RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Improper use of antibiotics increases antimicrobial resistance. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the use of antibiotics and the impact of an intervention designed to improve antibiotic prescription for surgical prophylaxis in 6 hospitals of Monterrey, Mexico. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Design: A prospective multicenter survey and a pretest-postest experimental study. Phase 1: Survey to evaluate the use of antibiotics through an especially designed guide. Phase 2: Intervention designed to improve antibiotic prescription for surgical prophylaxis by the medical staff by using printed, audiovisual and electronic messages. Phase 3: Survey to evaluate the impact of the intervention. ANALYSIS: Frequencies, percentages, medians, ranges and X2 test. RESULTS: Phase 1: We evaluated 358 surgical patients, 274 prophylactic antibiotic regimens. A total of 96% of antibiotics regimens began with inappropriate timing (290/302), 82.8% were inappropriate regimens (274/331), 77.7% were in inappropriate dosage (230/296), 86% of inadequate length (241/280), and in 17.4% restricted antibiotics were used (52/299). Phase 2: 9 sessions including 189 physicians (14 department chairs, 58 general practitioners and 117 residents). Phase 3: We evaluated 303 surgical patients, 218 prophylactic antibiotics regimens. Inappropriate treatment commencement was reduced to 84.1% (180/214) (P<0.001), inappropriate regimens to 75.3% (162/215) (P=0.03), inappropriate dosages to 51.2% (110/215) (P<0.001), and use of restricted antibiotics to 8.3% (18/215) (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery is a frequent problem in Monterrey. The intervention improved the antibiotic prescription for surgical prophylaxis by reducing inappropriate treatment commencement, regimens, dosages, and overuse of restricted antibiotics. It is necessary to strengthen strategies to improve the prescription of antibiotics in surgical prophylaxis.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/organización & administración , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Foreign body aspiration represents an emergency event that usually requires immediate medical intervention. In some cases this event may be misdiagnosed with few, or absence of, clinical symptoms, but it can result in serious consequences. The continuous technical improvements in minimally invasive procedures such as bronchoscopy have permitted success in foreign body removal. We present a case of aspiration of unusual foreign body (river stones) lodged in the left bronchial tree, in a patient with epilepsy, and that were removed by rigid bronchoscopy.
Asunto(s)
Bronquios , Broncoscopía , Cuerpos Extraños/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The rheumatoid arthritis is a clinical entity capable to cause hearing impairment that can be diagnosed promptly with high frequencies audiometry. OBJECTIVE: To detect subclinical sensorineural hearing loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study on patients with rheumatoid arthritis performing high frequency audiometry 125Hz to 16,000Hz and tympanometry. The results were correlated with markers of disease activity and response to therapy. RESULTS: High frequency audiometry was performed in 117 female patients aged from 19 to 65 years. Sensorineural hearing loss was observed at a sensitivity of pure tones from 125 to 8,000 Hz in 43.59%, a tone threshold of 10,000 to 16,000Hz in 94.02% patients in the right ear and in 95.73% in the left ear. Hearing was normal in 8 (6.84%) patients. Hearing loss was observed in 109 (93.16%), and was asymmetric in 36 (30.77%), symmetric in 73 (62.37%), bilateral in 107 (91.45%), unilateral in 2 (1.71%), and no conduction and/or mixed hearing loss was encountered. Eight (6.83%) patients presented vertigo, 24 (20.51%) tinnitus. Tympanogram type A presented in 88.90% in the right ear and 91.46% in the left ear, with 5.98 to 10.25% type As. Stapedius reflex was present in 75.3 to 85.2%. Speech discrimination in the left ear was significantly different (p = 0.02)in the group older than 50 years. No association was found regarding markers of disease activity, but there was an association with the onset of rheumatoid arthritis disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis had a high prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss for high and very high frequencies.