Evaluation and management of heavy menstrual bleeding in adolescents.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common condition in women of reproductive age; however, adolescents with this issue present unique challenges in both diagnosis and management. Much of the research into this topic focuses on the adult population, with variable applicability to adolescents. There are currently no standard guidelines for the work up and treatment of adolescents with HMB. RECENT FINDINGS: Current research into this topic has explored the utilization of standardized protocols in the evaluation of HMB in adolescents, the efficacy of various hormonal, nonhormonal, and surgical treatment modalities, and the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach. Recent literature has focused on adolescents found to have an underlying bleeding disorder, recommending more comprehensive bleeding disorder work up to identify these patients in a timely manner and initiate effective treatment plans. SUMMARY: Providers in the primary care setting should be aware of the definitions for normal menses, and be able to recognize abnormal bleeding and HMB. Early recognition of HMB in adolescents can then lead to appropriate diagnosis of underlying disorders, and current research has proposed standard protocols to assist with the evaluation, ultimately leading to effective long-term management into adulthood.VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Presentation and Management of Uterine Didelphys with Unilateral Cervicovaginal Agenesis/Dysgenesis (CVAD): A Multicenter Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: There are several well-described presentations of uterine didelphys (UD): UD without vaginal septum, UD with non-obstructed longitudinal vaginal septum, or UD with duplicated vaginas and an obstructed hemivagina on one side with ipsilateral renal anomaly. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe another variant of UD and compare the presentation and management across different institutions METHODS: This was a retrospective case series approved by the NASPAG Fellows Research Consortium. Participating institutions obtained IRB approval. Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of UD and unilateral cervicovaginal agenesis/dysgenesis (CVAD). Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: Five patients met the inclusion criteria, with ages ranging from 13 to 27 years. Presenting symptoms included dysmenorrhea (80%), irregular bleeding (40%), acute onset left lower quadrant pain (20%), and abdominal mass (20%). Three patients had additional known abnormalities, including solitary kidney and solitary adrenal gland. All patients underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. Two cases were only suspicious for unilateral CVAD on imaging and required pathology review postoperatively to confirm diagnosis. Two cases required a 2-staged approach with an initial diagnostic surgery followed by a second definitive procedure. Three patients were noted to have endometriosis intraoperatively. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 2 months to 2 years, with 1 patient reporting chronic pelvic pain. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis on the basis of pelvic imaging can be difficult, as this unique variant may mimic classic obstructed hemivagina with ipsilateral renal anomaly. In patients with UD with unilateral CVAD, standard management is removal of the obstructed uterine horn. This multicenter series stresses awareness about the clinical presentation, distinguishes cases of cervical agenesis from dysgenesis, and reviews approaches to management.

Medical Child Abuse: A Case Presenting as Anogenital Bleeding of Unknown Origin in an Older Child.

BACKGROUND: Medical child abuse is a challenging diagnosis to make, particularly in older children with unusual presenting symptoms. CASE: A 7-year-old child with complex medical history presented with anogenital bleeding of unknown origin. Extensive laboratory testing, imaging studies, and diagnostic procedures were negative for any etiology. Forensic testing confirmed the blood in her underwear was a genetic match to the patient. Trial separation from the mother was diagnostic and therapeutic in this case. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: Older children who are victims of medical child abuse might present in a variety of ways, and might even collaborate with the perpetrator in falsifying symptoms. It is important to keep medical child abuse on the differential when the patient's symptoms and work-up do not match.