differences were not significant by random effects model.

Video capsule endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The assessment of the severity of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in emergency department (ED) patients is difficult to assess with commonly available diagnostic tools. Small studies have shown that video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a promising risk-stratification method and may be better than current clinical decision rules such as the Rockall score and the Glasgow Blatchford score. This review aims to assess the accuracy of VCE to detect active upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage compared to a reference standard. METHODS: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology was used to perform a review of studies that have measured the diagnostic accuracy of VCE. Studies were included if they measured ED use of VCE for upper GI hemorrhage as compared to a reference standard of an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). A meta-analysis was performed on select patients using a fixed effects and random-effects model to determine the primary outcome of diagnostic test accuracy. RESULTS: 40 studies were screened for eligibility and five studies representing 193 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All patients received both a VCE and an EGD. The sensitivity and specificity of VCE were 0.724 and 0.748, respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 6.29 (95% CI: 3.23-12.25) and the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.782. CONCLUSIONS: VCE demonstrated high accuracy for detecting upper GI hemorrhage in this meta-analysis of existing studies. In light of the potential advantages of VCE in the ED, further research is warranted to further establish its role.

Cerebral Microbleeds and Acute Hematoma Characteristics in the ATACH-2 and MISTIE III Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To study the relationship between the presence of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and acute hematoma characteristics among patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: We pooled individual patient data from the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage 2 (ATACH-2) trial and the Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Alteplase for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation phase 3 (MISTIE III) trial. We included individuals with a brain MRI scan. Exposure was the presence of a CMB. The coprimary outcomes were admission ICH volume and hematoma expansion. Mixed-effects linear and logistic regression models were used, with demographics and comorbid conditions considered fixed effects and the study cohort treated as a random effect. Additional analyses assessed the relationship between CMB topography and number and hematoma characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 1,499 patients with ICH enrolled in the parent trials, 466 (31.1%) were included in this analysis, and 231 (49.6%) patients had CMBs. In adjusted models, presence of CMBs was associated with smaller ICH volume (ß = -0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.44 to -0.08) and lower odds of hematoma expansion (odds ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.40-0.95; p = 0.04). The strength of association between CMBs and hematoma characteristics increased with increasing number of CMBs. The location of the CMBs and the severity of leukoaraiosis did not modify these results. DISCUSSION: In a pooled cohort of patients with ICH, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that more severe underlying small vessel disease, as represented by CMBs, leads to smaller baseline hematoma volumes and reduced hematoma expansion. Underlying cerebral small vessel disease may be of prognostic significance after ICH. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01176565 and NCT01827046. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that the presence of microbleeds on MRI is associated with a smaller ICH volume at presentation and a lower rate of hematoma expansion on follow-up imaging.

Analgesic and Opioid Use for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Ureteral Stones.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe and characterize the analgesic and opioid use for patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) with renal colic due to ureteral stone. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective trial of ED patients diagnosed by CT scan as having a symptomatic ureteral stone <9 mm in diameter. Participants were contacted after randomization on days 2, 7, 15, 20, and 29 and reported opioid and nonopioid analgesic use and stone passage. CT scan was repeated on day 29 to 36 to confirm passage. Results: Of 403 participants, 314 (77.9%) took an analgesic after discharge and 199 (49.4%) took opioids. Opioids were more commonly used by younger patients (p = 0.04) and those with a family history of stones (p = 0.003). Stone size and tamsulosin use were not associated with analgesic utilization. Shorter time to passage and more distal stone location were associated with less analgesic and opioid use. For those who did not expel a stone, 55.0% took opioids at any time, and for those who did expel a stone, 31.9% took opioids before the stone was expelled and 15.7% took opioids at any time after the stone was expelled. Conclusions: Factors associated with increased use of analgesics in patients discharged from the ED include a longer time to stone passage, no spontaneous passage, and proximal position of the stone in the ureter. Some patients continued to use analgesics after the stone had passed, but most stopped using analgesics by day 29. The study has been registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00382265).

Accuracy of Patient Reported Stone Passage for Patients With Acute Renal Colic Treated in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: To study patients who initially presented to the Emergency Department with acute renal colic to determine if patient-reported stone passage detects stone expulsion as accurately as follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a multi-center prospective trial of patients diagnosed by a CT scan with a symptomatic ureteral stone <9 mm in diameter. Patient-reported stone passage, defined as capture or visualization of the stone, was compared to CT scan-confirmed passage performed 29-36 days after initial presentation. RESULTS: Four-hundred-three patients were randomized in the original study and 21 were excluded from this analysis because they were lost to follow-up or received ureteroscopic surgery. Of the 382 remaining evaluable patients, 237 (62.0%) underwent a follow-up CT scan. The mean (standard deviation) diameter of the symptomatic kidney stone was 3.8 mm (1.4). In those who reported stone passage, 93.8% (91/97) demonstrated passage of the symptomatic ureteral stone on follow-up CT. Of patients who did not report stone passage, 72.1% (101/140) demonstrated passage of their stone on follow-up CT. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who report capture or visualization of a ureteral stone, a follow-up CT scan may not be needed to verify stone passage. For patients who do not capture their stone or visualize stone passage, imaging should be considered to confirm passage.